scholarly journals Safety and feasibility of three port procedure in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1975
Author(s):  
Vipin Gupta ◽  
Shailendra Pal Singh ◽  
Somendra Pal Singh ◽  
Anil Kumar Keshari ◽  
Anil Kumar Erry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Standard Technique ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely accepted gold standard technique for management of cholelithiasis and has undergone many refinements including decrease in size and number of ports. Many researchers have claimed that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible method for management of cholelithiasis but still it is not performed widely by the surgeons. Objective of our study was to assess the safety and feasibility of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by comparing the various defined parameters with the standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: The study included 100 patients and was divided equally in 2 groups. Patients in Group A underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy by three-port technique and in Group B were operated by four-port technique. Patients in both the groups were compared in terms of operative time, intra-operative complications, post-operative pain, post-operative complications and cosmesis outcome.Results: The mean operative time was similar in both groups. Intra-op and post-op complications were also similar. 3 patients in Group A needed fourth port and 1 patient in both group required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Mean pain score and requirement of parentral analgesia was found to be lower in Group A. Duration of hospital was similar in both the groups. Patients in group A had slightly better cosmetic outcome.Conclusions: Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive, safe and feasible technique and is not difficult to master than other advanced techniques. In experienced hands, laparoscopy cholecystectomy can be initially started with three-ports and can be converted to four-port if rarely necessary.

scholarly journals Comparison of Early and Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-94
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nasir ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is now accepted as being safe for acute cholecystitis. However, it has not become routine, because the exact timing and approach to the surgical management remains ill define. Careful selection of patients, the knowledge of typical procedure-related complications, and their best treatment are the key points for a safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Objective: To compare the early and delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the acute phase in terms of frequency of conversion to open cholecystectomy. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial. Settings: Department of Surgery, Divisional Headquarter Hospital, Faisalabad. Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad Pakistan. Duration: Study was carried out over a period of six months from June 2018 to May 2019. Methodology: A total of 152 cases (76 cases in each group) were included in this study. All patients were randomly allocated to either group i.e., group -A early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and group-B delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Results: Mean age was 39.09 + 8.8 and 37.05+ 8.5 years in group- A and B, respectively. In group-A, male patients were 48 (63.2%) and female patients were 28 (36.8%). Similarly, in group-B, male patients were 41 (53.9%) and female patients were 35 (46.1%). Conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in 6 patients (7.9%) of group-A and 16 patients (21.0%) of group – B. Significant difference between two groups was observed (P= 0.021). Conclusion: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is safe and feasible in terms of less frequency of conversion to open cholecystectomy.

DOES EARLY LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AFTER ERCP OFFERS SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT IN SURGICAL OUTCOME? A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EARLY AND LATE GROUPS

2021 ◽  
pp. 59-61
Author(s):  
Anshul Mathur ◽  
Ketan Patel ◽  
Jitendra Kumar Mangtani ◽  
K.K. Dangayach
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction:- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) prior to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy(LC) is most commonly practiced strategy worldwide for management of co-existing cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. The time interval between Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) and Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is questionable and varies from 1 day to 6 weeks in different studies. Aims and objectives:- To compare two groups of patients managed with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (after ERCP), EARLY(24 to 72 hours), and LATE(> 6weeks) in terms of mean operative time in minutes, intraoperative difculties, conversion rates to open cholecystectomy, conversion rates to open cholecystectomy, drain insertion required or not, postoperative complications, and duration of hospital stay. Materials and methods:- A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted on 70 patients who presented with concomitant cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis over a period of January 2019 to June 2020 at the Department of General Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur. After ERCP and stone retrieval patients were randomised into 2 groups using sealed envelope method. Group A underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (24 to 72hours) and Group B underwent late laparoscopic cholecystectomy (after 6 weeks). Data collected, statistical analysis done, results and observations concluded. Result:- We found that mean operative time, intraoperative difculties, post operative complications and mean hospital stay in days were signicantly higher in Group B as compared to Group A. Though the conversion rates to open procedure and requirement of drain insertion were comparatively higher in Group B but were found to be statistically non signicant. Conclusion:- We hereby conclude that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (24 to 72 hours) after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is better as compared to late laparoscopic cholecystectomy (>6 weeks) after ERCP in patients of cholelithiasis with coexisting choledocholithiasis. So, we recommend performing early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (24-72hours) after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP)

scholarly journals Ultrasonic cutting and coagulation device versus conventional diathermy dissection in thyroid surgery: prospective randomized trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 335
Author(s):  
Aditya Singhal ◽  
Dharma Kant Baskota ◽  
Kunjan Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Thyroid Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Ultrasonic Device ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lottery System ◽  
Ultrasonic Cutting

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The objective of this study was to compare the operative time and postoperative outcomes in thyroid surgeries using the ultrasonic cutting and coagulation device with conventional diathermy dissection. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">This study was a prospective, interventional, cohort study. The patients   were randomized in two groups by lottery system. The patients operated with ultrasonic device were labeled as Group A: UCCD and by conventional diathermy as Group B: CDD. The operative time, postoperative drain volume, pain score on VAS and complications were assessed and compared in between the two techniques of surgery.  </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Total of 18 males and 58 females underwent thyroid surgery with age ranging from 17 to 75 years. The operative time in UCCD group was less than CDD group (93.29 min vs. 106.59 min; p=0.06). The cumulative mean amount of drain was found to be less in UCCD group, this difference was statistically significant (77.86 ml vs. 138.05 ml; p=0.00018). The drain was removed earlier in UCCD group, this comparison was also statistically significant (2.49 days in UCCD group vs. 3.02 days in CDD group; p=0.000009). The mean pain score was found to be statistically significant on all the postoperative days in UCCD group. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The patients experienced less pain and complication while using UCCD as technique for surgery.  Hence, ultrasonic device using both cutting and coagulating mode at the same time is efficient in hemostasis and lesser post-operative pain, and found to be advantageous.</span></p>

scholarly journals A comparative study of adenoidectomy by microdebrider vs conventional method

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 808
Author(s):  
M. Muniraju ◽  
Mohammed Saifulla
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Collateral Damage ◽  
Adenoid Tissue ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Adenoidectomy is a commonly performed ENT surgery. This present article aims to evaluate endoscopic powered adenoidectomy as an alternative for conventional curettage method.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Sixty consecutive cases requiring adenoidectomy were randomized into two groups of thirty each. Group A underwent endoscopic assisted micro-debrider adenoidectomy and Group B underwent conventional adenoidectomy using the curettage method in study period from November 2015 to May 2017.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The average time taken in Group A was 34.10 minutes and in Group B was 22.83 minutes (p&lt;0.001). The average blood loss in Group A was 29.57 ml as compared to 16.67 ml in Group B (p&lt;0.001). The resection was invariably complete in Group A whereas five (16.7%) cases had more than 50% residual adenoid tissue in Group B. Four cases in group B had collateral damage whereas in Group A, there were no added injuries. Post operative pain was studied only in cases undergoing adenoidectomy alone. Group A (n=8) demonstrated a pain score of 3.50 – 3.09 whereas Group B (n=11) demonstrated a pain score of 2.75-2.55. In group A, the mean recovery period was 2.80 days and 8.23 days in Group B (p&lt;0.001).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Endoscopic powered adenoidectomy was found to be a safe and effective tool for adenoidectomy. The study parameters where endoscopic powered adenoidectomy fared better were completeness of resection, accurate resection under vision, lesser collateral damage and faster recovery time. On the other hand, conventional adenoidectomy scored in matter of lesser operative time and intra-operative bleeding.</p>

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Conventional Electrocautery Versus Ultrasonic Dissector in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-73
Author(s):  
Saad Bin Anis ◽  
Pir Muneeb Rehman ◽  
Farhan Ahmad ◽  
Umar Farooq
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
P Value ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Ultrasonic Dissector ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is very commonly performed for removal of gallstones. In routine, ultrasonic devices are used for laparoscopy involving the deeper operating fields, while electrosurgical devices are preferred for LC. However, nowadays both of these devices are used for LC. The objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of ultrasonic dissector over conventional electrocautery in patients planned for LC. Material and Methods: This non-randomized clinical trial was conducted in general surgery unit, Jinnah hospital Lahore. The study duration was 15th January 2015 to 31st December 2016. In group A (n=100), patients were operated through three-port standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional electrosurgical cautery was used for dissection. While in group B (n=50), patients were operated through single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and Harmonic dissector was used for sealing of cystic artery and cystic duct. SPSS version 23 was used for data analysis. Complications between electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector were compared using chi-square test/Fischer exact test and operative time was compared using student’s t-test with p-value ≤ 0.05 considered as statistically significant.Results: Out of 150 patients planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 33 (22%) were males and 117 (78%) females. The mean age was 40±6.45 years with an age range of 12-80 years. In group A, intraoperative gall bladder perforation was found in 5 patients whereas in group B, there was only one patient with perforation. A total of 4 cases were converted to open cholecystectomy in group A due to difficult dissection in Calot’s triangle as compared to 1 case in group B. In group A, 3 cases had postoperative bile leakage in the drain. In two patients it settled over a period of 3 days. About 03 cases had wound infection in group A and 1 in group B. Mean operative time in group A was 42.2±8.93 minutes versus 35.7±4.85 minutes in group B (p-value 0.001).Conclusion: In this study, the rate of post-operative complications was similar between the two groups, but operative time was significantly shorter in the group B. Harmonic dissector enabled easy dissection of tissues with good hemostasis and less trafficking of instrument, avoiding use of clips and sutures during minimal invasive surgery.

scholarly journals Short term outcomes of three dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Razaque Shaikh ◽  
Aaijaz Ahmed Shaikh ◽  
Mujib Rehman Abbasi
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the short-term outcomes of three dimensional (3D) versus two dimensional (2D) laparoscopic procedures used for cholecystectomy. Methods: This study was conducted at minimally invasive surgery center of Liaquat University of Medical Health and Sciences (LUMHS) Jamshoro Pakistan, between 15th May 2017 to 16th December 2017 after taking informed consent. All patients were diagnosed cases of cholelithiasis without any complications. Patients having risk factors for inability to get access to gall bladder via laparoscope and in whom the chances of conversion to open cholecystectomy were greater were not included as part of study. One group of patients underwent cholecystectomy under 3D laparoscopy while other group underwent 2D laparoscopy. Surgeons included in the study were all well-trained. The short-term outcome noted were intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion to open, operative time, mortality and hospital stay. Visual strain and headache for the surgeon in three D laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results: A total of one hundred forty patients were included in the study. Group-A consists of sixty two females and eleven males whereas Group-B comprised of fifty eight females and fifteen males. Eight percent of patients in Group-A whereas in Group-B two percent had gallbladder rupture. Fifteen percent of patients in Group-A whereas 5.4% from Group-B had bleeding from liver bed. One patient from Group-A had CBD (Common Bile Duct) injury. Post-operatively two (2.73%) patients from Group-A had port site bleeding. Six (8.21%) patients had port site infection in Group-A. Conclusion: Three dimensional was found to have low incidence of intra-operative and post-operative complications compared to 2D laparoscopic cholecystectomy. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3721 How to cite this:Shaikh AR, Shaikh AA, Abbasi M. Short term outcomes of three dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):162-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3721 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FLUCTUATIONS IN HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS USING DIFFERENT INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURES IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

2021 ◽  
pp. 27-29
Author(s):  
Challa Karunasree ◽  
Devashri Chilke ◽  
Arunima Dutta ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hemodynamic Changes ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy decreases postoperative pain, decreases the need for postoperative analgesia, returns the patient to full activity within 1 week (compared with 1 month after open cholecystectomy), discharged the day after surgery. This study was conducted to compare the uctuations in hemodynamic changes using different intra- abdominal pressures with CO2 in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thisrandomised, prospective, interventional study was conducted in Durgapur Steel Plant Hospital, Durgapur, West Bengal from November 2018 to January 2020. In our study, we attempted to compare the uctuations in hemodynamic changes using different intra- abdominal pressures. Present study included 90 cases undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy who were randomly divided into 3 groups with different intra-abdominal pressures, maintained during surgical intervention by CO2 insufation. RESULT: Mean VAS score was 2.83 in group Aafter 6 hours of laparoscopic cholecystectomy which decreased to 2.13 and 0.07 by the end of 12 and 24 hours respectively. The mean VAS scores for group B and C were 5.87; 8.03, 4.33; 7.10 and 2.40; 5.93 at 6, 12 and 24 hours post laparoscopic cholecystectomy respectively. Mean VAS score was signicantly lower in group A as compared to group B and lower in group B as compared to group C respectively at all time intervals (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Low intra-abdominal pressures during surgical intervention by CO2 insufation leads to better hemodynamic control, better pain management and decreased hospital stay. Present study thus recommends use of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in all cases undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals Modified Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Lengthening by Triple Hemisection for Achilles Tendon Contracture

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangjing Lin ◽  
Jin Cao ◽  
Changgui Zhang ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Xiaojun Duan
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Tendon Lengthening ◽  
Group A ◽  
Achilles Tendon Lengthening ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background. Both percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening by triple hemisection and the traditional open Z-lengthening are effective methods for Achilles tendon contracture. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new therapeutic method, which is based on the percutaneous sliding technique with three hemi-cuts in the tendon, as compared with the traditional open Z-lengthening. Methods. Retrospective analysis of the Achilles tendon contracture cases in our hospital between January 2010 and September 2016 was conducted. Twenty-five cases received percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening (group A), and 30 patients who underwent open Z-lengthening during the same period were in the control group (group B). Operative time and hospital stay were statistically analyzed. Incision complication, equinus recurrence rate and Achilles tendon rupture morbidity were recorded. The function was assessed by American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. All cases in group A received Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of ankle preoperatively and in the follow-ups. Results. The mean follow-up period was 42.04 months in group A and 61.7 months in group B. The entire operative time and the mean hospitalization days were lower in group A than in group B. No incision and infection complication occurred in group A. The infection rate in group B was 3.3%. Equinus recurrence rate was 4% in group A and the equinus recurrence rate in group B was 21.4%. In group A, the mean AOFAS score increased from 64 ± 10.16 points preoperatively to 96.08 ± 3.17 at final follow-up, while the score in group B increased from 63.48 ± 6.2 points to 85.4 ± 10.3. MRI showed continuity of the Achilles tendon and homogeneous signal in group A. Conclusion. Modified surgery can significantly reduce the risk of Achilles tendon rupture, provide better balance in soft tissue strength between ankle dorsiflexion and ankle plantarflexion, helping to avoid recurrence of the deformity.

Comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in haemorrhoidectomy patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmad ◽  
Syed Tatheer Abbas ◽  
Amna Javaid ◽  
Naveed Arshad ◽  
Falak Shair
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Complete Wound Healing ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To assess the comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted at General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2019 to September 2019. Informed consent was obtained from eligible 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group-A, haemorrhoidectomy was conducted according to the harmonic scalpel method. In group-B, open haemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan Morgan procedure. Data was assembled through a designed questionnaire and investigated via SPSS version 25. Data were stratified for descriptive statistics, level of haemorrhoids and period of haemorrhoids. Post-stratification, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Mean age of both groups patients were 44.6±7.6 and 43.8±8.2 years, respectively. In group-A, mean operative time was 20.8±2.8 minutes, while 26.5±2.8 minutes in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. In group-A, mean convalescence period was 9.7±2.9 days, while 13.4±3.7 days in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. The mean convalescence period with harmonic scalpel method was 7.4 days (range 5–14, SD 3.6) versus 18.6 days (range 7–30, SD 5.4) with Milligan Morgan technique (P?0.001). This research observed that harmonic scalpel method required almost six weeks for complete wound healing, whereas in  Milligan Morgan technique, complete wound healing was achieved after three months (P<0.05). Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy found an advantageous method when assessing the operative time and convalescence period. Hence, Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternative method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids. Continuous...

Role of a modified epigastric port in reducing post operative pain and causing early ambulation in a patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to a standard four port procedure, a randomized controlled study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 3986
Author(s):  
Arijit Roy ◽  
Pramatha Nath Datta ◽  
Kushankur Guha
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Quality Life ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Better Than

Background: Standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard in the treatment of gall stones. Modified epigastric port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be considered an alternative, as this procedure maintains the advantages of four ports and does not require any special set of instruments. In this study we aimed to see whether this procedure is comparable to the standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on the primary objectives of postoperative pain score, degree of ambulation, time to return to normal activities.Methods: Consecutive patients due to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, meeting all the predefined criteria were recruited into the study. The group A was assigned to receive intervention in the form of modified epigastric port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The group B was assigned to receive intervention in the form of standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients in group A were compared with patients in group B based on multiple pre-defined parameters.Results: Pain scores were significantly better in group A. Degree of ambulation at was significantly better in group A. In respect to the time to resumption of normal activities there was no significant difference between the two groups. When comparing the quality life at 1 month following surgery with SF-36 health survey, the patients in group A did better than patients in group B with respect to the six scales. Conclusions: Modified epigastric port laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be significantly better than the standard four port cholecystectomy in terms of postoperative recovery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document