scholarly journals Study of the stress-strain state in defective railway reinforced-concrete pipes restored with corrugated metal structures

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1 (89)) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitalii Kovalchuk ◽  
Ruslan Markul ◽  
Andriy Pentsak ◽  
Bohdan Parneta ◽  
Oleksiy Gayda ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-60
Author(s):  
Mikhail Turko

The article discusses the methodology for calculating corrugated metal structures used as culverts based on the semi-analytical finite element method. The calculation is carried out according to a non-deformable scheme using the load dependences obtained on the basis of the structural mechanics of bulk solids. Significant differences in the nature of the stress-strain state of corrugated structures in comparison with smooth shells is revealed.


2022 ◽  
Vol 906 ◽  
pp. 93-98
Author(s):  
Tigran Dadayan ◽  
Lusine Karapetyan

Currently, the main type of connection between a steel column and a reinforced concrete foundation is a steel base, which is often economically unprofitable due to its size, number or diameter of anchor bolts. Not only in Armenia, but also in most countries, a steel base is the main type of connection between a steel column and a reinforced concrete foundation. The usage of other types of connections is associated with both new calculation methods and technological problems. The possibility of computation and design of the connection of a steel column with a reinforced concrete foundation in seismically active regions using shear studs is considered in this work, a reinforced concrete section with longitudinal reinforcement is used for this type of connection which ensures a smooth transfer of forces from the column to the foundation. Based on the example of the connection of a single-story industrial building column shows the change in the stress-strain state of the connection under axial force and bending moments for seismic regions. Not only the feature and construction technology of the connection considered in the work, but also proposes a calculation method with future possibility of its subsequent inclusion in the building codes of the Republic of Armenia.


2020 ◽  
pp. 48-57
Author(s):  
Viktor Nosenko ◽  
Oleg Krivenko

At present, the tendency to build multi-storey residential buildings has become widespread in Ukraine. This is due to a number of reasons: significant increase in land prices in cities, dense urban development and the availability of appropriate equipment for the construction of such structures. One of the most common materials for multi-storey buildings is monolithic reinforced concrete. The main advantage of monolithic structures is the possibility of free spatial planning and the possibility of uniform redistribution of forces in the elements of the frame - the house works as one rigid entire structure. On the other hand, such structures require a long construction time and appropriate highly qualified control of monolithic works. Therefore, as an alternative, prefabricated reinforced concrete structures are used to accelerate the pace of construction. In this work, the influence of the rigidity of a precast reinforced concrete house on the stress-strain state of CFA piles foundation is investigated. The stress-strain state of a precast reinforced concrete building with two basement options is analyzed: precast and monolithic.                                                 The numerical modeling of the interaction of the system elements is used as a research method: soil base - foundation - aboveground structure. It was found that the replacement in a prefabricated house only one basement floor of precast concrete on a monolithic one affects the redistribution of forces, so the self-supporting wall is loaded 2.6 times, and the busiest wall, which rests on both sides of the floor slab, is unloaded to 2.1 times.  It was found that in the case of a basement made of precast reinforced concrete with a precast basement the difference efforts in pile heads (under the load-bearing walls) can differ 1.98 times, and in the case of a monolithic one 1.17 times. So it is mean, the monolithic foundation redistributed of efforts between the piles is more uniform. It is established that the monolithic reinforced concrete basement, in comparison with the prefabricated one, reduces the uneven settlement of the foundation by 2.4 times. When designing large-panel houses, it is advisable to provide a basement floor monolithic - this will allow to load the fundamental constructions more evenly, which in its reduction reduces the relative deformation of buildings and reduces their cost.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document