scholarly journals Rib fractures in blunt chest trauma-morbidity and mortality: self-experience study

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iv. Novakov ◽  
◽  
P. Timonov ◽  
Ch. Stefanov ◽  
G. Petkov ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Annrish Tan Baby ◽  
Anuraj Appukuttan ◽  
Harihara Jothi ◽  
Reema Sajan

Introduction: Chest trauma is a major cause of mortality accounting for a substantial proportion of all trauma admissions and death. In India, the reported mortality range is between 4-60% and no current national guidelines exist to assist the management of this patient group unless patient has severe immediate life threatening injuries. A scoring system for identification of patients at higher risk for development of morbidity and mortality will allow early selection of vulnerable patients, choice of an appropriate treatment protocol and therapeutic interventions. Aim: This present study aims for the analysis of a scoring system to identify patients with isolated blunt chest trauma at higher risk for morbidity and mortality, in order to prioritise intervention and improve the outcome. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted at the departments of emergency medicine and general surgery of a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India over a period of 18 months. The study included 85 isolated blunt chest trauma patients. We utilised a Chest Trauma Score (CTS) composed of patient factors like age, smoking, lung disease and severity factors like rib fractures, parenchymal and pleural involvement, partial pressure of oxygen/ fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio. CTS were applied at the time of admission after detailed assessment of all injuries. Patient was followed-up at regular intervals upto 30 days. The CTS and outcome measurements were analysed using logistic regression analysis. Results: The area under Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) was found to be 0.979 (p-value <0.001). The CTS cut-off value was ≥11.5 with 89% sensitivity and 95% specificity. In patients with CTS ≥11.5, 98.3% had associated morbidity and complications whereas only 25.9% with CTS <11.5 had associated morbidity (p-value<0.001). Number of rib fractures, pulmonary contusion and PaO2/FiO2 ratio (odds ratio 10.632, 6.007, 12.859, respectively) were found to be significant independent predictors of morbidity and complications. Conclusion: In summary, CTS ≥11.5 has shown a significant association with poor outcome. Patients who sustained isolated blunt chest trauma and together with increasing scores, had increasing incidence of morbidity and complications. The scoring system used in this study proved that it makes a useful tool to predict the outcome in thoracic trauma.


2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Om P. Sharma ◽  
Michael F. Oswanski ◽  
Shashank Jolly ◽  
Sherry K. Lauer ◽  
Rhonda Dressel ◽  
...  

Rib fractures (RF) are noted in 4 to 12 per cent of trauma admissions. To define RF risks at a Level 1 trauma center, investigators conducted a 10-year (1995–2004) retrospective analysis of all trauma patients. Blunt chest trauma was seen in 13 per cent (1,475/11,533) of patients and RF in 808 patients (55% blunt chest trauma, 7% blunt trauma). RF were observed in 26 per cent of children (<18 years), 56 per cent of adults (18–64 years), and 65 per cent of elderly patients (≥65 years). RF were caused by motorcycle crashes (16%, 57/347), motor vehicle crashes (12%, 411/3493), pedestrian-auto collisions (8%, 31/404), and falls (5%, 227/5018). Mortality was 12 per cent (97/808; children 17%, 8/46; adults 9%, 46/522; elderly 18%, 43/240) and was linearly associated with a higher number of RF (5% 1–2 RF, 15% 3–5 RF, 34% ≥6 RF). Elderly patients had the highest mortality in each RF category. Patients with an injury severity score ≥15 had 20 per cent mortality versus 2.7 per cent with ISS <15 ( P < 0.0001). Increasing age and number of RF were inversely related to the percentage of patients discharged home. ISS, age, number of RF, and injury mechanism determine patients’ course and outcome. Patients with associated injuries, extremes of age, and ≥3 RF should be admitted for close observation.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. e0224105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Liebsch ◽  
Tina Seiffert ◽  
Markus Vlcek ◽  
Meinrad Beer ◽  
Markus Huber-Lang ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 713-718
Author(s):  
Daisuke Okutani ◽  
Shigeharu Moriyama

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482096627
Author(s):  
Christina S. Martin ◽  
Ning Lu ◽  
David S. Inouye ◽  
Kazuma Nakagawa ◽  
Karen Ng ◽  
...  

Background Patient factors associated with delayed respiratory failure (DRF) after blunt chest trauma are not well documented. Earlier identification and closer monitoring may improve outcomes for these patients. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence and clinical predictors of DRF in patients after blunt chest trauma. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of adult patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center after blunt chest trauma between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013, was conducted. Patients with early respiratory failure were compared to patients with DRF using Fisher’s exact tests, chi square, and Student’s t-tests. A P-value of <.05 was considered significant. Results 1299 patients had blunt chest trauma and at least 1 rib fracture, of which 830 met inclusion criteria. 5.8% of patients progressed to respiratory failure. Respiratory failure was delayed in 25% of these patients. DRF patients had significantly lower ISS (16.5 vs. 22.7, P = .04), more bilateral rib fractures (66.7% vs. 28.7%, P = .02) and fewer pulmonary contusions (16.7% vs. 50.0%, P = .04). Discussion Injury patterns, including bilateral rib fractures without pulmonary contusions and low but severe Injury Severity Score burden, may help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from closer monitoring and more aggressive therapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Truong Giang ◽  
Nguyen Van Nam ◽  
Nguyen Ngoc Trung ◽  
Le Viet Anh ◽  
Nguyen Trung Kien

Author(s):  
Arthur A. R. Sweet ◽  
Reinier B. Beks ◽  
Frank F. A. IJpma ◽  
Mirjam B. de Jong ◽  
Frank J. P. Beeres ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the incidence of combined clavicle and rib fractures and the association between these two injuries. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases on the 14th of August 2020. Outcome measures were incidence, hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit admission and length of stay (ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), mortality, chest tube duration, Constant–Murley score, union and complications. Results Seven studies with a total of 71,572 patients were included, comprising five studies on epidemiology and two studies on treatment. Among blunt chest trauma patients, 18.6% had concomitant clavicle and rib fractures. The incidence of rib fractures in polytrauma patients with clavicle fractures was 56–60.6% versus 29% in patients without clavicle fractures. Vice versa, 14–18.8% of patients with multiple rib fractures had concomitant clavicle fractures compared to 7.1% in patients without multiple rib fractures. One study reported no complications after fixation of both injuries. Another study on treatment, reported shorter ILOS and less complications among operatively versus conservatively treated patients (5.4 ± 1.5 versus 21 ± 13.6 days). Conclusion Clavicle fractures and rib fractures are closely related in polytrauma patients and almost a fifth of all blunt chest trauma patients sustain both injuries. Definitive conclusions could not be drawn on treatment of the combined injury. Future research should further investigate indications and benefits of operative treatment of this injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document