scholarly journals The first-line therapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas in russian clinical practice: data from the EQUILIBRIUM study

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-18
Author(s):  
L. G. Babicheva ◽  
I. V. Poddubnaya
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
First Line ◽  
Therapy Efficacy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphomas

The objective: evaluation of effectiveness of the first-line therapy with rituximab of B-cell lymphoproliferative diseases in Russian clinical practice in the period from 2014 to 2017.Materials and methods. The EQUILIBRIUM post-registration multicenter study included 1000 patients aged 21 to 91 years old with a verified diagnosis of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, who received at least 4 cycles of rituximab-containing therapy with Acellbia®. The group of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (aNHL), which is the subject of this article, included 295 patients with a median age of 55.9 years: diffuse B-large cell lymphoma – 87 %, primary mediastinal lymphoma – 11 %, Burkitt’s lymphoma – 1 %. Group characterized by the presence of aggressive clinical signs reflecting the poor prognosis: in the majority of patients, generalized stages were diagnosed (61 %), in half of the cases (50.2 %), extranodal localization of tumor foci was detected (in 32.4 % of patients there were 2 or more). The overwhelming majority of patients (84.5 %) received adequate treatment complying with national and international recommendations (R-CHOP, R-CHOEP and R-EPOCH, high-intensity NHL-BFM-R, R-HyperCVAD and R-MACOP-B regimes). The use of R-CVP, FCR, RB, Chl-R, R-monotherapy treatment programs (which received 15.5 % of patients) was considered inadequate for this category of patients.Results. According to the results of the final assessment, high therapy efficacy was established: the overall response exceeded 90 %, complete remission was achieved in most patients with aNHL (68.5 %), partial remission – in every 5th patient (21.8 %). With a median follow-up of 15 months, 16 (5.42 %) deaths and 34 (11.53 %) events were registered. Median of event-free survival and overall survival have not been achieved. Statistically significant differences depending on first-line therapy efficacy were found in overall survival (p = 0.00000) and eventfree survival (p = 0.00000), once again confirming that the main goal of aNHL treatment is to achieve complete remission.Conclusion. Available and compliant with national clinical guidelines treatment of aNHL patients with Russian bioanalogue of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (Acellbia®) demonstrates high immediate efficacy and acceptable long-term results, comparable to a retrospective analysis of previous clinical studies of the original drug rituximab.

Fludarabine Monophosphate as First Line Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) - 11 Years Clinical Experience.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4970-4970
Author(s):  
J.E. Novoa ◽  
A.L. Rojo ◽  
B. Beñaran ◽  
R. Draper ◽  
H. Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Formulation

Abstract Background: fludarabine (F) has become the standard first line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in younger patients. Treatment of early stage patients with chlorambucil without risk stratification has not been shown to prolong survival. In recent years effective and potentially curative approaches such as nucleosides analogues, stem cell transplantation or monoclonal antibodies have been developed. The attraction of monoclonal antibodies is based on selective targeting of tumor - relevant surface markers and a distinct mechanism of action (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity). Aims: to assess the efficacy, safety and quality of life of F in previously untreated B-cell CLL patients in a group of medical institutions in Uruguay during 11 years (1995–2006). Methods: 168 patients between the period 1995 – 2006 were evaluated.120 of them received F intravenous formulation (1995–2006) and 48 the oral one (2002–2006). Age: 48 – 85 years old, media 67 years old. Gender: male 90, female 78. Inclusion criteria for B-cell CLL was Binet stages B, C and A progressive (Ap), 18 to 85 years old, non multiorganic failure, performance status 0 – 2 (WHO), written informed consent. First condition was non previous treatment. Staging: Binet A 12/168, B 116/168 & C 40/168. Treatment: as first line therapy all the patients received (minimum): 6 cycles of i.v. Fludarabine (Fludara®, Schering) 25 mg/m2/daily (5 days) e/30 days or Oral Fludarabine, 40 mg/m2/daily (5 days), 6 cycles. Results: on this B-cell CLL cohort the overall response rate (ORR) was 78% (CR+PR), 80% of them have immunophenotypic response. Safety: on the 1100 cycles in 168 patients, the toxicity was: 1 AIHA, 2 pancytopenia, 3 plaquetopenia. Grade 3–4 infection rate was 1,3%. No alopecia was observed in any patient. Kaposi sarcoma (0,7%). Mortality rate: 1,7% (3/168 patients). Other adverse factors to overall survival were, age over 65 (p=0,0001) and hepatic impairment (p=0,0001). Toxicity: (WHO>2): granulocytopenia 28%, thrombocytopenia 8%, infection 2%. Although fludarabine-treated patients experienced more significant myelosuppression, no difference in the treatment group was demonstrated. Causes of death: Richter 12%, sepsis 5%, associated disease 34%, second malignancy 17% and others 30%. Comparing oral with intravenous formulation in overall survival the results were: CLL 34% vs 36% (p= NS). Conclusions: fludarabine monofosfate (Fludara®) looks like an effective and safe treatment for B-cell CLL. The oral and intravenous formulations have a similar response rate in elderly and young patients. The challenge remains to integrate new information to apply novel therapies in a disease-specific and risk-adapted maner. A longer follow up and a larger trial, might be needed to confirm these results.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Afatinib and Gefitinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations in Indonesia: Observational Studies with Retrospectives

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 3516-3522
Author(s):  
Seftika Sari ◽  
Tri Murti Andayani ◽  
Dwi Endarti ◽  
Kartika Widayati
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Effectiveness data can describe the results or performance of an intervention (treatment) in daily clinical practice and also provide recommendations to policymakers regarding the need or not of health technology to be implemented into the health care system. Research related to the effectiveness of afatinib and gefitinib is still minimal, especially in Indonesia. This study aims to provide an overview of the effectiveness of afatinib and gefitinib in daily clinical practice (the real world) as first-line therapy. This research is an observational study with a retrospective approach that observes the medical records of NSCLC patients who have EGFR mutations in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta and Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Semarang, Java Island, Indonesia in the period January 2016 - March 2019. The effectiveness seen is the Progress Free Survival and Overall Survival based on the patient's medical records and analyzed using the Kaplan Meier test to see survival. There were 113 patients identified, 27 patients using afatinib and 86 patients using gefitinib. Afatinib had significantly superior progression-free survival (448 days or 14.7 months; 95% CI = 12-17.4 months; p = 0.002) compared to gefitinib (344 days or 11.3 months; 95% CI = 8, 4-14.3 months), however, overall survival of afatinib is no better than gefitinib (472 days or 15.5 months; 95% CI = 13.8-17.2 months vs 653 days or 21.4 months; 95% CI = 18-24.8 months) with a value of p = 0.302. Afatinib has superior progression-free survival compared to gefitinib, but not overall survival as first-line therapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Refractory to First Line Therapy: Incidence, Associated Clinical and Histological Factors, and Outcome among 503 Newly Diagnosed Patients.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1373-1373
Author(s):  
Angela Gueli ◽  
Daniele Caracciolo ◽  
Manuela Zanni ◽  
Luciana Bergui ◽  
Paolo Gavarotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Histological Factors

Abstract Introduction: Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) are malignancies usually sensitive to chemotherapy; this results in prolonged survival and often disease eradication in a large proportion of patients. Despite general improvements in treatment options, a variable number of NHL patients still shows refractoriness, i.e. poor or absent response to induction therapy. This study was undertaken to evaluate the actual rate of refractory patients, to identify possible factors predictive of refractory disease and to compare long-term outcome of refractory vs. responsive patients. Patients and Methods: Data have been collected on 503 NHL patients referred and treated at our Hematology Division between 1990 and 2005. The series included 461 B-cell and 42 T-cell NHL, main histologic subtypes included: 305 high-grade, 183 low-grade and 15 mantle-cell lymphoma. Patient median age was 53 yrs, 55% were male; 359 (73%) patients presented with advanced stage disease. Refractory patients were identified for stable/progressive disease or transient response with disease progression within 6 months, following first-line therapy. Overall, 298 (59%) patients received conventional chemo-radiotherapy, 205 (41%), with either high-risk presentation or unfavorable histology, had high-dose sequential therapy (HDS) with autograft front-line; rituximab was employed in 158 (31%) patients. Results: Overall, 126 (25%) patients were refractory (39% with no response at all, 61% with short-lasting response soon followed by disease progression). The rate of refractoriness was as high as 40% in the small T-cell NHL subgroup, while the overall incidence was 24% for B-cell NHL. There was no significant difference in the distribution of refractory patients among the histological subtypes of B-NHL, in other words none of the B-cell NHL subtypes was specifically associated with poorer response. Among several parameters evaluated for their potential predictive value, in multivariate logistic regression analysis, two factors only were associated with a higher risk of refractory disease: high serum level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and stages IIB-IV, with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 3.52 and 3.75, respectively; the use of HDS program was associated with reduced risk of refractory disease (OR=0.30). Overall, refractory patients had a definitely short life expectancy, with a median survival of 21 months and a 14-yr survival projection of 10%, which is markedly worse compared to 88%, 76% and 65% survival projections at respectively 5, 10 and 15 yrs., of responsive patients, as shown in Figure 1. Conclusions. i. patients with refractory disease represent approximately one fourth of NHL undergoing induction therapy; ii. besides advanced stage and high LDH levels, no other clinical and histological factors are specifically associated to refractoriness; iii. further studies are needed to identify markers predictive of refractoriness, in order to design induction therapies adapted for refractory patients, given their dismal outcome with currently available treatment strategies. Figure 1. Overall survival of 126 refractory and 377 responsive NHL ptients Figure 1. Overall survival of 126 refractory and 377 responsive NHL ptients

scholarly journals Catheter ablation of short-coupled variant of torsade de pointes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Steinfurt ◽  
Babak Nazer ◽  
Martin Aguilar ◽  
Joshua Moss ◽  
Satoshi Higuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Torsade De Pointes ◽  
Intracardiac Echocardiography ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Electrical Storm ◽  
3D Mapping ◽  
Free Wall ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background The short-coupled variant of torsade de pointes (sc-TdP) is a malignant arrhythmia that frequently presents with ventricular fibrillation (VF) electrical storm. Verapamil is considered the first-line therapy of sc-TdP while catheter ablation is not widely adopted. The aim of this study was to determine the origin of sc-TdP and to assess the outcome of catheter ablation using 3D-mapping. Methods and results We retrospectively analyzed five patients with sc-TdP who underwent 3D-mapping and ablation of sc-TdP at five different institutions. Four patients initially presented with sudden cardiac arrest, one patient experienced recurrent syncope as the first manifestation. All patients demonstrated a monomorphic premature ventricular contraction (PVC) with late transition left bundle branch block pattern, superior axis, and a coupling interval of less than 300 ms. triggering recurrent TdP and VF. In four patients, the culprit PVC was mapped to the free wall insertion of the moderator band (MB) with a preceding Purkinje potential in two patients. Catheter ablation using 3D-mapping and intracardiac echocardiography eliminated sc-TdP in all patients, with no recurrence at mean 2.7 years (range 6 months to 8 years) of follow-up. Conclusion 3D-mapping and intracardiac echocardiography demonstrate that sc-TdP predominantly originates from the MB free wall insertion and its Purkinje network. Catheter ablation of the culprit PVC at the MB free wall junction leads to excellent short- and long-term results and should be considered as first-line therapy in recurrent sc-TdP or electrical storm. Graphic abstract

scholarly journals Efficiency of lenalidomide, bortezomib and prednisone (RVP) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Belousov ◽  
T. A. Mitina ◽  
Yu. Yu. Chuksina ◽  
A. K. Golenkov ◽  
E. V. Kataeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Objective: to study the efficacy and safety of the antitumor RVP program (lenalidomide, bortezomib, prednisone) as a first-line therapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Materials and methods. A prospective study involved 39 patients with MM (15 women, 24 men), median age 61 years (30–76 years). All patients had Durie–Salmon stage III disease. According to the paraprotein isotype variant, 19 patients (48.7 %) had Gk myeloma, 8 (20.5 %) had Gλ, 4 (10.2 %) – Ak, 1 – Aλ, 1 – Dk, 1 – paraproteinemia Bens-Jones k and 1 – Bens-Jones λ, 2 – Dλ, and 2 patients – nonsecreting MM. The average level of plasma cells in the bone marrow was 31.7 % (0.8–80.0 %). In 14 (35.8 %) patients there were plasmacytomas of various localization (spine, cranial bones, clavicle, pleura). Nine (23.0 %) patients had renal failure, requiring the start of renal replacement therapy. The average Karnovsky index in the study group was 50 %. All patients received RVP therapy (lenalidomide 25 mg in 1–14 days, bortezomib 1.3 mg subcutaneously in 1, 4, 8, 11 days, prednisolone 60 mg/m2; the interval between courses was 42 days) as the first line therapy. Evaluation of therapy efficacy, characterized by overall survival, objective response rates (the number of complete, very good partial and partial remissions) was performed after 6 treatment courses. Results. The median follow-up was 15 months; the median of overall survival was not achieved. Objective antitumor response achieved in 29 (74.3 %) patients, including complete remissions in 3 (7.6 %), very good partial remissions – in 7 (17.9 %), partial remissions – in 19 (48.7 %) patients. In 2 out of 9 patients who received renal replacement therapy, independence from dialysis therapy was achieved. Cases of III–IV stage hematological and non-hematological toxicity in the study were not noted. Conclusion. The antitumor RVP program showed high efficacy and safety as a first-line therapy in a non-selective group of patients, including those with a complicated MM course.

Prognostic impact of prior local therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikifumi Koura ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Shohei Ueda ◽  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Objective This study aimed to reveal the prognostic values of prior local therapy in first-line therapy using androgen receptor-axis targeting agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) or docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods The study included 303 patients treated with first-line therapy for non-metastatic and metastatic CRPC. The association between prior local therapy and therapeutic outcome including progression-free survival and overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses as well as propensity score-matched analysis. Results In univariate analysis, local prior therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.79; P = 0.0009). Overall survival, but not progression-free survival, was better among patients with prior local therapy compared with patients without prior local therapy even after multivariate analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusions This study robustly indicated that prior local treatment was prognostic for overall survival among patients with CRPC. This finding is useful to predict patient prognosis in CRPC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document