Spectral analysis of body waves from the earthquake of February 18, 1956

1964 ◽  
Vol 54 (6A) ◽  
pp. 2017-2035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomowo Hirasawa ◽  
William Stauder
Keyword(s):  
Amplitude Ratio ◽  
Source Region ◽  
Focal Depth ◽  
Mean Amplitude ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Body Waves ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
S Wave

abstract The earthquake which occurred south of Honshu, Japan, on February 18, 1956 is studied by means of Fourier analysis. The focal depth of the shock is about 450 km and the magnitude is 714 to 712. Three theoretical models of the source mechanism, that is, Type Ia, Type Ib, and Type II, are examined by the observed amplitude spectra of S and ScS waves. It is found that the observed amplitude ratios of the Fourier components between two horizontal components of the S wave and of the ScS wave, respectively, agree well with the theoretical ratios for a Type II source. Under the assumption that spectral structures should be the same at all observing points, the scattering from the mean amplitude is calculated. The result shows that the Type II model is preferable to either of the Type I models. Assuming Honda's volume model, whose radiation pattern corresponds to that of a Type II point source, the radius of the source region is estimated by making use of the amplitude ratio of the Fourier component of the S wave to that of the P wave. The radius of the source is found to be 11 km ± 2 km.

Focal mechanism of the Prince William Sound, Alaska earthquake of March 28, 1964

1969 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 799-811
Author(s):  
Samuel T. Harding ◽  
S. T. Algermissen
Keyword(s):  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Prince William Sound ◽  
Wave Polarization ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Polarization Data ◽  
Wave Data ◽  
First Motion

abstract Two nodal planes for P were determined using a combination of P-wave first motion and S-wave polarization data and from S-wave data alone. The S-wave polarization error, δ∈, is slightly lower for a type Il than for a type I mechanism. The type I mechanism solution indicates a predominately dip-slip faulting on a steeply dipping plane. The preferred solution is a type II mechanism with the following P nodal planes: strike N62°E, dip 82°S, (a plane); strike N22°W, dip 52°W, (b plane). Two solutions are possible: right lateral faulting which strikes northeast; or, left lateral faulting which strikes northwest. Both possible fault planes dip steeply.

The 1998 Valhall microseismic data set: An integrated study of relocated sources, seismic multiplets, and S-wave splitting

Geophysics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. B183-B195 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. De Meersman ◽  
J.-M. Kendall ◽  
M. van der Baan
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Amplitude Ratio ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Wave Form ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Wave Splitting ◽  
Source Mechanisms

We relocate 303 microseismic events recorded in 1998 by sensors in a single borehole in the North Sea Valhall oil field. A semiautomated array analysis method repicks the P- and S-wave arrival times and P-wave polarizations, which are needed to locate these events. The relocated sources are confined predominantly to a [Formula: see text]-thick zone just above the reservoir, and location uncertainties are half those of previous efforts. Multiplet analysis identifies 40 multiplet groups, which include 208 of the 303 events. The largest group contains 24 events, and five groups contain 10 or more events. Within each multiplet group, we further improve arrival-time picking through crosscorrelation, which enhances the relative accuracy of the relocated events and reveals that more than 99% of the seismic activity lies spatially in three distinct clusters. The spatial distribution of events and wave-form similarities reveal two faultlike structures that match well with north-northwest–south-southeast-trending fault planes interpreted from 3D surface seismic data. Most waveform differences between multiplet groups located on these faults can be attributed to S-wave phase content and polarity or P-to-S amplitude ratio. The range in P-to-S amplitude ratios observed on the faults is explained best in terms of varying source mechanisms. We also find a correlation between multiplet groups and temporal variations in seismic anisotropy, as revealed by S-wave splitting analysis. We explain these findings in the context of a cyclic recharge and dissipation of cap-rock stresses in response to production-driven compaction of the underlying oil reservoir. The cyclic nature of this mechanism drives the short-term variations in seismic anisotropy and the reactivation of microseismic source mechanisms over time.

Atrioventricular conduction abnormalities and atrioventricular blocks: ECG patterns and diagnosis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Serge Barold
Keyword(s):  
P Wave ◽  
Conduction Time ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Av Block ◽  
Ventricular Extrasystoles ◽  
Av Conduction ◽  
Pr Interval ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Second Degree

The diagnosis of first-degree and third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block is straightforward but that of second-degree AV block is more involved. Type I block and type II second-degree AV block are electrocardiographic patterns that refer to the behaviour of the PR intervals (in sinus rhythm) in sequences (with at least two consecutive conducted PR intervals) where a single P wave fails to conduct to the ventricles. Type I second-degree AV block describes visible, differing, and generally decremental AV conduction. Type II second-degree AV block describes what appears to be an all-or-none conduction without visible changes in the AV conduction time before and after the blocked impulse. The diagnosis of type II block requires a stable sinus rate, an important criterion because a vagal surge (generally benign) can cause simultaneous sinus slowing and AV nodal block, which can resemble type II block. The diagnosis of type II block cannot be established if the first post-block P wave is followed by a shortened PR interval or by an undiscernible P wave. A narrow QRS type I block is almost always AV nodal, whereas a type I block with bundle branch block barring acute myocardial infarction is infranodal in 60–70% of cases. All correctly defined type II blocks are infranodal. A 2:1 AV block cannot be classified in terms of type I or type II block, but it can be AV nodal or infranodal. Concealed His bundle or ventricular extrasystoles may mimic both type I or type II block (pseudo-AV block), or both

Amplitude-based misfit functions in viscoelastic full-waveform inversion applied to walk-away vertical seismic profile data

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. B335-B351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenyong Pan ◽  
Kristopher A. Innanen
Keyword(s):  
Amplitude Ratio ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Seismic Profile ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Western Canada ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
Walk Away ◽  
Profile Data ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Full Waveform

Viscoelastic full-waveform inversion is applied to walk-away vertical seismic profile data acquired at a producing heavy-oil field in Western Canada for the determination of subsurface velocity models (P-wave velocity [Formula: see text] and S-wave velocity [Formula: see text]) and attenuation models (P-wave quality factor [Formula: see text] and S-wave quality factor [Formula: see text]). To mitigate strong velocity-attenuation trade-offs, a two-stage approach is adopted. In Stage I, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] models are first inverted using a standard waveform-difference (WD) misfit function. Following this, in Stage II, different amplitude-based misfit functions are used to estimate the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] models. Compared to the traditional WD misfit function, the amplitude-based misfit functions exhibit stronger sensitivity to attenuation anomalies and appear to be able to invert [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] models more reliably in the presence of velocity errors. Overall, the root-mean-square amplitude-ratio and spectral amplitude-ratio misfit functions outperform other misfit function choices. In the final outputs of our inversion, significant drops in the [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] ratio (~1.6) and Poisson’s ratio (~0.23) are apparent within the Clearwater Formation (depth ~0.45–0.50 km) of the Mannville Group in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Strong [Formula: see text] (~20) and [Formula: see text] (~15) anomalies are also evident in this zone. These observations provide information to help identify the target attenuative reservoir saturated with heavy-oil resources.

scholarly journals Evidence for deep icequakes in an Alpine glacier

2000 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Deichmann ◽  
J. Ansorge ◽  
F. Scherbaum ◽  
A. Aschwanden ◽  
F. Bernard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rayleigh Wave ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Focal Depth ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Swiss Alps ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Glacier Surface ◽  
Simultaneous Inversion ◽  
Wave Velocities

AbstractTo obtain more reliable information about the focal-depth distribution of icequakes, in April 1997 we operated an array of seven portable digital seismographs on Unteraargletscher, central Swiss Alps. Over 5000 events were detected by at least two instruments during the 9 day recording period. P-wave velocities (3770 m f) were determined from several calibration shots detonated at the glacier surface as well as in a 49 m deep borehole, whereas S-wave velocities (1860 ms–1) were derived from a simultaneous inversion for Vp/Vs6 applied to 169 icequakes. So far, hypocentral locations have been calculated for over 300 icequakes. Besides confirming the occurrence of shallow events associated with the opening of crevasses, our results show that a small but significant fraction of the hypocenters are located at or near the glacier bed. One event was found at an intermediate depth of about 120 m. Three-dimensional particle-motion diagrams of both explosions and icequakes clearly demonstrate that all vertical component seismograms from shallow sources are dominated by the Rayleigh wave. On the other hand, for events occurring at depths greater than about 40 m, the Rayleigh wave disappears almost entirely. Therefore, a qualitative analysis of the signal character provides direct information on the focal depth of an event and was used as an independent check of the locations obtained from traditional arrival-time inversions. Thus, our results demonstrate that deep icequakes do occur and that simple rheological models, according to which brittle deformation is restricted to the uppermost part of a glacier, may need revision.

scholarly journals Seismic Attenuation Tomography From 2018 Lombok Earthquakes, Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awali Priyono ◽  
Andri Dian Nugraha ◽  
Muzli Muzli ◽  
Ardianto Ardianto ◽  
Atin Nur Aulia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Source Region ◽  
Bouguer Anomaly ◽  
High Ratio ◽  
Seismic Attenuation ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Fluid Content ◽  
P Wave Velocity ◽  
Lombok Island

Local earthquake data was used to determine a three-dimensional (3D) seismic attenuation structure around the aftershock source region of the 2018 Lombok earthquake in Indonesia. The aftershocks were recorded by 13 seismic stations from August 4 to September 9, 2018. The selected data consist of 6,281 P-wave t∗ values from 914 events, which had good t∗ quality in at least four stations. Our results show that the two aftershock clusters northwest and northeast of Lombok Island have different attenuation characteristics. A low P-wave quality factor (low-Qp), low P-wave velocity (Vp), and high ratio of P-wave velocity and S-wave velocity (Vp/Vs), which coincide with a shallower earthquake (<20 km) northwest of Lombok Island, might be associated with a brittle area of basal and imbricated faults influenced by high fluid content. At the same time, the high-Qp, low Vp, and low Vp/Vs, which coincide with a deeper earthquake (>20 km) northeast of Lombok Island, might be associated with an area that lacks fluid content. The difference in fluid content between the northwest and northeast regions might be the cause of the early generation of aftershocks in the northwest area. The significant earthquake that happened on August 5, 2018, took place in a region with moderate Qp, close to the contrast of high and low-Qp and high Vp, which suggests that the earthquake started in a strong material before triggering the shallower aftershocks occurring in an area affected by fluid content. We also identified an old intrusive body on the northeast flank of the Rinjani volcano, which was characterized by a high-Qp, high-velocity, and a high Bouguer anomaly.

Earthquake mechanism determination by S-wave data

1964 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 457-474
Author(s):  
Anne E. Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Focal Mechanisms ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Force System ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Family ◽  
Force Systems ◽  
Generalized Force ◽  
Earthquake Mechanism

ABSTRACT The nature of force systems at the foci of earthquakes can be studied by analyzing initial longitudinal (P) and transverse (S) displacements produced by them on the surface of the earth. The force system described in this paper results from a superposition of three mutually orthogonal double forces which act at a point focus. A family of equations is derived which depends only on S polarization angles and not on initial P displacements to determine the orientation of this generalized force system. An IBM 1620 computer has been programmed to solve the family of equations for two particular focal mechanisms—the single couple (Honda's Type I) and the double dipole (Honda's Type II). Two possible force systems are thus calculated for each earthquake using only S angles. The appropriate mechanism for each earthquake is selected by comparing the distribution of initial P displacements actually recorded, with that predicted from the solutions of the mechanism equations making use of S data. Computer solutions are presented for 32 earthquakes for which data are available in the literature. The orientation of the force system for each earthquake calculated from S data alone is in general agreement with that determined from P data.

Reflection and refraction of type-II S waves in elastic and anelastic media

1977 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger D. Borcherdt
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Particle Motion ◽  
Plane Boundary ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
S Wave ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Reflection And Refraction ◽  
Linear Behavior ◽  
Inhomogeneous Plane

abstract The general theory of viscoelasticity, which accounts for elastic as well as anelastic linear behavior of materials, predicts that two types of S waves propagate in anelastic earth materials. The particle motion for an inhomogeneous plane S wave of type I is elliptical in the plane defined by the directions of propagation and attenuation, while the particle motion for an inhomogeneous plane S wave of type II is linear perpendicular to this plane. The general theory predicts that an S-wave incident upon a plane boundary perpendicular to the plane defined by the directions of propagation and attenuation generates S waves only of the same type. General characteristics of the type-II S waves reflected and refracted at plane anelastic boundaries are: The general theory predicts these characteristics for the waves whenever a plane type-II S wave interacts with a plane anelastic boundary such as a soil-bedrock, crust-mantle, or core-mantle interface. None of these characteristics are predicted for the plane SH waves described by elasticity theory.

The partition of radiated energy between P and S waves

1984 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-376
Author(s):  
John Boatwright ◽  
Jon B. Fletcher
Keyword(s):  
Wave Energy ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Focal Mechanisms ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Waves ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Corner Frequency ◽  
S Wave ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Radiated Energy

Abstract Seventy-three digitally recorded body waves from nine multiply recorded small earthquakes in Monticello, South Carolina, are analyzed to estimate the energy radiated in P and S waves. Assuming Qα = Qβ = 300, the body-wave spectra are corrected for attenuation in the frequency domain, and the velocity power spectra are integrated over frequency to estimate the radiated energy flux. Focal mechanisms determined for the events by fitting the observed displacement pulse areas are used to correct for the radiation patterns. Averaging the results from the nine events gives 27.3 ± 3.3 for the ratio of the S-wave energy to the P-wave energy using 0.5 〈Fi〉 as a lower bound for the radiation pattern corrections, and 23.7 ± 3.0 using no correction for the focal mechanisms. The average shift between the P-wave corner frequency and the S-wave corner frequency, 1.24 ± 0.22, gives the ratio 13.7 ± 7.3. The substantially higher values obtained from the integral technique implies that the P waves in this data set are depleted in energy relative to the S waves. Cursory inspection of the body-wave arrivals suggests that this enervation results from an anomalous site response at two of the stations. Using the ratio of the P-wave moments to the S-wave moments to correct the two integral estimates gives 16.7 and 14.4 for the ratio of the S-wave energy to the P-wave energy.

Amplitude balancing in separating P- and S-waves in 2D and 3D elastic seismic data

Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. S103-S113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Sun ◽  
George A. McMechan ◽  
Han-Hsiang Chuang
Keyword(s):  
Wave Amplitude ◽  
Amplitude Ratio ◽  
Velocity Ratio ◽  
Displacement Component ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Elastic Displacement ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
S Waves

The reflected P- and S-waves in elastic displacement component data recorded at the earth’s surface are separated by reverse-time (downward) extrapolation of the data in an elastic computational model, followed by calculations to give divergence (dilatation) and curl (rotation) at a selected reference depth. The surface data are then reconstructed by separate forward-time (upward) scalar extrapolations, from the reference depth, of the magnitude of the divergence and curl wavefields, and extraction of the separated P- and S-waves, respectively, at the top of the models. A P-wave amplitude will change by a factor that is inversely proportional to the P-velocity when it is transformed from displacement to divergence, and an S-wave amplitude will change by a factor that is inversely proportional to the S-velocity when it is transformed from displacement to curl. Consequently, the ratio of the P- to the S-wave amplitude (the P-S amplitude ratio) in the form of divergence and curl (postseparation) is different from that in the (preseparation) displacement form. This distortion can be eliminated by multiplying the separated S-wave (curl) by a relative balancing factor (which is the S- to P-velocity ratio); thus, the postseparation P-S amplitude ratio can be returned to that in the preseparation data. The absolute P- and S-wave amplitudes are also recoverable by multiplying them by a factor that depends on frequency, on the P-velocity α, and on the unit of α and is location-dependent if the near-surface P-velocity is not constant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document