scholarly journals Iranian EFL learners’ preferred oral corrective feedback: High anxious learners vs. low anxious learners

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davoud Abedi ◽  
Zafarghandi Amir Mahdavi ◽  
Jaleh Hassaskhah
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
High Anxious ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback

The interplay of oral corrective feedback and L2 willingness to communicate across proficiency levels

2020 ◽  
pp. 136216882092896
Author(s):  
Mostafa Zare ◽  
Zohreh Gooniband Shooshtari ◽  
Alireza Jalilifar
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Willingness To Communicate ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Feedback Type ◽  
Proficiency Levels ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
High Preference ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
The Impact

This study aims to explore the impact of oral corrective feedback types on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ willingness to communicate across proficiency levels. It also investigates how EFL learners view different types of feedback in relation to their willingness to communicate. Sixty Iranian EFL learners were tracked in four proficiency levels. Initially, the participants filled in a questionnaire to measure their attitudes to oral CF and their willingness to communicate. Subsequent to the teachers’ employment of explicit correction, recasts, and prompts, the learners’ willingness to communicate was measured anew. A semi-structured interview was also conducted. The results revealed learners’ high preference for prompts. A two-way mixed between-within ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect for both oral corrective feedback and proficiency level on willingness to communicate. Furthermore, elicitative types of feedback were ranked as the most contributory feedback type to L2 willingness to communicate.

How do learners engage with oral corrective feedback on lexical stress errors?

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-276
Author(s):  
Hooman Saeli ◽  
Mohammadreza Dalman ◽  
Payam Rahmati
Keyword(s):  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Cognitive Engagement ◽  
Lexical Stress ◽  
Cognitive Resources ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Negative Perceptions ◽  
Direct Feedback

Abstract This study explored the affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement of 18 Iranian EFL learners with oral corrective feedback on lexical stress errors. The data were collected using questionnaires, pretests, posttests, and interviews. The questionnaire responses showed that the participants held various perceptions about direct feedback. Additionally, the pretest and posttest results indicated that the learners with positive perceptions about direct feedback had significant lexical stress accuracy gains. Also, the students who viewed direct feedback favorably showed positive affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement with it. These learners, for instance, frequently reviewed the provided feedback and used cognitive resources when utilizing it. In contrast, the students with negative perceptions about direct feedback showed negative engagement with it. The findings suggest that learners’ affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement can determine the working of feedback. Also, students’ perceptions seem to filter the feedback they receive, thereby helping shape how they engage with feedback.

scholarly journals The Role of Oral Corrective Feedback Types in the Acquisition of the Grammatical Structures

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Firoozeh Abedini ◽  
Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari
Keyword(s):  
Language Learners ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Grammatical Structure ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Third Person ◽  
Clarification Request ◽  
Grammatical Structures

<p>This study investigated whether the effects of different types of corrective feedback (CF) (simple clarification request, enhanced prompt and elliptical elicitation) would differ on the acquisition of different types of grammatical structures. The target grammatical structures were verb endings (morphological morphemes) in three different English tenses including the simple present third person singular “-s”, the present continuous verb formation marker “-ing”, and the simple past verb ending” -ed”. These targets were chosen because they are rather problematic for EFL learners to acquire. For this purpose, 31 L1 Persian EFL learners at intermediate level were given an opportunity to carry out some tasks and were provided with different types of CF on their erroneous utterances. Data analysis on the output accuracy following feedback on the three grammatical targets showed that the proportion of errors corrected in response to CF in the form of enhanced prompt was more than the proportion of errors corrected in response to the other two types of CF. These results suggest that the more explicit the CF, the more effective it would be in correcting language learners’ erroneous utterances regardless of the type of given grammatical structure.</p>

scholarly journals An investigation into how EFL learners emotionally respond to teachers’ oral corrective feedback

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan De Dios Martínez
Keyword(s):  
Secondary School ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Feedback Process ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Language Pedagogy ◽  
Oral Feedback ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Way

This research study draws on research in SLA and language pedagogy and hopes to throw some light on the pedagogical effectiveness of the oral feedback process in L2 classrooms by focusing exclusively on the potential affective damage that teachers´ oral corrective feedback can cause among learners in classroom settings. The paper describes a study in which we investigated how EFL learners actually perceive or rather emotionally respond to the oral feedback process. This paper aims to investigate to what extent the way teachers provide oral corrective feedback is somehow associated with learners´ motivations and attitudes. For this purpose, a short questionnaire was designed and distributed among a sample of 208 EFL secondary school learners. The article first reviews the literature on the controversial role of corrective feedback in L2 classrooms. Next, the findings are reported and discussed. This research paper suggests that EFL learners emotionally respond to teachers´ oral corrective feedback in different ways. Additionally, it found evidence that anxiety can have a negative effect on the way learners benefit from the oral feedback process. Thus, the paper issues warnings about the potential affective damage oral corrective feedback can cause among learners in classroom situations.

scholarly journals TEACHING SPEAKING: EXPLORING METHOD OF TEACHING AND ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL LEARNERS’ CLASSROOM

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Aldha Williyan
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Group Work ◽  
Role Play ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Communicative Language Teaching ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Pair Work ◽  
Vast Area

This study investigates teaching speaking in EFL learners' classroom as teaching speaking is a vast area of research.  This study, however, limits the focus to types of methods and oral corrective feedback.  This study involves two groups of participants, namely a group of EFL learners and an English teacher.  This qualitative study employs observation.  Afterward, the unstructured interview with the English teacher is conducted to give further data.  Through the observation, it is found that the teacher does some particular activities in teaching speaking.  The lesson is opened by group work and the teacher conducts a dialogue and chain drill.  The lesson eventually is closed by pair work and role play.  The analysis shows that the teacher uses several methods in doing those five activities.  Those are communicative language teaching, audio-lingual method, and cooperative language learning.  From those three, the audio-lingual method dominates the class activities. Additionally, this study finds that the teacher employs several types of oral corrective feedback.  Those are recast, explicit correction, clarification requests, and elicitation. These findings indicate that there is a relationship between methods and oral corrective feedbacks used by the teacher.

The Effect of Immediate vs. Delayed Oral Corrective Feedback on the Writing Accuracy of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 1780
Author(s):  
Hasti Yasaei
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Writing Accuracy ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Experimental Group

This research used the quasi-experimental design to investigate the effects of immediate vs. delayed oral corrective feedback (CF) on the writing accuracy of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. A Nelson English Language Test (section 200 A) was used to homogenize three classes, two of which then were randomly assigned to experimental group and one to control group. During the treatment, the experimental group 1 received immediate oral CF through a face-to-face negotiation between the teacher and each individual after an error was made by a learner. The experimental group 2 received delayed oral CF in which learners received oral CF some time after an error was made by a learner. The control group received direct correction. After a 16-session treatment, the results of the post-test indicated a significant difference between the three groups.

Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and feedback exposure conditions

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-48
Author(s):  
Takehiro Iizuka ◽  
Kimi Nakatsukasa
Keyword(s):  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oral Corrective Feedback ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Picture Description ◽  
Potential Factors ◽  
Implicit And Explicit ◽  
Instructional Settings ◽  
The Impact

This exploratory study examined the impact of implicit and explicit oral corrective feedback (CF) on the development of implicit and explicit knowledge of Japanese locative particles (activity de, movement ni and location ni) for those who directly received CF and those who observed CF in the classroom. Thirty-six college students in a beginning Japanese language course received either recast (implicit), metalinguistic (explicit) or no feedback during an information-gap picture description activity, and completed a timed picture description test (implicit knowledge) and an untimed grammaticality judgement test (explicit knowledge) in a pre-test, immediate post-test and delayed post-test. The results showed that overall there was no significant difference between CF types, and that CF benefited direct and indirect recipients similarly. Potential factors that might influence the effectiveness of CF, such as instructional settings, complexity of target structures and pedagogy styles, are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document