scholarly journals Prognostic factors for survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases: experience of a single brazilian cancer center

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 266-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Héber Salvador de Castro Ribeiro ◽  
Paulo Roberto Stevanato-Filho ◽  
Wilson Luiz da Costa Jr. ◽  
Alessandro Landskron Diniz ◽  
Paulo Herman ◽  
...  

CONTEXT: Liver metastases are a common event in the clinical outcome of patients with colorectal cancer and account for 2/3 of deaths from this disease. There is considerable controversy among the data in the literature regarding the results of surgical treatment and prognostic factors of survival, and no analysis have been done in a large cohort of patients in Brazil. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the results of surgical treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases, and to establish prognostic factors of survival in a Brazilian population. METHOD: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal metastases in a tertiary cancer hospital from 1998 to 2009. We analyzed epidemiologic variables and the clinical characteristics of primary tumors, metastatic disease and its treatment, surgical procedures and follow-up, and survival results. Survival analyzes were done by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was applied to determine the influence of variables on overall and disease-free survival. All variables associated with survival with P<0.20 in univariate analysis, were included in multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: During the period analyzed, 209 procedures were performed on 170 patients. Postope-rative mortality in 90 days was 2.9% and 5-year overall survival was 64.9%. Its independent prognostic factors were the presence of extrahepatic disease at diagnosis of liver metastases, bilateral nodules and the occurrence of major complications after liver surgery. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival was 39.1% and its prognostic factors included R1 resection, extrahepatic disease, bilateral nodules, lymph node involvement in the primary tumor and primary tumors located in the rectum. CONCLUSION: Liver resection for colorectal metastases is safe and effective and the analysis of prognostic factors of survival in a large cohort of Brazilian patients showed similar results to those pointed in international series. The occurrence of major postoperative complications appears to be able to compromise overall survival and further investigation in needed in this topic.

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo J. Valadares ◽  
Wilson Costa Junior ◽  
Heber Salvador C. Ribeiro ◽  
Alessandro L. Diniz ◽  
Felipe J. F. Coimbra ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES: to determine the prognostic factors that may impact on morbidity and mortality and survival of patients undergoing surgical treatment of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: We studied 22 patients undergoing liver resection for metastases from neuroendocrine tumors between 1997 and 2007. Epidemiological and clinical data were correlated with morbidity and mortality and overall and disease-free survivals. RESULTS: twelve patients were male and ten female, with a mean age of 48.5 years. Bilobar disease was present in 17 patients (77.3%). In ten patients (45.5%) the primary tumor originated in the pancreas, terminal ileum in eight, duodenum in two, rectum in one and jejunum in one. Complete surgical resection (R0) was achieved in 59.1% of patients. Eight patients (36.3%) developed complications in the immediate postoperative period, one of them dying from septicemia. All patients undergoing re-hepatectomy and/or two-stage hepatectomy had complications in the postoperative period. The overall survival at one and five years was 77.3% and 44.2%. The disease-free survival at five years was 13.6%. The primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (p = 0.006) was associated with reduced overall survival. Patients with number of metastatic nodules < 10 (p = 0.03) and asymptomatic at diagnosis (p = 0.015) had higher disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: liver metastases originating from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors proved to be a negative prognostic factor. Symptomatic patients with multiple metastatic nodules showed a significant reduction in disease-free survival.


2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael FONTANA ◽  
Paulo HERMAN ◽  
Vincenzo PUGLIESE ◽  
Marcos Vinicius PERINI ◽  
Fabricio Ferreira COELHO ◽  
...  

Context Colorectal cancer is the second most prevalent cancer worldwide, and the liver is the most common site of metastases. Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases provides the sole possibility of cure and the best odds of long-term survival. Objectives To describe surgical outcomes and identify features associated with disease prognosis in patients submitted to synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis resection. Methods Retrospective study of 59 patients who underwent surgery for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Actuarial survival and disease-free survival were assessed, depending on the prognostic variable of interest. Results Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 3.38% and 30.50% respectively. Five-year disease-free survival was estimated at 23.96%, and 5-year overall survival, at 38.45%. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels ≥50 ng/mL and presence of three or more liver metastasis were limiting factors for disease-free survival, but did not affect late survival. No patient with liver metastases and extrahepatic disease had disease-free interval longer than 20 months, but this had no significance or impact on long-term survival. None of the prognostic factors assessed had an impact on late survival, although no patients with more than three liver metastases survived beyond 40 months. Conclusions Although Carcinoembryonic antigen levels and number of metastases are prognostic factors that limit disease-free survival, they had no impact on 5-year survival and, therefore, should not determine exclusion from surgical treatment. Resection is the best treatment option for synchronous colorectal liver metastases, and even for patients with multiple metastases, large tumors and extrahepatic disease, it can provide long-term survival rates over 38%.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Vladislav E. Bugaev ◽  
Maxim P. Nikulin ◽  
Sergey N. Nered ◽  
Ludmila N. Lyubchenko ◽  
Ivan S. Stilidi

Relevance. Leiomyosarcomas is highly aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. Surgical resection is a standard treatment approach. However, data of long-term results of surgical treatment are lacking due to rarity of retroperitoneal form of leiomyosarcoma. Prognostic significance of tumor size, grade and recurrence type remains unclear as well. Aim. To analyze results of surgical treatment of patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and to define prognostic factors which are associated with disease-free and overall survival. Materials and methods. The study included patients with primary retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas who have received surgical or combined treatment between January 2003 and April 2019 at Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes of surgical and combined treatment as well as recurrence rate, pattern of recurrence and morphological features were analyzed in order to define prognostic factors of disease-free and overall survival. Results. The study included 64 patients with primary retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas 12 men (18%) and 52 women (82%). Median tumor size was 10.55.0 cm. Most of the operations (93.3%) were done by open approach. Combined resections were performed in 62.5% of cases (n=40), vascular resections in 17.2% cases (n=11). Radical (R0) resections were performed in 54 cases (85.9%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality rate were 39% and 0% respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy received 21 (35%) patients and 1 (1.7%) patient respectively. 46 (71.9%) patients had a disease recurrence. Recurrence type (local recurrence/distant metastases) did not influence overall survival (р=0.655). Median disease-free survival was 27 months (95% CI 1043.9). 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival was 43% and 21% respectively. Median overall survival was 79 months (95% CI 49108.9). 3-year and 5-year overall survival was 73% and 59% respectively. Among patients grade 2 and grade 3 tumors median disease-free survival was 49 vs. 18 months (р=0.271), median overall survival 146 vs. 58 months (р=0.018). There were no statistically significant differences in rate of radical resections among patients with different tumor location (р=0.804) or its size (р=0,520). Patients, who have undergone radical (R0) resection, had better overall (р=0.028) and disease-free survival (р0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated lower risk of disease recurrence (p=0.976), type of recurrence (р=0.981) and lower overall survival (р=0.284). Conclusion. Tumor grade and radical resection are the most important prognostic factors in patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. In our study, tumor size was not correlated with long-term results and possibility of radical resection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-504
Author(s):  
Muhammet Sayan

Background: This study aims to identify the prognostic factors in Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer and to investigate whether there was a significant difference in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival among the subgroups belonging to this disease stage. Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2018, a total of 144 patients (125 males, 19 females; median age 60 years; range, 41 to 80 years) who were operated for non-small cell lung cancer in our clinic and whose pathological stage was reported as IIIA were retrospectively analyzed. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, histopathological diagnosis, the standardized uptake value of the mass on positron emission tomography-computed tomography, tumor diameter, type of surgery, lymph node metastasis status, visceral pleural invasion, and overall and disease-free survival rates were recorded. Results: The median survival was 39 (range, 27.8 to 46.1) months and the five-year overall survival rate was 28%. The mean tumor diameter was 4.3±2.7 cm. The median disease-free survival was 37 (range, 28.1 to 48.6) months and the five-year disease-free survival rate was 26.9%. In the multivariate analysis, overall survival and disease-free survival in T2N2M0 subgroup were significantly worse than the other subgroups. The other poor prognostic factors of survival were the standardized uptake value of the tumor, pneumonectomy, and histopathological subtypes other than squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Parietal pleural invasion was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival rates. Conclusion: Our results showed that there may be significant survival differences between subgroups created by tumor histopathology, lymph node invasion and the type of surgery in a heterogeneous lung cancer stage.


Author(s):  
Sergio Renato PAIS-COSTA ◽  
Sergio Luiz Melo ARAÚJO ◽  
Olímpia Alves Teixeira LIMA ◽  
Sandro José MARTINS

ABSTRACT Background: Laparoscopic hepatectomy has presented great importance for treating malignant hepatic lesions. Aim: To evaluate its impact in relation to overall survival or disease free of the patients operated due different hepatic malignant tumors. Methods: Thirty-four laparoscopic hepatectomies were performed in 31 patients with malignant neoplasm. Patients were distributed as: Group 1 - colorectal metastases (n=14); Group 2 - hepatocellular carcinoma (n=8); and Group 3 - non-colorectal metastases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n=9). The conversion rate, morbidity, mortality and tumor recurrence were also evaluated. Results: Conversion to open surgery was 6%; morbidity 22%; postoperative mortality 3%. There was tumor recurrence in 11 cases. Medians of overall survival and disease free survival were respectively 60 and 46 m; however, there was no difference among studied groups (p>0,05). Conclusion: Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy for treating hepatic malignant tumors are satisfactory. There is no statistical difference in relation of both overall and disease free survival among different groups of hepatic neoplasms.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Ishiyama ◽  
Masaki Oneyama ◽  
Yuki Tomizawa ◽  
Manabu Amiki ◽  
Shingo Ito ◽  
...  

Abstract Backgrounds Anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, whether the choice of the treatment for anastomotic leakage may affect the oncological outcomes is under debate. We evaluated the oncological outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery for anastomotic leakage between conservative and surgical treatment. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data for patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative colectomy from April 2010 to January 2020. Results A total 1039 patients underwent surgery colorectal cancer in our hospital. After exclusion, a total of 915 patients underwent a low anastomosis with diverting stoma for colorectal cancer of which 92 (10.0%) anastomotic leakage occurred. After stage Ⅳ and emergency surgery case were excluded, a total of 75 patients were included for the analysis. The surgical treatment group was 25 cases. The conservative treatment group was 50 cases. Early anastomotic leakage was more than in surgical treatment compared to conservative treatment (84% vs 54%, P =0.008). The 5-year overall survival rates and the 5-year disease free survival did not differ significantly between the two groups. The recurrence location of liver metastasis was more than in surgical treatment compared to conservative treatment (20% vs 2 %, P=0.02). On a multivariable analysis, anastomotic leak did not impact overall survival and disease free survival. Conclusion We found that the treatment for anastomotic leakage was not depended on increased local, distance recurrence, overall survival, and disease free survival. Our findings may help surgeons determine which AL treatment is most appropriate, when the decision is unclear.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Varley ◽  
M Tarazi ◽  
M Davé ◽  
S Mobarak ◽  
M Stott ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Colorectal liver metastases were historically considered a contraindication to liver transplantation, but dismal outcomes for those with metastatic colorectal cancer and advancements in liver transplantation (LT) have led to a renewed interest in the topic. We aim to compare the current evidence for liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases (NRCLM) with the current standard treatment of palliative chemotherapy reported in literature – 5-year survival rate &lt;10%. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions was conducted following screening of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and CENTRAL for studies reporting liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases. Post-operative outcomes measured included 1-, 3- and 5-year survival, overall survival, disease-free survival, and complication rates. Results Three non-randomised studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 48 patients receiving LT for NRCLM. Survival at 1-, 3- and 5-years was 83.3-100%, 58.3-80% and 50-80% respectively with no significant difference detected (p = 0.22, p = 0.48, p = 0.26). Disease free survival was 35-56% with the most common site of recurrence being lung. Thirteen out of fourteen deaths were due to disease recurrence. Conclusions Although current evidence suggests a survival benefit conferred by LT in NRCLM compared to palliative chemotherapy, the ethical implications of organ availability and allocation demand rigorous justification. Eight registered clinical trials will report on 300 more patients undergoing LT for NRCLM over the next 10 years: concomitant improvements in the management of patients following liver resection and of palliative chemotherapy regimens is paramount.


2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 382-390
Author(s):  
Tristan D. Yan ◽  
David R. Nunn ◽  
David L. Morris

This study critically evaluated the prognostic determinants for disease-free survival (DFS) after cryoablation for colorectal liver metastases. An observational cohort study of prospectively collected data on 135 patients who underwent cryoablation with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the prognostic factors for overall DFS, cryosite DFS, remaining liver DFS, and extrahepatic DFS. Overall, 115 patients (85%) developed recurrence at the cryosite (44%), and the remaining patients developed recurrence at the liver (62%) and extrahepatic site (71%). In univariate analysis, pre-operative and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were significant for overall DFS. Distribution of metastases, operation type, total number of metastases, number of cryotreated metastases, largest size of cryotreated metastasis, and postoperative CEA were significant for cryosite DFS. The number of cryotreated metastases and postoperative CEA were significant for remaining liver DFS. The largest size of cryotreated metastasis, and preoperative and postoperative CEA were significant for extrahepatic DFS. In multivariate analysis, resection plus cryoablation, ≤7 liver metastases and ≤3 cm cryotreated metastasis were independently associated with an improved cryosite DFS. Preoperative CEA of ≤5 ng/mL was independently associated with an improved overall and extrahepatic DFS. The role of CEA in colorectal metastasis is important. Resection plus cryoablation rather than cryoablation alone should be used for larger lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document