scholarly journals QuickStats: Percentage* of Total Daily Kilocalories† Consumed from Sugar-Sweetened Beverages§ Among Children and Adults, by Sex and Income Level¶ — National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United States, 2011–2014

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 181 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 676-676
Author(s):  
Yan-Bo Zhang ◽  
Yi-Wen Jiang ◽  
An Pan

Abstract Objectives We aimed to investigate the associations of dietary intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and artificially sweetened beverages (ASB) with mortality. Methods Adults without cancer aged 20 years or older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2014 were followed up to December 31, 2015. Beverage intake was assessed by 24-hour dietary recall interviews (a single recall in 5109 participants and an average of two recalls in 19,914 participants). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations of SSB and ASB intake with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched for related cohort studies. Random-effects models were used to pool the estimates, and dose-response analyses were conducted using the 2-stage generalized least-squares trend program. Results After a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 2365 deaths were identified in 25,023 participants. Each additional serving of daily SSB intake was associated with an HR (95% CI) of 1.06 (1.02–1.11), 1.13 (1.03–1.24), and 1.06 (1.00–1.11) for mortality from all-cause, heart diseases, and other causes. Each additional serving of daily ASB intake was associated with an HR (95% CI) of 0.96 (0.92–1.00), 0.90 (0.82–0.98), and 0.97 (0.92–1.02) for mortality from all-cause, heart diseases, and other causes. No significant associations were found with cancer mortality. We identified 23,631 citations and included 12 studies (including 13 cohorts) in meta-analyses. It was shown that each additional serving of daily SSB intake was associated with an HR (95% CI) of 1.08 (1.05–1.11, ten cohorts with 388,548 participants) for all-cause mortality and 1.10 (1.06–1.14, five cohorts with 255,584 participants) for cardiovascular mortality. No significant association was found between ASB intake and mortality in the meta-analysis. Conclusions Higher SSB intake was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, while the association between ASB intake and mortality needed further investigation. Funding Sources National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Nature Science Foundation of China, and Hubei Province Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars.


Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2952
Author(s):  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Neha Jain ◽  
Vipra Vanage ◽  
Norton Holschuh ◽  
Anne Hermetet Agler ◽  
...  

This study examined differences in dietary intake between ready-to-eat cereal eaters and non-eaters in adults from the United States. Participants (n = 5163) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015–2016 were included. One-day dietary recall was used to define ready-to-eat cereal consumption status and estimate dietary intake in eaters and non-eaters. Data from Food Patterns Equivalent Database 2015–2016 were used to compare intakes of food groups by consumption status. Diet quality was assessed by Healthy Eating Index 2015. Nineteen percent of US adults were ready-to-eat cereal eaters; they had a similar level of energy intake as non-eaters, but they had significantly higher intake of dietary fiber, and several vitamins and minerals, such as calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, zinc, vitamin A, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, and vitamin D. They were also more likely to meet nutrient recommendations. Compared to non-eaters, ready-to-eat cereal eaters had the same level of added sugar intake but they had significantly higher intake of whole grains, total fruits, and dairy products. The diet quality of ready-to-eat cereal eaters was significantly higher than that of non-eaters. The study supports that ready-to-eat cereal eaters have better dietary intake with a healthier dietary pattern than non-eaters in the United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document