scholarly journals Comparative study of oral PGE 1 and intracervical PGE2 gel for pre-induction cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes >37 weeks gestational age

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1801
Author(s):  
Alka N. Nadar ◽  
Sirisha P. S. R. N. S.
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Successful Induction ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Mean Time

Background: Active induction of labour in prelabour rupture of membranes resulted in a lower risk of maternal and fetal sepsis as compared to conservative management. Pre-induction cervical ripening helps in successful induction of labour.in this study we have compared the efficacy of low dose 25 mcg oral misoprostol versus intracervical PGE2 gel for cervical ripening in term PROM patients.Methods: Women with pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks gestational age presenting with PROM at term and a Bishop score of 4 or less were randomly assigned to receive either a 25-mcg oral misoprostol every 4-hourly interval or 3 applications of intracervical PGE2 gel at a 6-hour interval for effective cervical ripening. Oxytocin was initiated if labor had not started after 6 hours of last effective dose of prostaglandin.Results: Fifty-three women (75.73%) (n = 70) in the oral misoprostol group with 2 doses, 4 hours apart had successful cervical ripening within 8 hours in comparison to sixty-two women (88.58%) (n = 70) in the intracervical PGE2 gel group with 2 doses, 6 hrs apart approximately 12 hrs for successful ripening. (p = 0.021). Oral misoprostol group needed shorter mean duration interval for the Bishop score <4 to >6 than intracervical PGE2 gel group, 7.84±3.64 hours and 9.39±4.20 hours respectively (p = 0.022). Similarly, the mean time duration interval from ruptured membranes to vaginal delivery in oral misoprostol was shorter i.e. 12.60±3.78 hours versus 14.66±4.08 hours (p = 0.005).Conclusions: Low dose 25 mcg oral misoprostol is a safe, efficacious and better tolerated alternative to intracervical PGE2 gel for pre-induction cervical ripening in especially in PROM patients at term.

Effectiveness of Sequential Low Dose Oral Misoprostol Solution for Induction of Labor: An Experience in a Thai Quaternary Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-653
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Labor Induction ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Oral Misoprostol

Background: Siriraj Hospital has seen remarkably high cesarean section rates during the last decade. A labor induction protocol has been established to reduce cesarean section rate from “failed induction”. Objective: To determine effectiveness of a sequential low dose misoprostol solution protocol for labor induction. Cervical ripening and vaginal delivery rates, pregnancy outcomes, and associated factors of successful vaginal delivery were determined. Materials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective observational study. Medical records of women with a term singleton pregnancy and with Bishop score of 6 or less who underwent labor induction were reviewed. The induction protocol started with series 1 which was 25 mL oral misoprostol solution (1 mcg/mL) every two hours for a maximum of 24 hours. If Bishop score was 6 or less by the end of series 1, then series 2 would follow, comprising 50 mL oral misoprostol solution (1 mcg/mL) every four hours for a maximum of 24 hours. Data of Bishop scores, delivery route by the end of each series, pregnancy outcomes, and possible associated factors were collected. Results: One hundred twenty-eight women were analyzed. The overall rate of cervical ripening, with a Bishop score of more than 6, was 92.2%, and at 88.3% with series 1 only. Successful vaginal delivery was achieved in 70 cases (54.7%), 53 of whom were delivered within 24 hours. Significantly associated factors with successful vaginal delivery were multiparity, and birth weight of 3,200 grams or less; adjusted OR 4.0 (95% CI 1.31 to 12.16, p=0.015) and 3.4 (95% CI 1.48 to 7.63, p=0.004), respectively. No serious adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed. Conclusion: With Siriraj induction protocol, success rates of cervical ripening and vaginal delivery were 92.2% and 54.7%, respectively, without serious adverse outcomes. Significant associated factors of successful vaginal delivery were multiparity and birth weight of 3,200 grams or less. Keywords: Oral misoprostol, Misoprostol solution, Low dose, Labor induction, Cervical ripenting, Vaginal delivery

scholarly journals Intracervical PGE2 gel application for cervical ripening and induction of labour: a clinical study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 3528
Author(s):  
Shilpa Modi ◽  
Jayalaxmi Mahur ◽  
Shashank V. S.
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Pelvic Examination ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Single Application ◽  
Uterine Contractions ◽  
Successful Induction ◽  
Labour Room

Background: PGE2 gel (cerviprime) not only helps in cervical ripening but also sensitizes the uterine musculature to physiological PGE2 for generation and maintenance of uterine contractions. In the present study the efficacy of PGE2 intracerival gel for ripening and induction of labour has been reported.Methods: This is a randomized prospective study of 80 cases admitted to the labour room during period of 2 years i.e. March 2017 to March 2019 in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KBNIMS, Gulbarga, Karnataka. All patients had clear indications for termination of pregnancy. The initial bishop score determined prior to induction by pelvic examination. Under aseptic precautions PGE2 endocervical gel was instilled. The results analyzed for successful ripening, induction delivery interval, results in primigravida and multigravida with single instillation or reinstallation if required, mode of delivery and maternal and perinatal complications.Results: The present study of 80 cases showed that a single application of intracervical PGE2 gel caused favorable changes in cervix by increasing Bishop score and shortened induction delivery interval with minimal side effects. Successful ripening with single application was achieved in 92.5% of cases (primi 42.5% and multi 50%). Only 6.25% of primi's and 1.25% of multi’s required reinstallation of PGE2 gel. Successful induction was achieved in 47.5% primi's and 50% multi’s i.e. 97.5% cases.Conclusions: The study concludes that single low dose intracervical PGE2 (cerviprime) gel proved to a safe, reliable and effective method for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

Randomized control trial of low dose oral misoprostol compared with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Savithri D. R. ◽  
Prashanthi Chennupalli ◽  
Suvarna R. ◽  
Akshatha S.
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
P Value ◽  
Maternal Complications ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Dose Oral

Background: Induction of labour is a therapeutic option when the benefits of delivery outweigh risks of continuing pregnancy. There are several agents for induction of labour to achieve better outcome of labour. Acceptable methods for induction are oxytocin infusion, dinoprostone gel, misoprostol and mechanical cervical dilators. Prostaglandins are the preferred choice in unripened cervix. Objective of this study was to compare efficacy, safety of low dose oral misoprostol compared with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening.Methods: One hundred women with single live fetus, term gestation, cephalic presentation, reactive fetal heart pattern and Bishops score <6 were included in the study. They were randomized to receive either 6 doses of 25ug oral misoprostol every 3rd hourly or 0.5ug intracervical dinoprostone every 6th hourly for a maximum of 3 doses.Results: Bishops score improvement after 6,12,18 hours in both the groups was statistically insignificant. Induction delivery interval was11.96±5.88 for misoprostol and 10.95±4.58 in dinoprostone group with P value 0.341 which was statistically insignificant. Need for oxytocin augmentation was less (18%) in misoprostol group as compared to dinoprostone group (44%). Caesarean section rate was slightly higher in misoprostol group (26% vs 24%). Meconium stained amniotic fluid was high in misoprostol group (16%) compared to dinoprostone group (8%). Maternal complications were minimal and neonatal outcome was good in both the groups.Conclusions: Compared to dinoprostone; misoprostol is easy to store, cost effective, stable at room temperature, can be easily administered and had better patient compliance and acceptability. It was found to be a better cervical ripening agent with similar maternal and fetal safety profile.

scholarly journals Oral Misoprostol vs Intravenous Oxytocin Infusion for Induction of Labor in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
Rajyashri Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Oxytocin Infusion ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Prelabor Rupture Of Membranes ◽  
To Receive

ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the efficacy, side effects and safety of oral misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin infusion for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM). Materials and methods Two hundred and sixty-six women of prelabor rupture of membranes were assigned to receive either oral misoprostol 100 μg 6 hourly to a maximum 3 doses (misoprostol group, n = 142), or escalating doses of oxytocin infusion up to 20 mIU/min in primigravida and up to 10 mIU/min in multigravida (oxytocin group, n = 114). Results Demographic characteristics were similar in both the groups. The difference in mean induction to delivery interval (8.2 ± 6 hours in misoprostol group vs 12.2 ± 6 hours in oxytocin group) was statistically significant when two groups were compared. The incidence of vaginal delivery (86.1% in misoprostol group vs 84.2% in oxytocin group), and cesarean delivery (13.9% in misoprostol group vs 15.8% in oxytocin group), was almost similar in both the groups. The indication of cesarean delivery was dystocia (40% in misoprostol group vs 67% in oxytocin group), and fetal distress (60% in misoprostol group vs 33% in oxytocin group) and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Maternal and neonatal safety outcomes were similar for the two treatments. Conclusion Oral misoprostol in prelabor rupture of membrane have almost similar results as intravenous oxytocin in safety, efficacy and side effects except induction delivery interval, which is less in misoprostol group. How to cite this article Anjum S, Sharma R. Oral Misoprostol vs Intravenous Oxytocin Infusion for Induction of Labor in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2016;8(1):4-7.

scholarly journals The role of oral mifepristone in pre-induction cervical ripening at term

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4337
Author(s):  
Uma H. Chourasia ◽  
Mudita Kamlesh Jain ◽  
Juzar I. Fidvi
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Labor Induction ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Pg E2 ◽  
To Receive

Background: Planned induction of labor is an established part of modern obstetrics and is used as a definite form of treatment where continuation of pregnancy would be detrimental to the health of mother or fetus. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of mifepristone in pre-induction cervical ripening and labor induction.Methods: A total of 200 pregnant women at term with Bishop Score 4 or less were selected for this prospective randomized placebo-controlled study. The sample was equally divided into study group to receive 200 mg of mifepristone and control group to receive placebo orally for 2 days. Bishop score was assessed at every 24 hours interval till patient entered in spontaneous labor or 72 hours after 1st dose. Women who did not enter labor spontaneously, labor induction was planned with per vaginal insertion of prostaglandin (PG) E2 analogue, Dinoprostone gel 2.5 mg or PGE1 analogue Tab. Misoprostol 25 µg.Results: Ninety-six subjects in the study group and eighty-one in the control achieved successful ripening of cervix and the difference was statistically significant. Sixty-eight of study group and thirty-nine of placebo group entered in spontaneous active labor within 72 hours. Requirement of oxytocin as adjuvant treatment was significantly lower in the study group. Nineteen women of study group and fifteen of control group delivered within 24 hours, and eighty-one of study group and sixty-two of placebo delivered in 48 hours. The mean induction delivery interval was 35.53±13.67 hours in the study group, whereas it was significantly prolonged in the placebo group 50.49±20.92 hours. Eighty-two subjects of study group and seventy-eight of the control group delivered vaginally, the differences were statistically not significant.Conclusions: Mifepristone was found to be an effective agent for cervical priming prior to labor induction in women at term and significantly reduces the induction delivery interval compared with placebo.

scholarly journals A comparative study of intracervical foley’s catheter with oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 3660
Author(s):  
Priyanka . ◽  
Shashi Bala Arya ◽  
Mirdu Sinha ◽  
J. K. Goel
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Successful Induction ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Group B

Background: Induction of labour implies stimulation of uterine contraction before spontaneous onset of labour with or without ruptured membranes. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intracervical Foley’s catheter with oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term.Methods: A total 100 term pregnant women were chosen with bishop score <6 and divided into two groups: Foley’s catheter with oxytocin (Group A) and vaginal misoprostol (Group B). In Group A, a 16 F Foley’s catheter introduced beyond internal os and traction applied every 4 hourly to check for expulsion with simultaneous oxytocin infusion (2 mU/min up to 32 mU/min). In Group B, 25 mcg misoprostol administered every 4 hourly (maximum 6 doses or 150 mcg). Data analysed using SPSS software 20.0. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: No statistical difference found between demographic variables between two groups. Both primigravida and multigravida had poor pre-induction bishop score in both groups. Foley’s catheter (80%) and misoprostol group (96%) had successful induction and was statistically significant (p<0.05). Foley’s catheter took more time from induction-delivery both in primigravida and post-dated pregnant women. The rate of cesarean in Foley’s catheter group was high (62.5%) including 33% cases with failed induction. Foley’s catheter had less maternal and neonatal complications, less NICU admission as compared to misoprostol (p>0.05).Conclusions: Misoprostol was found better for successful induction, decreases induction-to-delivery interval and increases vaginal delivery as compared to Foley’s catheter but it needs constant supervision in view of hyperstimulation and tachysystole.

scholarly journals Comparative study of intra vaginal misoprostol (PGE1) with intracervical dinoprostone (PGE2) gel for induction of labour

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3769
Author(s):  
Bina M. Raval ◽  
Nainesh S. Zalavadiya ◽  
Pushpa A. Yadava ◽  
Shital T. Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Mean Time

Background: Labour is a final consequence of Pregnancy and is inevitable. The timing of labour may vary widely but it will happen sooner or later. The aim of the present research was to study the safety, efficacy and effect of intra vaginal Misoprostol and intra cervical Dinoprostone gel for induction of labour.Methods: 100 patients who required labour of induction were included in this prospective cross-sectional study from September 2017- March 2018. 50 patients of them received 25mcg tablet misoprostol intravaginal and 50 patients of them required 0.5mg intracervical dinoprostone gel and doses were repeated every 6 hourly for up to maximum 6 doses for Misoprostol and 3 doses for Dinoprostone gel.Results: The majority of patients had gestational age above 40 weeks and between 37-40 weeks in PGE2 and PGE1 group respectively. The mean time taken for the onset of labour was less in Misoprostol than in Dinoprostone group (43.22min v/s 1 hr40 min). The mean time taken for induction to active phase of labour (1hr 42min v/s 4hr 10min) and active phase to delivery (3hr 6min v/s 4hr54min) was less in Misoprostol than Dinoprostone group. The mean time required for induction to delivery was less in Misoprostol group (5hr 2min v/s 11hrs). Requirement of oxytocin for augmentation of labour was almost equal in both groups. Caesarean section rate was less in Misoprostol group (10% v/s 22%). Maternal side effects were minimal in either groups and neonatal outcome was good in both the groups.Conclusions: Both Misoprostol and Dinoprostone gel are safe, effective for cervical ripening and induction but Misoprostol is more cost effective and stable at room temperature.

scholarly journals Postpartum Vaginal Blood Loss following Two Different Methods of Cervical Ripening

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Okon Asuquo Okon ◽  
John Egede Ekabua
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Catheter Group ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
The University ◽  
To Receive

Eighty women undergoing induction of labor at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital were recruited and randomly allocated into two treatment groups (40 each), to receive either serial 50 µg doses of misoprostol or intracervical Foley catheter. Vaginal blood loss was collected and measured using an under buttocks plastic collection bag and by perineal pad weighing up to 6 hours postpartum. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics. Comparison of blood loss in vaginal deliveries between the two groups revealed that subjects in the misoprostol group had significantly higher blood loss than subjects in the Foley catheter group (488 ± 222 versus 326 ± 106, p<0.05). In both groups, there was strong and statistically significant positive correlation between postpartum blood loss and induction delivery interval (r=0.75, p<0.0001; r=0.77, p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in maternal outcomes. In view of this, further study is required to ascertain if lower doses of misoprostol for induction of labor may result in lesser blood loss. This trial is registered with ISRCTN14479515.

scholarly journals High Dose and Low Dose Oxytocin Regimen as Determinants of Successful Induction: A multicenter comparative study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
MELESE GEZAHEGN TESEMMA ◽  
Demisew Amenu Sori ◽  
Desta Hiko Gemeda
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
P Value ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Delivery Time ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Successful Induction

Abstract Background Induction of labor by Oxytocin is a routine obstetric procedure. However, little is known regarding the optimal dose of oxytocin so as to bring successful induction. This study is aimed at comparing the effect of high dose versus low dose oxytocin regimen on success of induction.Methods Hospital based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in four selected hospitals in Ethiopia from October 1, 2017 to May 30, 2018. A total of 216 pregnant women who undergo induction of labor at gestational age of 37 weeks and above were included. Data was entered into Epi-data version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS version 20 for cleaning and analysis. Chi-square test and logistic regression were done to look for determinants of successful induction. The result is presented using 95% confidence interval of crude and adjusted odds ratios. P-value < 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance.Result Mean “Induction to delivery time” was 5.9 hours and 6.3 hours for participants who received high dose Oxytocin and low dose Oxytocin respectively. Higher successful induction (72.2% versus 61.1%) and lower Cesarean Section rate (27.8% vs. 38.9) was observed among participants who received low dose Oxytocin compared to high dose. Favourable bishop score [AOR 4.0 95% CI 1.9, 8.5], elective induction [AOR 0.2 95% CI 0.1, 0.4], performing artificial rupture of membrane [AOR 10.1 95% CI 3.2, 32.2], neonatal birth weight of < 4Kg [AOR 4.3, 95% CI 1.6, 11.6] and being parous [AOR 2.1 95% CI 1.1, 4.0] were significantly associated with success of induction. Conclusions : In this study, oxytocin regimen didn’t show significant association with success of induction. But, high dose oxytocin regimen is significantly associated with slightly shorter induction to delivery time. Favourable bishop score, emergency induction, performing artificial rupture of membrane and delivery to non-macrosomic neonate are positive determinants of successful induction. Thus, we recommend ripening cervix when condition allows, estimating fetal weight and performing artificial rupture of membrane. We also recommend researchers to conduct more strong research that controls confounders to see the real effect of different oxytocin regimen on induction success.

scholarly journals A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Intravaginal Misoprostol and Intracervical Dinoprostone in Pre Induction Cervical Ripening

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (03) ◽  
pp. 45-54
Author(s):  
B. H. Radhika ◽  
S. Soundara Raghavan
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Intervention Delivery ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Mean Cost

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening. Material andMethods: It was a randomized controlled trial conducted at department of obstetrics and gynecology, JIPMER, Puducherry. Three hundred women with Bishop score of 6, were assigned randomly to receive either intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every four hours for four doses, and intracervical dinoprostone gel 0.5 mg every eight hours for two doses. (one hundred women in each group). Oxytocin was initiated as per standardized protocol, if the cervix was favourable. If the cervical ripening was unsuccessful (Bishop score 6) after the maximum doses of drugs in both the groups, then further treatment was individualized. Efficacy and cost of the drugs were compared in both groups. Results: Primary outcome measure was change in Bishop score. Mean Bishop score change at the end of 16 hours was significantly higher in the misoprostol group, (2.57±0.59) compared to dinoprostone group (2.17±0.10, p=0.016). This finding was inspite of the fact that the dinoprostone group had higher Bishop score prior to the ripening.(3.55±0.56 vs 3.28±0.77, p=0.006). Secondary outcome measures such as mean intervention-delivery interval, oxytocin requirement, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar in both the groups. Overall mean cost of ripening agent per patient was significantly less in the misoprostol group, (22.56±93.16 rupees) compared to dinoprostone group (493.89±173.99 rupees, p0.0001).Conclusion: Low dose misoprostol is as effective as dinoprostone in cervical ripening and demonstrates similar fetal and maternal safety profile.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document