scholarly journals PROVIDING PUBLIC ORDER IN THE LIGHT OF CODIFICATION OF CURRENT LEGISLATION

2019 ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
S. A. Komissarov
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Main Function ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Purpose ◽  
Legal Thinking ◽  
European Standards

The article deals with the codification of administrative legislation. The basic concepts are considered, approaches to a problem are revealed, directions of improvement of the current legislation are analyzed. The main attention is paid to the issue of codification as a legal category and codification of administrative law, since it is a form of lawmaking, and its main purpose is to providing the most complete legal regulation of a certain sphere of social relations by adopting logically complete normative acts of complex and generalizing nature. It is suggested that public law should perform the function of public order, which is provided with appropriate means of influence in case of violation of relations in this field. It is emphasized that the list of remedies of public order includes the rules of public law, but those with a protective orientation, public-legal relations that arise in cases of committing offenses in the sphere of public order, and acts of implementation of these rules. As for administrative law, its main function should be to protect the rights and freedoms of a citizen from illicit acts or inction of state bodies (officials). On the basis of a critical analysis of the foundations of post-Soviet jurisprudence, a modern understanding of the role and content of norms of administrative law is offered, as well as a comprehensive, balanced and consistent revision of the legislation, and its adjustment with modern European standards. In particular, there is an urgent need to reform the administrative law of Ukraine, the basis for defining the purpose of which is an approach formed in Soviet times, which should be based on a substantially updated, more democratic understanding of the public purpose of public law, which will replace Soviet administrative law. It is concluded that a qualitatively new ideology of legal thinking must be created and practically introduced in Ukraine.

The Principle of Legal Certainty: whether there Can Be Gaps in the Public Law?

2020 ◽  
Vol 2(22) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Maria A. Kapustina
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Social Regulation ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
The Moment

Legal regulation is caused by the necessity to provide legal order of social regulation. The legal order of regulation is provided by formal legal certainty of regulatory provisions (legal prescripts) and their legal substance. However, there exist relations, whose content, namely, subjective rights and juridical responsibilities of the parties are not strictly prescribed in the legislative norms. Because a legislator cannot foresee all the variety of social relations that may occur in real life and prescribe their formal and legal substance in corresponding legislative acts. In such cases, we usually talk about gaps in law, about the uncertainty of legal regulation. Gaps are taken for granted, considered as an obligatory element of any legal system. Nonetheless, whether there can be gaps in the public law, if in the public law sphere norms are created purposively? In public law, norms are created purposefully (with a goal in mind), public law institutions are artificially established and rationally modernized. The lack of a norm of a statute can mean the refusal of the legislator to legally regulate the question, at least at the moment. This is so-called in legal literature “qualified silence of the legislator” that should not be considered as a gap in law.

scholarly journals MANAGEMENT (ADMINISTRATIVE) ACTIVITY OF THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITIES IN THE AREA OF TAXATION: ESSENCE AND TYPES

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olha Tylchyk ◽  
Yurii Riabchenko ◽  
Oleksandr Popivniak
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Theoretical Background ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Activity System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Scientific Analysis ◽  
Scientific Papers

The innovation of conceptual provisions of the administrative law doctrine that are based on the priority of rights, freedoms, legitimate interests of an individual, service orientation of the public administration authorities’ performance affects the essence of the controlling authorities’ management (administrative) activity in the area of taxation and requires its fundamental upgrade. Drafting of theoretical provisions as to the essence and the types of the controlling authorities’ management (administrative) activity in the area of taxation should be based on a profound theoretical and legal analysis of the existing concepts and doctrines and their comparison with the current developments in the public administration authorities’ performance that carry out similar activities. In addition, it’s reasonable to highlight the issues of legal regulation of the relations with respect to the controlling authorities’ management (administrative) activity carried out in the area of taxation. The research objective is to substantiate the theoretical background of the controlling authorities’ management (administrative) activity in the area of taxation set out in the form of a list of the substantive characteristics of such activity, the provisions that reflect its peculiarities, as well as the systematization of the lines and types of such activity. The object of the research is the social relations of a public-law nature, related to the activities of the controlling authorities in the area of taxation. The contemporary concepts and doctrines developed by the scientists through critical thinking constitute the theoretical basis of the scientific analysis. This article explores the scientific papers related to the issues of public administration, administrative law, and administrative activity. System-based approach constitutes the methodology of the scientific analysis which made it possible to single out the elements of the administrative activity system, to reveal their content and to take into account their specific features when determining the nature of the controlling authorities’ management (administrative) activity in the area of taxation. The result of this research is the theory that reveals the current essence of the specified activity and its lines. This article places emphasis on the existence of public and service component of the specified activity.

scholarly journals Prawo administracyjne prywatne. Propozycja nowego terminu w siatce pojęciowej polskiego prawa administracyjnego

2018 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 149-165
Author(s):  
Witold Małecki
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Protective Measures ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public

PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. THE PROPOSAL OF A NEWDistinction of the set of norms called ,,private administrative law” is conditioned by the recognition that the theorem on the public-law affiliation of administrative law is of typological relevance, not of classification relevance — in every branch of law also in administrative law it is possible to distinguish, in various proportions, norms of public and private law. The norms of private administrative law set the legal framework for public administration to use forms of activity that traditionally belong to private law in a way that prevents “escape to private law”, fusing private-law forms of activity and public-law protective measures. Public procurement law is presented as a model area of legal regulation within the scope of private administrative law.

Fiduciary Principles and Public Offices

2019 ◽  
pp. 302-322
Author(s):  
Ethan J. Leib ◽  
Stephen R. Galoob
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Public Office ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Normative Structure ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law

This chapter examines how fiduciary principles apply to public offices, focusing on what it means for officeholders to comport themselves to their respective public roles appropriately. Public law institutions can operate in accordance with fiduciary norms even when they are enforced differently from the remedial mechanisms available in private fiduciary law. In the public sector, fiduciary norms are difficult to enforce directly and the fiduciary norms of public office do not overlap completely with the positive law governing public officials. Nevertheless, core fiduciary principles are at the heart of public officeholding, and public officers need to fulfill their fiduciary role obligations. This chapter first considers three areas of U.S. public law whose fiduciary character reinforces the tenet that public office is a public trust: the U.S. Constitution’s “Emoluments Clauses,” administrative law, and the law of judging. It then explores the fiduciary character of public law by looking at the deeper normative structure of public officeholding, placing emphasis on how public officeholders are constrained by the principles of loyalty, care, deliberation, conscientiousness, and robustness. It also compares the policy implications of the fiduciary view of officeholding with those of Dennis Thompson’s view before concluding with an explanation of how the application of fiduciary principles might differ between public and private law settings and how public institutions might be designed or reformed in light of fiduciary norms.

scholarly journals Scientific Concepts of a Deputy’s Mandate: Apology and Criticism

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
Natalya T. Leonenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Scientific Concepts ◽  
Government Structure ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Representative System

The article studies the genesis of the deputy’s mandate institution. The relevancy of this subject is determined by the imperfection of the legal regulation of the institution under study; absence of clarity in its implementation; modernization of public law relations. The public government structure and the general democracy system largely depend on which type of mandate will be preferred in the Russian representative system. The purpose of the article is the research of the legal nature of the institution of mandate of a deputy of representative public government authorities and various aspects of this problem using formal legal, historical, comparative legal and logical methods.

scholarly journals Javnopravno uređenje zvanične toponimije - od državnog nivoa do nivoa lokalne samouprave / The Public Law Regulation of the Official Toponymy From State’s To Local Level

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Vladimir Đurić ◽  
Nevenko Vranješ
Keyword(s):  
Local Level ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Place Names ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Domestic Law ◽  
Law Regulation

It is the purpose of this paper to highlight the relation between official toponymy in comparative and domestic law. Toponymy is legally regulated. After the analyzing of the position of official toponymy in the comparative law, selected legal aspects of its regulation in the Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Srpska legal systems are presented: the constitutional regulation of the names of country, constitutive unites and capitals, the constitutional and law regulation of the official use of language and script, the legal regulation of the local-self-government unit names and official place names, as well as the administrative procedure of the place names change.

Public Servitudes for the Certain Types of Facilities Placing: Towards a Discussion on Public Interest Presence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P. Ushakova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Private Interest ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private Interests ◽  
Arbitrary Decision ◽  
The Right

From the standpoint of the dominant interest criterion the article examines the justification of the legislator`s decision to apply public law methods in order to regulate relations concerning the use of land for infrastructural facilities placing. The author gives the arguments in favor of understanding the public interest as the interest of the whole society as a system, rather than the interest of an indefinite range of persons or the majority of the population. The author concludes that there is the simultaneous presence in the specified legal relations and private interests of the participants of legal relations, and public interests of society as a system. Both types of interests in these legal relations are important, but in terms of different aspects of the legal impact mechanism. Public interest is important because its realization is the purpose of legal regulation of this type of legal relations, from this point of view it acts as a dominant interest. The private interest of the holder of a public servitude is important as an incentive to attract the efforts of private individuals to achieve a publicly significant goal. The private interest of a land plot owner is important from the point of view of securing the right of ownership. It is substantiated that the public servitude is not an arbitrary decision of the legislator, but an example of application of the incentive method in the land law, which provides a favorable legal regime for a socially useful activity.

Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in France

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-52
Author(s):  
Delphine Costa
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Judicial Remedy ◽  
Individual Decisions ◽  
Laws And Regulations ◽  
Administrative Justice

This chapter describes administrative procedure and judicial review in France. In French public law, no constitutional provision provides for judicial review of administrative measures. Nor is there a convention providing for judicial review of administrative measures. This is only envisaged by the laws and regulations, in particular the Administrative Justice Code and the Code of Relations between the Public and the Administration. The administrative courts exercise extensive control over the acts or measures of the public administration, including both individual decisions and regulatory acts, but some are nonetheless beyond judicial review. Where an act or measure is contested on procedural grounds, judicial review takes place only under certain conditions: the procedural defect must have deprived the applicant of a guarantee or it must have influenced the meaning of the decision taken. Two types of judicial remedy exist in administrative law: it is therefore up to the applicant to limit their application before the administrative judge.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation of Public Governance in Finland – an Illusion of Predictable Public Administration?

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-59
Author(s):  
Niina Mäntylä ◽  
Laura Perttola ◽  
Kristian Siikavirta
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Soft Law ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Public Governance ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Changing Role

Legal coherence and predictable decision-making are the cornerstones of Finnish administrative law. The aim of this research is to analyze the factors that make administrative decisions unpredictable in Finland today. Why is the challenge so significant for the authorities? The factor analysis revealed six main features affecting predictability in the legal regulation of Finnish public governance: the increasing use of soft law, the devolution of government, deregulation, the changing role of the individual, the blurring of the division between the public and the private sector and the influence of international and EU-law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document