scholarly journals A randomized controlled trial of sublingual Misoprostol - 600µg versus intravenous Oxytocin - 10IU in prevention of post partum hemorrhage during cesarean section

Author(s):  
Rajasri G. Yaliwal ◽  
Shailaja R. Bidri ◽  
Ashwini S. Navani

Background: Mortality related to pregnancy and childbirth causes half a million women around the world to die annually. About 35% of these deaths are from postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Prevention of PPH has been advised by the WHO by the use of Oxytocin 10 IU IM or IV and Misoprostol 600 µg in low resource settings in vaginal delivery. However there have been only a few reports on the use of Misoprostol during cesarean section. The best route and dose of Misoprostol is still being debated.Methods: One hundred women with term singleton pregnancy undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either Misoprostol 600µg sublingually or intravenous oxytocin 10 IU soon after delivery of the baby. Estimated blood loss and comparative change in preoperative hemoglobin to post operative hemoglobin levels and side effects were evaluated.Results: Blood loss was found to be more in Misoprostol than Oxytocin. Eight patients of the Misoprostol group required additional oxytocics. Oxytocin group did not receive any additional drugs. No surgical intervention was made in either of the groups.  The most common side effect with Misoprostol was shivering (46%) and in Oxytocin group fever (4%).Conclusions: Sublingual Misoprostol of 600µg works to prevent postpartum bleeding. In our study Oxytocin was more effective than Misoprostol in preventing PPH during cesarean section. Late onset of action of Misoprostol in comparison to Oxytocin may render suturing of the uterus difficult due to pooling of blood. In settings in which use of Oxytocin is not feasible, Misoprostol might be a suitable alternative for post-partum hemorrhage.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252491
Author(s):  
Maria Regina Torloni ◽  
Monica Siaulys ◽  
Rachel Riera ◽  
Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco ◽  
Rafael Leite Pacheco ◽  
...  

Background There is no consensus on the best timing for prophylactic oxytocin administration during cesarean section (CS) to prevent post-partum hemorrhage (PPH). Objectives Assess the effects of administrating prophylactic oxytocin at different times during CS. Methods We searched nine databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT). We pooled results and calculated average risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to assess the overall evidence certainty. Results We screened 13,389 references and included four trials. We found no statistically significant differences between oxytocin given before versus after fetal delivery on PPH (RR 0.60, 95%CI 0.15–2.47; 1 RCT, N = 300) or nausea/vomiting (RR 1.21, 95%CI 0.69–2.13; 1 RCT, N = 300). There was a significant reduction in the need for additional uterotonics when oxytocin was given immediately before uterine incision versus after fetal delivery (RR 0.37, 95%CI 0.18–0.73; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs; N = 301). Oxytocin given before fetal delivery significantly reduced intra-operative blood loss (MD -146.77mL, 95%CI -168.10 to -125.43; I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, N = 601) but did not change the incidence of blood transfusion (RR 0.50, 95%CI 0.13–1.95; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, N = 301) or hysterectomy (RR 3.00; 95%CI 0.12–72.77; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, N = 301). One trial (N = 100) compared prophylactic oxytocin before versus after placental separation and found no significant differences on PPH, additional uterotonics, or nausea/vomiting. Conclusions In women having pre-labor CS, there is limited evidence indicating no significant differences between prophylactic oxytocin given before versus after fetal delivery on PPH, nausea/vomiting, blood transfusion, or hysterectomy. Earlier oxytocin administration may reduce the volume of blood loss and need for additional uterotonics. There is very limited evidence suggesting no significant differences between prophylactic oxytocin given before versus after placental separation on PPH, need for additional uterotonic, or nausea/vomiting. The overall certainty of the evidence was mostly low or very low due to imprecision. Protocol: CRD42020186797.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seifeldin Sadek ◽  
Arnold M Mahesan ◽  
Hadi Ramadan ◽  
Nimra Dad ◽  
Vani Movva ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of obstetric morbidity and mortality around the world. Prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients at risk for PPH is aimed at reducing estimated blood loss (EBL). Method This was a prospective cohort study. Patients at high risk of PPH were given 1000mg of TXA intravenously at cord clamping after delivery of the baby, and compared with high PPH risk controls who did not receive TXA. Both cesarean section deliveries (CD) and vaginal deliveries (VD) were included. The primary outcome was postpartum hemorrhage, and the secondary outcome was calculated estimated blood loss (cEBL). Results Between January 2017 and May 2017, 101 patients at high risk for PPH were enrolled. Fifty one received TXA and 50 did not. There were 20 cases of PPH in the TXA group compared with 30 cases in the control group (OR 0.43, 95% CI, NNT=5). The average cEBL for VD and CD were significantly lower in the patients who received TXA compared with controls: 561ml ±336ml compared with 841ml ±462ml (p=0.0006) for VD and 658ml ±294mL compared with 1024ml ±276 for CD (p=0.0007). Conclusions Intravenous TXA may be used as prophylaxis for PPH in obstetric patients at high risk.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Singh ◽  
N Adhikari ◽  
S Ghimire ◽  
S Dhital

Background Cesarean section has been identified as one of the commonest indication for blood transfusion in obstetric practice because it involves risk of major intra-operative blood loss. Different figures varying from less than 500 ml to more than 1000 ml have been quoted as estimated blood loss associated with caesarean section. There is also a wide variation in blood ordering practices for this surgery. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the blood ordering practice and transfusion for cesarean sections at our institute, to see post-operative drop in hemoglobin and hematocrit and to correlate those parameters with the duration between uterine incision and repair. Methods In this prospective observational study, non-randomised purposive sample was taken from 121 ladies who underwent elective and emergency cesarean section at the department of obstetrics of Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital. Post-cesarean drop in hemoglobin and hematocrit and their relation with duration of uterine manipulation was calculated. Cross-match to transfusion (C/T ratio) ratio, transfusion probability (%T) and transfusion index (Ti) were also calculated. Results Most frequent blood group was found to be O positive (38%) among those ladies. Average post-cesarean drop in hemoglobin was 1.52±1.27 gm/dl and drop in haematocrit was 5.49±4.1%. Post-operative drop in hemoglobin and haematocrit had weak and positive linear relation with duration between uterine incision and repair. Cross-match to transfusion ratio was 1, transfusion probability 100% and transfusion index was 2. Conclusion There is no need of routine cross-matching of blood for cesarean section. Only grouping with confirmation of availability should be done for emergency situation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v11i2.12490 Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.11(2) 2013: 144-146


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 132-137
Author(s):  
Mahham Janjua ◽  
Maria Imran

OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol in reducing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss with that of intravenous (IV) oxytocin infusion in the first two hours at cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN Randomized controlled trial PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY The study was conducted in Lady Aitchison Hospital, Lahore unit IV-King Edward Medical University, and the duration of the study was one year. MATERIALS and METHODS Eighty-two women with term singleton pregnancy undergone elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either misoprostol 400 µg sublingually or  IV infusion of 20 units oxytocin in 1000ml of normal saline soon after delivery of the baby. Estimated blood loss at the surgery and within the first 2 h post-operation were measured in both groups. Side effects in both groups were also recorded. RESULTS Mean blood loss with misoprostol was significantly less as compared to that of oxytocin. Post-operative hemoglobin was decreased by -4.95% in sublingual misoprostol and in the oxytocin group it was decreased by -9.33%. Blood transfusion and additional uterotonic therapy were significantly higher in the oxytocin group as compared to that of misoprostol. Nausea, vomiting, and hypotension was significantly higher in oxytocin group as compared to that of the misoprostol group. On the other hand, pyrexia and shivering were significantly higher in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION The results of this trial showed that sublingual misoprostol is more effective as compared to intravenous oxytocin infusion in terms of reduction of blood loss in the first two hours at the cesarean section. It offers several advantages over oxytocin including long shelf life, stability at room temperature, and oral administration which makes it a suitable uterotonic agent in low-resource areas.


2021 ◽  
pp. 56-57
Author(s):  
Anupama Anupama

Aim – The aim of the study was to study the effect of sublingual misoprostol for prevention of PPH. Materials and Methods – This was a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Inclusion criteria were women aged 20-40 years with 38-40 weeks of gestation who underwent elective caesarean section. Exclusion criteria were women have risk factors for post-partum haemorrhage, active thromboembolic disease and intrinsic risk for thrombosis. Participants were randomly assigned to misoprostol group or group A (n=50) and placebo group or group B(n=50). Group A received 400µg of sublingual misoprostol after delivery of the baby, group B received placebo tablet at the same time. Primary outcome measures were blood loss from delivery of the placenta to the end of the caesarean section to 2 hours postpartum, haemoglobin estimation was done in all patients pre operatively and 24 hours post operatively and the change in concentration was noted. Secondary outcome measures were need for additional uterotonics, use of additional surgical interventions to control post-partum haemorrhage. Result – Blood loss from both placental delivery to the end of caesarean section and from end of caesarean section to 2 hours postpartum were signicantly lower in the study group. (p<0.0001). Change ifn haemoglobin concentration in study group was also signicantly less than in the control group. (p<0.0001). Total amount of Oxytocin required was signicantly less in the study group (p=0.01). The number of women requiring other oxytocics (inj. Methyl ergometrine, inj. Carboprost) was signicantly less in study group (p=0.0078). Conclusion – Sublingual misoprostol has been found to be effective in preventing PPH.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takako Ishii ◽  
Kenjiro Sawada ◽  
Shunsuke Koyama ◽  
Aki Isobe ◽  
Atsuko Wakabayashi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pravin Shah ◽  
Ajay Agrawal ◽  
Shailaja Chhetri ◽  
Pappu Rijal ◽  
Nisha K. Bhatta

Background: Postpartum hemorrhage is a common and occasionally life-threatening complication of labor. Cesarean section is associated with more blood loss in compared to vaginal delivery. Despite, there is a trend for increasing cesarean section rates in both developed and developing countries thereby increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality, especially among anemic women. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative administration of intravenous Tranexamic acid on blood loss during and after elective cesarean section.Methods: This was a prospective, randomized controlled study with 160 eligible pregnant women of 37 or more period of gestation. They were all planned for elective cesarean section and were randomized into two groups either to receive 10ml (1gm) of Tranexamic acid intravenously or 10ml of normal saline. Blood loss was measured during and for 24 hours after operation.Results: The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in women treated with Tranexamic acid compared with women in the placebo group (392.13 ml±10.06 vs 498.69 ml±15.87, respectively; p<0.001). The mean difference in pre-operative and post-operative hemoglobin levels was statistically significant in the Tranexamic acid group than in the control group (0.31±0.18 vs 0.79±0.23, respectively; p<0.001).Conclusions: Pre-operative use of Tranexamic acid is associated with reduced blood loss during and after elective cesarean section. In a developing country like ours where postpartum hemorrhage is a major threat to the life of the mothers, it seems to be a promising option.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document