scholarly journals TEACHING SPEAKING: EXPLORING METHOD OF TEACHING AND ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL LEARNERS’ CLASSROOM

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Aldha Williyan
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Group Work ◽  
Role Play ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Communicative Language Teaching ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Pair Work ◽  
Vast Area

This study investigates teaching speaking in EFL learners' classroom as teaching speaking is a vast area of research.  This study, however, limits the focus to types of methods and oral corrective feedback.  This study involves two groups of participants, namely a group of EFL learners and an English teacher.  This qualitative study employs observation.  Afterward, the unstructured interview with the English teacher is conducted to give further data.  Through the observation, it is found that the teacher does some particular activities in teaching speaking.  The lesson is opened by group work and the teacher conducts a dialogue and chain drill.  The lesson eventually is closed by pair work and role play.  The analysis shows that the teacher uses several methods in doing those five activities.  Those are communicative language teaching, audio-lingual method, and cooperative language learning.  From those three, the audio-lingual method dominates the class activities. Additionally, this study finds that the teacher employs several types of oral corrective feedback.  Those are recast, explicit correction, clarification requests, and elicitation. These findings indicate that there is a relationship between methods and oral corrective feedbacks used by the teacher.

The interplay of oral corrective feedback and L2 willingness to communicate across proficiency levels

2020 ◽  
pp. 136216882092896
Author(s):  
Mostafa Zare ◽  
Zohreh Gooniband Shooshtari ◽  
Alireza Jalilifar
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Willingness To Communicate ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Feedback Type ◽  
Proficiency Levels ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
High Preference ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
The Impact

This study aims to explore the impact of oral corrective feedback types on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ willingness to communicate across proficiency levels. It also investigates how EFL learners view different types of feedback in relation to their willingness to communicate. Sixty Iranian EFL learners were tracked in four proficiency levels. Initially, the participants filled in a questionnaire to measure their attitudes to oral CF and their willingness to communicate. Subsequent to the teachers’ employment of explicit correction, recasts, and prompts, the learners’ willingness to communicate was measured anew. A semi-structured interview was also conducted. The results revealed learners’ high preference for prompts. A two-way mixed between-within ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect for both oral corrective feedback and proficiency level on willingness to communicate. Furthermore, elicitative types of feedback were ranked as the most contributory feedback type to L2 willingness to communicate.

scholarly journals Tanzanian Secondary School Learners’ Beliefs about EFL Learning, Teaching and Testing: Exploratory Account

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Zelda Elisifa Sam
Keyword(s):  
Secondary School ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Language Teaching ◽  
Data Gathering ◽  
Language Assessment ◽  
Communicative Language Teaching ◽  
National Language ◽  
Language Curriculum ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Teaching Learning

The current study explored EFL secondary school learners’ beliefs about language teaching, learning and testing in Tanzania. Specifically, it sought to find out the EFL learners’ beliefs about language assessment, explore the EFL learners’ beliefs about language learning and establish degree of EFL learner variability in their beliefs about language teaching. The study involved 48 secondary school learners, 36 (75%) males and 12 (25%) females. From these 20 (all boys) (50%) were from a private secondary school in Temeke and the rest (16 boys and all 12 girls) from another secondary school in Kinondoni District, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Data were collected via a questionnaire, which was one and only tool for data gathering and it consisted of 25 items, five on language assessment, 9 on language teaching and 11 on language learning to which the respondents were asked to react and register their level of agreement about pre –developed assertions. Findings showed that while the learners differed in their beliefs about language teaching, a grand majority shared a belief about primacy of grammar teaching and on role of teacher in error correction and disfavoured communicative language teaching. The same was the case for language assessment where the most shared belief was testing grammar and correcting errors. It is concluded that these set of beliefs are hinged upon years of grammar-focussed teaching in Tanzania which still characterize language teaching in Tanzania despite the introduction of communicative language teaching approach in the national language curriculum more than ten years ago.

How do learners engage with oral corrective feedback on lexical stress errors?

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-276
Author(s):  
Hooman Saeli ◽  
Mohammadreza Dalman ◽  
Payam Rahmati
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Cognitive Engagement ◽  
Lexical Stress ◽  
Cognitive Resources ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Negative Perceptions ◽  
Direct Feedback

Abstract This study explored the affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement of 18 Iranian EFL learners with oral corrective feedback on lexical stress errors. The data were collected using questionnaires, pretests, posttests, and interviews. The questionnaire responses showed that the participants held various perceptions about direct feedback. Additionally, the pretest and posttest results indicated that the learners with positive perceptions about direct feedback had significant lexical stress accuracy gains. Also, the students who viewed direct feedback favorably showed positive affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement with it. These learners, for instance, frequently reviewed the provided feedback and used cognitive resources when utilizing it. In contrast, the students with negative perceptions about direct feedback showed negative engagement with it. The findings suggest that learners’ affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement can determine the working of feedback. Also, students’ perceptions seem to filter the feedback they receive, thereby helping shape how they engage with feedback.

scholarly journals Effect of Oral Corrective Feedback on Language Skills

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 672
Author(s):  
Radiah Alsolami
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Language Skills ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Language Classrooms ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Impact

Corrective feedback is an important element in the language learning process. The issue of corrective feedback in language classrooms has been investigated by numerous scholars who believe that the strategy can effectively be used to improve the language skills of students. Though many forms of feedback approaches are used in learning, oral corrective feedback is the commonly used strategy in teaching languages. This is mainly because it captures the diverse elements of language lessons such as pronunciations and spelling. Oral corrective feedback presents a broad field which assists both teachers and students in error identification and eradication. It mainly focuses on highlighting the common errors and mistakes and addressing them enabling the students to avoid them in the future. This paper mainly explores the impact of oral corrective feedback on the language skills of learners. It generally analyses articles that address the issue of oral corrective feedback and derives information regarding the impact of the strategy in language learning outcomes.

scholarly journals The Effect of Immediate and Delayed Error Correction on Accuracy of EFL Learners’ Oral Production

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Safari
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Error Correction ◽  
English Language ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Specific Situation ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Oral Production ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
The Subject ◽  
English Language Institute

The concept of corrective feedback in learning a second language has gained more importance and it has been the subject of many researches during recent years. Therefore, considering some aspects that affect it such as when and how to correct, and also what types of corrective feedback are more preferable and effective is of crucial concern. The aim of this study is to find the most effective type of error correction (especially the best time: whether immediately or delayed) in the case of accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ oral production. Thus, in order to investigate this study, 30 homogenous intermediate EFL learners were selected randomly (female) aged 13 to 30 from Tak English language institute in Dezful, Iran. The participants were divided into 2 groups of 15. For G1 errors were corrected immediately and for G2 with some delay, i.e. after finishing their speech during a term. At the end of the term, each student were asked to discuss one of the topics they have covered during the term, while their voices were recorded and transcribed later. Measures of accuracy were developed to examine the results. Data analysis indicated that both Immediate and Delayed Error Correction had positive effects on the accuracy of learners’ oral production. However, it was evident that although both types of CF were beneficial, the effects of Immediate Error Correction were larger than the other. In conclusion, regarding the specific purpose of language learning in a specific situation and classroom, it is recommended that teachers should be familiarized with all types of CF and then cautiously select the most appropriate one.

scholarly journals Immediate Uptake of Phonological Corrective Feedback in Language Learning and Retention

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Amin Naeimi ◽  
Mahnaz Saeidi ◽  
Biook Behnam
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Language Learner ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Metalinguistic Feedback ◽  
Error Treatment ◽  
Learner Uptake ◽  
Phonological Errors

As language learners’ phonological errors have attracted substantial attention, error treatment strategies have become an indispensable part of teachers’ repertoire. Research has found positive effects for corrective feedback on language learner uptake; however, the effect has not been proved to be sustained over time. This quasiexperimental study sought to explore whether uptake can reflect language learning and retention through measuring the effectiveness of three common types of oral corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ phonological errors. Fifty-four male intermediate-level learners received a nine-session treatment in the form of recast, elicitation, and metalinguistic feedback during story retelling tasks. Results of comparing and correlating uptake with posttest scores revealed that while recast was found to be the most effective feedback in inducing correct uptake, it was metalinguistic feedback that proved to be the most conducive in learning and retention. Besides, there was no significant relationship between the learners’ scores in uptake and their learning and retention in any groups. This suggests that EFL learners’ immediate reactions to teachers’ input-providing or output-prompting correction could not be a reflection of language development, and more consistent and continuous long-term assessment of the success of corrective feedback has to be envisaged in language teaching methodologies.

scholarly journals EFL students' attitudes toward corrective feedback: a study conducted at undergraduate level

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanzina Halim ◽  
Rizwana Wahid ◽  
Shanjida Halim
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Male Students ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Language Classrooms ◽  
Students Attitudes ◽  
Automated Feedback

PurposeThe purpose of this study is mainly to find out the EFL learners' attitude towards corrective feedback. This paper also investigates types of learners who prefer the online or offline corrective feedback, and how feedback should be tailored to the needs of the learners.Design/methodology/approachThe study was conducted on sixty female participants who were students of levels 7 and 8 of the B. A. program (English) at King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia. They were administered a questionnaire comprising eight questions about corrective feedback from teachers individually and independently so that they could identify their own choices without any influence from other participants. The items in the questionnaire were closed items.FindingsIt was found that both types of feedbacks are essential to enhance learners' linguistic accuracy. Learners have shown their positive attitude towards teachers' corrective feedback because they consider it a motivating learning tool. Not only that the learners have expressed the view that corrective feedback is very useful in enhancing the learning process for EFL learners. On the other hand, some of the learners are not serious about going through corrective feedback given by teachers because sometimes they are unable to differentiate between what helps or hampers progress towards language learning. However, they preferred both online (immediate/automated) feedback and offline (delayed) feedback. In general, the results state that the learners have expressed the view that corrective feedback is very useful in enhancing the learning process for EFL learners.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has some limitations. The first one is the sample size. Only students from levels 7 and 8 (undergraduates) were taken into consideration. The second limitation is that the researchers focused on only one university in Saudi Arabia. The third limitation is that no male students participated in this study. The results might be different if the male students participated as well.Originality/valueOne vital point in employing CF in the language classrooms is timing. Considering the timing of corrective feedback, teachers face the problem of whether CF should be immediate (online) or delayed (offline).

scholarly journals The Role of Oral Corrective Feedback Types in the Acquisition of the Grammatical Structures

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Firoozeh Abedini ◽  
Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari
Keyword(s):  
Language Learners ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Grammatical Structure ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Third Person ◽  
Clarification Request ◽  
Grammatical Structures

<p>This study investigated whether the effects of different types of corrective feedback (CF) (simple clarification request, enhanced prompt and elliptical elicitation) would differ on the acquisition of different types of grammatical structures. The target grammatical structures were verb endings (morphological morphemes) in three different English tenses including the simple present third person singular “-s”, the present continuous verb formation marker “-ing”, and the simple past verb ending” -ed”. These targets were chosen because they are rather problematic for EFL learners to acquire. For this purpose, 31 L1 Persian EFL learners at intermediate level were given an opportunity to carry out some tasks and were provided with different types of CF on their erroneous utterances. Data analysis on the output accuracy following feedback on the three grammatical targets showed that the proportion of errors corrected in response to CF in the form of enhanced prompt was more than the proportion of errors corrected in response to the other two types of CF. These results suggest that the more explicit the CF, the more effective it would be in correcting language learners’ erroneous utterances regardless of the type of given grammatical structure.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document