RELATIONSHIPS AND DIFFERENCES IN IMPLICITE INTELLIGENCE, PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT, AND PERCEIVED ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY AMONG COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL STUDENTS

Author(s):  
Guna Svence

The purpose of this study was to explore relationships of implicit intelligence, perceived social support and perceived academic self-efficacy and to identify how these factors influence academic achievements amongst youth, as well as implement adaption of the revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale (De Castell & Byrne, 2015) in Latvia. The research was based on implicit intelligence, perceived social support and academical self-efficacy theories. Nowadays, a growing amount of attention is focused on the reasons driving the academic achievements, self-belief and cumulates conversations about the importance of a social support. According to other scientists’ notes, there is a connection between implicit beliefs of intelligence, social support, academic self-efficacy, because all these constructively provide academic achievements. In several researches there are noted differences between boys and girls, therefore it was studied if there is a difference between sexes. 258 respondents participated in the research (N = 258) from two schools in Latvia between ages of 14-18, 134 of which were girls (n = 134) and remaining 124 - boys (n = 124), all completed three surveys - The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale (De Castell & Byrne, 2015); Children’s Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (Bandura, 2006); Multidimensional scale of perceived social support /MSPSS/ (Zimet, G.D, Dahlem, N.W., Zimet, S.G., & Farley, G.K., 1988). Results showed that between academic achievements and development thinking, academical self-efficacy, perceived social support there is a statically important positive correlation, but negative – with common and fixed belief about the measures of intelligence. A positive connection was found between academic self-efficacy and academic achievements, as well as, from all the studied measures, academical self-efficacy forecasts academical achievements the best of all (3.6%). Differences amongst sexes were also noted. Results confirmed the expected correlation and matches other researches carried out before, which proves that the implicit intelligence, social support and academic self-efficacy are important for the learning achievements and researches on this topic should be carried out in the future, especially on implicit intelligence.  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhao ◽  
Zeqing Zheng ◽  
Chenchen Pan ◽  
Lulu Zhou

As an important predictor of academic achievement and an effective indicator of learning quality, academic engagement has attracted the attention of researchers. The present study explores the relationship among adolescent self-esteem and academic engagement, the mediating effect of academic self-efficacy, and the moderating effect of perceived social support. Four-hundred and eighty adolescents (Mage = 14.92) from the Hebei Province of China were recruited to complete anonymous questionnaires. The results show that self-esteem positively predicted adolescent academic engagement through the indirect mediating role of academic self-efficacy, and the percentage of this mediation effect of the total effect was 73.91%. As a second-stage moderator, perceived social support moderated the mediating effect of academic self-efficacy. Specifically, when students felt more perceived social support, the impact of academic self-efficacy on their academic engagement was greater. Our findings suggest that adolescent self-esteem, academic self-efficacy, and perceived social support are key factors that should be considered together to improve adolescent academic engagement. Therefore, parents and school educators should actively guide adolescents to improve their self-esteem and academic self-efficacy. Parents and educators should also construct an effective social support system to improve students’ perceived social support and enhance their academic engagement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-17
Author(s):  
Iveta Ādamsone ◽  
Nataļja Gudakovska ◽  
Guna Svence

Growth mindset has become popular in the field of psychology and education all around the world. In the Baltic States this concept is relatively new. This research compiles results of two different studies that, for the first time in the Baltic States, analyse the concept of “implicit theories of intelligence” (ITI) and its factors – growth and fixed mindset, and investigate the relations between ITI and academic achievement of students. Data of two different samples of secondary school adolescents is used. Sample 1 consisted of students (N1=258) aged between 14 and 18, 134 females (M=15.13; SD=1.29) and 124 males (M=15.40; SD=1.20) studying in 7th-12th grade in two Latvian schools. Sample 2 consisted of students (N2=165), 80 females and 85 males, aged between 15 and 19 (M=16.75; SD=.90) studying in 10th-12th grade in five Latvian schools. Measures: The Revised Implicit Theories of Intelligence Scale, The Implicit Theories of Intelligence Scale for Children, and The College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale. The results of the study in Sample 1 (N1=258) showed significant positive relations between growth mindset and academic achievement, and gender specific difference in views of intelligence. The results of the study in Sample 2 (N2=165) identified positive relations between ITI and students’ achievement in Mathematics. The regression analysis (N2=165) showed that ITI predict academic achievement in Mathematics at a significant level. The findings suggest discrepancies with the previous studies. The construct needs to be explored further. Keywords: academic self-efficacy, academic achievement, gender differences, growth and fixed mindset, intelligence theories, school students.


2020 ◽  
pp. 073194872091882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Mana ◽  
Noa Saka ◽  
Orit Dahan ◽  
Anat Ben-Simon ◽  
Malka Margalit

This study examined the predictive role of learning difficulties in the academic self-efficacy of students enrolled in higher education institutions and the serial multiple mediation of inner and external resources. The sample consisted of 2,113 students (age range = 18–35) at 25 higher education institutions in Israel. Participants were divided into four groups: (a) 668 typical students (without learning difficulties or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]), (b) 370 students with self-reported but undiagnosed academic difficulties, (c) 372 students diagnosed with specific learning disabilities (SLDs), and (d) 703 students diagnosed with attention deficit disorders (ADHD). Implicit theories on accommodations, perceptions of social support, hope, and academic self-efficacy were examined. Results demonstrated that students with SLD and ADHD had higher beliefs in the value of expectations, yet they experienced lower levels of academic self-efficacy than their typical peers. These implicit theories did not predict directly the academic self-efficacy, but external resources (perceptions of support) and internal resources (hope) mediated these relationships. The results focused on the accommodations and beliefs in their value for predicting academic self-efficacy, and the importance of social support and hope.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document