Residual Deformations Induced By The Thermal Shock During Pulsed Ion Implantation

1994 ◽  
Vol 354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge N. Feugeas ◽  
S. P. BrÜhl ◽  
G. Sanchez ◽  
G. H. Kaufmann
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Surface Layers ◽  
Double Exposure ◽  
Plasma Gun ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Aisi 316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316 ◽  
Residual Deformations ◽  
Argon Ion ◽  
Pulsed Irradiation

AbstractSamples of AISI 316 Stainless Steel were nitrogen and argon ion implanted with pulsed beams generated with a Plasma Gun operated in the detonation mode. The residual deformations induced by the beams were studied by double exposure (before and after implantation) holographic interferometry.The results showed residual deformations corresponding to a concave situation, with the total value depending on the number of single pulses accumulated. A saturation in the deformation is observed when the number of pulses is > 20. A model of the process of pulsed irradiation (based on the strong thermal effect due to the short duration of pulses) and the state of stresses induced in the surface layers is presented.

scholarly journals Breakdown and Evolution of the Protective Oxide Scales of AISI 304 and AISI 316 Stainless Steels under High-Temperature Oxidation

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Habib ◽  
M. S. Damra ◽  
J. J. Saura ◽  
I. Cervera ◽  
J. Bellés
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Breakdown Point ◽  
304 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 304 Stainless Steel ◽  
Protective Oxide ◽  
Aisi 304 ◽  
316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316

The failure of the protective oxide scales of AISI 304 and AISI 316 stainless steels has been studied and compared at 1,000°C in synthetic air. First, the isothermal thermogravimetric curves of both stainless steels were plotted to determine the time needed to reach the breakdown point. The different resistance of each stainless steel was interpreted on the basis of the nature of the crystalline phases formed, the morphology, and the surface structure as well as the cross-section structure of the oxidation products. The weight gain of AISI 304 stainless steel was about 8 times greater than that of AISI 316 stainless steel, and AISI 316 stainless steel reached the breakdown point about 40 times more slowly than AISI 304 stainless steel. In both stainless steels, reaching the breakdown point meant the loss of the protective oxide scale of Cr2O3, but whereas in AISI 304 stainless steel the Cr2O3scale totally disappeared and exclusively Fe2O3was formed, in AISI 316 stainless steel some Cr2O3persisted and Fe3O4was mainly formed, which means that AISI 316 stainless steel is more resistant to oxidation after the breakdown.

DOUBLE GLOW PLASMA SURFACE TITANIZING ON AISI 316 STAINLESS STEEL WITH IMPROVED WEAR RESISTANCE: EFFECTS OF PROCESS PARAMETERS

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (07) ◽  
pp. 1950178
Author(s):  
YONG MA ◽  
NAIMING LIN ◽  
QIANG LIU ◽  
JIAOJUAN ZOU ◽  
XIUZHOU LIN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Wear Resistance ◽  
Wear Rate ◽  
Process Parameters ◽  
Coating Thickness ◽  
Optimal Process ◽  
Plasma Surface ◽  
Aisi 316 Stainless Steel ◽  
Aisi 316 ◽  
Glow Plasma

Using the double glow plasma surface alloying technique, a titanizing coating with improved wear resistance can be prepared on AISI 316 stainless steel. The purpose of this paper is to investigate process parameter effects by orthogonal array design. Four main factors, titanizing temperature, holding time, voltage difference and electrode distance, are adopted in orthogonal experiments. For each factor, four levels are set. The range analysis is used to investigate the factor and level influences on the coating thickness and specific wear rate. Meanwhile, the analysis of variance method is applied to calculate the contributions of each factor. The results indicate that temperature is most critical. In balancing the coating thickness and the wear property, the optimal process parameters are 950∘C, 3[Formula: see text]h, 200[Formula: see text]V and 18[Formula: see text]mm. Corresponding to the optimal process, the thickness and the specific wear rate of the titanizing coating are 10[Formula: see text][Formula: see text]m and 2.609E−05 mm3⋅ N−1⋅ m−1, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document