scholarly journals Drug utilization study in medicine intensive care unit in tertiary care hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Siddharth Suryakant Athawale ◽  
Madhuri D. Kulkarni
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Potassium Clavulanate ◽  
Medical Intensive Care ◽  
The Mean

Background: The medical intensive care unit (MICU) is a setting were patients who are critically ill are admitted and thus usually receive a large number of drugs of different pharmacological classes due to life threatening illnesses which may be fatal. The various drugs used in MICU and there clinical outcome was investigated in this study.Methods: Patients admitted between January 2017 to June 2018 in Medicine ICU of GMC Aurangabad were included in this study.Results: Total of 351 prescriptions was analyzed from the medicine intensive care unit. Out of 351 patients 243 (69.23%) were male, while 108 (30.77%) were female. The mean age of the patients admitted in MICU was 42.78±18.14 years. The most common type of patients admitted in MICU have the diagnosis of organophosphorous poisoning (25.36%), followed by cerebrovascular accident (15.95%), pneumonitis (10.26%), snake bite (7.12%), chronic kidney disease (5.98%), diabetic ketoacidosis (5.70%) and seizure disorder (3.42%). The most common drugs used were ranitidine (99.71%) and ondansetron (99.43%). Among antibiotics cephalosporins were most commonly used, ceftriaxone (39.03%), cefotaxim (40.46%), cefoperazone and sulbactum (24.22%). Other antibiotics most commonly used were metronidazole (61.25%), amoxicillin and potassium clavulanate (26.78%), piperacillin and tazobactum (11.68%), meropenem (11.40%).Conclusions: In conclusion, we found that in MICU utilization rate of gastroprotective (ranitidine), antiemetic (ondansetron) and antibiotics (cephalosporins) was high. The present study provides valuable insight about the overall pattern of drugs used in medicine intensive care unit.

scholarly journals Non-Invasive Ventilation in a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) with Respiratory Failure: Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (Number 1) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
S Hoque ◽  
ASM N U Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Mean

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has now become an integral tool within the treatment of both acute and chronic respiratory failure, and at an equivalent time reducing the necessity for invasive ventilation. A cross sectional, retrospective study based on a retrospective review of hospital medical records of patients who underwent NIV in the period between January 2017 and December 2019, to determinate the efficacy of NIV in pediatrics whom admitted to Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with respiratory failure (short term evaluation), demographic and clinical data were collected before and after applying the NIV. The data included heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen concentration (P02) and CO2 concentration (PCO2). NIV was used for a total of 61 pediatric patients admitted to PICU during the period of the study. Pneumonia was the commonest indication for the NIV (n=25, 41.0%), and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was used in 52(85.2%) patients. The mean duration of NIV was 817.2 days, there was a significant clinical improvement after one hour from application of NIV The mean improvement in RR was from 48.412.2 to 35.01I.5 (P=0.000), SPO2 was improved from 88.111.8 to 96.510.7 (P= 0.000), and the PCO2 was improved from 61.4±6.1 to 48.713 7 (P=0.002). Five patients were failing to respond to the NIV and shifted to mechanical ventilation. The NIV is a useful tool for treatment of respiratory failure in pediatrics, especially under the age of one year. Pneumonia was the commonest indication for the use of the NB!. More investigation is needed to fully evaluate the ramifications of increased use of this technology in the PICU.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document