scholarly journals A prospective study of 50 cases of laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis by Endo GIA universal loading stapler (green/blue) versus Endo GIA articulating reload with tri staple technology (purple)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 3657
Author(s):  
Mehulkumar K. Vasaiya ◽  
Samir M. Shah ◽  
Vikram B. Gohil ◽  
Milankumar S. Vaghasia
Keyword(s):  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Staple Line ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Clinical Safety ◽  
Postoperative Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group B ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: Intestinal anastomosis is a commonly performed procedure in surgery. Various evolvements have occurred in the field of intestinal anastomosis and recent advancement is the use of stapler in laparoscopic surgeries as a device for Gastrointestinal (GI) anastomosis. Few previous studies evaluating the clinical safety of the 2 laparoscopic linear stapling devices are available.Methods: A prospective comparative study of 50 cases which met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this hospital-based study. They were randomly allocated to two groups, Group A which underwent laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis by Endo GIA tri-staple (purple) stapler and Group B which underwent Endo GIA universal loading unit (blue/green) stapler. Primary outcome was assessed in terms of intra-operative staple line bleeding, operative time and post-operative anastomotic leak.Results: Patients with laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis by Endo GIA tri-staple stapler (purple) have required less operation time as compared to Endo GIA universal loading unit. In Endo GIA universal loading unit (blue/green) 04% patients developed anastomotic leak and 40% patients had intra-operative staple line bleed while with Endo GIA tri-staple no postoperative anastomotic leak was found and 02% patients developed intra-operative staple line bleeding.Conclusions: The result of our study has shown that the Endo GIA reload tri- staple (purple) is superior in terms of having no anastomosis leak, negligent staple line bleeding and less operation time as compared with Endo GIA universal loading unit (blue/green). Thus, laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis by Endo GIA reload tri-staple stapler (purple) technology is more effective and overall more efficient.

scholarly journals Study of clinical outcome of patients undergoing intestinal anastomoses with single layer extramucosal technique and double layer anastomoses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvind Rai ◽  
Sukantth R. J.
Keyword(s):  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Layer Versus ◽  
Intestinal Anastomoses ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

 Background: Intestinal anastomosis is one of the common surgeries for cases like bowel obstruction, incarcerated hernias, benign and malignant tumours of small and large bowel. The ideal intestinal anastomosis does not leak and allow normal function of the gastrointestinal tract. This study compared single layer versus double layer  intestinal anastomosis in terms of duration, postoperative complications like anastomotic leak.Methods: A total of 100 patients admitted in Hamidia hospital, based on history and clinical examinations and radiological examinations, placed in two groups, group A (single layer anastomosis) and group B (double layer anastomosis) and were operated by a qualified surgical specialist. Data analysis of anastomotic time, anastomotic leak was done and statistical tests of significance were applied. A p value less than 0.05 is considered as significant.Results: In group A (single layer) the time required to perform in 30 (60%) patients is between 16-20 minutes. In double layer, maximum were done in between 26 to 30 minutes, 32 (64%). In our study of 100 patients, there were 6 anastomotic leaks, of which four of them were in group A (single layer) and 2 of them in group B (double layer).Conclusions: In our study, the duration required to perform a single layer intestinal anastomosis is significantly lesser when compared to double layer. There is no significant difference in anastomotic leak between two groups. Less time with no difference in complications, a move towards single layer anastomosis should be preferred.

scholarly journals Single Layer Extra-Mucosal Interrupted Anastomoses; Revalidated

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
Bilal Khattak ◽  
Faiz -Ur- Rahman ◽  
Irfan -Ul-Islam Nasir ◽  
Muhammad Iftikhar ◽  
Imtiaz Ahmad Khattak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
P Value ◽  
Burst Abdomen ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Anastomosis Leakage ◽  
Group B

Objective:To evaluate the safety regarding anastomotic failure of single layer interrupted extra mucosal intestinal anastomosis in comparison with double layer intestinal anastomosisMethodology:This prospective comparative study was conducted in surgical A unit of Lady reading Hospital Peshawar from 1st June 2007 to 1st February 2008 (8 months).Patients were divided into two groups, each comprising 60 patients. First 60 consecutive patients were included in Group A, for single layer extra mucosal anastomosis while Group B included last 60 consecutive patients for double layer inverting anastomosis (continuous inner and interrupted outer Lambert sutures). All the cases were admitted through OPD and emergency. The safety of two techniques of anastomosis was analyzed by comparing the outcome in terms of complications.Results:In this study, anastomosis leakage occurred only in 4 (3.33%) patients, one (1.67%) in group A and three (5%) in group B with a P-Value 0.138. Mean age of patient in group A was 36.15 years (+/- 6.0 years) and in group B was 33.25 years (+/- 5.5 years).Conclusion:Single layer extra-mucosal anastomosis has least anastomotic leakage and other complication like wound infection, septicemia, and collection and burst abdomen than in patients with double layer investing anastomosis.

Longer Operative Time and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion are Associated with Postoperative Anastomotic Leak after Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Chandler S. Cortina ◽  
Gillian C. Alex ◽  
Kristin N. Vercillo ◽  
Vidyaratna A. Fleetwood ◽  
Jill B. Smolevitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Leak Rate ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Blood Transfusions ◽  
Postoperative Anastomotic Leak

Anastomotic leak after lower gastrointestinal surgery is a complication with potential for high morbidity, mortality, and increased costs. A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent lower gastrointestinal surgery between June 2009 and June 2013. Fifty-seven variables were included in our analysis and their association with postoperative anastomotic leak was examined. Nine hundred fifty-two patients underwent 983 lower gastrointestinal anastomoses with an overall leak rate in this series of 6 per cent. Type of intestinal anastomosis created (P < 0.00005), operative indication (P < 0.015), operation performed (P < 0.014), intraoperative blood transfusion (P < 0.017), and intraoperative surgical drain placement (P < 0.022) were all predictive of anastomotic leak. Anastomotic leak rate increased by 1.3 times for every additional hour in the operating room after three hours. Both increasing operation time and intraoperative blood transfusions were associated with an increased rate of anastomotic leak. When operative time extends beyond three hours or in those cases were blood transfusions are given, surgeons should consider taking steps to minimize the risks of a potential anastomotic leak.

scholarly journals A Prospective Study of Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate Comparing the Efficiency and Safety of the Method in Large and Small Adenomas

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Mertziotis ◽  
Diomidis Kozyrakis ◽  
Christos Kyratsas ◽  
Andreas Konandreas
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Transurethral Resection Of Prostate ◽  
Stricture Formation ◽  
Urogenital Infections ◽  
Bipolar Technology ◽  
Group A ◽  
New Perspective ◽  
Group B ◽  
A Prospective Study

Bipolar technology offers a new perspective in the treatment of BPH.Purpose.To present our experience with the TURis system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).Materials and Methods.From February 2011 till December 2013 in a prospective study, 93 patients were treated for BPH. They were evaluated with IPSS, QoL, uroflow (Qmax), and residual urine (RU), preoperatively as well as 6 and 9 months postoperatively. Based on the prostate volume, the patients were divided into two groups: group A (n=48) with prostates ≥ 75 cc and group B (n=45) with smaller prostate glands. All patients underwent bipolar TURP or/and plasma vaporization.Results.The postoperative improvement for IPSS, QoL,Qmax, and RU was statistically significant. The operation time was longer in group A in comparison with group B (P<0.001). The former group also had higher infection and stricture formation rates; however, there was no statistical difference between the two groups.Conclusions.Treatment with the TURis constitutes an effective technique and can be offered to large prostates with results equivalent to those in small ones. Regarding safety, large adenomas treated with TURis are not at a higher risk for urethral stricture but their odds to develop urogenital infections are relatively higher compared to the smaller adenomas.

scholarly journals Intermittent Self Dilation – An Option For The Prevention of Urethral Stricture Recurrence After Filliform Follower Urethral Dilation

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
N M Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Urethral Stricture ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Urine Test ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Group B ◽  
Stricture Recurrence ◽  
Urethral Dilation ◽  
Lower Urinary

Background: Urethral stricture and its recurrence is still a major problem in male. Several procedures are present for the treatment of the disease. Lapides introduced the concept of intermittent self dilatation (ISD) which has decreased the incidence of recurrence of urethral stricture if doing properly. The aim of the this study was to report the outcomes of ISD for the treatment of urethral stricture after Filliform follower urethral dilatation (FFUD).Method: This was a prospective comparative study, conducted in the department of surgery, urology unit from March 2013 to February 2016. Total of 49 patients were enrolled and were randomly divided into Group A and Group B. In Group A, all the patients were taught ISD with Nelaton Catheter after FFUD. In group B, all patients underwent only FFUD for urethral stricture. In both groups, Foley's catheter was removed after 2 weeks of FFUD. These patients who had difficulty In passing urine or having lower urinary tract syndrome after removal of catheter, were evaluated for urethral stricture recurrency by clinical symptoms, ultrasonography, urine test for culture and sensitivity, cystoscopy/urethrogram as necessarily.Result: In Group A, 4 patients out of 20(20%)developed urethral stricture recurrency where as in Group B,18 patients out of 23 (78.26%) developed urethral stricture recurrency. Therefore, the rate of urethral stricture recurrence is significantly more in group B than the Group A (p< 0.001).Conclusion: ISD is an effective way for the prevention of urethtral stricture recurrence after FFUD. JNGMC,  Vol. 14 No. 2 December 2016, Page: 38-40

scholarly journals Infective complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in relation to preoperative urine culture status

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13
Author(s):  
Birendra Kumar Yadav ◽  
Robin Bahadur Basnet ◽  
Anil Shrestha ◽  
Parish Mani Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Stone Characteristics ◽  
Negative Urine Culture ◽  
Infective Complications

Introductions: Fever and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) secondary to urinary tract infection is a major determinant of overall post PCNL complications. This study aims to analyse infective complications after PCNL in relation to pre-operative urine culture status. Methods: A comparative analysis of post PCNL infective complications in pre-operative urine culture positive (Group A) and negative (Group B) was done for one year during June 2017 to May 2018 in department of urology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. Demographics, stone characteristics, mean operative time, post-operative hospital stay and post-operative complications as per Modified Clavien classification were compared between the two groups. Results: Out of total 136 PCNL patients, 51 were in Group A and 85 in Group B. Infective complications were significantly high, 28 (54.90%) in group A compared to 20 (23.53%) in group B, p=0.004. The most common isolate was Escherichia coli 19 (37.25%), sensitive to amikacin 37 (72.55%). The mean operation time, transfusion and hospital stay was not statically different in two groups. Morality occurred in 1 (1.96%) in group A. Conclusions: Infective complications were significantly high after PCNL in patients with preoperative positive urine culture, even when it was treated to sterile with sensitive antibiotics, compared to patients with preoperative negative urine culture.

CLINICAL OUTCOME AND COST COMPARISON OF CARPAL TUNNEL WOUND CLOSURE WITH MONOCRYL® AND ETHILON®: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Hand Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 189-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anis Dosani ◽  
Sameer K. Khan ◽  
Sheila Gray ◽  
Steve Joseph ◽  
Ian A. Whittaker
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Unit Cost ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Comparison ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
A Prospective Study

This prospective non-randomised two-cohort study compares the use of an absorbable suture (Poliglecrapone [Monocryl]: Group A) and a non-absorbable suture (Polyamide [Ethilon]: Group B) in wound closure after elective carpal tunnel decompression. The primary outcome was scar cosmesis as assessed by the Stonybrook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES); the financial cost of wound closure was compared as a secondary outocome. All fifty patients completed follow-up. At six weeks, there was no significant difference in the two groups regarding scar tenderness (p = 0.5), although residual swelling was more evident in the absorbable group (p = 0.2). The mean SBSES score at six weeks was 4.72 in Group A, and 4.8 in Group B (p = 0.3). The unit cost per closed wound of Monocryl was three times than Ethilon (p < 0.05). Ethilon is thus cost-effective without compromising the cosmetic outcome, and we recommend using this as the preferred suture for closure of carpal tunnel wounds.

Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis.

2021 ◽  
pp. 039156032110016
Author(s):  
Francesco Chiancone ◽  
Marco Fabiano ◽  
Clemente Meccariello ◽  
Maurizio Fedelini ◽  
Francesco Persico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) (Group A) and 72 underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) (Group B). All OPNs were performed with a retroperitoneal approach, while all LPNs were performed with a transperitoneal approach by a single surgical team. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumor characteristics in all variables. Group A was found to be similar to group B in terms of operation time ( p = 0.781), conversion to radical nephrectomy ( p = 0.3485), and positive surgical margins ( p = 0.338) while estimated blood loss ( p = 0.0205), intra-operative ( p = 0.0104), and post-operative ( p = 0.0081) transfusion rates, drainage time ( p = 0.0012), pain score at post-operative day 1 (<0.0001) were significantly lower in Group B. The rate of enucleation and enucleoresection/polar resection was similar ( p = 0.1821) among the groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative factors were not independently associated with the surgical approach. There was a statistically significant difference in complication rate (<0.0001) between the two groups even if no significant difference in terms of grade ⩾3 post-operative complications ( p = 0.3382) was detected. Discussion: LPN represents a feasible and safe approach for high complex renal tumors if performed in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. This procedure offers good intraoperative outcomes and a low rate of post-operative complications.

Modified Lift Versus Cutting Seton for Transphincteric Fistula -Experience at Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3257-3260
Author(s):  
Muhammad Najam Iqbal ◽  
Ashfaq Nasir
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Anal Incontinence ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
Fistula Tract ◽  
Fistula Closure ◽  
Fistula In Ano ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Cutting Seton ◽  
Group B

Background: Fistula in ano is a common disease which has high recurrence rate and high fecal incontinence rate after surgery. We compared modified LIFT (Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) through lateral approach ) with cutting seton for transphincteric fistula. Aim: This study is aimed at which procedure is better with respect to postoperative complications Study design: It was a prospective comparative study. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study from 01-01-2019 to 30-06-2021 which was conducted on 50 patients who presented with transsphincteric fistula in ano (FIA) in surgical ward of Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur. Patients were divided into two groups .Patients of Group A underwent modified lift procedure and patients of group B underwent cutting seton procedure. Data was collected on a proforma which included patients’ name ,age ,sex, age group, comorbid disease like diabetes mellitus ,chronic liver disease, cardiovascular disease and chronic renal failure, fistula tract involving less than 50% or more than 50% external sphincter ,procedure done, healing time of wound, complications like recurrence and incontinence. Patients were followed for 6 months for healing rate ,recurrence and incontinence. Data was analysed on spss 22 version Results: In Group A, complete healing (fistula closure without recurrence) was achieved in 20 patients (80%) out of 25. There was no case of anal incontinence after the procedure. 5 (20%) patients experienced recurrence in 6 months . In Group B, complete healing (fistula closure without recurrence) was achieved in 21 patients (84%), in 6 months follow up . 4(16%) patients were diagnosed as a case of anal incontinence. There were 4 (16%) patients with recurrence. Conclusion: Modified LIFT is better in terms of incontinence where as cutting seton is better in terms of recurrence.it is suggested that for high lying fistula modified LIFT is better procedure and for low lying fistula involving less than 50% sphincter cutting seton is better procedure.. Keywords: Modified LIFT (ligation of ineter sphincteric fistula tract) ,Cutting seton , transphincteric fistula.

scholarly journals A PROSPECTIVE STUDY TO ANALYSE THE SIDE EFFECTS OF OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL AND ENALAPRIL IN HYPERTENSIVE SUBJECTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 258
Author(s):  
Parminderpal Singh ◽  
Kiranjit Kiranjit
Keyword(s):  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Postural Hypotension ◽  
Olmesartan Medoxomil ◽  
National Commission ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Taste Alteration ◽  
A Prospective Study

Objective: The present study was aimed to analyze the side effects of olmesartan medoxomil and enalapril in hypertensive subjects.Methods: The study consisted of newly diagnosed hypertension categorized according to 7th report of Joint National Commission on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. The subjects were divided into two groups. The Group A subjects received olmesartan, and Group B subjects received enalapril. Pressure was recorded both in supine and sitting positions. The appearance of side effects was observed in the follow-up, i.e., dry cough, headache, postural hypotension, angioedema, dizziness, skin rashes, taste alterations, and urticaria. A statistical data were prepared on the basis of information obtained and analyzed thoroughly for antihypertensive effects and side effects of olmesartan and enalapril. SPSS software was used for analysis.Results: There was observed an increase in the incidence of taste alteration with drug therapy in Group B (Enalapril). There was observed an increase in the incidence of postural hypotension with drug therapy in both groups. In Group A (Olmesartan), the incidence of postural hypotension at the beginning of trial, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks was 0%, 2%, and 2%, respectively. In Group A (Olmesartan), there was no incidence of a headache at the beginning of trial, at 4 weeks and 8 weeks.Conclusion: From the study, it can be concluded that both olmesartan and enalapril are effective in Stage I and Stage II hypertension, but olmesartan is tolerated well with lesser side effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document