scholarly journals Mitral Regurgitation – A Multidisciplinary Challenge

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Eduardo Alegria-Barrero ◽  
Olaf W Franzen ◽  
◽  

Mitral regurgitation is an increasing valvular disease that represents a difficult management challenge. Surgical treatment for degenerative mitral regurgitation is the standard of care treatment. Percutaneous therapies have emerged rapidly over the past years as an option for treatment of mitral regurgitation for selected, predominantly high-risk patients. Catheter-based devices mimic these surgical approaches with less procedural risk. Mitraclip® implantation mimics the surgical edge-to-edge leaflet repair technique, reducing the regurgitant area. We review the increasing evidence with the Mitraclip device reported to date.

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 436-436
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Kane ◽  
Martha K. Terris ◽  
William J. Aronson ◽  
Joseph C. Presti ◽  
Christopher L. Amling ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (10) ◽  
pp. 1478-1482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven T. Pleger ◽  
Derliz Mereles ◽  
Marius Schulz-Schönhagen ◽  
Ulrike Krumsdorf ◽  
Emmanuel Chorianopoulos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Grieshaber ◽  
M. Merbecks ◽  
C. Jaschinski ◽  
E. Fonseca-Escalante ◽  
M. Gorenflo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 60-62
Author(s):  
A. A. Yanishev ◽  
A. V. Bazaev ◽  
A. I. Abelevich ◽  
E. A. Babushkina

2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 148-156
Author(s):  
David S. Shin ◽  
Hong Vo ◽  
Guy Johnson ◽  
Raimund Pichler ◽  
Scott W. Biggins

AbstractCirrhosis with complications of portal hypertension portends a poor prognosis. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) can successfully treat some of these complications in select patients. While the safety and efficacy of TIPS have improved significantly over the past decade, certain patients are categorized as high-risk based on various demographic, laboratory, and comorbid factors. Herein, we provide an in-depth review of TIPS in these settings, including high model for end-stage liver disease score, hepatic malignancy, advanced age, cardiac disease, renal dysfunction, and pregnancy, and discuss their impact on patient selection and procedural considerations.


Author(s):  
Robert M. MacGregor ◽  
Spencer J. Melby ◽  
Richard B. Schuessler ◽  
Ralph J. Damiano

The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation has evolved over the past 2 decades due to the advent of ablation technology, and the introduction of less invasive surgical approaches. Current devices produce ablation lines that aim to replace the incisions of traditional surgical ablation strategies, such as the Cox-Maze procedure. This has helped to simplify and shorten surgical ablation procedures and has allowed for the development of minimally invasive surgical techniques. This review discusses surgical ablation energy sources and devices, providing background on device characteristics, mechanism of tissue injury, and success in creating transmural lesions.


2003 ◽  
Vol 388 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Shimada ◽  
Itaru Endo ◽  
Mitsutaka Sugita ◽  
Hideki Masunari ◽  
Yoshiro Fujii ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 393
Author(s):  
Alexander Hendricks ◽  
Anu Amallraja ◽  
Tobias Meißner ◽  
Peter Forster ◽  
Philip Rosenstiel ◽  
...  

Personalized treatment vs. standard of care is much debated, especially in clinical practice. Here we investigated whether overall survival differences in metastatic colorectal cancer patients are explained by tumor mutation profiles or by treatment differences in real clinical practice. Our retrospective study of metastatic colorectal cancer patients of confirmed European ancestry comprised 54 Americans and 54 gender-matched Germans. The Americans received standard of care, and on treatment failure, 35 patients received individualized treatments. The German patients received standard of care only. Tumor mutations, tumor mutation burden and microsatellite status were identified by using the FoundationOne assay or the IDT Pan-Cancer assay. High-risk patients were identified according to the mutational classification by Schell and colleagues. Results: Kaplan–Meier estimates show the high-risk patients to survive 16 months longer under individualized treatments than those under only standard of care, in the median (p < 0.001). Tumor mutation profiles stratify patients by risk groups but not by country. Conclusions: High-risk patients appear to survive significantly longer (p < 0.001) if they receive individualized treatments after the exhaustion of standard of care treatments. Secondly, the tumor mutation landscape in Americans and Germans is congruent and thus warrants the transatlantic exchange of successful treatment protocols and the harmonization of guidelines.


Author(s):  
Aurore Perrot ◽  
Jill Corre ◽  
Hervé Avet-Loiseau

In the past 15 years, significant improvements in overall survival have been observed in multiple myeloma (MM), mainly due to the availability of novel drugs with variable mechanisms of action. However, these improvements do not benefit all patients, and some of them, defined as high risk, still display short survival. The most important risk factors are the genetic abnormalities present in the malignant plasma cells. The most important high-risk features are the del(17p), the del(1p32), the t(4;14), and 1q gains. Assessing these markers is mandatory at diagnosis and at least at first relapse, since it has been clearly shown that the lenalidomide-dexamethasone combination is not efficient in these high-risk patients. In contrast, a triplet combination adding a proteasome inhibitor or a monoclonal antibody to the lenalidomide-dexamethasone backbone clearly improves the survival. Another way to improve the outcome would be to specifically target genetic abnormalities with specific inhibitors. The sequencing of more than 1,000 MM exomes revealed again a huge heterogeneity. The most frequent mutations involve the KRAS and NRAS genes (20%–25% each). However, to date, no good RAS-inhibitors are clinically available, preventing targeted therapy. The only drugable target is the V600E BRAF mutation. Unfortunately, this specific mutation is present in only 3% of the patients. Finally, it has been recently reported a specific efficiency of the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax in patients with the t(11;14) translocation, which is found in 20% of the patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document