scholarly journals A comparative study of adenoidectomy by microdebrider vs conventional method

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 808
Author(s):  
M. Muniraju ◽  
Mohammed Saifulla
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Collateral Damage ◽  
Adenoid Tissue ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Adenoidectomy is a commonly performed ENT surgery. This present article aims to evaluate endoscopic powered adenoidectomy as an alternative for conventional curettage method.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Sixty consecutive cases requiring adenoidectomy were randomized into two groups of thirty each. Group A underwent endoscopic assisted micro-debrider adenoidectomy and Group B underwent conventional adenoidectomy using the curettage method in study period from November 2015 to May 2017.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The average time taken in Group A was 34.10 minutes and in Group B was 22.83 minutes (p&lt;0.001). The average blood loss in Group A was 29.57 ml as compared to 16.67 ml in Group B (p&lt;0.001). The resection was invariably complete in Group A whereas five (16.7%) cases had more than 50% residual adenoid tissue in Group B. Four cases in group B had collateral damage whereas in Group A, there were no added injuries. Post operative pain was studied only in cases undergoing adenoidectomy alone. Group A (n=8) demonstrated a pain score of 3.50 – 3.09 whereas Group B (n=11) demonstrated a pain score of 2.75-2.55. In group A, the mean recovery period was 2.80 days and 8.23 days in Group B (p&lt;0.001).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Endoscopic powered adenoidectomy was found to be a safe and effective tool for adenoidectomy. The study parameters where endoscopic powered adenoidectomy fared better were completeness of resection, accurate resection under vision, lesser collateral damage and faster recovery time. On the other hand, conventional adenoidectomy scored in matter of lesser operative time and intra-operative bleeding.</p>

scholarly journals Comparative study between conventional adenoidectomy and adenoidectomy using micro-debrider

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Essam A. Abo Elmagd ◽  
Mahmoud S. Khalifa ◽  
Beshoy K. Abeskharoon ◽  
Abdelrahman A. El Tahan
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Average Amount ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Adenoid Tissue ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Adenoidectomy is a common ENT procedure. This article aims to evaluate micro-debrider-assisted adenoidectomy as a substitute for the conventional curettage method. Results The study aimed to compare between two study groups: micro-debrider-assisted adenoidectomy (group A) and conventional adenoidectomy (group B). The average time needed in group A was 34.1 min while it was 22.83 min in group B (p<0.001). The average amount of blood lost in group A was 29.57 ml and 16.67 ml in group B (p<0.001). The resection was nearly complete in group A, while in group B, five (16.66%) cases had more than 50% of the adenoid tissue left behind. Four cases in group B had damage to collaterals while in group A no major injuries were noted. Postoperative pain has only been studied in cases where adenoidectomy solely was done. Candidates in group A (n=8) reported a pain score of 3.5-3.09 whereas candidates in group B (n=11) reported a pain score of 2.75-2.55. The mean recovery time was 2.8 days in group A and 8.23 days in group B (p<0.001). Conclusions Endoscopic adenoidectomy using micro-debrider is both an effective and safe adenoidectomy tool. The strengths of this technique include resection completeness, precise resection under vision, minor damage to collaterals, and a more rapid recovery period. Conventional adenoidectomy, however, scored better regarding lesser operative time and bleeding intraoperatively.

scholarly journals Ultrasonic cutting and coagulation device versus conventional diathermy dissection in thyroid surgery: prospective randomized trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 335
Author(s):  
Aditya Singhal ◽  
Dharma Kant Baskota ◽  
Kunjan Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Thyroid Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Ultrasonic Device ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Lottery System ◽  
Ultrasonic Cutting

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The objective of this study was to compare the operative time and postoperative outcomes in thyroid surgeries using the ultrasonic cutting and coagulation device with conventional diathermy dissection. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">This study was a prospective, interventional, cohort study. The patients   were randomized in two groups by lottery system. The patients operated with ultrasonic device were labeled as Group A: UCCD and by conventional diathermy as Group B: CDD. The operative time, postoperative drain volume, pain score on VAS and complications were assessed and compared in between the two techniques of surgery.  </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Total of 18 males and 58 females underwent thyroid surgery with age ranging from 17 to 75 years. The operative time in UCCD group was less than CDD group (93.29 min vs. 106.59 min; p=0.06). The cumulative mean amount of drain was found to be less in UCCD group, this difference was statistically significant (77.86 ml vs. 138.05 ml; p=0.00018). The drain was removed earlier in UCCD group, this comparison was also statistically significant (2.49 days in UCCD group vs. 3.02 days in CDD group; p=0.000009). The mean pain score was found to be statistically significant on all the postoperative days in UCCD group. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The patients experienced less pain and complication while using UCCD as technique for surgery.  Hence, ultrasonic device using both cutting and coagulating mode at the same time is efficient in hemostasis and lesser post-operative pain, and found to be advantageous.</span></p>

scholarly journals Safety and feasibility of three port procedure in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1975
Author(s):  
Vipin Gupta ◽  
Shailendra Pal Singh ◽  
Somendra Pal Singh ◽  
Anil Kumar Keshari ◽  
Anil Kumar Erry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Standard Technique ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely accepted gold standard technique for management of cholelithiasis and has undergone many refinements including decrease in size and number of ports. Many researchers have claimed that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible method for management of cholelithiasis but still it is not performed widely by the surgeons. Objective of our study was to assess the safety and feasibility of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by comparing the various defined parameters with the standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: The study included 100 patients and was divided equally in 2 groups. Patients in Group A underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy by three-port technique and in Group B were operated by four-port technique. Patients in both the groups were compared in terms of operative time, intra-operative complications, post-operative pain, post-operative complications and cosmesis outcome.Results: The mean operative time was similar in both groups. Intra-op and post-op complications were also similar. 3 patients in Group A needed fourth port and 1 patient in both group required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Mean pain score and requirement of parentral analgesia was found to be lower in Group A. Duration of hospital was similar in both the groups. Patients in group A had slightly better cosmetic outcome.Conclusions: Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive, safe and feasible technique and is not difficult to master than other advanced techniques. In experienced hands, laparoscopy cholecystectomy can be initially started with three-ports and can be converted to four-port if rarely necessary.

scholarly journals Modified Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Lengthening by Triple Hemisection for Achilles Tendon Contracture

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangjing Lin ◽  
Jin Cao ◽  
Changgui Zhang ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Xiaojun Duan
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Tendon Lengthening ◽  
Group A ◽  
Achilles Tendon Lengthening ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background. Both percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening by triple hemisection and the traditional open Z-lengthening are effective methods for Achilles tendon contracture. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new therapeutic method, which is based on the percutaneous sliding technique with three hemi-cuts in the tendon, as compared with the traditional open Z-lengthening. Methods. Retrospective analysis of the Achilles tendon contracture cases in our hospital between January 2010 and September 2016 was conducted. Twenty-five cases received percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening (group A), and 30 patients who underwent open Z-lengthening during the same period were in the control group (group B). Operative time and hospital stay were statistically analyzed. Incision complication, equinus recurrence rate and Achilles tendon rupture morbidity were recorded. The function was assessed by American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. All cases in group A received Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of ankle preoperatively and in the follow-ups. Results. The mean follow-up period was 42.04 months in group A and 61.7 months in group B. The entire operative time and the mean hospitalization days were lower in group A than in group B. No incision and infection complication occurred in group A. The infection rate in group B was 3.3%. Equinus recurrence rate was 4% in group A and the equinus recurrence rate in group B was 21.4%. In group A, the mean AOFAS score increased from 64 ± 10.16 points preoperatively to 96.08 ± 3.17 at final follow-up, while the score in group B increased from 63.48 ± 6.2 points to 85.4 ± 10.3. MRI showed continuity of the Achilles tendon and homogeneous signal in group A. Conclusion. Modified surgery can significantly reduce the risk of Achilles tendon rupture, provide better balance in soft tissue strength between ankle dorsiflexion and ankle plantarflexion, helping to avoid recurrence of the deformity.

The Outcome Comparison of two Groups of total Extraperitoneal and Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2712-2714
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aamir Jamil ◽  
Muhammad Asif ◽  
Imran Yousaf ◽  
Muhammad Faheem Anwer ◽  
Muhammad Waseem Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Total Extraperitoneal ◽  
Outcome Comparison ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Aim: The outcome comparison of total extraperitoneal versus mesh repair for inguinal hernia. Study design: Quasi experimental study. Place and duration of study: Department of Surgery, M. Islam Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala from March 2018 to March 2019. Methodology: After the approval of hospital ethical committee, a total of 50 patients were included and randomly divided into two groups equally. Group A (Total extraperitoneal), Group B (Mesh repair). An informed consent was taken from every patient about operative procedure and the outcome. A detailed history of the patient i.e. clinical examination, routine investigations (CBC, Urine R/E, urea, creatinine) and some specific investigations (chest X-ray, ECG and ultrasound abdomen and prostate) was done for surgery. All data of patients was collected on proforma and was analyzed with the help of a computer SPSS programme 20. Results: The mean age of patients was 34.22±11.54 years in group A and 35.63±11.25 years in group B. All male and female patients included in this study in both groups. Twelve (48%) of patients were direct inguinal hernia in group A 13(22%) were in group B and 14(56%) patients were in group A and 11(44%) patients were in group B. The mean±SD postoperative hospital stay was 24.48±4.62 in group A and 34.65±12.26 hours in group B (p 0.001). The mean±SD postoperative recovery time in weeks was 2.18±0.43 in group A and 2.90±0.46 weeks in group B (p 0.001). Only 2 (4%) patient had postoperative infection on first week and 4 (8%) patients had infection respectively. No recurrence was seen in group A and only 3% recurrence was in group B. Conclusion: It is concluded that group A had shorter hospital stay, recovery time, postoperative time and less infection rate as compared to group B. In group A 13% patients had severe pain and in group B 25% patients. Keywords: Inguinal Hernia, Total extraperitoneal, Mesh repair.

Comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in haemorrhoidectomy patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmad ◽  
Syed Tatheer Abbas ◽  
Amna Javaid ◽  
Naveed Arshad ◽  
Falak Shair
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Complete Wound Healing ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To assess the comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted at General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2019 to September 2019. Informed consent was obtained from eligible 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group-A, haemorrhoidectomy was conducted according to the harmonic scalpel method. In group-B, open haemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan Morgan procedure. Data was assembled through a designed questionnaire and investigated via SPSS version 25. Data were stratified for descriptive statistics, level of haemorrhoids and period of haemorrhoids. Post-stratification, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Mean age of both groups patients were 44.6±7.6 and 43.8±8.2 years, respectively. In group-A, mean operative time was 20.8±2.8 minutes, while 26.5±2.8 minutes in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. In group-A, mean convalescence period was 9.7±2.9 days, while 13.4±3.7 days in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. The mean convalescence period with harmonic scalpel method was 7.4 days (range 5–14, SD 3.6) versus 18.6 days (range 7–30, SD 5.4) with Milligan Morgan technique (P?0.001). This research observed that harmonic scalpel method required almost six weeks for complete wound healing, whereas in  Milligan Morgan technique, complete wound healing was achieved after three months (P<0.05). Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy found an advantageous method when assessing the operative time and convalescence period. Hence, Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternative method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids. Continuous...

scholarly journals A Double-Blind Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Ondansetron with Droperidol in the Prevention of Emesis following Strabismus Surgery

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Davis ◽  
S. Krige ◽  
D. Moyes
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Time ◽  
Strabismus Surgery ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Oral Fluids ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Mean Time

A prospective double-blind study was conducted to compare the anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol in preventing postoperative emesis following strabismus surgery. A sample size of 213 patients was divided into three equal groups to receive ondansetron 150 μg/kg (Group A), ondansetron 75 μg/kg (Group B), or droperidol 75 fig/kg (Group C). All patients received a standardized anaesthetic technique. All episodes of emesis, recovery time, and time to tolerating oral fluids were recorded. The incidence of emesis during 24 hours was Groups A and B 19.7%, and Group C 28.2%. The lower incidence of emesis recorded by the ondansetron groups compared with the droperidol group was not statistically significant. Ondansetron at 75 μg/kg was as effective as 150 μg/kg in reducing emesis when compared with droperidol. Mean time to discharge from the recovery room was 75.3 minutes (Group A), 44.4 minutes (Group B), and 41.0 minutes (Group C). The mean time to tolerating oral fluids was 356.5 minutes (Group A), 402.8 minutes (Group B), and 378.1 minutes (Group C). There was no statistical difference in discharge times from recovery or time to tolerating oral fluids in any of the three groups.

scholarly journals Comparing the Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam on Sedation in Children with Head Trauma to Perform CT in Emergency Department / Upoređivanje efekata deksmedetomidina i midazolama na sedaciju dece sa povredom glave radi snimanja CT-om na Odeljenju urgentne medicine

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-65
Author(s):  
Hojjat Derakhshanfar ◽  
Farzad Bozorgi ◽  
Adel Hosseini ◽  
Shamila Noori ◽  
Abolfazl Mostafavi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Head Trauma ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Loading Dose ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pediatric Sedation ◽  
Group B

Summary Many of the children referred to the emergency complain of head trauma. Children usually require sedition to reduce their failure and fear because of high activity and fear of performing computed tomography (CT). Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam belong to short-acting drugs for this purpose. This study aimed to compare the effect of the above mentioned drugs on sedition in children. Children referred to the emergency department were randomly divided into two groups. Group A was sedated with 0.05 mg/kg IV Midazolam and group B with 2μg/kg IV Dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes (loading dose), and then repeat boluses 2μg/kg IV over 10 minutes. Measurements included induction time, recovery time, efficacy, side effects, complications, and failure with each drug and vital signs and RAMSY scale. SPSS V.20 was used for data analysis. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Totally, 100 patients participated in the current study (44 girls and 56 boys). The mean and standard deviation of age was 5.3 ± 2.5 years. During the study, just 5 patients (10%) from group A did not have appropriate sedition following the injection of first dose of Midazolam and received the second dose. However, in B group patients no such case was reported. No significant difference was observed among blood pressure, heart rate, respiration and RAMSY Scale among the groups. No significant difference was seen between efficacy of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine in pediatric sedation. More research should be done for generalization of our findings .

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF TRIGGER POINT PRESSURE RELEASE WITH ULTRASOUND THERAPY TO DECREASE RHOMBOIDS TRIGGER POINTS PAIN

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Azam Mahmood ◽  
Saad Saleem ◽  
Muhammad Usman Khan
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ultrasound Therapy ◽  
Pressure Release ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of trigger point (TrP) pressure release with ultrasound therapy to reduce rhomboid pain due to TrP. STUDY DESIGN Experimental study STUDY SETTINGS Outpatient department of Ziauddin Hospital, Clifton campus, Karachi, Pakistan. SAMPLE SIZE 50 patients SAMPLING TECHNIQUE Simple random sampling. The patients were divided into two groups of 25. Group A were given TrP pressure release treatment with exercise and group B were given ultrasound (u/s) treatment with exercise. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and functional rating index (FRI) for functional performance RESULTS In group A, mean pain score on VAS before the treatment were 5.88±1.130 and after treatment were 1.80±1.041 with a p-value of <0.006. Group B, mean pain score on VAS before treatment were 6.56±1.446, after treatment were 2.72±1.208, with a p-value of <0.006. The mean FRI in group A before treatment was 39.92 ± 2.691 and after treatment was 29.60 ± 5.454, with a p-value of 0.002. The mean FRI in Group B before treatment was 41.12 ± 2.505 and after treatment was 35.92 ± 4.183, with a p-value of 0.002.

scholarly journals A comparative study of two operative procedures in anterior hypospadias repair: limited urethral mobilization and tubularized incised plate urethroplasty.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1578-1584
Author(s):  
Shafiq ur Rehman ◽  
Fareena Ishtiaq ◽  
Zarlish Fazal ◽  
Muhammad Anwar ◽  
Saad Fazal
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Cosmetic Appearance ◽  
Tubularized Incised Plate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objectives: This study is aimed to compare the results of limited urethral mobilization and tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in the management of anterior hypospadias, in terms of cosmetic and functional outcomes, complication rate, operative time, and hospital stay. Study Design: Prospective Randomized Controlled study. Settings: Department of Pediatric Surgery, DHQ Teaching Hospital Sahiwal. Period: January 2019 to December 2020. Material and Methods: A total of 89 patients with anterior hypospadias were included. Patients were divided randomly into two groups. In group A, limited urethral mobilization was performed and in group B, tubularized incised plate urethroplasty was carried out. A self-structured performa was used to collect the data of all patients. Both groups were compared in terms of the operation time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, cosmetic appearance, and functional outcomes. Results: Forty-five patients were included in group A, age ranged from 2.5 to 12 years (mean 4.83years). Forty-four patients were included in group B and their ages ranged from 3.5 to 11years (mean 4.76 years). The operation time was significantly less for group A than for group B. In group A, it ranged from 54 to 69 min with an average time of 60.51 min and in group B from 70 to 88 min, with an average of 79.34 min. The mean hospital stay period in group A was 7.37 days, ranged from 7 to 9 days, and in group B was 11.04 days, ranging from 10 to 13 days. The mean follow-up period in both groups was 7.45 months, ranging from 3 months to 12 months. Meatal stenosis was the most common complication in group A, which developed in 6.66% (n=3) patients. Urethrocutaneous fistula was the most common complication in group B, which developed in 6.81% (n=3) patients. Cosmetic appearance and functional outcome were good and comparable in both groups. Conclusion: Although both techniques, tubularized incised plate and limited urethral mobilization urethroplasty are acceptable modalities for the management of anterior hypospadias. But limited urethral mobilization urethroplasty seems to be a good option due to its simplicity, short hospital stay, significant shorter operative time, low fistula formation rate, and good cosmetic and functional outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document