Joint Council of National Pediatric Societies

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-208
Author(s):  
Ralph J. Wedgwood

The Joint Council of National Pediatric Societies was formed in April 1967 to provide liaison and to facilitate efforts towards common goals. The stated purpose of the Council is to "coordinate and express common policies of its constituent societies in matters related to national issues affecting child health." The constituent societies are: American Academy of Pediatrics, ,Association of Medical School Pediatric Department Chairmen, American Pediatric Society, Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health, and Society for Pediatric Research.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 660-661
Author(s):  
JAMES E. STRAIN

I would like to respond to Dr Newhart's question about who authored the Statement on Pediatric Fellowship Training. It was written by the Federation of Pediatric Organizations and approved by the Executive Committees/ Boards of each of the organizations represented on the Federation. These include the Ambulatory Pediatric Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Board of Pediatrics, the American Pediatric Society, the Association of Medical School Pediatric Department Chairmen, the Association of Pediatric Program Directors, and the Society for Pediatric Research.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 112 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 735-737
Author(s):  
O. Marion Burton

The Issue. Advocacy on behalf of children who are medically underserved and the pediatricians who care for them has been a long-standing core commitment of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Although different in etiology, barriers to adequate health care exist in both nations. In the United States, almost 18 million children have either no health insurance or inadequate coverage, whereas in the United Kingdom, parents can, in most cases, readily enroll their youngsters in a universal health insurance program that is not dependent on employers or employment.1 However, despite universal access to health care in the United Kingdom, as in the United States, there are infants and children who do not regularly use or otherwise connect to available health care delivery systems. Many of these families are not participants in other social systems (eg, church, school, voting, employment, property ownership/rental) and therefore are not known to governments, agencies, authorities, or health care professionals. Both nations have citizens living in extreme poverty with its associated environmental and health hazards and tendencies to health risk behaviors. Both the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and the American Academy of Pediatrics have strategies and programs to address these issues and to support pediatricians who work in their communities to improve the lives of children. The following describes the American Academy of Pediatrics Community Access to Child Health infrastructure that supports practicing community pediatricians in these efforts and opportunities to develop collaborative international endeavors to advance the practice of community pediatrics.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. iv-iv
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Dewitt ◽  
Kenneth B. Roberts

"It takes about 6 to 12 months to learn how to practice in an office after completing a residency in pediatrics." This common assertion has been heard so frequently as to have become almost axiomatic. It reflects what has been termed the "residency-practice training mismatch," a problem more extreme in pediatrics than in any other specialty. The effort to combat the mismatch by providing pediatrics residents "real world" experience in community settings is not new, but the movement has taken on new momentum. The Residency Review Committee Program Requirements now mandate "structured educational experiences that prepare residents for the role of advocate for the health of children within the community." Several programs nationally have led the way in developing, implementing, and evaluating models in practices, schools, and various community agencies. The conference, of which this supplement is a summary, provided a "State of the Art" review of basic and applied educational principles for residency education in community settings. The forerunner of the conference was an invitational symposium in Worcester, MA, on June 13 and 14, 1992, supported by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau. The 1992 conference brought together experienced, knowledgeable individuals from programs with education activities in their communities and served as the basis for the development of Pediatric Education in Community Settings. A Manual. The manual was supported by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Ambulatory Pediatric Association. The 1996 national conference was designed to take place shortly after the printing of the manual, to reinforce basic elements of education—with special reference to education outside the hospital setting—and to promote active discussion and networking.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 112 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 771-772
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Goldhagen ◽  
Tony Waterston

The Issue. As a result of the work completed during the meeting and summarized at the last session, 4 implementation groups have been established as the organizational framework for the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)-Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) Equity Project. This project will be the mechanism by which the RCPCH and the AAP will continue the endeavor that was initiated at this meeting. The Equity Project Implementation Groups will focus on Education and Training, Practice and Advocacy, Research and Public Policy, and Children’s Rights. The goals and objectives of each group reflect the accomplishments of the conference participants. A call will go out to members of the AAP and the RCPCH to join these groups as the core of the operation of the project. Objectives will be prioritized and joint initiatives developed to focus on these priorities. The project thus will evolve as a broad-based effort to engage as many members of the AAP and the RCPCH as possible in project endeavors.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Alan Pincus ◽  
Stephen B. Thomas ◽  
Donna J. Keyser ◽  
Nicholas Castle ◽  
Jacob W. Dembosky ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhian L Cramer ◽  
Helen L McLachlan ◽  
Touran Shafiei ◽  
Lisa H Amir ◽  
Meabh Cullinane ◽  
...  

Despite high rates of breastfeeding initiation in Australia, there is a significant drop in breastfeeding rates in the early postpartum period, and Australian government breastfeeding targets are not being met. The Supporting breastfeeding In Local Communities (SILC) trial was a three-arm cluster randomised trial implemented in 10 Victorian local government areas (LGAs). It aimed to determine whether early home-based breastfeeding support by a maternal and child health nurse (MCH nurse) with or without access to a community-based breastfeeding drop-in centre increased the proportion of infants receiving ‘any’ breast milk at four months. Focus groups, a written questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were undertaken to explore the interventions from the perspective of the SILC-MCH nurses (n=13) and coordinators (n=6), who established and implemented the interventions. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes, then findings further examined using Diffusion of Innovations Theory as a framework. SILC-MCH nurses and coordinators reported high levels of satisfaction, valuing the opportunity to improve breastfeeding in our community; and having focused breastfeeding time with women in their own homes. They felt the SILC interventions offered benefits to women, nurses and the MCH service. Implementing new interventions into existing, complex community health services presented unforeseen challenges, which were different in each LGA and were in part due to the complexity of the individual LGAs and not the interventions themselves. These findings will help inform the planning and development of future programs aimed at improving breastfeeding and other interventions in MCH.


Author(s):  
Sydne J Newberry ◽  
Mei Chung ◽  
Marika Booth ◽  
Margaret A Maglione ◽  
Alice M Tang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document