scholarly journals Managed care, capitation, and the future of nephrology.

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1618-1623
Author(s):  
T I Steinman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Managed Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Chronically Ill ◽  
The United States ◽  
Management Service ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Future

Within the next decade, it is predicted that more than 90% of the United States population will receive its health insurance through managed care. Capitation will be the reimbursement mechanism to health care providers as the major way of controlling costs. Currently, managed care has had little experience with capitation payments for chronically ill patients, who consume large financial and physical resources. The end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population represents a vulnerable group of patients, and their care may be compromised in a capitated environment. Nephrologists will need to serve as advocates for ESRD patients through a mechanism of quality of care, driven by a continuous quality improvement model. Cost-effective delivery of care will occur as nephrologists join together to form Independent Practice Associations (IPAs). In this article, the role of a nephrologist in a capitated environment is outlined in detail, and background for the basis of managed care growth is provided as a framework for understanding the change in our health care delivery system. After formation of a nephrology IPA, there will most likely be a linkage with a management service organization (MSO). A business plan driven by the highest principles will allow nephrologists to work together as a cohesive force in accepting global risk capitated contracts. The starting point is for ESRD care, and the future includes pre-ESRD care.

Nurse Practitioner Challenges to the Orthodox Structure of Health Care Delivery: Regulation and Restraints on Trade

1985 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-225
Author(s):  
Karla Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Allied Health Care

AbstractUntil recently, physicians have been the primary health care providers in the United States. In response to the rising health care costs and public demand of the past decade, allied health care providers have challenged this orthodox structure of health care delivery. Among these allied health care providers are nurse practitioners, who have attempted to expand traditional roles of the registered nurse.This article focuses on the legal issues raised by several major obstacles to the expansion of nurse practitioner services: licensing restrictions, third party reimbursement policies, and denial of access to medical facilities and physician back-up services. The successful judicial challenges to discriminatory practices against other allied health care providers will be explored as a solution to the nurse practitioners’ dilemma.

scholarly journals Improving Behavioral Health Equity through Cultural Competence Training of Health Care Providers

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supp2) ◽  
pp. 359-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian McGregor ◽  
Allyson Belton ◽  
Tracey L. Henry ◽  
Glenda Wrenn ◽  
Kisha B. Holden
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Cultural Competence ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Ethnic Disparities ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Needs

 Racial/ethnic disparities have long persisted in the United States despite concerted health system efforts to improve access and quality of care among African Americans and Latinos. Cultural competence in the health care setting has been recognized as an important feature of high-quality health care delivery for decades and will continue to be paramount as the society in which we live becomes increasingly culturally diverse. Unfortunately, there is limited empirical evidence of patient health benefits of a culturally competent health care workforce in integrated care, its feasibility of imple­mentation, and sustainability strategies. This article reviews the status of cultural competence education in health care, the merits of continued commitment to training health care providers in integrated care settings, and policy and practice strategies to ensure emerging health care professionals and those already in the field are prepared to meet the health care needs of racially and ethnically diverse populations. Ethn Dis. 2019;29(Supp 2):359-364. doi:10.18865/ed.29.S2.359

Successful Strategies to Address Disparities: Insurer and Employer Perspectives

2020 ◽  
pp. 292-300
Author(s):  
Manali I. Patel ◽  
Richard Snyder ◽  
Otis Brawley
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cancer Disparities ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Quality Cancer Care

Disparities in cancer have been documented for decades and continue to persist despite clinical advancements in cancer prevention, detection, and treatment. Disparate cancer outcomes continue to affect many populations in the United States and globally, including racial and ethnic minorities, populations with low income and education, and residents of rural areas or low socioeconomic neighborhoods, among others. Addressing cancer disparities requires approaches that are multilevel. Addressing social determinants of health, such as removing obstacles to health (e.g., poverty, discrimination, access to housing and education, jobs with fair pay, and health care) can reduce cancer disparities. However, to achieve cancer health equity, multilevel approaches are required to ensure that access to high-quality cancer care and equitable receipt of evidence-based services can reduce cancer disparities. Policy, health system interventions, and innovative delivery and health care coverage approaches by private and public payers, employer-based payers, and labor union organizations can assist in ensuring access to and receipt of high-quality cancer care while addressing the high costs of care delivery. Partnerships among patients, caregivers, employers, health care providers, and health care payers can make impactful changes in the way in which cancer care is delivered and, in turn, can assist in reducing cancer disparities.

Managing Care in the New Era of “Systems-Think”: The Implications for Managed Care Organizational Liability and Patient Safety

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 290-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice A. Noble ◽  
Troyen A. Brennan
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Managed Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Medical Error ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Dominant Form ◽  
New Era ◽  
The Individual

Three major trends in American health policy are intersecting in a fascinating way. First, managed care has grown to become the most dominant form of health-care delivery, leading to reductions in health-care costs as insurers are able to influence health-care providers with financial incentives. Second, the present growth of managed care has slowed, almost to a standstill, largely on account of consumers questioning what effects these financial incentives are having on the care of patients — questioning that has been expressed in particular through lawsuits against managed care companies.Third, we are experiencing a renewed interest in the existence of medical error and how it may be reduced as a result of the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) report, To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. The most important aspect of this renaissance in error reduction has been its emphasis on health care as a system that can be made better through system-oriented change. The most frustrating aspect is that the IOM did not endorse change in malpractice liability, which consistently puts the impetus for reducing medical error on the individual provider rather than the system as a whole.

scholarly journals Perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cardio-oncology: results from the COVID-19 International Collaborative Network survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Sadler ◽  
◽  
Jeanne M. DeCara ◽  
Joerg Herrmann ◽  
Anita Arnold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Medical Professional ◽  
Collaborative Network ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Future Health ◽  
Professional Societies ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Re-allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delays in care delivery to patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The ability of health care providers to provide optimal care in this setting has not been formally evaluated. Objectives To assess the impact of COVID-19 resource re-allocation on scheduling, testing, elective procedures, telemedicine access, use of new COVID-19 therapies, and providers’ opinions on healthcare policies among oncology and cardiology practitioners. Methods An electronic survey was conducted by a cardio-oncology collaborative network through regional and state chapters of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Descriptive statistics were reported by frequency and proportion for analyses, and stratified categorically by geographic region and specialty. Results One thousand four hundred fifteen providers (43 countries) participated: 986 cardiologists, 306 oncologists, and 118 trainees/internal medicine. 63% (195/306) of oncologists vs 92% (896/976) of cardiologists reported cancellations of treatments/elective procedures (p = 0.01). 46% (442/970) of cardiologists and 25% (76/303) of oncologists modified the scope of their practice (p = < 0.001). Academic physicians (74.5%) felt better supplied with personal protective equipment (PPE) vs non-academic (74.5% vs 67.2%; p = 0.018). Telemedicine was less common in Europe 81% (74/91), and Latin America 64% (101/158), than the United States, 88% (950/1097) (p = < 0.001). 95% of all groups supported more active leadership from medical professional societies. Conclusions These results support initiatives to promote expanded coverage for telemedicine, increased access to PPE, better testing availability and involvement of medical professional societies to help with preparedness for future health care crisis.

scholarly journals The COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Cardio-Oncology: Results From the COVID-19 International Collaborative Network Survey.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Sadler ◽  
Jeanne M. DeCara ◽  
Joerg Herrmann ◽  
Anita Arnold ◽  
Arjun K. Ghosh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Medical Professional ◽  
Collaborative Network ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Future Health ◽  
Professional Societies ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BackgroundRe-allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delays in care delivery to patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The ability of health care providers to provide optimal care in this setting has not been formally evaluated.ObjectivesTo assess the impact of COVID-19 resource re-allocation on scheduling, testing, elective procedures, telemedicine access, use of new COVID-19 therapies, and providers’ opinions on healthcare policies among oncology and cardiology practitioners.MethodsAn electronic survey was conducted by a cardio-oncology collaborative network through regional and state chapters of the American College of Cardiology , American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Descriptive statistics were reported by frequency and proportion for analyses, and stratified categorically by geographic region and specialty.Results1,415 providers (43 countries) participated: 986 cardiologists, 306 oncologists, and 118 trainees/internal medicine. 63% (195/306) of oncologists vs 92% (896/976) of cardiologists reported cancellations of treatments/elective procedures (p=0.01). 46% (442/970) of cardiologists and 25% (76/303) of oncologists modified the scope of their practice (p=<0.001). Academic physicians (74.5%) felt better supplied with personal protective equipment (PPE) vs non-academic (74.5% vs 67.2%; p=0.018). Telemedicine was less common in Europe 81% (74/91), and Latin America 64% (101/158), than the United States, 88% (950/1,097) (p=<0.001). 95% of all groups supported more active leadership from medical professional societies.ConclusionsThese results support initiatives to promote expanded coverage for telemedicine, increased access to PPE, better testing availability and involvement of medical professional societies to help with preparedness for future health care crisis.Appendix: Link to the Survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/C8ZDYNW

Implications of Negligent Selection and Retention of Physicians in the Age of ERISA

1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-418
Author(s):  
Torin A. Dorros ◽  
T. Howard Stone
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Quality Of Health Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Insurance Reform

Enormous and fundamental changes are currently taking place in health care delivery. These changes include the consolidation of health care providers—from hospitals, physicians, and insurance companies, to medical supply businesses, managed care networks, and other health care providers—and numerous health care and insurance reform efforts by government at all levels. These changes pose significant implications for the delivery of health care in the United States, and will impact the manner, cost, and accessibility of health care delivery. These changes will almost certainly affect the quality of health care services as well. The quality of health care in the United States has for many years been a central concern of government, industry, health care providers, payors, and consumers. Quality in health care is essential to overall national health, the guarantor of a productive and healthy populace, and an important indicator of United States social and technological preeminence.

Practice gaps and challenges integrating new immuno-oncology agents in the treatment of cancer patients in the United States: A mixed-method study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11028-11028
Author(s):  
Neal E. Ready ◽  
Aparna Raj Parikh ◽  
Patrice Lazure ◽  
Morgan Peniuta ◽  
Marianne Davies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Immune Biomarkers

11028 Background: Previous research has indicated challenges integrating new immuno-oncology agents (IOAs) and predictive immune biomarkers into practice. Barriers, clinical gaps and underlying causalities explaining these challenges, however, are poorly understood. Methods: A mixed-methods educational needs assessment was conducted with physicians from 6 specialties (oncology, interventional radiology, pathology, pulmonology, emergency medicine and rheumatology), clinical pharmacists, physician assistants and advanced nurse practitioners involved in the care of cancer patients in the United States. Semi-structured interviews and discussion groups were thematically analyzed to identify challenges, barriers and underlying causalities. Qualitative findings subsequently informed the development of online surveys, which served to quantify findings. The following findings pertain to oncologists. Results: A total of 660 health care providers participated in the study, in which 17 interviews and 88 surveys were completed with oncologists. Seventy-two percent reported sub-optimal knowledge of the interactions between IOAs and the tumor’s micro-environment, while 62% reported sub-optimal skills determining which IOA to select based on this information. Oncologists reported sub-optimal knowledge of best practices for using IOAs to treat cancer in presence of an autoimmune disease (74%-80% depending on condition), and sub-optimal skills weighing the risks and benefits of prescribing IOAs for these profiles (66%-77%). In addition, 50% of oncologists reported feeling overwhelmed by the volume of new IOAs being made available. Many oncologists expressed doubts regarding the clinical benefit (59%) and innovative nature (43%) of emerging IOAs. Finally, 46% reported limited skills identifying viable treatment options based on pharmacodiagnostic test reports. Barriers to having predictive biomarkers inform treatment decisions included sub-optimal communication between specialists regarding specimen requirements and desired biomarker information. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the need to further support healthcare professionals as they face challenges integrating new IOAs and predictive immune biomarkers into practice. Given the wide array of IOAs becoming available each year, addressing the knowledge, skills, confidence and attitude gaps identified in this study could help improve health care delivery and potentially optimize outcomes for cancer patients.

Medical Record Confidentiality Law, Scientific Research, and Data Collection in the Information Age

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 113-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Turkington
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Delivery System ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Health Records

A powerful movement is afoot to create a national computerized system of health records. Advocates claim it could save the health delivery system billions of dollars and improve the quality of health services. According to Lawrence Gostin, a leading commentator on privacy and health records, this new infrastructure is “already under way and [has] an aura of inevitability.” When it is in place, almost any information that is viewed as relevant to a decision in the health care delivery system would be available to a large and yet undetermined number of individuals. The transformation of the collection and communication of health information from texts housed by health care providers and facilities to data electronically transmitted through networks of linked computers has significant implications for confidentiality and for data collection in scientific research. The best evidence clearly indicates that most people in the United States consider confidentiality for health information important and worry that the increased computerization of health records will result in inappropriate disclosure.

Overview of Current Approaches to Aural Rehabilitation for Adults With Cochlear Implants

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1175-1187
Author(s):  
Rachel Glade ◽  
Erin Taylor ◽  
Deborah S. Culbertson ◽  
Christin Ray
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Aural Rehabilitation ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Clinical Models ◽  
Hearing Health

Purpose This clinical focus article provides an overview of clinical models currently being used for the provision of comprehensive aural rehabilitation (AR) for adults with cochlear implants (CIs) in the Unites States. Method Clinical AR models utilized by hearing health care providers from nine clinics across the United States were discussed with regard to interprofessional AR practice patterns in the adult CI population. The clinical models were presented in the context of existing knowledge and gaps in the literature. Future directions were proposed for optimizing the provision of AR for the adult CI patient population. Findings/Conclusions There is a general agreement that AR is an integral part of hearing health care for adults with CIs. While the provision of AR is feasible in different clinical practice settings, service delivery models are variable across hearing health care professionals and settings. AR may include interprofessional collaboration among surgeons, audiologists, and speech-language pathologists with varying roles based on the characteristics of a particular setting. Despite various existing barriers, the clinical practice patterns identified here provide a starting point toward a more standard approach to comprehensive AR for adults with CIs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document