Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic lateral suspension

Objective: Restorative procedures are essential for sexually active vaginal vault prolapse (VVP) cases. There are concerns about the long learning curve and major complications of sacrocolpopexy. Laparoscopic lateral suspension has a relatively short learning curve and no reported major complications. However, there are concerns about the use of mesh in prolapse surgeries and limited data is available about mesh complications with laparoscopic lateral suspension. This study aimed to establish the mesh-related complications after laparoscopic lateral suspension. Study Design: We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic lateral suspension for symptomatic VVP at three tertiary hospitals. Cases were identified from theatre records with coding data and the universities database. Demographic features, concomitant procedures, duration of surgery, intra-operative complications, hospital stay, change in pelvic organ prolapse quantification point C, Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale records, mesh-related complications and their management are presented. Results: A total of 120 patients underwent laparoscopic lateral suspension for symptomatic vault prolapse between 2014-2019. In total, mesh complications developed in 3 women (2.5%). While two vaginal mesh exposures were successfully managed with topical estrogen, one required surgical excision. One lateral mesh arm was loosened from the skin causing pain and itching. From 110 Patient Global Impression of Improvement scores, 106 women (96%) described their prolapse as ‘very much’ or ‘much’ better, 4 patients (3.6 %) reported ‘no change’ and no one reported worsening of symptoms. Conclusions: This series suggests that laparoscopic lateral suspension has low risk of mesh-related complications. It is a safe and effective procedure for symptomatic vault prolapse with high rates of patient satisfaction.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical prolapse

Journal of Robotic Surgery ◽

10.1007/s11701-021-01234-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Patrick Dällenbach ◽

Milena Alec ◽

Michel Boulvain ◽

Stas Shabanov

Keyword(s):

De Novo ◽

Perioperative Complications ◽

Pelvic Organ ◽

Sacral Colpopexy ◽

Cure Rate ◽

Patient Global Impression ◽

Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension ◽

Life Threatening ◽

Objective Cure

AbstractAbdominal sacral colpopexy/hysteropexy is the gold standard for the treatment of vaginal apex support. However, dissection of the promontory may expose to potentially life-threatening complications. To avoid this risk, laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh is an alternative. Robotic assistance may be helpful in both techniques. The objective of our study was to evaluate outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). From March 2012 to January 2018, 59 consecutive patients underwent RALLS using titanized polypropylene mesh. Between August 2017 and September 2019, all patients were contacted to assess outcome. We performed a clinical exam and asked them to complete the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. Fifty-four patients (91.5%) were available for follow-up. Mean age was 58.5 years (28.8–79.8). There were no perioperative complications. The mean follow-up was 33.6 months (11.2–74.1).The objective cure rate (no prolapse beyond hymen) and the subjective cure rate (PGI-I ≤ 2) were 83.3% and 77.2%, respectively. Five women (9.3%) were reoperated for POP recurrence. There was no erosion. Of the 20 women complaining of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) preoperatively, 12 (60%) were cured without any additional SUI procedure. Only two women (10%) required TVT for persistent grade 2 SUI. Two women (5.9%) developed de novo SUI, but none of them required an operation. RALLS repair for POP with mesh is safe and effective and may represent an alternative to sacral colpopexy/hysteropexy.

Download Full-text

Fixation stability and implant-associated complications in periacetabular osteotomy: a comparison of screw and K-wire fixation

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery ◽

10.1007/s00402-021-04112-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Vincent Justus Leopold ◽

Juana Conrad ◽

Robert Karl Zahn ◽

Christian Hipfl ◽

Carsten Perka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Screw Fixation ◽

Periacetabular Osteotomy ◽

Implant Migration ◽

Major Complications ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Duration Of Surgery ◽

Wire Fixation ◽

Fixation Stability ◽

Screw Group

Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to compare the fixation stability and complications in patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) with either K-wire or screw fixation. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective study to analyze a consecutive series of patients who underwent PAO with either screw or K-wire fixation. Patients who were treated for acetabular retroversion or had previous surgery on the ipsilateral hip joint were excluded. 172 patients (191 hips: 99 K-wire/92 screw fixation) were included. The mean age at the time of PAO was 29.3 years (16–48) in the K-wire group and 27.3 (15–45) in the screw group and 83.9% were female. Clinical parameters including duration of surgery, minor complications (soft tissue irritation and implant migration) and major complications (implant failure and non-union) were evaluated. Radiological parameters including LCE, TA and FHEI were measured preoperatively, postoperatively and at 3-months follow-up. Results Duration of surgery was significantly reduced in the K-wire group with 88.2 min (53–202) compared to the screw group with 119.7 min (50–261) (p < 0.001). Soft tissue irritation occurred significantly more often in the K-wire group (72/99) than in the screw group (36/92) (p < 0.001). No group showed significantly more implant migration than the other. No major complications were observed in either group. Postoperative LCE, TA and FHEI were improved significantly in both groups for all parameters (p = < 0.0001). There was no significant difference for initial or final correction for the respective parameters between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant difference in loss of correction was observed between the two groups for the respective parameters. Conclusion K-wire fixation is a viable and safe option for fragment fixation in PAO with similar stability and complication rates as screw fixation. An advantage of the method is the significantly reduced operative time. A disadvantage is the significantly higher rate of implant-associated soft tissue irritation, necessitating implant removal. Level of evidence III, retrospective trial.

Download Full-text

Modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with a five-arm mesh in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

BMC Women s Health ◽

10.1186/s12905-021-01388-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Eren Akbaba ◽

Burak Sezgin

Keyword(s):

Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽

De Novo ◽

Pelvic Organ ◽

Laparoscopic Technique ◽

Life Questionnaire ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Posterior Compartment ◽

Anterior Compartment ◽

Mesh Graft ◽

Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension

Abstract Background Laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) is a laparoscopic technique used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in apical and anterior compartment defect with the use of a synthetic T-shaped mesh graft. The posterior compartment is repaired using a second mesh or a procedure along with LLS, such as posterior colporrhaphy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of LLS for POP using a five-arm mesh instead of a T-shaped mesh graft to repair the defect of the posterior compartment in addition to the apical and anterior compartments. Methods Data from 37 patients with a diagnosis of advanced-stage (≥ 3) POP undergoing LLS with the use of a five-arm mesh were retrospectively analysed. Pre-operative and post-operative examinations and, surgical outcomes were determined. The results of measurements and examinations, reoperation rates, erosion rates, lower urinary tract symptoms, and complications were analysed. The Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) was also used. Results The median post-operative follow-up was 20 (13–34) months. There was a significant improvement in POP-Q scores in all treated compartments, with overall objective cure rates of 94.5% for the apical compartment, 86.4% for the anterior compartment, and 91.8% for the posterior compartment. The median operative time was 96 (76–112) minutes. The median length of hospitalization was 2 (1–3) days. A significant improvement in vaginal bulge, urinary urgency, incomplete voiding, urinary frequency, and constipation was observed after surgery. The sexuality among patients increased from 13 (35.1%) preoperatively to 22 (59.4%) post-operatively. De novo stress urinary incontinence developed in 7 (18.9%) patients. The P-QOL scores improved significantly after surgery. Conclusions In advanced-stage POP patients, the posterior compartment damage can also be repaired in LLS with the use of a single five-arm mesh without the need for an additional procedure, and the recurrence rate can be reduced.

Download Full-text

Open Versus Endoscopic Osteotomy of Posterosuperior Calcaneal Tuberosity for Haglund Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/23259671211001055 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (4) ◽

pp. 232596712110010

Author(s):

Yanbin Pi ◽

Yuelin Hu ◽

Qinwei Guo ◽

Dong Jiang ◽

Xin Xie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Learning Curve ◽

Endoscopic Surgery ◽

Extent Of Resection ◽

Endoscopic Procedure ◽

Postoperative Outcomes ◽

Open Procedure ◽

Surgery Group ◽

Duration Of Surgery

Background: Although endoscopic calcaneoplasty and retrocalcaneal debridement have been extensively applied to treat Haglund syndrome, evidence of the value of the endoscopic procedure remains to be fully established. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes and the amount of osteotomy between open and endoscopic surgery for the treatment of Haglund syndrome. It was hypothesized that endoscopic calcaneoplasty would lead to higher patient satisfaction and lower complication rates compared with open surgical techniques. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The following postoperative outcomes were compared between the open surgery group (n = 20) and the endoscopic surgery group (n = 27): visual analog scale for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale, Foot Function Index, Tegner score, Ankle Activity Score, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; postoperative complications; and duration of surgery. To determine the extent of resection, the authors compared the calcaneal height ratio, calcaneal resection ratio, calcaneal resection angle, pitch line, and Haglund deformity height between groups. The learning curve for endoscopic calcaneoplasty was also calculated. Results: There were no significant differences between the open and endoscopic groups on any outcome score. Two patients in the open group reported temporary paresthesia around the incisional site, indicating sural nerve injuries; no complication was reported in the endoscopy group. None of the parameters for extent of resection were statistically significant between the groups. The duration of surgery was 44.90 ± 10.52 and 65.39 ± 11.12 minutes in the open and endoscopy groups, respectively ( P = .001). Regarding the learning curve for endoscopic calcaneoplasty (6 surgeons; 27 follow-up patients; 9 patients lost to follow-up), the duration of surgery reached a steady point of 55.68 ± 4.19 minutes after the fourth operation. Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that the endoscopy procedure was as effective as the open procedure. The endoscopic procedure required significantly more time than the open procedure, and the duration of the endoscopic procedure was shortened only after the fourth operation, suggesting that it requires high technical skills and familiarity with the anatomic relationships.

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Women s Health ◽

10.1186/s12905-021-01505-z ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Xiaojuan Wang ◽

Yisong Chen ◽

Changdong Hu ◽

Keqin Hua

Keyword(s):

Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Pelvic Organ ◽

Transvaginal Mesh ◽

Recurrence Rates ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Mesh Surgery ◽

Patient Global Impression

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall outcomes and complications of transvaginal mesh (TVM) placement for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with different meshes with a greater than 10-years of follow-up. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with POP who underwent prolapse repair surgery with placement of transvaginal mesh (Prolift kit or self-cut Gynemesh) between January 2005 and December 2010. Baseline of patient characteristics were collected from the patients’ medical records. During follow-up, the anatomical outcomes were evaluated using the POP Quantification system, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) was used to assess the response of a condition to therapy. Overall postoperative satisfaction was assessed by the following question: “What is your overall postoperative satisfaction, on a scale from 0 to 10?”. Relapse-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results In total, 134 patients were included. With a median 12-year (range 10–15) follow-up, 52 patients (38.8%) underwent TVM surgery with Prolift, and Gynemesh was used 82 (61.2%). 91% patients felt that POP symptom improved based on the PGI-I scores, and most satisfied after operation. The recurrence rates of anterior, apical and posterior compartment prolapse were 5.2%, 5.2%, and 2.2%, respectively. No significant differences in POP recurrence, mesh-associated complications and urinary incontinence were noted between TVM surgery with Prolift versus Gynemesh. Conclusions Treatment of POP by TVM surgery exhibited long-term effectiveness with acceptable morbidity. The outcomes of the mesh kit were the same as those for self-cutmesh.

Download Full-text

Treatment of the pilonidal sinus in children using laser radiation

Laser Medicine ◽

10.37895/2071-8004-2020-24-4-32-36 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 24 (4) ◽

pp. 32-36

Author(s):

D. S. Zolotukhin ◽

I. V. Krochek ◽

S. V. Sergiyko

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

Surgical Treatment ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Pain Syndrome ◽

Surgical Excision ◽

Duration Of Surgery ◽

Invasive Method ◽

Open Excision ◽

Interstitial Thermotherapy ◽

Late Postoperative Period

The work carried out a comparative analysis of the results of surgical treatment of the epithelial-coccygeal course of ECC in 133 children aged 3 to 17 years, using laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy (LIT) and open excision. Comparative analysis was carried out according to the following criteria: duration of surgery, average time of hospital stay, duration of pain syndrome on a 10-point scale (VAS), the presence of complications in the early and late postoperative period. In the main group, the average time of hospital stay was 4.9 ± 0.3; the duration of surgical treatment was 17.2 ± 2.8 minutes. The duration of the pain syndrome was 5.3 ± 2.1 hours, and its severity was 2.7 ± 0.8 points. Average terms of epithelialization of fistulas are 3.1 ± 2.8 days. Recurrence of ECC was observed in 7 patients (11.7%), which required re-intervention. In 3 (5.0%) patients, LIT was used, and in 4 (6.7%), excision using plastics according to the Bascom method. In the comparison group, the duration of surgical treatment was 32.6 ± 5.4 minutes. The duration of inpatient treatment is 16.7 ± 1.4 days. Pain syndrome averaged 71.8 ± 11.9 hours, severity 6.5 ± 2.3 points. The number of relapses was 9 (12.3%), of which 5 (6.8%) children underwent laser treatment, and 4 (5.5%) repeated surgical excision with Bascom with recovery. This technique is an effective and minimally invasive method for treating ECC, which makes it possible to recommend this method for use in pediatric surgical practice.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes using a Piezosurgery Device Vs. A Conventional Osteotome for Lateral Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty

Ear Nose & Throat Journal ◽

10.1177/014556131709600819 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 96 (8) ◽

pp. 318-326 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Bulent Koc ◽

Eltaf Ayca Ozbal Koc ◽

Selim Erbek

Keyword(s):

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Learning Curve ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Time Interval ◽

Open Technique ◽

Critical Step ◽

Lateral Osteotomy ◽

Perioperative Bleeding ◽

Duration Of Surgery

Our aim for this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent lateral osteotomy with a Piezosurgery device or a conventional osteotome in open-technique rhinoplasty. This cohort trial involved 65 patients (36 women and 29 men; average age: 23.6 ± 5.71 yr) who underwent surgery between May 2015 and January 2016. Piezo-surgery was used for lateral osteotomy in 32 patients, whereas 33 patients underwent conventional external osteotomy. These 2 groups were compared for duration of surgery, perioperative bleeding, postoperative edema, ecchymosis, pain, and patient satisfaction on the first and seventh postoperative days. The Piezosurgery group revealed significantly more favorable outcomes in terms of edema, ecchymosis, and hemorrhage on the first day postoperatively (p < 0.001 for all). Similarly, edema (p = 0.005) and ecchymosis (p < 0.001) on the seventh postoperative day also were better in the Piezosurgery group. Hemorrhage was similar in both groups on the seventh postoperative day (p = 0.67). The Piezosurgery group not only experienced less pain on the first postoperative day (p < 0.001), but these patients also were more satisfied with their results on both the first and seventh postoperative days. Results of the present study imply that Piezosurgery may be a promising, safe, and effective method for lateral osteotomy, a critical step in rhinoplasty. The time interval necessary for the learning curve is counteracted by the comfort and satisfaction of both patients and surgeons.

Download Full-text