scholarly journals Comparison of pregnancy outcome between clomiphene citrate and sequential clomiphene citrate+human menopausal gonadotropin in intrauterine insemination

Author(s):  
Ankita Singh ◽  
Rohan Palshetkar ◽  
Namrata Singh ◽  
Awyay Rege

Background: Intrauterine insemination (IUI) has been widely used as a common treatment for infertile couples. This study compares the sequential clomiphene citrate (CC) treatment with CC and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) treatment in women undergoing IUI. Therefore, this study was designed to determine the effects of addition of gonadotropin (CC+hMG) would improve the pregnancy rate in women undergoing IUI. And also compare the sequential CC+hMG treatment with CC treatment in women undergoing IUI.Methods: A cross-sectional study design was conducted at D. Y. Patil Fertility Centre, D.Y Patil Hospital, Navi Mumbai from September 2018 to August 2019. Source populations were all patients who live in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. A total of 67 patients were enrolled in this study. (It consisted of 67 sub fertile couples undergoing ovarian stimulation for IUI cycles). Results: There was no significant difference between the two studied groups regarding endometrial thickness (8.3±2.1 versus 9.7±2.8, respectively), number of mature follicles on the day of hCG injection (3.3±1.2 versus 3.5±1.1, respectively) and, but there was significant difference between the CC+hMG group and CC group regarding the total dose of gonadotropins used in ovulation induction (305±23.8 versus 655±192; total IU, respectively) p<0.05.Conclusions: Women undergoing IUI, ovarian stimulation CC combined with hMG, significantly improved the pregnancy and live birth rates as compared to that of CC group. In women undergoing ovarian stimulation and IUI, there are no significant differences in pregnancy and live birth rates among the various stimulation protocols.

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1319-1324
Author(s):  
E M Bordewijk ◽  
N S Weiss ◽  
M J Nahuis ◽  
J Kwee ◽  
A F Lambeek ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is endometrial thickness (EMT) a biomarker to select between women who should switch to gonadotropins and those who could continue clomiphene citrate (CC) after six failed ovulatory cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER Using a cut-off of 7 mm for EMT, we can distinguish between women who are better off switching to gonadotropins and those who could continue CC after six earlier failed ovulatory CC cycles. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN For women with normogonadotropic anovulation, CC has been a long-standing first-line treatment in conjunction with intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI). We recently showed that a switch to gonadotropins increases the chance of live birth by 11% in these women over continued treatment with CC after six failed ovulatory cycles, at a cost of €15 258 per additional live birth. It is unclear whether EMT can be used to identify women who can continue on CC with similar live birth rates without the extra costs of gonadotropins. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Between 8 December 2008 and 16 December 2015, 666 women with CC failure were randomly assigned to receive an additional six cycles with a change to gonadotropins (n = 331) or an additional six cycles continuing with CC (n = 335), both in conjunction with intercourse or IUI. The primary outcome was conception leading to live birth within 8 months after randomisation. EMT was measured mid-cycle before randomisation during their sixth ovulatory CC cycle. The EMT was available in 380 women, of whom 190 were allocated to gonadotropins and 190 were allocated to CC. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS EMT was determined in the sixth CC cycle prior to randomisation. We tested for interaction of EMT with the treatment effect using logistic regression. We performed a spline analysis to evaluate the association of EMT with chance to pregnancy leading to a live birth in the next cycles and to determine the best cut-off point. On the basis of the resulting cut-off point, we calculated the relative risk and 95% CI of live birth for gonadotropins versus CC at EMT values below and above this cut-off point. Finally, we calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Mid-cycle EMT in the sixth cycle interacted with treatment effect (P &lt; 0.01). Spline analyses showed a cut-off point of 7 mm. There were 162 women (45%) who had an EMT ≤ 7 mm in the sixth ovulatory cycle and 218 women (55%) who had an EMT &gt; 7 mm. Among the women with EMT ≤ 7 mm, gonadotropins resulted in a live birth in 44 of 79 women (56%), while CC resulted in a live birth in 28 of 83 women (34%) (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13–2.19). Per additional live birth with gonadotropins, the ICER was €9709 (95% CI: €5117 to €25 302). Among the women with EMT &gt; 7 mm, gonadotropins resulted in a live birth in 53 of 111 women (48%) while CC resulted in a live birth in 52 of 107 women (49%) (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.75–1.29). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This was a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and therefore mid-cycle EMT measurements before randomisation during their sixth ovulatory CC cycle were not available for all included women. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In women with six failed ovulatory cycles on CC and an EMT ≤ 7 mm in the sixth cycle, we advise switching to gonadotropins, since it improves live birth rate over continuing treatment with CC at an extra cost of €9709 to achieve one additional live birth. If the EMT &gt; 7 mm, we advise to continue treatment with CC, since live birth rates are similar to those with gonadotropins, without the extra costs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The original MOVIN trial received funding from the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw number: 80-82310-97-12067). C.B.L.A. reports unrestricted grant support from Merck and Ferring. B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for Merck, ObsEva, IGENOMIX and Guerbet. All other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR1449


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
U Göktürk ◽  
S Kahraman

Abstract Study question Are cycle outcomes different in frozen embryo transfer in obese and overweight women compared to normal weight cases? Summary answer As BMI increases, although implantation rates are similar, miscarriage rates increase and live birth rates decrease, especially in cases whose BMI value is above 30. What is known already Obesity has adverse effects on the reproductive system. Obesity causes ovulatory dysfunction and menstrual cycle disorders, thus reducing fertility. As BMI increases, the implantation, pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates decrease and the rate of clinical losses increases. In donor oocyte cycles, the BMI of the recipient has a statistically significant detrimental effect on obstetrics outcomes such as pregnancy rate and live birth rate. However, very few studies evaluate the impact of BMI on frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study was conducted at Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Center between 2011 and 2020. A total of 5642 frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles were examined. Patients were grouped according to the World Health Organisation BMI classification system: Group I (BMI 25–29.9) (n = 1663); Group II (BMI 30–34.9) (n = 598); Group III (BMI 35–39.9) (n = 150); Group IV (BMI&gt;40) (n = 30); Control Group (BMI 18.5–24.9) (n = 3201). Participants/materials, setting, methods: Patients between 17–42 years old were included. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was performed for patients &gt;37 years old. Exclusion criteria were: repeated pregnancy losses, Mullerian abnormalities, intrauterine adhesions, endometrial thickness &lt;7mm during frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle. For endometrial preparation, modified natural cycle or artificial cycle were used. Single top/good quality blastocysts were transferred. Main results and the role of chance A total of 5642 FET cycles were analyzed. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics in terms of mean age, endometrial thickness on embryo transfer day and Anti Mullerian Hormone levels between the groups. Cycle outcomes were analysed according to the BMI groups. Mean age of groups were 32.1(17–42), 32(18–42), 32.6(20–42), 32.8(23–42) in groups I to IV respectively and 32(18–42) in the control group. Pregnancy rates were 70.9%(n = 1180) 70.7%(n = 423), 76%(n = 114) and 54.8%(n = 17) in groups I to IV respectively and 72.4% in the control group(n = 2321) (p &gt; 0,05). Clinical pregnancy losses rates were 18.9%(n = 196), 23.9%(n = 86), 23.1%(n = 22) and 23%(n = 3) in groups I to IV respectively and 15.1% in the control group(n = 316) (p &lt; 0,05). The live birth rates were 49.9%(n = 830) 45.1%(n = 270), 47.3%(n = 71) and 33.3%(n = 10) in groups I to IV, respectively and 54.9% (n = 1759) in the control group (p &lt; 0,05). There was no statistically significant difference in implantation rates between the groups but clinical pregnancy losses rates were higher in obese patients (groups II-III-IV) whereas live birth rates were lower compared to group I (overweight) and the control group. Limitations, reasons for caution The limitation of the study is its retrospective nature. Wider implications of the findings: Our study shows that, there is a significantly higher risk of negative cycle outcomes in obese patients. Pre-treatment counselling is therefore needed to increase patient awareness of the risks and to provide advice on weight loss. Trial registration number Not applicable


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Petanovsk. Kostova

Abstract Study question Study aim is to compare implantation,clinical pregnancy and livebirth rates between giving1500IU of hCG4hours after GnRHagonist,on trigger day or GnRHagonist as alone trigger with luteal support withHCG1500IU.35h later on OPUday. Summary answer Adjuvant doze of1500IUhCG4h after bolus of GnRHagonist on trigger day significantly improve quality of blastocyst,implantation,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates without increasing the risk ofOHSS. What is known already The use of GnRHagonist for final oocyte maturation in antagonist cycle significantly decrease the incidence of OHSS,but there have been studies showing lower pregnancy rates in patients triggered with GnRHagonist compared with hCG in autologous cycles,attributed to a defective luteal phase, especially in high–risk patients despite intensive luteal phase support.To improve the results of IVF,an alternative approach is adding a small bolus dose of hCG(1500IU)35h later,on the OPU day after GnRHagonist trigger which provides more sustained support for the corpus luteum.The question is does low doses of hCGgiven on the same day with GnRHagonist trigger is making better quality oocytes. Study design, size, duration Single center prospective longitudinal cohort study fromJanuary2017 to Decembar2019.The initial inclusion criteria were:women age≥18and≤39years,AMH≥3,3ng/ml and ≥12 antral follicles on basal ultrasound.Patients with history of OHSS and PCO are also included in the study.Patients with applied “freeze-all” technique with peak estradiol≥4000pg/ml on trigger day&gt;18oocytes on the OPU day,and recognized significant risk for developing OHSS were also included.The cumulative implantation,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were analyzed,only in embryos from the same COS protocol in every patient. Participants/materials, setting, methods A total of 231 patients were entered for final analysis,who underwent a flexible antagonist protocol,ICSI and fresh or thawed ET on 3th(38.53%) or 5th( 61.47%)day in women’s autologous cycles.Patients were randomized in one of two groups: GroupA-Dual trigger group 1500IUof hCG 4h after GnRH agonist application on trigger day and GroupB –1500IU of HCG 35h later,on the OPU day.We used nonparametric and parametric statistical tests.Significant differences were considered all values ​​of p &lt; 0.05 Main results and the role of chance Both groups are homogenous regarding several variables:age,BMI,type of sterility,smoking status,AMH,PCO, spermogram.There is no significant difference between the two(AvsB)groups according to average number of retrieved oocytes(13.6 vs 14.6 p &gt; 0,05),M II oocytes(11.03 vs 11.99 p &gt; 0.05).The dual trigger group(A)had a higher fertility rate(69.99% vs 64.11% p &lt; 0,05)compared with GnRHagonist trigger group(B).There are no significant difference between groups(AvsB)according to cumulative average number of:transferred embryos(2.4vs2.5 p &gt; 0.05)TQE transfered on 3th day(1.5.vs 1.3.p&gt;0.05);transferred blastocyst(2.6 vs2.7 &gt;0.05);cryo embryos(2.5vs1.9 p &gt; 0.05),but there are significant difference according to cumulative implantation rate of transferred blastocyst in favor of group A(48.18% vs 33.89%p&lt;0.05).Analyzes of morphological characteristics of transferred blastocyst depicted in the order of degree of blastocyst expansion,inner cellular mass(ICM)and trofoectoderm(TE) and ranking overall blastocysts quality from“excellent”,“good”,“average” and “pore” ,shows that there are significantly more percentage of patient with embryo transfer of “excellent” or even one “excellent” blastocyst in group A (30.56%,31.94% vs 21.54%,23.08% p &lt; 0.05) in opposite of percentage of patients with embryo transfer with “poore “” blastocyst in group B (37.5% vs 46.15.%p&lt;0.05). Clinical pregnanacy rate (71.68% vs 50.84% p &lt; 0.05) , and live birth rate (60,18% vs 42,58% ), were significantly higher in group A. There were no cases of moderate or severe OHSS in both groups. Limitations, reasons for caution Dual trigger in GnRH antagonist protocols should be advocated as a safe approach but undetected high risk patients are reasons for caution for developing clinically significant OHSS. Wider implications of the findings: Adjuvant low dose of hCG on GnRHagonist trigger day improve clinical pregnancy and live birth rates without increasing the risk of clinically significant OHSS.Protocol of dual trigger and freezing all oocytes or embryos in patients with high risk of developing OHSS is promising technique in everyday practice. Trial registration number 8698


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1082-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Irani ◽  
C Canon ◽  
A Robles ◽  
B Maddy ◽  
V Gunnala ◽  
...  

STUDY QUESTION Does ovarian stimulation affect embryo euploidy rates or live birth rates (LBRs) after transfer of euploid embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER Euploidy rates and LBRs after transfer of euploid embryos are not significantly influenced by gonadotropin dosage, duration of ovarian stimulation, estradiol level, follicle size at ovulation trigger or number of oocytes retrieved, regardless of a woman’s age. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Aneuploidy rates increase steadily with age, reaching &gt;80% in women &gt;42 years old. The goal of ovarian stimulation is to overcome this high aneuploidy rate through the recruitment of several follicles, which increases the likelihood of obtaining a euploid embryo that results in a healthy conceptus. However, several studies have suggested that a high response to stimulation might be embryotoxic and/or increase aneuploidy rates by enhancing abnormal segregation of chromosomes during meiosis. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated a remarkable difference in euploidy rates, ranging from 39.5 to 82.5%, among young oocyte donors in 42 fertility centres, potentially suggesting an iatrogenic etiology resulting from different stimulation methods. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a retrospective cohort study that included 2230 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles and 930 frozen-thawed single euploid embryo transfer (FET) cycles, performed in our centre between 2013 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 12 298 embryos were analysed for ploidy status. Women were divided into five age groups (&lt;35, 35–37, 38–40, 41–42 and &gt;42 years old). Outcomes were compared between different durations of stimulation (&lt;10, 10–12 and ≥13 days), total gonadotropin dosages (&lt;4000, 4000–6000 and &gt;6000 IU), numbers of oocytes retrieved (&lt;10, 10–19 and ≥20 oocytes), peak estradiol levels (&lt;2000, 2000–3000 and &gt;3000 pg/mL), and sizes of the largest follicle on the day of trigger (&lt;20 and ≥20 mm). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Within the same age group, both euploidy rates and LBRs were comparable between cycles regardless of their differences in total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation, number of oocytes harvested, size of the largest follicles or peak estradiol levels. In the youngest group, (&lt;35 years, n = 3469 embryos), euploidy rates were comparable between cycles with various total gonadotropin dosages (55.6% for &lt;4000 IU, 52.9% for 4000–6000 IU and 62.3% for &gt;6000 IU; P = 0.3), durations of stimulation (54.4% for &lt;10 days, 55.2% for 10–12 days and 60.9% for &gt;12 days; P = 0.2), number of oocytes harvested (59.4% for &lt;10 oocytes, 55.2% for 10–19 oocytes and 53.4% for ≥20 oocytes; P = 0.2), peak estradiol levels (55.7% for E2 &lt; 2000 pg/mL, 55.4% for E2 2000–3000 pg/mL and 54.8% for E2 &gt; 3000 pg/mL; P = 0.9) and sizes of the largest follicle (55.6% for follicles &lt;20 mm and 55.1% for follicles ≥20 mm; P = 0.8). Similarly, in the oldest group (&gt;42 years, n = 1157 embryos), euploidy rates ranged from 8.7% for gonadotropins &lt;4000 IU to 5.1% for gonadotropins &gt;6000 IU (P = 0.3), from 10.8% for &lt;10 days of stimulation to 8.5% for &gt;12 days of stimulation (P = 0.3), from 7.3% for &lt;10 oocytes to 7.4% for ≥20 oocytes (P = 0.4), from 8.8% for E2 &lt; 2000 pg/mL to 7.5% for E2 &gt; 3000 pg/mL (P = 0.8) and from 8.2% for the largest follicle &lt;20 mm to 8.9% for ≥20 mm (P = 0.7). LBRs after single FET were also comparable between these groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although this large study (2230 IVF/PGT-A cycles, 12 298 embryos and 930 single FET cycles) demonstrates the safety of ovarian stimulation in terms of aneuploidy and implantation potential of euploid embryos, a multi-centre study may help to prove the generalisability of our single-centre data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These findings reassure providers and patients that gonadotropin dosage, duration of ovarian stimulation, estradiol level, follicle size at ovulation trigger and number of oocytes retrieved, within certain ranges, do not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates or LBRs, regardless of the woman’s age. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was received and there are no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos P. Polyzos ◽  
Milie Nwoye ◽  
Roberta Corona ◽  
Christophe Blockeel ◽  
Dominic Stoop ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vânia Costa Ribeiro ◽  
Samuel Santos-Ribeiro ◽  
Neelke De Munck ◽  
Panagiotis Drakopoulos ◽  
Nikolaos P. Polyzos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ashok Verma ◽  
Shivani Sharma ◽  
Suresh Verma ◽  
Pankaj Sharma ◽  
Tenzin Tsamo Tenga ◽  
...  

Background: To compare two protocols comprising of FSH/CC/HMG and CC/HMG for ovulation induction and IUI in women with infertility.Methods: 60 women with unexplained infertility were randomized using sequentially numbered opaque envelope method. Group A received inj FSH 150 units on day 2 of menstrual cycle and clomiphene citrate 100 mg from day 3-7, followed by injection HMG 150 units on day 9 of menstrual cycle. Group B received clomiphene citrate 100 mg from day 3-7, and HMG 150 units on day 7 and 9 of the menstrual cycle.  Ovulation triggered with hCG 5000 units when dominant follicle was 18mm. Single IUI was done 36-42 hours afterwards.Results: Pregnancy occurred in 3 out of 30 women in 116 cycles Group A (with FSH) with a pregnancy rate of 10 percent, and 2.8% per cycle. In group B (without FSH) pregnancy occurred in 3 out of 30 women in 117 cycles with pregnancy rate of 10 percent, and 2.6% per cycle. The number of follicles per cycle was 1.36 and follicle size was 18.57 mm in group A. While in Group B numbers of follicles per cycle were 1.22, with average size of 18.9mm. Mean endometrial thickness was 7.7mm in Group A and 6.37 in Group B (p=.01, significant). Mild OHSS was observed in one woman in Group B. No other side effects were observed in both the groups.Conclusions: The controlled ovarian stimulation regimes used in this study are equally effective, easy to administer, require less intensive monitoring and fewer medications, with little risk of OHSS and multiple gestation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document