scholarly journals A comparative study of sublingual versus oral misoprostol following oral mifepristone for second trimester termination of pregnancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 498
Author(s):  
Ruchi Gupta ◽  
Krishna Priya Banerjee ◽  
Reena Pant
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Oral Route ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Sublingual Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: The objective of this study is to assess the effectualness and safety of sublingual versus oral misoprostol following oral mifepristone for second trimester termination of pregnancy.Methods: This institution based contingent study was conducted on 220 women requesting for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy between 12-20 weeks with legal indication as per Govt. MTP act. After excluding the women as per exclusion criteria, they were randomly allocated into two groups (Group A Sublingual, Group B Oral), the women received 200 mg oral mifepristone followed by sublingual or oral misoprostol 400µg three hourly for a maximum of 5 doses 48 hours later. The course of misoprostol was reiterated if women failed to abort in 24 hours.Results: The mean induction-abortion interval of Group-A and Group -B was 4.02±1.39 hours and 6.44±1.79 hours respectively. The mean dose of misoprostol in Group–A and Group-B was 680±220.4µg and 1003.6±274.9µg. Hence mean Induction-abortion interval and dose were shortened in  Group-A as compare to Group-B (p <0.05). There was 100% success rate noticed via both routes. Evacuation was done in 4 (3.64%) women in Group-B as compare to only 1 (0.91%) in Group-A . The acceptability was significantly more in Group-B (100%) as compare Group-A (52.73%), probably because of unpleasant taste of sublingual misoprostol. All side effects (Nausea, pain, headache, and diarrhea) were common in both the Groups, only fever was significantly more common in sublingual group as compare to oral group (p<0.05).Conclusions: From present study authors conclude that, sublingual misoprostol when combined with mifepristone is effective for medical abortion in second trimester in terms of effectualness, endurability and success rate than oral route.

scholarly journals Randomized comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone priming in termination of second trimester pregnancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3869
Author(s):  
Shrikrushna Vasant Chavan ◽  
Niraj Nilkanth Mahajan ◽  
Arundhati Gundu Tilve
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Sublingual Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: Sublingual Misoprostol 200 ug 4 hrly is as effective or less effective than vaginal Misoprostol 200ug 4hrly with 200mg oral Mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy.To compare effectiveness, side-effects, and patient satisfaction of sublingual vs vaginal misoprostol administration.Methods: It was prospective randomized open label study. 60 women 13-20 weeks of gestation with a valid legal indication for termination of pregnancy as per MTP act in INDIA were enrolled for study, randomly divided into Group A- Sublingual (n=30) group B-Vaginal (n=30). For group A, 200 mg of Mifepristone was given, 48h later Misoprostol 200 µg was given sublingually 4hrly up to a maximum of 5 doses. If abortion does not occur, the pregnancy was terminated with vaginal misoprostol, in group A. Same procedure repeated in group B. If abortion fails to occur after 5 doses, then second course of vaginal misoprostol was given in group B. Failure of procedure was defined as failed expulsion of foetus at 48 hrs. Results: Mean induction-abortion interval in vaginal group was 12.8±4.38h and 11.47±4.42h in sublingual group was comparable with insignificant p value (p=0.136). All the side effects were comparable in both groups. The overall success rate was 93.3% in the sublingual group while it was 100% in the vaginal group.Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol with oral mifepristone priming in second -trimester medical abortion has a shorter time to pregnancy termination compared with a sublingual regimen. However, both the routes are equally effective for induction of abortion.

scholarly journals Oral and vaginal route of misoprostol for induction of labour: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1956
Author(s):  
Deepti D. Sharma ◽  
Kavita A. Chandnani
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Vaginal Route ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive

Background: Induction of labour can be defined as “Artificial initiation of uterine contractions before the onset of spontaneous labour, after the period of viability, by any methods, for purpose of vaginal delivery.” The key factor for a successful induction is the status of cervix, its form, consistency and dilatation which is determined by the Bishop score. In case of unfavourable cervix or in the pregnancies remote from the term; prostaglandins are more effective than any other method of induction. Introduction of misoprostol, PGE1 analogue, for the induction of labour in 1993 and its approval for clinical use by ACOG (American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology) in 1999 has been the most significant advancement. It is the latest drug for induction of labour which is cheap and stable at room temperature and is being used worldwide in different doses and by various routes. We compared the most commonly preferred two routes; vaginal and oral in terms of success of induction and noted the adverse events and side effects in both routes.Methods: This was a prospective comparative study carried out at SBKSMIRC (Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre), Dhiraj general hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, 200 patients who required induction of labour were recruited after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly divided in two groups- Group A meant to receive 50µg oral misoprostol, Group B - meant to receive 25µg vaginal misoprostol repeated 4 hourly up to maximum of five doses. Progress of labour was charted on the partograph. The mean induction delivery interval, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes and complications were observed.Results: The mean induction to delivery interval was significantly less in vaginal group than oral (23.3±12.4 hours in oral vs. 17.3±10 hours in vaginal). Vaginal delivery and cesarean section rates were comparable in both groups (76% in Group A vs. 72% in Group B for vaginal delivery, 18% vs. 20% for Cesarean section, respectively). 58% patients in Group A required more than two doses as compared to 39% in group B, though the difference was statistically not significant. Significant number of patients required added oxytocin administration in Group A (72%). No major complications or adverse events were observed. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia was seen more in Group A.Conclusions: Both Oral misoprostol in a dose of 50μg and vaginal misoprostol 25 μg every four hours, to a maximum of five doses, have the potential to induce labour safely and effectively. The vaginal route however is beneficial in effecting delivery in lesser time with few numbers of doses as compared to oral route.

scholarly journals GESTATIONAL DIABETES

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1298-1303
Author(s):  
Tayyaba Majeed ◽  
Rabia Adnan ◽  
Irum Mubshar ◽  
Hamis Mahmood ◽  
Kanwal Saba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Route ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Neonatal Hypoglycemia ◽  
Consecutive Sampling ◽  
Pregnant Females ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of Metformin with insulin in gestationaldiabetes mellitus in terms of fetomaternal outcome. Study Deign: Randomized clinicaltrial study. Setting: Lady Aitchison Hospital Lahore. Period: January 2014 to March 2015.Methodology: Total 500 pregnant females with GDM were included in the study through nonprobability,consecutive sampling. Patients were divided into 2 equal groups (A: B). Patientsin group A were given tablet metformin 500 mg by oral route and group B was administratedregular injection Insulin by subcutaneous route. Results: The mean age of females was32.14±6.13 years. The mean gestational age was 31.07±3.8 weeks. There were 78 (15.6%)females who had 0 parity, 107 (21.4%) females had parity 1, 175 (35%) females had parity2, 95 (19%) females had parity 3, 33 (6.6%) females had parity 4 and 12 (2.4%) femaleshad parity 5.There were 54 (10.8%) cases had PTB, out of which 12 (4.8%) had PTB withmetformin while 42 (16.8%) had PTB with insulin. There were 115 (23%) neonates requiredNICU admission, out of which 37 (14.8%) neonates with metforminand78 (31.2%) neonateswith insulin. There were 87 (17%) neonates who had neonatal hypoglycemia, out of which23 (9.2%) neonates with metformin and64 (25.6%) neonates with insulin. The difference wassignificant between both groups for all fetal outcomes (P<0.05). Conclusion: The metforminis more effective in preventing adverse fetal and maternal outcome as compared to insulin.

scholarly journals Role of misoprostol 4 hourly versus 6 hourly in medical termination of pregnancy in 2nd trimester.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1645-1649
Author(s):  
Komal Devi ◽  
Shazia Aftab ◽  
Reena ◽  
Huma Baloch ◽  
Devi Kumari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Medical Termination ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To determine efficacy of misoprostol given in 4 hourly versus 6 hourly intervals in second trimester for termination of pregnancy. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Study was conducted at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Jinnah Medical and Dental College Karachi Allied Hospital. Period: March to August 2020. Material & Methods: Pregnant ladies in second trimester, requiring abortion due to medical reasons, were planned for termination of pregnancy. Two groups were made. Patients in Group-A were given misoprostol 4 hourly and those in Group-B were given misoprostol 6 hourly. Similar dose of drug (200ug) was given in both groups and monitoring was done. If abortion done in 48 hours, it was considered effective abortion and if not happened in 48 hours, it was considered a failed abortion. Consent was taken from all ladies in study group. Ethical approval was taken from ethical review committee. Results: Total 140 cases were studied, 70 cases in each group, A & B. Age range of cases was 16-40 years with mean age of 26.4±3.5 years. Most of the cases were having age between 20-30 years (63.5%). Group-A (N=70) was given misoprostol 4 hourly, where abortion was done in 94.3% cases while abortion failed in 5.7% cases. In Group-B (N=70) misoprostol was given 6 hourly, induced abortion in 82.8% and failed in 17.1% cases. Conclusion: Misoprostol dose of 20ug given via vaginal route is much effective drug for medical termination of pregnancy when given 4 hourly instead 6 hourly, with low failure rate.

First experiences of a low-dose protocol for CT-guided musculoskeletal biopsies combining different radiation dose reduction techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36
Author(s):  
Zlatan Alagic ◽  
Haris Alagic ◽  
Robert Bujila ◽  
Subhash Srivastava ◽  
Saif Jasim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Ct Guided ◽  
Protocol Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background The use of computed tomography (CT) for image guidance during biopsies is a powerful approach. The method is, however, often associated with a significant level of radiation exposure to the patient and operator. Purpose To investigate if a low-dose protocol for CT-guided musculoskeletal (MSK) biopsies, including a combination of different radiation dose (RD) techniques, is feasible in a clinical setting. Material and Methods Fifty-seven patients underwent CT-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) utilizing the low-dose protocol (group A). A similar number of patients underwent CT-guided FNAC using the reference protocol (group B). Between-group comparisons comprised radiation dose, success rate, image quality parameters, and workflow. Results In group A, the mean total dose-length product (DLP) was 41.2 ± 2.9 mGy*cm, which was statistically significantly lower than of group B (257.4 ± 22.0 mGy*cm), corresponding to a mean dose reduction of 84% ( P<0.001). The mean CTDIvol for the control scans were 1.88 ± 0.09 mGy and 13.16 ± 0.40 mGy for groups A and B, respectively ( P < 0.001). The success rate in group A was 91.2% and 87.9% in group B ( P = 0.56). No negative effect on image-quality parameters, time of FNAC, and number of control scans were found. Conclusion We successfully developed a low-dose protocol for CT-guided MSK biopsies that maintains diagnostic accuracy and image quality at a fraction of the RD compared to the reference biopsy protocol at our clinic.

scholarly journals Mifepristone and Oral Misoprostol for Early Medical Abortion

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Shrivastava ◽  
A Shrivastava
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Medical Termination ◽  
Health Research Council ◽  
Good Success Rate

Background: Combined mifepristone and misoprostol is the best method of medical termination of pregnancy. The study is undertaken to find out the success rate, acceptability, efficacy and patient satisfaction of medical abortion in pregnant women with 49 days of gestation. Methods: The pregnant women with amenorrhea of 49 days or less seeking termination of pregnancy received were studied. The 200 mg of oral mifepristone and followed 48 hours later with 600 microgram of oral misoprostol were given. Results: The success rate with the regime was 47 (94%) and 49 (98%) were satisfied. Weakness 24 (48%), Nausea 10 (20%), diarrhea 12 (25%), needing analgesic 4 (8%) were the side effects of the combined regime. Conclusions: Medical termination of pregnancy with combination of mifepristone and oral misoprostol has a good success rate. The side effect of the regimen in our setup is less and well accepted. Majority of the patient are satisfied with medical termination of pregnancy. Key words: medical abortion; misoprostol; mifepristone DOI: 10.3126/jnhrc.v7i2.3021 Journal of Nepal Health Research Council Vol.7(2) Apr 2009 127-130

scholarly journals Comparative study between sequential use of Foley catheter with vaginal misoprostol versus sequential use of oral mifepristone with vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 4545
Author(s):  
Michelle N. Fonseca ◽  
Vernica Sah
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Sequential Administration ◽  
Group A ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: Abortions are one of the most commonly performed procedures in gynaecological departments worldwide. They are still a major problem in developing countries contributing to a significant percentage of maternal morbidity and mortality. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, side effects and acceptability of intracervical Foley and oral Mifepristone both followed with sequential administration of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion.Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial of 36 healthy women opting for termination of pregnancy with ultrasound confirmed intrauterine gestation between 12 to 20 completed weeks. Intracervical Foley catheter with administration of misoprostol (200µg) vaginally was done for Group A. Mifepristone 200mg was administered on day one followed by misoprostol (200µg) vaginally, 48 hours later, to Group B. Both groups received misoprostol (200µg) vaginally at 4 hourly intervals. Completeness of abortion was assessed, and surgical evacuation was performed, if abortion was found to be incomplete.Results: The two groups were comparable with respect to age, parity and gestational age. 83-89% of the women in both the groups had complete abortion. The mean induction abortion interval was 20.11 hours in Group A and 54.77 hours in Group B, which was statistically significant. Side effect profile was comparable in both groups however the intensity and the duration of persistence of pain was greater among patients from Group A.Conclusions: Authors conclude that medical abortions with both methods were found to be safe, effective, inexpensive and acceptable methods. Whereas a shorter induction abortion interval was observed in the Foley induction group, induction with mifepristone was the preferred regimen in second trimester abortion because of its high efficacy, low incidence of side effects, better tolerance by the patients and due to lower dose of misoprostol required following mifepristone administration.

scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy of Misoprostol 4 hourly with Misoprostol 6 hour for Medical termination of pregnancy in second trimester.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Shamas un Nisa ◽  
Farzana Razaq ◽  
Sadaf un Nisa
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fetal Loss ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Medical Termination ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Termination of Pregnancy (TOP), in our country is carried out only when considerable danger to a fetus due to congenital abnormalities, intrauterine fetal loss or when maternal life is under threat. The principle concerns in providing second trimester termination include safety, efficacy, simplicity, low-cost, and fast acting with minimal side effects. Objectives: To compare the efficacy in term of complete abortion within 48 hours between protocol-I (200 µg misoprostol 4 hourly) versus protocol-II (200 µg misoprostol 6 hourly) for second trimester (14-24 weeks) medical termination of pregnancy. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Settings: Gynecology & obstetrics unit-II, Bahawal Victoria Hospital (BVH) Bahawalpur. Period: From 1st July 2017 to 30th June 2018. Material & Method: A total of 182 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in study. Ninety one patients were included in group-A and 91 patients were included in group-B.  Women allocated to group-A was given misoprostol 200µg every 4 hour. Similar drug and dose were administered to women of group-B intra-vaginally, 6 hourly. Patients in both groups were monitored up to 48. If abortion occurred within 48 hours of induction, it was labeled as effective abortion otherwise it was regarded as failed abortion. Results: The mean age in group-A was 26.71 years 25.49 years in Group-B. In group-A, 89 (97.8%) patients showed efficacy (abortion within 48 hours) and in group-B, 74 (81.32%) patients showed efficacy to misoprostol. Conclusion: The regimen of using 200μg of vaginal misoprostol 4 hourly is more efficacious and quick for 2nd trimester TOP with fewer side effects when compared to 200μg of vaginal misoprostol 6 hourly.

scholarly journals SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (04) ◽  
pp. 581-586
Author(s):  
DR HEMLATA ◽  
QAMAR-UR- NISA ◽  
RUBINA SOLANGI ◽  
Suresh Kumar Rathi ◽  
Habib Ullah
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Pregnancy ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Second Trimester Pregnancy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare clinical efficacy and side effects of oral misoprotol with vaginal misoprostol for termination of second trimester pregnancy. Design: Interventional Quasi experimental. Setting: Gynae Unit III, Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad. Period: 1st March 2006 to 31st August 2006. Methodology: Sixty patients were selected with thirty in each group i.e thirty for oral route (group A) and thirty for vaginal route(group B). The patients included in this study were those having singleton pregnancy with gestational age between 12 to 26 weeks requiring termination of pregnancy. A dose of 100ug to 200ug was used with maximum of 1200ug in each group of patients. Results: The subjects of either group were similar with respect to mean age, height, weight, parity, gestational age and pre induction Bishop Score. The success rate in group A was 94.4% as compared to group B was 86.8%. intra uterine death was the commonest indication in both groups found in 46.7% women of vaginal misoprostol group and 50% women of oral misoprostol group. Surgical evacuation was needed in 36.7% women of oral misoprostol group and 16.7% women of vaginal misoprostol group. Conclusions: The present study shows misoprostol to be effective for mid trimester abortions, both orally and vaginally, the later route is preferable because it requires lesser doses and produces a shorter induction – abortion interval. However safety data are needed to guide the route choice and well designed studies are necessary. 

scholarly journals Randomized control trial to compare the effectiveness of mifepristone followed by misoprostol at 12 hours interval versus misoprostol alone in second trimester medical termination of pregnancy

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 3299
Author(s):  
Preet Kamal Bedi ◽  
Arunima Saini
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Cervical Dilatation ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Mifepristone priming in second trimester abortions not only decreases the induction-abortion interval (IAI) but also lessens the total misoprostol dose required and hence reduces adverse effects. The present study aims to compare the role of mifepristone priming 12 hours before misoprostol administration so as to increase patient compliance and shorten the duration of hospital stay.Methods: This prospective study was conducted over a period of one year, on 50 patients requiring second trimester abortion, at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Amritsar. The patients were divided into two groups with 1:1 randomization. In Group A, 25 women were given tablet mifepristone 200 mg orally followed 12 hours later by tablet misoprostol 400 µg per vaginum followed by the same dose 3 hourly for a maximum of five doses per 24 hours. In group B, 25 women received only tablet misoprostol 400 µg vaginally in the posterior fornix followed by the same dose 3 hourly for a maximum of five doses per 24 hours. Primary outcome was to compare the completeness of expulsion of products of conception by pelvic ultrasound after 48 hours of the last dose administered. Secondary outcome was to compare the Induction abortion interval (IAI), mean dose of misoprostol required, side effects, effect of parity, gestational age and cervical dilatation on IAI with both the regimens used.Results: The success rate was 76% in group A and 64% in group B. The mean induction abortion interval in group A was 8.9±4.70 hours whereas in group B, it was 13.14±6.03 hours and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.008). A statistically significant difference was also observed in mean dose of misoprostol required in group A and B being 1232.00±398.60 µg and 1584.00±423.94 µg respectively (p=0.004). The side effects were less in group A. Parity and cervical dilatation hold an inverse relation with the mean IAI whereas it has a direct relation with the gestational age.Conclusions: Regimen involving mifepristone priming 12 hours before misoprostol is better than misoprostol alone regimen with significant reduction in IAI, mean dose of misoprostol and less side effects. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document