scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING INVENTORY (CPSI) BERBASIS WEB UNTUK MENGUKUR KETERAMPILAN KOLABORASI DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Ika Sukmawati ◽  
Karunia Galih Permadani

Abstrak. Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) adalah salah satu keterampilan penting abad ke-21. Keterampilan ini juga merupakan keterampilan yang harus ditanamkan pada siswa dalam pembelajaran. Pengukuran CPS dapat dilakukan dengan menggunakan instrument berupa inventory. Dalam penelitian ini, dikembangkan Collaborative Problem Solving Inventory (CPSI) berbasis web dengan metode pengembangan Learning Development Cycle (LDC). CPSI yang dikembangkan oleh penyusun merupakan pengukuran terhadap Collaborative Problem Solving yang inovatif, menekankan pada pengukuran sebelum, selama dan sesudah kegiatan pembelajaran Collaborative Problem Solving dilakukan. Tahapan penelitian ini meliputi: (1) Observasi, Survei dan Analisis Kebutuhan; (2) Focus Group Discussion; (3) Penyusunan Desain CPSI; (4) Pengembangan CPSI Berbasis Web melalui Model Pengembangan LDC; (5) Validasi CPSI oleh ahli pengembang bahan ajar (kelayakan) dan guru (kepraktisan); dan (6) Analisis Data. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian didapatkan instrumen CPSI berbasis web dengan indikator penilaian keterampilan kolaborasi yang telah divalidasi oleh ahli dan praktisi. Hasil validasi menunjukkan bahwa instrumen layak digunakan dengan perbaikan kecil (validitas 3,75 oleh ahli media; validitas 3,78 oleh ahli evaluasi; dan rerata 3,65 oleh praktisi). Tindak lanjut penelitian dapat dilakukan dengan mengujicobakan instrumen dalam situasi pembelajaran di kelas, dengan terlebih dahulu melakukan perbaikan terkait kemenarikan tampilan dan desain website.Abstract. Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) is one of the essential skills of the 21st century. This skill is also must be instilled in students in learning process. CPS can be gauged by using an instrument in the form of inventory. In this study, a web-based Collaborative Problem Solving Inventory (CPSI) was developed with the Learning Development Cycle (LDC) development method. The CPSI developed by the authors is a measurement of innovative Collaborative Problem Solving, emphasizing on measurements before, during and after Collaborative Problem Solving learning activities are carried out. The stages of this research include: (1) Observation, Survey and Needs Analysis; (2) Focus Group Discussion; (3) Preparation of CPSI Design; (4) Development of Web-Based CPSI through LDC Development Model; (5) CPSI validation by experts in developing teaching materials (feasibility) and teachers (practical); and (6) Data Analysis. Based on the results of the study, it was obtained that the CPSI instrument was web-based with indicators for assessing collaboration skills that had been validated by experts and practitioners. The validation results showed that the instrument is feasible to use with minor improvements (validity 3.75 by media experts; validity 3.78 by evaluation experts; and mean 3.65 by practitioners). Follow-up research can be done by testing the instrument in a classroom learning situation, by first making improvements related to the attractiveness of the appearance and website design.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Tassaneewon Lertcharoenrit

This classroom action research aims to investigate the development of collaborative problem-solving competencies using STEM-based learning through dietary plan lessons. The participants included 77 twelfth-grade students in the 2018 academic year in the science-technology program in a public school under the supervision of the Ministry of University Affairs. Two types of instruments were used in the study: 1) ten lesson plans of the biomolecules unit equivalent to eighteen lesson periods; 2) data collection instruments, including collaborative problem-solving competencies observation sheets, students’ learning reflections, and informal interview protocols. The data analysis involved frequencies, percentages, and content analysis. The results of the study revealed that the students improved all three competencies. Regarding the first competency, “Establishing and Maintaining Shared Understanding,” the students were accustomed to having a dominant member assigning the task while other members passively followed the orders. When they encountered a problem, each member individually solved it or asked the teachers for help without a group discussion. However, after the instruction, the students improved their communication skills by discussing the task processes with the other group members. Moreover, when a problem occurred, they approached it as a shared responsibility instead of as an individual’s duty. Therefore, the problem was collectively sorted out and successfully solved. In terms of the second competency, “Taking Appropriate Action to Solve the Problem,” the students had previously been assigned their roles by the group leaders without consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of each member, resulting in an unsuccessful task. After the instruction, everyone became more collaborative in considering the task at hand and discussed the role that best suited each member. When they encountered a problem, everyone collectively planned the appropriate steps toward the solution. With regard to the third competency, “Establishing and Maintaining Team Organization,” the students had not previously reflected on their performance, but after the activities, they learned to provide feedback to improve other members’ understanding and carry out the task more efficiently. A challenge that emerged in implementing the activities involved the time issue. It is important to manage time effectively and to challenge the students to collaboratively solve the problem. The instructional activities should be conducted continuously by rotating students into new groups where they can practice their teamwork skills with others. Moreover, the collaborative problem-solving activities are found to be applicable not only for a STEM-based approach but also for a project-based approach.


Author(s):  
Sridadi Pudjo Suparto

Abstrak: Evaluasi Program E-Learning bagi Petugas Lapangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pengembangan e-learning dalam program KB dengan menggunakan model evaluasi Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) oleh Stufflebeam. Data yang diperoleh dengan menggunakan guided interview, focus group discussion dan studi dokumentasi tentang pengembangan e-learning. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan hal-hal sebagai berikut. (1) Prinsip-prinsip dan rasional mengapa e-learning perlu dibangun dalam sistem belajar program KB telah dapat diidentifikasi dan telah dapat dibuktikan kesiapan tentang sistem dan komitmen yang mendukung pengembangan e-learing tersebut. (2) Penyesuaianpenyesuaian perlu dilakukan dalam sistem pelatihan, aplikasi dari organisasi belajar, tim pengembang e-learning, strategi e-learning, desain dan standard bahan pembelajaran, jaringan, bandwith, peralatan, serta dana untuk mendukung proses interaktif dalam belajar. (3) Perlu pemahaman dari organisasi tentang diperlukannya dukungan tambahan jaringan dan bandwith dalam belajar. (4) Perlu pemahaman dari sistem lokal tentang faktor-faktor teknis untuk memperbaiki proses belajar, meningkatkan kecepatan, dan menghindari masalah-masalah teknis yang lain selama proses interaksi. Kata Kunci: e-learning, pengembangan, evaluasi Abstract: An Evaluation of the E-learning Program for Field Workers. This study was aimed to improve the effectiveness of the e-learning development in the family planning program using the CIPP evaluation model.The data were collected through guided interviews, focus group discussion and documentation. The findings of the study showed the followings. (1) The principles and rationales of the e-learning development could be identified from the readiness of the system and the commitment to support the e-learning development, (2) Adjustments needed to be done in the training system, the application of the learning organization, the e-learning development team, e-learning strategies, the design and standard of the teaching materials, the network, bandwidth, equipment, and budget to support the interactive process in learning. (3) The organization needed to understand about the required support in the form of extra network and bandwidth. (4) The local system needed to understand about the technical factors to improve the learning process, the speed, and to avoid other technical problems in the interaction process. Keywords: e-learning, development, evaluation


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liru Hu ◽  
Gaowei Chen

According to the complex dynamic systems (CDS) perspective, learning emerges at various system levels. This study built a coherent theoretical framework based on CDS and Bakhtinian dialogic theory and further employed the concept of attractor (i.e., certain stable states that recur over time) in CDS theory to investigate the trajectories of idea emergence and how they diversified group outcomes in dialogic collaborative problem solving (D-CPS). Two contrasting groups were compared using visual and qualitative analysis approaches. The analysis based on idea tree diagrams showed that new ideas emergent in group discussion tended to attract local utterances and performed features of attractors in CDS in both high-performing and low-performing groups. The analysis based on idea hierarchy diagrams revealed how ideas emerged at various system levels. It was also found that status problems were likely to affect the functioning of regulative feedback loops, which might give rise to different structures of idea evolution. This study proposed CDS theory as an alternative perspective, augmented by the ethical considerations of Bakhtinian dialogism, for examining the dynamics of D-CPS.


Vidya Karya ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Binar Kurnia Prahani ◽  
Mohammad Nur ◽  
Leny Yuanita ◽  
Iqbal Limatahu

Abstract: Result of a preliminary study showed that in general the collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence of students of SMA Negeri 19 Surabaya, SMAN 1 Tegaldlimo, MA Roudlotun Nasyin Mojokerto are still low. Therefore, researchers developed a model instructional group science learning to enhance collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence. The purpose of this research is to get validity of Group Science Learning (GSL) developed to improve collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence. Methods of data collection validation using Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Group science learning model developed needs to be validated by experts through Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Group science learning model assessed the validity of the learning model based on content validity and construct validity. Results of the validation by experts through focus group discussions indicate that group science learning model to improve the collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence in this study are included in the category of very valid. This group science learning model can be implemented in learning to improve the collaborative problem solving skills, science process skills, and confidence. Keywords:  content validity, construct validity,  and group science learning model  Abstrak: Hasil studi awal menunjukkan bahwa secara umum keterampilan pemecahan masalah kolaboratif, keterampilan proses sains, dan kepercayaan diri siswa SMA Negeri 19 Surabaya, SMA Negeri 1 Tegaldlimo, MA Roudlotun Nasyin Mojokerto masih rendah. Oleh karena itu peneliti bermaksud mengembangkan model group science learning. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendapatkan validitas model Group Science Learning  yang dikembangkan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah kolaboratif, keterampilan proses sains, dan kepercayaan diri. Metode pengumpulan data validasi menggunakan Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Validitas model pembelajaran Group Science Learning dinilai berdasarkan validitas isi dan validitas konstruk. Hasil validasi oleh pakar melalui FGD menunjukkan bahwa model Group Science Learning untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah kolaboratif, keterampilan proses sains, dan kepercayaan diri dalam penelitian ini termasuk dalam kategori sangat valid. Model Group Science Learning dapat diimplementasikan dalam pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah kolaboratif, keterampilan proses sains, dan kepercayaan diri.Kata Kunci: Validitas isi, validitas konstruk,  dan group science learning model


Vidya Karya ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nasir ◽  
Madlazim Madlazim ◽  
I Gusti Made Sanjaya

Abstract. The initial research showed that in general, the problem solving skills and students’ metacognition in several secondary high schools in Samarinda such as SMAN 8, Kunjang, SMAN 14 Loa Bakung, SMAN 3 Ulu, and SMAN 10  Seberang are still low.  Therefore, the researcher intend to develop physics metacognition learning model to improve problem solving skills and students’ metacognition. This study aims to develop physics metacognition learning model to increase problem solving skills and students’ metacognition. The data collection method used Focus Group Discussion (FGD. The validity of the model was evaluated based on content and construct validity. Validation result by expert showed that physics metacognition learning model and the learning devices can be categorized as valid. The physics metacognition learning model can be implemented in physics to increase problem solving skill and students’ metacognition.  Keywords: content validity, construct validity, physics metacognition learning model Abstrak. Hasil studi awal menunjukkan bahwa secara umum, keterampilan pemecahan masalah dan metakognisi siswa SMA Negeri 8 Sungai Kunjang Samarinda, SMA Negeri 14 Loa Bakung, SMA Negeri 3 Samarinda Ulu, dan SMA Negeri 10 Samarinda Seberang masih rendah. Oleh karena itu peneliti bermaksud mengembangkan model physics metacognition learning. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan model physics metacognition learning untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah dan metakognisi siswa. Metode pengumpulan data validasi menggunakan Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Validitas model pembelajaran physics metacognition learning dinilai berdasarkan validitas isi dan validitas konstruk. Hasil validasi oleh pakar melalui FGD menunjukkan bahwa model physics metacognition learning dan perangkatnya untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah dan metakognisi siswa dalam penelitian ini termasuk dalam kategori valid. Model physics metacognition learning dapat diimplementasikan dalam pembelajaran fisika  untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah, dan metakognisi siswa. Kata Kunci: Validitas isi, validitas konstruk, dan model physics metacognition learning


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emile Taylor Welty ◽  
◽  
Ann Yoachim ◽  
Austin Hogans ◽  
◽  
...  

Academic design-build programs offer a method of teaching that outperforms conventional architecture pedagogy. Design build learning outcomes including those focused on complexity and collaborative problem solving offer transferable lessons that young designers can take with them into the profession. This is a baseline assumption our university’s community design center has operated under for fourteen years, an assumption based on academic writings, antidote, and personal experience. With hundreds of alumni now in practice, we used a web-based survey instrument to test these assumptions and assess the outcomes of the design-build mode of education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document