scholarly journals Comparative study of conventional versus microdebrider assisted endoscopic sinus surgery in sinonasal polyposis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Bindia Ghera ◽  
Manish Munjal ◽  
Hemant Chopra
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Postoperative Results ◽  
Conventional Instruments ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sinonasal Polyposis

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Functional endoscopic sinus surgery, conventional or with powered instruments is the standard surgical modality in sinonasal polyposis refractive to medical therapy. The recent modality, microdebrider assisted endoscopic sinus surgery offers better therapeutic approach for patients when compared to endoscopic sinus surgery with the conventional instruments. The objective was to evaluate the utility of microdebrider in endoscopic sinus surgery versus conventional instruments and to compare the intraoperative and postoperative results in both the methods.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A prospective, randomized, comparative study was conducted on 30 patients with bilateral sinonasal polyposis. The subjects were selected by applying all the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into two groups i.e. the right and left side of nose were operated and compared for efficacy of microdebrider and conventional instruments. Each patient served as his or her own control. This study emphasizes the utility of microdebrider. It compares the intraoperative and postoperative results in the conventional and microdebrider assisted endoscopic sinus surgery.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The intraoperative mean blood loss and duration of surgery were significantly higher in the conventional group (p-value &lt;0.001) as compared to microdebrider group. Postoperative symptom and endoscopy scores (discharge, scarring, crusting and polyp recurrence) were significantly higher in the conventional group (p-value &lt;0.001) as compared to the microdebrider group in 6 months follow up.</p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Microdebriders are more effective as compared to conventional endoscopic sinus surgery due to lesser intraoperative bleeding (relatively bloodless) and duration of surgery, better postoperative endoscopic and symptom scores, combine cutting and suction  in a single  tool, enabling accurate and precise tissue removal without damaging the surrounding mucosa , less scarring/synechiae, fewer complications.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Sinonasal Polyposis: Microdebrider or Conventional Instruments

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (208) ◽  
pp. 447-50
Author(s):  
Nabin Lageju ◽  
Bibhu Pradhan ◽  
Narmaya Thapa
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Endoscopic Examination ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Conventional Instruments ◽  
Mucosal Oedema ◽  
Sinonasal Polyposis

Introduction: Sinonasal polyposis is one of the commonest causes of nasal obstruction. Surgical management is treatment of choice. Microdebrider offers more advantage to conventional instruments. We aimed to find out outcome using microdebrider versus conventional instruments in endoscopic sinus surgery of sinonasal polyposis. Methods: The cross sectional descriptive study carried out in patients aged 13 years and above with diagnosis of sinonasal polyposis. Total of 51 patients were operated on the right side with microdebrider and left side with conventional instruments. Postoperatively each patient assessed for nasal obstruction subjectively and by endoscopic examination to look for mucosal oedema, synechiae and recurrence at 4 weeks and 8 weeks postoperatively. Results: The incidence of mucosal oedema in microdebrider and conventional instruments at 4 weeks and 8 weeks was statistically not significant with P value 0.089, 0.322 respectively. The incidence of synechiae in conventional group was more than microdebrider 1 (2%) versus 4 (7.8%) at 4 weeks follow up but the difference was statistically not significant (P value 0.773). There were 2 (3.9%) recurrences in microdebrider group and 3 (5.8%) recurrences in conventional group with P value 0.532. Conclusions: Use of microdebrider offered fewer incidences of synechiae and recurrence. But we couldn’t find statistical advantage over conventional instruments. Keywords:  conventional instruments; endoscopic sinus surgery; microdebrider; sinonasal polyposis.

Computed tomography assessment of the ethmoid roof based on Keros classification in Iraqi patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-370
Author(s):  
Baseem Natheer Abdulhadi ◽  
Ali Ibrahim Shyaa ◽  
Laith ALTamimi
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Type I ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Gender ◽  
The Right

Background: Among the most popular methods employed to classify the depth of the olfactory fossa is Keros classification. This study aims to assess Keros classification of the ethmoid roof, any possible association between Keros types and gender, and the incidence of asymmetry between right and left sides among Iraqi patients.  Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Al-Shaheed Gazi Al-Hariri Teaching Hospital, Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq. The archived reports and the CT scans images (nose and paranasal sinuses) of 126 patients who have undergone functional endoscopic sinus surgery between January 2019 and January 2020 were reviewed. Univariate and bivariate statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 24. The statistically significant was considered at less than 0.05. Results: More than half of patients were females (54.0%) with a mean age of 31.52 ± 11.38 (SD) years (range: 10-57 years). Among the total patients, the mean depth of olfactory fossa (OF) was 3.58 ± 0.02 mm. Results showed that Keros type I was the most common type (71.0%), followed by type II (27.4%) and type III (1.6%) respectively. The difference in the olfactory fossa depth between the right and left sides was ≥ 1 mm in 16 (12.7%) patients and < 1 mm in 110 (87.3%) patients. Moreover, there was no significant relation between symmetry/asymmetry and gender ( p-value > 0.05). Conclusion: Keros type I was the most common type, which carries the lowest risk of inadvertent intracranial injury during endoscopic sinus surgery; besides the relatively low percentage of asymmetry in the depth of the two olfactory fossae among patients, surgeons should always be cautious during surgery to avoid iatrogenic injury concerning the thin lateral lamella of the cribriform plate.

Safety of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in the Elderly—Are Octogenarian Patients at a Higher Risk?

2021 ◽  
pp. 194589242110253
Author(s):  
Lirit Levi ◽  
Yonatan Reuven ◽  
Daniel Ben-Ner ◽  
Noam Koch ◽  
Mor Gunders-Peleg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Surgical Complications ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background Surgeons are often faced with concerns regarding the risks versus benefits of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in elderly patients. Objective To analyze the risk for complications of ESS in the elderly (age ≥70 years) compared to younger patients, with emphasis on octogenarians. Methods Retrospective review of medical charts of adult patients who underwent ESS at a tertiary referral center during the years 2014 to 2018. Results We compared 128 elderly patients with 276 matched younger patients. In the elderly group mean age was 76 years (range, 70-91 years ). Thirty-one elderly patients were 80 years or older. Surgical complications in the elderly patients were 3.9%. Minor complications were 2.3% and major complications were 1.7%. The surgical complications rate was similar in the younger group (8%, P value: .127). Medical complications were observed in 2.3% comparing to 0.7% in younger patients. Interestingly, age, revision surgery, extent and duration of surgery, and modality of anesthesia were not identified as risk factors. Only ischemic heart disease (IHD) was identified as a risk factor for complications in a multivariate analysis in elderly patients. Comparison of elderly patients younger than 80 years with octogenarians revealed no difference in complication rate between these groups. Conclusions Overall, ESS was found to be a safe procedure in elderly patients compared to younger patients. Octogenarian patients should not be denied upfront surgery. IHD is a risk factor for complications in elderly patients.

scholarly journals Pattern of symptom improvement following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Salma S. Al Sharhan ◽  
Mohammed H. Al Bar ◽  
Shahad Y. Assiri ◽  
Assayl R. AlOtiabi ◽  
Deemah M. Bin-Nooh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
T Test ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
P Value ◽  
Psychological Dysfunction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Snot 22

Abstract Background Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammation of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. Intractable CRS cases are generally treated with endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Although the effect of ESS on CRS symptoms has been studied, the pattern of symptom improvement after ESS for CRS is yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude and sequence of symptom improvement after ESS for CRS, and to assess the possible preoperative factors that predict surgical outcomes in CRS patients. Methods This was a longitudinal prospective study of 68 patients who had CRS (with or without nasal polyps). The patients underwent ESS at King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia. The Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire was used for assessment at four time points during the study: pre-ESS, 1-week post-ESS, 4 weeks post-ESS, and 6 months post-ESS. Results The difference between the mean scores recorded for the five SNOT-22 domains pre-ESS and 6 months post-ESS were as follows: rhinologic symptoms (t-test = 7.22, p-value =  < 0.001); extra-nasal rhinologic symptoms (t-test = 4.87, p-value =  < 0.001); ear/facial symptoms (t-test = 6.34, p-value =  < 0.001); psychological dysfunction (t-test = 1.99, p-value = 0.049); and sleep dysfunction (t-test = 5.58, p-value =  < 0.001). There was a significant difference between the mean scores recorded for the five domains pre-ESS and 6 months post-ESS. Rhinologic symptoms had the largest effect size (d = 1.12), whereas psychological dysfunction had the least effect size (d = 0.24). The only statistically significant difference in the SNOT-22 mean scores recorded 4 weeks post-ESS was observed between allergic and non-allergic patients (t = − 2.16, df = 66, p = 0.035). Conclusion Understanding the pattern of symptom improvement following ESS for CRS will facilitate patient counselling and aid the optimization of the current treatment protocols to maximize surgical outcomes and quality of life. Level of evidence Prospective observational.

Endoscopic Septal Spur Resection

1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 213-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald C. Lanza ◽  
Deborah Farb Rosin ◽  
David W. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Chronic Sinusitis ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Postoperative Results ◽  
Valuable Alternative ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
The Past ◽  
Septal Spur

A variety of surgical approaches exists for the management of nasal septal spurs in patients who undergo endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Treatment of septal spurs in the past has been frequently addressed by septoplasty which can result in increased bleeding and length of surgical procedure as well as mandate postoperative nasal packing. Individually each of these problems can jeopardize the success of endoscopic sinus surgery. An endoscopic approach, which targets the septal spur alone, can minimize perioperative morbidity. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the effectiveness of endoscopic septal spur resection (ESSR) for the management of significant septal spurs in 8 patients who underwent concurrent ESSR during ESS for chronic sinusitis. Surgical technique and postoperative results are discussed and suggest that ESSR is a valuable alternative to more traditional techniques.

Sleep Quality after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients with Sinonasal Polyposis

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. P256-P256
Author(s):  
Mohammad R. Majidi ◽  
Navid Nourizadeh ◽  
Bashir Rasoulian ◽  
Amir Rezaei Ardani ◽  
Hadi Asadpour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinonasal Polyposis

scholarly journals "Silent sinus syndrome": One more indication for functional endoscopic sinus surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 65-68
Author(s):  
Ljiljana Jovancevic ◽  
Slobodan Savovic ◽  
Slavica Sotirovic-Senicar ◽  
Maja Buljcik-Cupic
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Orbital Floor ◽  
Orbital Trauma ◽  
Silent Sinus Syndrome ◽  
Slow Development ◽  
The Right

Introduction. Silent sinus syndrome is a rare condition, characterized by spontaneous and progressive enophthalmos and hypoglobus associated with atelectasis of the maxillary sinus and downward displacement of the orbital floor. Patients with this syndrome present with ophthalmological complaints, without any nasal or sinus symptoms. Silent sinus syndrome has a painless course and slow development. It seems to be a consequence of maxillary sinus hypoventilation due to obstruction of the ostiomeatal unit. The CT scan findings are typical and definitely confirm the diagnosis of silent sinus syndrome. Case report. We present the case of a 35-year-old woman, with no history of orbital trauma or surgery. She had slight righthemifacial pressure with no sinonasal symptoms. The patient had no double vision nor other ophthalmological symptoms. The diagnosis of silent sinus syndrome was based on the gradual onset of enophthalmos and hypoglobus, in the absence of orbital trauma (including surgery) or prior symptoms of sinus disease. On paranasal CT scans there was a complete opacification and atelectasis of the right maxillary sinus with downward bowing of the orbital floor. The patient was treated with functional endoscopic sinus surgery, with no orbital repair. Conclusion. Silent sinus syndrome presents with orbithopaties but is in fact a rhinologic disease, so all ophthalmologists, rhinologists and radiologists should know about it. The treatment of choice for silent sinus syndrome is functional endoscopic sinus surgery, which should be performed with extra care, by an experienced rhinosurgeon.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document