How Translators Affect the Experience and Healthcare of Primary Spanish-Speaking Patients in the Trauma Department

Background and Objective: The trauma bay is a fast-paced environment where comprehension of medical jargon is difficult even for native English-speaking patients. For Spanish-speaking patients, the presence, and use of the translating tools in hospitals may change the course and/or quality of their care, especially in a trauma setting. Our objective was to gather information and perspectives of Spanish-speaking patients in the trauma bay and subsequent hospitalization. This pilot study determined if there were constant themes. Methods: In this pilot qualitative study, we successfully recruited three adult primary Spanish-speaking patients admitted to the trauma service for at least twenty-four hours in July 2021 at an urban academic level I trauma center. Spanish only in-person semi-structured interviews were used to gather patient’s perspectives, with data supplemented from electronic health records and trauma registries. The interview was transcribed in Spanish, translated to English, coded, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Although recruitment occurred at both hospitals, this study includes only three patients admitted at IU Health Methodist. All three were males aged 22-37 years from Latin America. Blunt injuries occurred in two with injury severity scores (ISS) ranging from 5-11 while the third had penetrating injuries with an ISS of 10. Several themes have emerged. All patients felt they did not have autonomy or empowerment in their care. It was found that the healthcare team decided who received a translator. Two of the patients had a lack of understanding in their traumatic injuries. One patient relied on his partner for translating, even though a translator was provided. Conclusions: These results suggest that Spanish-speaking trauma patients lack autonomy, empowerment, and understanding their medical conditions. Further interviews need to be conducted in order to strengthen the perspective of a Spanish-speaking trauma patient’s care.

Download Full-text

35. Emergency Medical Services Use of Trauma Triage Criteria to Stratify Patients by Injury Severity and Need for Emergent Intervention

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine ◽

10.1017/s1049023x00045702 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 11 (S2) ◽

pp. S32-S32

Author(s):

Robert E. O'Connor ◽

Glen H. Tinkoff ◽

Susan Mascioli ◽

Ross E. Megargel

Keyword(s):

Injury Severity ◽

Vital Signs ◽

Penetrating Trauma ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Chi Square ◽

Probability Of Survival ◽

Trauma Service ◽

Severity Scores ◽

Serious Injury ◽

Level I

Purpose: Prehospital triage criteria (PTC) have been used to classify patients according to risk of serious injury. This study was conducted determine whether PTC could be used to identify serious injury, the need for intensive care (ICU), or immediate operative intervention (IOI).Methods: Data for this observational study were gathered prospectively, at a level-I trauma center, from a patient cohort admitted to the trauma service from 01 February to 31 July 1995. Specific triage criteria, based on information given by EMS prior to arrival were used to categorize patients by severity. Patients classified as most serious (codes) had the following: shock, major anatomic injury or proximal penetrating trauma. Patients classified as more serious (alerts) had one of the following: abnormal vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale <13, moderate anatomic injury, high-risk mechanism of injury, or co-morbid factors. Patients not meeting either set of criteria, but were admitted, served as controls (consults). Injury severity scores (ISS) and probability of survival (Probsurvival) were calculated for each patient. The percentage admitted to the ICU, operating room (OR), or requiring IOI, were tabulated. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, Mest and chi-square.

Download Full-text

Impact of Acute Care General Surgery Coverage by Trauma Surgeons on the Trauma Patient

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313480807400607 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 74 (6) ◽

pp. 494-502 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Paul J. Schenarts ◽

Sachin V. Phade ◽

Claudia E. Goettler ◽

Brett H. Waibel ◽

Steven C. Agle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Trauma Patient ◽

Acute Care ◽

General Surgery ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Trauma Service ◽

Severity Scores ◽

Trauma Surgeons ◽

The Impact

Although acute care general surgery (ACS) coverage by trauma surgeons may help re-invigorate the field of trauma surgery, introducing additional responsibilities to an already overburdened system may negatively impact the trauma patient. Our purpose was to determine the impact on the trauma patient of a progressive integration of ACS coverage into a trauma service. Data from a university, Level I trauma registry was retrospectively reviewed to compare demographics, injury severity, complications, and outcomes over a 6-year period. During this study period, the trauma service treated only trauma patients for 32 months, then added ACS coverage 2 days per week for 32 months, and then expanded to 4 days per week coverage for 9 months. Trauma patients admitted during periods of ACS coverage were not different with respect to gender, mechanism of injury, Revised Trauma Score, or Glasgow Coma Score; however, they were slightly older and had slightly higher injury severity scores. As ACS coverage progressively increased, trauma patients had an increase in ventilator days ( P < 0.0001), intensive care unit length of stay ( P < 0.0001), and hospital length of stay ( P < 0.0001). Occurrences of neurologic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and infectious complications were similar during all three time periods, whereas cardiac and renal complications progressively increased after ACS coverage was added. Mortality remained unchanged after ACS integration.

Download Full-text

Urban Bicyclist Trauma: Characterizing the Injuries, Consequent Surgeries, and Essential Sub-Specialties Providing Care

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481708300111 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 83 (1) ◽

pp. 16-22

Author(s):

Elizabeth Warnack ◽

Jessica Heyer ◽

Monica Sethi ◽

Manish Tandon ◽

Charles Dimaggio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Injury Severity ◽

Operative Management ◽

The United States ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Emergency Department Care ◽

Lower Extremity Injuries ◽

Trauma Service ◽

Surgical Subspecialty ◽

Severity Scores ◽

Extremity Injuries

In the United States in 2013, nearly 500,000 bicyclists were injured and required emergency department care. The objectives of this study were to describe the types of injuries which urban bicyclists sustain, to analyze the number and type of surgeries required, and to better delineate the services providing care. This is an observational study of injured bicyclists presenting to a Level I trauma center between February 2012 and August 2014. Most data were collected within 24 hours of injury and included demographics, narrative description of the incident, results of initial imaging studies, Injury Severity Score, admission status, length of stay, surgical procedure, and admitting and discharging service. A total of 706 injured bicyclists were included in the study, and 187 bicyclists (26.4%) required hospital admission. Of those admitted, 69 (36.8%) required surgery. There was no difference in gender between those who required surgery and those who did not (P = 0.781). Those who required surgery were older (mean age 39.1 vs 34.1, P = 0.003). Patients requiring surgery had higher Abbreviated Injury Scores for head (P ≤ 0.001), face (P ≤ 0.001), abdomen (P = 0.012), and extremity (P ≤ 0.001) and higher mean Injury Severity Scores (12.6 vs 3.7, P < 0.001). Sixty-nine patients required surgery and were brought to the operating room 82 times for 89 distinct procedures. Lower extremity injuries were the reason for 43 (48.3%) procedures, upper extremity injuries for 14 (15.7%), and facial injuries for 15 (16.9%). Orthopedic surgery performed 50 (56.2%) procedures, followed by plastic surgery (15 procedures; 16.8%). Trauma surgeons performed five (5.6%) procedures in four patients. The majority of admitted patients were admitted and discharged by the trauma service (70.1%, 56.7%, respectively) followed by the orthopedics service (13.9%, 19.8%, respectively). Injured bicyclists represent a unique subset of trauma patients. Orthopedic surgeons are most commonly involved in their operative management and rarely are the operative skills of a general traumatologist required. From a resource perspective, it is more efficient to direct the inpatient care of bicyclists with single-system trauma to the appropriate surgical subspecialty service soon after appropriate initial evaluation and treatment by the trauma service.

Download Full-text

Trauma resource pit stop: increasing efficiency in the evaluation of lower severity trauma patients

Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open ◽

10.1136/tsaco-2020-000670 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. e000670

Author(s):

Imad S Dandan ◽

Gail T Tominaga ◽

Frank Z Zhao ◽

Kathryn B Schaffer ◽

Fady S Nasrallah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Injury Severity ◽

Diagnostic Testing ◽

Trauma Team ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Evaluation Time ◽

Retrospective Comparison ◽

Trauma Bay

BackgroundOvertriage of trauma patients is unavoidable and requires effective use of hospital resources. A ‘pit stop’ (PS) was added to our lowest tier trauma resource (TR) triage protocol where the patient stops in the trauma bay for immediate evaluation by the emergency department (ED) physician and trauma nursing. We hypothesized this would allow for faster diagnostic testing and disposition while decreasing cost.MethodsWe performed a before/after retrospective comparison after PS implementation. Patients not meeting trauma activation (TA) criteria but requiring trauma center evaluation were assigned as a TR for an expedited PS evaluation. A board-certified ED physician and trauma/ED nurse performed an immediate assessment in the trauma bay followed by performance of diagnostic studies. Trauma surgeons were readily available in case of upgrade to TA. We compared patient demographics, Injury Severity Score, time to physician evaluation, time to CT scan, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Comparisons were made using 95% CI for variance and SD and unpaired t-tests for two-tailed p values, with statistical difference, p<0.05.ResultsThere were 994 TAs and 474 TRs in the first 9 months after implementation. TR’s preanalysis versus postanalysis of the TR group shows similar mean door to physician evaluation times (6.9 vs. 8.6 minutes, p=0.1084). Mean door to CT time significantly decreased (67.7 vs. 50 minutes, p<0.001). 346 (73%) TR patients were discharged from ED; 2 (0.4%) were upgraded on arrival. When admitted, TR patients were older (61.4 vs. 47.2 years, p<0.0001) and more often involved in a same-level fall (59.5% vs. 20.1%, p<0.0001). Undertriage was calculated using the Cribari matrix at 3.2%.DiscussionPS implementation allowed for faster door to CT time for trauma patients not meeting activation criteria without mobilizing trauma team resources. This approach is safe, feasible, and simultaneously decreases hospital cost while improving allocation of trauma team resources.Level of evidenceLevel II, economic/decision therapeutic/care management study.

Download Full-text

Non-Selective Thoracic Computed Tomography in Trauma Patients Results in Injury Severity Score Inflation

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/00031348211024973 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 000313482110249

Author(s):

Leonardo Alaniz ◽

Omaer Muttalib ◽

Juan Hoyos ◽

Cesar Figueroa ◽

Cristobal Barrios

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Injury Severity Score ◽

Severity Score ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Treatment Plan ◽

Mortality Prediction ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Mortality Benefit ◽

Severity Scores ◽

Score Inflation

Introduction Extensive research relying on Injury Severity Scores (ISS) reports a mortality benefit from routine non-selective thoracic CTs (an integral part of pan-computed tomography (pan-CT)s). Recent research suggests this mortality benefit may be artifact. We hypothesized that the use of pan-CTs inflates ISS categorization in patients, artificially affecting admission rates and apparent mortality benefit. Methods Eight hundred and eleven patients were identified with an ISS >15 with significant findings in the chest area. Patient charts were reviewed and scores were adjusted to exclude only occult injuries that did not affect treatment plan. Pearson chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression were used to compare adjusted cases vs non-adjusted cases. Results After adjusting for inflation, 388 (47.8%) patients remained in the same ISS category, 378 (46.6%) were reclassified into 1 lower ISS category, and 45 (5.6%) patients were reclassified into 2 lower ISS categories. Patients reclassified by 1 category had a lower rate of mortality ( P < 0.001), lower median total hospital LOS ( P < .001), ICU days ( P < .001), and ventilator days ( P = 0.008), compared to those that remained in the same ISS category. Conclusion Injury Severity Score inflation artificially increases survival rate, perpetuating the increased use of pan-CTs. This artifact has been propagated by outdated mortality prediction calculation methods. Thus, prospective evaluations of algorithms for more selective CT scanning are warranted.

Download Full-text

Traumatic respiratory failure and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

Perfusion ◽

10.1177/02676591211012840 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 026765912110128

Author(s):

Ismael A Salas De Armas ◽

Bindu Akkanti ◽

Pratik B Doshi ◽

Manish Patel ◽

Sachin Kumar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Respiratory Failure ◽

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Ecmo Support ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Membrane Oxygenation ◽

Trauma Service ◽

Proper Patient Selection ◽

Vv Ecmo

Background: Respiratory failure (RF) is a common cause of death and morbid complication in trauma patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in adults with RF refractory to invasive mechanical ventilation. However, use of ECMO remains limited for this patient population as they often have contraindications for anticoagulation. Study design: Medical records were retroactively searched for all adult patients who were admitted to the trauma service and received veno-venous ECMO (VV ECMO) support between June 2015 and August 2018. Survival to discharge and ECMO-related complications were collected and analyzed. Results: Fifteen patients from a large Level I trauma center met the criteria. The median PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 53.0 (IQR, 27.0–76.0), median injury severity score was 34.0 (IQR, 27.0–43.0), and the median duration of ECMO support was 11 days (IQR, 7.5–20.0). For this cohort, the survival-to-discharge rate was 87% (13/15). The incidence of neurologic complications was 13%, and deep vein thrombosis was reported in two cases (13%). Conclusions: Survival rates of trauma patients in this study are equivalent to, or may exceed, those of non-trauma patients who receive ECMO support for other types of RF. With the employment of a multidisciplinary team assessment and proper patient selection, early cannulation, traumatic RF may be safely supported with VV ECMO in experienced centers.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of Microvascular Perfusion and Resuscitation after Severe Injury

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481508101231 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 81 (12) ◽

pp. 1272-1278 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yann-Leei L. Lee ◽

Jon D. Simmons ◽

Mark N. Gillespie ◽

Diego F. Alvarez ◽

Richard P. Gonzalez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Injury Severity ◽

Capillary Flow ◽

Severe Trauma ◽

Dark Field ◽

Serum Lactate ◽

Microvascular Perfusion ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Sidestream Dark Field ◽

Trauma Population ◽

Severity Scores

Achieving adequate perfusion is a key goal of treatment in severe trauma; however, tissue perfusion has classically been measured by indirect means. Direct visualization of capillary flow has been applied in sepsis, but application of this technology to the trauma population has been limited. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the efficacy of standard indirect measures of perfusion to direct imaging of the sublingual microcirculatory flow during trauma resuscitation. Patients with injury severity scores >15 were serially examined using a handheld sidestream dark-field video microscope. In addition, measurements were also made from healthy volunteers. The De Backer score, a morphometric capillary density score, and total vessel density (TVD) as cumulative vessel area within the image, were calculated using Automated Vascular Analysis (AVA3.0) software. These indices were compared against clinical and laboratory parameters of organ function and systemic metabolic status as well as mortality. Twenty severely injured patients had lower TVD (X = 14.6 ± 0.22 vs 17.66 ± 0.51) and De Backer scores (X = 9.62 ± 0.16 vs 11.55 ± 0.37) compared with healthy controls. These scores best correlated with serum lactate (TVD R2 = 0.525, De Backer R2 = 0.576, P < 0.05). Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, pH, bicarbonate, base deficit, hematocrit, and coagulation parameters correlated poorly with both TVD and De Backer score. Direct measurement of sublingual microvascular perfusion is technically feasible in trauma patients, and seems to provide real-time assessment of micro-circulatory perfusion. This study suggests that in severe trauma, many indirect measurements of perfusion do not correlate with microvascular perfusion. However, visualized perfusion deficiencies do reflect a shift toward anaerobic metabolism.

Download Full-text

Predictors of blunt diaphragm injury in Australia

Trauma ◽

10.1177/14604086211041857 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 146040862110418

Author(s):

Annelise M Cocco ◽

Vignesh Ratnaraj ◽

Benjamin PT Loveday ◽

Kellie Gumm ◽

Phillip Antippa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Injury Severity Score ◽

Severity Score ◽

Major Trauma ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Rib Fractures ◽

Organ Injury ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Missed Injury ◽

Diaphragm Injury ◽

Trauma Service

Introduction Blunt diaphragm injury (BDI) is an uncommon, potentially fatal consequence of blunt torso injury. While associations between BDI and other factors such as mechanism of injury or other injuries have been described elsewhere, little recent research has been done in Australia into BDI. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence rate of BDI in our centre, identify how it was diagnosed, determine rates of missed injury and identify predictive factors for BDI. The hypothesis was that patients with BDI would significantly differ to those without BDI. Methods All major trauma patients with blunt torso injuries at our Level 1 major trauma service from 2010 to 2018 were included. Data for patient demographics, other injuries, diagnosis and treatment of BDI were extracted. Patients with BDI were compared with patients without BDI in order to identify differences that could be used to predict BDI in future patients. Results Of 5190 patients with a blunt torso injury, 51 (0.98%) had a BDI at a mean age of 53 ± 19.6 years, and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 27(IQR 21–38.5) compared with 5139 patients with a mean age of 48.2 ± 20.7 years and median ISS of 21.9(IQR 14–26) who did not have a BDI. The diagnosis of BDI was made at CT ( n = 35), surgery ( n = 14) or autopsy ( n = 2). Blunt diaphragm injury was missed on index imaging for 11 of 43 patients (25.6%). On multivariate analysis, each point increase in ISS (OR 1.03, p = 0.02); rib fractures (OR 4.65, p = 0.004); splenic injury (OR 2.60, p = 0.004); and liver injury (OR 2.78, p = 0.003) were independently associated with BDI. Conclusion Injury Severity Score, rib fractures and solid abdominal organ injury increase the likelihood of BDI. In patients with these injuries, BDI should be considered even in the presence of normal CT findings.

Download Full-text

Suburban geriatric trauma: the experiences of a level I trauma center

American Journal of Critical Care ◽

10.4037/ajcc1995.4.5.379 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 4 (5) ◽

pp. 379-382 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

F DeKeyser ◽

D Carolan ◽

A Trask

Keyword(s):

Trauma Center ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Injury Severity ◽

The Elderly ◽

Mortality Rates ◽

Geriatric Trauma ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Younger Patients ◽

Severity Scores ◽

Trauma Scores

BACKGROUND: As the mean age of the US population increases, so does the incidence of geriatric trauma. Investigators have shown that the elderly have high morbidity and mortality rates associated with traumatic injuries. OBJECTIVE: To compare the severity of injury, mortality, and functional outcomes of geriatric patients with younger patients admitted to a suburban trauma center. METHOD: A convenience sample of trauma patients who were 65 years old or older was compared with trauma patients who were 35 to 45 and 55 to 64 years old. Demographic data, injury data, Injury Severity Scores, Revised Trauma Scores, length of stay, and functional ability outcomes were abstracted from a trauma registry in aggregate form and then analyzed. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 766 subjects (age 35-45, n = 223; age 55-64, n = 135; age 65 and older, n = 408) with a mean age of 64.6 years. A larger percentage of the elderly were victims of falls; younger trauma patients were more likely to be victims of motor vehicle crashes. Significant differences were found between age groups on Glasgow Coma Scale scores. Revised Trauma Scores, and length of stay. Significant differences were not found on Injury Severity Scores, mortality rates, or functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although anatomic injury severity of elderly patients was similar to that of younger patients, the elderly demonstrated greater physiologic compromise and longer hospital stays. Mortality rates were lower for the elderly group, but this result might be because a larger proportion of elderly patients were hospitalized with minor or moderate injuries.

Download Full-text

Trauma Attending Physician Continuity: Does it Make a Difference?

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481007600110 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 76 (1) ◽

pp. 48-54

Author(s):

David G. Jacobs ◽

Jennifer L. Sarafin ◽

Karen E. Head ◽

A Britt Christmas ◽

Toan Huynh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Trauma Service ◽

Retrospective Comparison ◽

Scale Scores ◽

Attending Physician

Continuity of care is important in achieving optimal outcomes in trauma patients, but the optimal length of the trauma attending (TA) rotation is unknown. We hypothesize that longer TA rotations provide greater continuity, and therefore improve outcomes. We did a retrospective comparison of trauma patient outcomes from two consecutive 6-month periods during which we transitioned from a 1-month TA rotation to a 1-week TA rotation. The Wilcoxon rank sum test, and the χ2 were used for statistical analysis. Over the 12-month study period 1924 patients were admitted to the Trauma Service. The two groups were similar with regard to age, gender, injury mechanism, Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Scale scores, and Abbreviated Injury Scores for the chest, abdomen, and extremities. Although mortality, patient charges, and violations of the standard of care were similar between the two groups, overall morbidity was lower (18.6% vs 23.2%), and hospital length of stay higher (9.07 days vs 8.41 days) in the 1-week TA group compared with the 1-month TA group. A one-week TA rotation was associated with a longer hospital length of stay, but improved morbidity. Longer TA rotations do not necessarily provide improved continuity or improved outcomes.

Download Full-text