scholarly journals Outcome analysis of low pressure versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 3740
Author(s):  
Salil Mahajan ◽  
Manu Shankar ◽  
Vinod K. Garg ◽  
Vijender Gupta ◽  
Jaya Sorout
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Bile Spillage

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is established as gold standard for management of cholelithiasis. Intraoperative pneumoperitoneum affects the postoperative outcomes. The current stress is on increasing patient safety. Hence, this prospective study was undertaken to compare the effect of low pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP <10 mm Hg) versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum (HPP > 14 mm Hg) on postoperative pain and ileus.Methods: 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into the LPP (<10mm Hg) group (n=60) and the HPP (>14 mm Hg) group (n=60). Total duration of surgery, intra-operative gas consumption, occurrence of bile spillage during operation, shoulder pain and abdominal pain in postoperative period, additional requirement of analgesia in postoperative period and postoperative ileus were assessed.Results: There was no significant difference in terms of operative duration, consumption of CO2 gas, intraoperative bile spillage, total hospital stay and tolerance to early feeding. The incidence of shoulder pain was higher in patients who underwent HPP laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p<0.05). There was early recovery and early return of bowel activity in LPP which was statistically significant.Conclusions: Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible and safe and results in reduced postoperative shoulder tip pain and near-equal operative time with early return of bowel activity compared with high-pressure pneumoperitoneum.

scholarly journals Intraoperative safety of low pressure pneumoperitoneum cholecystectomy: a comparative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 3679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salil Mahajan ◽  
Manu Shankar ◽  
Vinod K. Garg ◽  
Vijender Gupta ◽  
Jaya Sorout
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Parietal Peritoneum ◽  
Working Space ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Operative Difficulty ◽  
Secondary Port ◽  
Care Surgery ◽  
Bile Spillage

Background: With the establishment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as gold standard for management of cholelithiasis, the current stress is on increasing patient safety. Hence, this study was undertaken to compare the effect of low pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP <10mm Hg) versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum (HPP >14mm Hg) in a prospective randomized manner on intraoperative safety, assessing the working space and safety by seeing contact of parietal peritoneum to underlying viscera during secondary port insertion.Methods: 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into the LPP (<10mm Hg) group (n=60) and the HPP (>14mm Hg) group (n=60) prospectively. Available working space assessed directly, safety by contact of parietal peritoneum to underlying viscera during secondary port insertion and operative difficulty assessed by visualization, dissection and grasping, total duration of surgery; intra-operative gas consumption, and bile spillage were assessed.Results: There was no significant difference in terms of available working space, operative duration, consumption of carbon dioxide, surgeon’s operative difficulty and intraoperative bile spillage. Out of 180 secondary ports inserted, there was evident contact of 20 (11.1%) secondary ports in high pressure groups and 14 (7.7%) secondary ports in low pressure group, which is suggestive of adequate exposure and working space available for surgery at both pressures.Conclusions: Low-pressure cholecystectomy did not compromise intraoperative safety and should be the standard of care in day care surgery.

scholarly journals Comparison of Complications between Direct Trocar Insertion Versus Veress Needle for Creation of Pneumoperitoneum in Patients Undergoing laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Control Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 294-299
Author(s):  
Kamran Hamid ◽  
Shabbir Ahmad ◽  
Bahzad Akram Khan ◽  
Muhammad Faheem Answer ◽  
Amer Latif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Needle Insertion ◽  
Veress Needle ◽  
P Value ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Trocar Insertion ◽  
Laparoscopic Entry ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Direct Trocar Insertion

Aim: To compare the outcomes in term of complication of Veress Needle Insertion (VNI) to Direct Trocar Insertion (DTI) for creation of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Design: Randomized controlled trial Place and Duration of Study: The current analysis was conducted at Khawaja Muhammad Safdar Medical College Surgical Department, Allama Iqbal Memorial Hospital and Govt. Sardar Begum Teaching Hospital, Sialkot from September 27, 2017, to September 26, 2020. Methodology: A total of six hundred and eight (n=608) patients, having age 30 to 75 years planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, Group A (Direct Trocar Insertion), Group B (Veress Needle Insertion). Both groups had age and sex matched males and female. All trocars and veress needle used were disposable, with a safety shield. The primary outcome of our study was to compare the complications to assess the safety levels, while total time taken by the procedure and mean time for laparoscopic entry were the secondary end points. The collected data was analyzed by using software SPSS version 22. Chi-square test was used to check the significance of variance. P-value less than 0.05 remained the statistically significant. Results: The complication rate in VNI group were significantly greater than the DTI group (p < 0.01), the duration of surgery between the two groups was not significantly different (p > 0.05), but we found statistically significant difference in mean laparoscope insertion time (DTI 3.4+ 1.4 versus VNI 4.8+ 0.7 minutes, p < 0.001). Conclusion: From the results of our study, it can be concluded that the direct trocar insertion is a safe alternative to veress needle insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy as it is associated with fewer complications.

Impact of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 1287-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hemanga K. Bhattacharjee ◽  
Azarudeen Jalaludeen ◽  
Virinder Bansal ◽  
Asuri Krishna ◽  
Subodh Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Standard Pressure ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Prospective randomised trial of standard pressure versus low pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary care hospital from Kolkata: Our experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
Bikash Chandra Ghosh ◽  
Ambar Gangopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Stone Disease ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Gall Stone Disease ◽  
Standard Pressure ◽  
Symptomatic Gall Stone

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the procedure of choice for symptomatic gall stone disease. An emerging trend is to perform Low pressure pnuemoperitonium laparoscopic surgery as it has additive advantages over standard pressure to avoid complications while providing adequate working space.Aims and Objectives: The current study was designed with an aim to compare the advantage of low pressure pneumoperitoneum vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in the department of General Surgery in R.G.Kar Medical College from January 2014 to June 2015. A total of 52 patients with symptomatic gall stone disease were recruited, 26 patients in each group randomly. Some intraoperative and post-operative parameters were studied.Results: All the intra-operative (IO) cardio-respiratory parameters (Pulse, Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), End tidal CO2, spO2) were recorded just before incision, 20 minutes intra-operatively and before reversal of general anesthesia (GA). The IO parameters in our study, were found to be significant only at 20 minutes IO and before reversal of GA. The post-operative (PO) parameters (Pulse, MAP, Respiratory rate, spO2) and pain by VAS score at 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours post-operatively were studied. In PO period, we observed significant differences at 2 hours post-operatively in all parameters except MAP. There was significant difference in pain at 6, 12 and 24 hours when compared in both groups. The shoulder tip pain (STP) and 2 hours PO nausea and vomiting were found to be significantly higher in Standard pressure Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) compared to Low pressure Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LPLC). The operative time, duration of hospital stay and return to normal life after surgery though had differences but it was statisticallyinsignificant.Conclusion: Low pressure laparoscopic surgery is safe with least post operative complications when performed by experienced surgeons even in patients of ASA III.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.9(4) 2018 17-22

scholarly journals Is Opioid-Free General Anesthesia More Superior for Postoperative Pain Versus Opioid General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?

PRILOZI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-87
Author(s):  
Marija Toleska ◽  
Aleksandar Dimitrovski
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Balanced Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Abstract Introduction: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a new anesthesiological technique, where the giving of opioids (fentanyl) is avoided in the intra- and post-operative period. This leads to reduction in the opioid-related side effects and lower pain scores in the postoperative period. Materials and methods: In this randomized, single-blind clinical study, 60 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled. Half of them (30 patients) received general balanced anesthesia with fentanyl (F group-FG), and the half received opioid-free general anesthesia (OFA group-OFAG). In the post-operative period, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were followed at rest and when coughing 1 hour, 4 hrs, 8 hrs, 12 and 24 hrs after surgery. Both groups were followed by opioid requirements in the postoperative period. Results: In the postoperative period, patients in the fentanyl group (FG) have higher pain scores at rest and on coughing in all analyzed timeframes compared to patients from the OFA group, but statistically significant difference was approved 1 and 24 hours after surgery. In the OFA group 24 hours after surgery none of the patients reported pain at rest and when coughing number 7, 8, 9 and 10 according to the VAS pain score. The total opioid requirement in the postoperative period was significantly higher in the fentanyl group (FG) at rest and when coughing, compared to the OFA group. Conclusion: Opioid-free anesthesia as a part of multimodal analgesia and a new anesthesiology technique is a safe procedure, where opioid-related negative effects in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy are avoided..

scholarly journals Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Çağdaş Baytar ◽  
Canan Yılmaz ◽  
Derya Karasu ◽  
Serra Topal
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Quadratus Lumborum ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Analgesia Requirement

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided (USG) subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum (QL) block as preventive analgesia methods after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods. A total of 120 patients, 18–75 years of age, were separated into 2 groups preoperatively. Patients in group TAP (n = 60) received 0.3 ml/kg bupivacaine with USG bilateral subcostal TAP block; patients in group QL (n = 60) received 0.3 ml/kg bupivacaine with USG bilateral QL block. Patients were assessed 24 h postoperatively, and pain scores, time to first analgesia requirement, total analgesia dose, and postoperative complications during the first 24 h were recorded. Results. Fifty-three patients in group TAP and 54 in group QL were ultimately evaluated. No statistically significant difference was found in at rest and dynamic visual analog scale scores between the groups. There was also no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to total analgesia consumption. Although the duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in group QL, no statistically significant difference was found in the duration of surgery between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusions. Results of this study demonstrated that USG subcostal TAP and QL blocks similarly reduced postoperative pain scores and analgesia consumption, with high patient satisfaction. However, subcostal TAP block could be considered preferable to QL block because it can be applied easily and in a shorter time.

Reduced Pain, Shorter Hospital Stay And Early Return To Work In Pcnl: Comparative Study On Outcome Of Pcnl Versus Open Surgery In The Treatment Of Large Renal Calculi

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Syed Al Fasani ◽  
Akm Zamanul Islam Bhuiyan
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Objective: To compare the outcome of PCNL & open surgery in the treatment of large renal calculi by assesing the amount of analgesia required to relief pain, mean hospital stay, & convalescence period. Materials & Methods: : This comparative study in during 80 patients diagnosed with kidney stone disease admitted in the NIKDU during the period of Jan’ to Dec’2009. They were divided conveniently into two groups. Intervention was done in the formPCNL(40) and open surgery (40). Clinical outcome like, duration of surgery, postoperative hospital stay,doses of narcotic analgesia required to relief pain and convalescence periodwere reviewed. In complete follow up 9 patients were missed in PCNL group resulting in 31 patients. There was no significant difference in preoperative variables such as age,sex, stone size in cm, stone number- single/multiple and stag horn Stone. Results : There were statistically significant difference in the parameters between the groups,( PCNL vs open surgery [mean ± SD]): duration of operation (min), 97.90 ± 24.89 vs 136.62 ± 23.54, postoperative hospital stay (days) ,4.77 ± 3.98 vs 9.55 ± 3.65, mean time return to work (days) , 3.09 ± 1.21vs 6.25 ± 1.53, ( p value is <0.001). The amount of analgesia required to relief pain was significantly reduced in PCNL vs open procedure ( no patient required > 2 doses vs 27 patient required 3 or >3 doses ), p value is <0.001. Conclusion: PCNL is relatively safe & better treatment option than open surgery in the treatment of large renal calculi. It has reduced pain, shorter hospital stay and more rapid return to work. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 16, No. 1, Jan 2013 p.16-20

Nasalance and Nasality in Low Pressure and High Pressure Speech

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Watterson ◽  
Kerry E. Lewis ◽  
Candace Deutsch
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Communication Disorder ◽  
Test Sensitivity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of ◽  
Hypernasal Speech ◽  
Test Specificity ◽  
The Mean

Objective This study compared nasalance measures and nasality ratings in low pressure (LP) and high pressure (HP) speech. Subjects The subjects for this study were 25 children ranging in age from 5 to 13 years. Twenty of the subjects were patients followed by a craniofacial team, and five had no history of communication disorder. Results The mean nasalance for the LP speech was 29.98% (SD, 16.16), and the mean nasalance for the HP speech was 30.28% (SD, 15.35). The mean nasality rating for the LP speech was 2.31, and the mean nasality rating for the HP speech was 2.59. Separate paired t tests revealed no significant difference between the LP or the HP speech for either the nasalance scores or the nasality ratings. The correlation coefficient between nasalance and nasality for the LP speech was r = 0.78, and for the HP speech r = 0.77. Using a cutoff of 26% for nasalance and 2.0 for nasality, Nasometer test sensitivity was 0.84 and test specificity was 0.88. Conclusions In general, clinicians may obtain valid measures of nasalance and/or ratings of nasality using either an LP stimulus or an HP stimulus. Sensitivity and specificity scores indicated that the Nasometer was reasonably accurate in distinguishing between normal and hypernasal speech samples.

scholarly journals CHOLECYSTECTOMY;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (07) ◽  
pp. 1062-1066
Author(s):  
Bashir Ahmed ◽  
Hamid Raza ◽  
Kamlaish -
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Eye Opening ◽  
Group B

Objectives: The aim of our study which is to compare total intravenousanesthesia with target controlled infusion using the drugs Propofol and remifenatnil with thetechniques of volatile induction maintenance anesthesia using sevoflurane and sufentanil inpatients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure, at a tertiary care hospital inKarachi, Pakistan. Study Design: The type of study is a randomized control trial, conductedfor a period of 8 months Period: from June 2015 to January 2016 Setting: at a tertiary carehospital in Karachi Pakistan. Method: The patient population consisted of n=100 patientsbelonging to the ASA class I and II and undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure atour institute. The patients were divided into two groups group A consisted of all those patientswho underwent total intravenous anesthesia and group B consisted of patients who underwentvolatile induction maintenance anesthesia. Appropriate blinding measures were taken for thosewho were involved in the post-operative care of the patients, and the patients themselves. Duringthe procedure routine monitoring was done, data was recorded in a pre-designed proforma.Patients were analyzed in the post-operative period for side effects and pain levels. Statisticalanalysis was done using SPSS version 23, a p value of less than 0.05 was considered to bestatistically significant. Results: The patient population consisted of n= 100 patients dividedinto two groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the demographicvariables of the patients of both groups (age, weight, baseline values of blood pressure, heartrate, time duration of surgery and anesthesia). The time for the loss of corneal reflex was longerin the group A (109 +/- 90) as compared to group B (45 +/- 10) having a p value of less than0.001. However the time for opening of the eyes and the duration of post anesthesia care unitwas shorter in group A (420 +/- 130 seconds for eye opening and 45 +/- 15 min for PACU) andin group B (484 +/- 116 seconds for eye opening and 53 +/- 25 mins for PACU) having p valuesof 0.006 (eye opening) and 0.017 (PACU) respectively. In group A n= 44 (88%) of the patientsrequired rescue analgesia, and in group B n= 36 (72%) of the patients required it, having a pvalue of 0.013 respectively. The need for the use of ephedrine and atropine in the pre and portoperative period was similar in both the groups. Conclusion: According to the results of ourstudy we found that each method of anesthesia has its own advantages and disadvantagesand the anesthetist present should weigh the risks and benefits for each patient individually,and use the most beneficial method of administration of anesthesia in the patient undergoinglaparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure, accordingly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document