scholarly journals Platelet-rich plasma application in experimentally-induced skin wounds in animals: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis v1 (protocols.io.k5rcy56)

protocols.io ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Maria ◽  
Anna Rita
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Skin Wounds ◽  
Experimentally Induced

scholarly journals Platelet-rich plasma to treat experimentally-induced skin wounds in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e0191093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Maria Tambella ◽  
Anna Rita Attili ◽  
Gilles Dupré ◽  
Andrea Cantalamessa ◽  
Stefano Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Skin Wounds ◽  
Experimentally Induced

Assisted therapy with platelet-rich plasma for burn patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Burns ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chien Kao ◽  
Dai-Zhu Lin ◽  
Sheng-Lian Lee ◽  
Chiehfeng Chen ◽  
Hsian-Jenn Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Burn Patients

scholarly journals Systematic Review: Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Platelet-Rich Plasma and Biomaterials as New Regenerative Strategies in Chronic Skin Wounds and Soft Tissue Defects

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Gentile ◽  
Simone Garcovich
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Wound Healing ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Chronic Wounds ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Skin Wounds ◽  
Soft Tissue Defects ◽  
Chronic Skin ◽  
Tissue Defects

The number of clinical trials evaluating adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and biomaterials efficacy in regenerative plastic surgery has exponentially increased during the last ten years. AD-MSCs are easily accessible from various fat depots and show intrinsic plasticity in giving rise to cell types involved in wound healing and angiogenesis. AD-MSCs have been used in the treatment of soft tissue defects and chronic wounds, employed in conjunction with a fat grafting technique or with dermal substitute scaffolds and platelet-rich plasma. In this systematic review, an overview of the current knowledge on this topic has been provided, based on existing studies and the authors’ experience. A multistep search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PreMEDLINE, Ebase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, Scopus database, and Cochrane databases has been performed to identify papers on AD-MSCs, PRP, and biomaterials used in soft tissue defects and chronic wounds. Of the 2136 articles initially identified, 422 articles focusing on regenerative strategies in wound healing were selected and, consequently, only 278 articles apparently related to AD-MSC, PRP, and biomaterials were initially assessed for eligibility. Of these, 85 articles were excluded as pre-clinical, experimental, and in vitro studies. For the above-mentioned reasons, 193 articles were selected; of this amount, 121 letters, expert opinions, commentary, and editorials were removed. The remaining 72 articles, strictly regarding the use of AD-MSCs, PRP, and biomaterials in chronic skin wounds and soft tissue defects, were analyzed. The studies included had to match predetermined criteria according to the patients, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study design (PICOS) approach. The information analyzed highlights the safety and efficacy of AD-MSCs, PRP, and biomaterials on soft tissue defects and chronic wounds, without major side effects.

scholarly journals Sporting participation following the operative management of chondral defects of the knee at mid-term follow up: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. G. Robinson ◽  
T. Williamson ◽  
I. R. Murray ◽  
K. Al-Hourani ◽  
T. O. White
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Chondral Defects ◽  
Chondrocyte Implantation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Autologous Chondrocyte

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the reparticipation in sport at mid-term follow up in athletes who underwent biologic treatment of chondral defects in the knee and compare the rates amongst different biologic procedures. Methods A search of PubMed/Medline and Embase was performed in May 2020 in keeping with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The criteria for inclusion were observational, published research articles studying the outcomes and rates of participation in sport following biologic treatments of the knee with a minimum mean/median follow up of 5 years. Interventions included microfracture, osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT), autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI), osteochondral allograft, or platelet rich plasma (PRP) and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). A random effects model of head-to-head evidence was used to determine rates of sporting participation following each intervention. Results There were twenty-nine studies which met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1276 patients (67% male, 33% female). The mean age was 32.8 years (13–69, SD 5.7) and the mean follow up was 89 months (SD 42.4). The number of studies reporting OAT was 8 (27.6%), ACI was 6 (20.7%), MACI was 7 (24.1%), microfracture was 5 (17.2%), osteochondral allograft was 4 (13.8%), and one study (3.4%) reported on PRP and PBSC. The overall return to any level of sport was 80%, with 58.6% returning to preinjury levels. PRP and PBSC (100%) and OAT (84.4%) had the highest rates of sporting participation, followed by allograft (83.9%) and ACI (80.7%). The lowest rates of participation were seen following MACI (74%) and microfracture (64.2%). Conclusions High rates of re-participation in sport are sustained for at least 5 years following biologic intervention for chondral injuries in the knee. Where possible, OAT should be considered as the treatment of choice when prolonged participation in sport is a priority for patients. However, MACI may achieve the highest probability of returning to the same pre-injury sporting level. Level of evidence IV

scholarly journals Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Hyaluronic Acid for treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

10.19082/2115 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 2115-2122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Niroomand Sadabad ◽  
Masoud Behzadifar ◽  
Farzad Arasteh ◽  
Meysam Behzadifar ◽  
Hamid Reza Dehghan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Intra-articular saline injection as effective as corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid for hip osteoarthritis pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

2020 ◽  
pp. bjsports-2020-102179
Author(s):  
Aaron Gazendam ◽  
Seper Ekhtiari ◽  
Anthony Bozzo ◽  
Mark Phillips ◽  
Mohit Bhandari
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Saline Injection ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Indirect Comparisons

ObjectiveIntra-articular (IA) injections represent a commonly used modality in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Commonly used injections include corticosteroids (CCS), hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). A network meta-analysis allows for comparison among more than two treatment arms and uses both direct and indirect comparisons between interventions. The objective of this network meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of the various IA injectable treatments in treating hip OA at up to 6 months of follow-up.DesignThis is a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Bayesian random-effects model was performed to assess the direct and indirect comparisons of all treatment options.Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science, from inception to October 2019.Eligibility criteria for selected studiesRandomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy of CCS, HA, PRP and placebo in the form of IA saline injection for patients with hip OA.ResultsEleven randomised controlled trials comprising 1353 patients were included. For pain outcomes at both 2–4 and 6 months, no intervention significantly outperformed placebo IA injection. For functional outcomes at both 2–4 and 6 months, no intervention significantly outperformed placebo IA injection. Regarding change from baseline at 2–4 months and 6 months, pooled data demonstrated that all interventions (including placebo), with the exception of HA+PRP, led to a clinically important improvement in both pain, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference.ConclusionEvidence suggests that IA hip saline injections performed as well as all other injectable options in the management of hip pain and functional outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document