scholarly journals Analytical tools in protein structure determination

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 103-111
Author(s):  
Krishna R Gupta ◽  
Uttam Patle ◽  
Uma Kabra ◽  
P. Mishra ◽  
Milind J Umekar

Three-dimensional protein structure prediction from amino acid sequence has been a thought-provoking task for decades, but it of pivotal importance as it provides a better understanding of its function. In recent years, the methods for prediction of protein structures have advanced considerably. Computational techniques and increase in protein sequence and structure databases have influence the laborious protein structure determination process. Still there is no single method which can predict all the protein structures. In this review, we describe the four stages of protein structure determination. We have also explored the currenttechniques used to uncover the protein structure and highpoint best suitable method for a given protein.

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teppei Ikeya ◽  
Peter Güntert ◽  
Yutaka Ito

To date, in-cell NMR has elucidated various aspects of protein behaviour by associating structures in physiological conditions. Meanwhile, current studies of this method mostly have deduced protein states in cells exclusively based on ‘indirect’ structural information from peak patterns and chemical shift changes but not ‘direct’ data explicitly including interatomic distances and angles. To fully understand the functions and physical properties of proteins inside cells, it is indispensable to obtain explicit structural data or determine three-dimensional (3D) structures of proteins in cells. Whilst the short lifetime of cells in a sample tube, low sample concentrations, and massive background signals make it difficult to observe NMR signals from proteins inside cells, several methodological advances help to overcome the problems. Paramagnetic effects have an outstanding potential for in-cell structural analysis. The combination of a limited amount of experimental in-cell data with software for ab initio protein structure prediction opens an avenue to visualise 3D protein structures inside cells. Conventional nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY)-based structure determination is advantageous to elucidate the conformations of side-chain atoms of proteins as well as global structures. In this article, we review current progress for the structure analysis of proteins in living systems and discuss the feasibility of its future works.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 1240009 ◽  
Author(s):  
AMEET SONI ◽  
JUDE SHAVLIK

Protein X-ray crystallography — the most popular method for determining protein structures — remains a laborious process requiring a great deal of manual crystallographer effort to interpret low-quality protein images. Automating this process is critical in creating a high-throughput protein-structure determination pipeline. Previously, our group developed ACMI, a probabilistic framework for producing protein-structure models from electron-density maps produced via X-ray crystallography. ACMI uses a Markov Random Field to model the three-dimensional (3D) location of each non-hydrogen atom in a protein. Calculating the best structure in this model is intractable, so ACMI uses approximate inference methods to estimate the optimal structure. While previous results have shown ACMI to be the state-of-the-art method on this task, its approximate inference algorithm remains computationally expensive and susceptible to errors. In this work, we develop Probabilistic Ensembles in ACMI (PEA), a framework for leveraging multiple, independent runs of approximate inference to produce estimates of protein structures. Our results show statistically significant improvements in the accuracy of inference resulting in more complete and accurate protein structures. In addition, PEA provides a general framework for advanced approximate inference methods in complex problem domains.


Author(s):  
Arun G. Ingale

To predict the structure of protein from a primary amino acid sequence is computationally difficult. An investigation of the methods and algorithms used to predict protein structure and a thorough knowledge of the function and structure of proteins are critical for the advancement of biology and the life sciences as well as the development of better drugs, higher-yield crops, and even synthetic bio-fuels. To that end, this chapter sheds light on the methods used for protein structure prediction. This chapter covers the applications of modeled protein structures and unravels the relationship between pure sequence information and three-dimensional structure, which continues to be one of the greatest challenges in molecular biology. With this resource, it presents an all-encompassing examination of the problems, methods, tools, servers, databases, and applications of protein structure prediction, giving unique insight into the future applications of the modeled protein structures. In this chapter, current protein structure prediction methods are reviewed for a milieu on structure prediction, the prediction of structural fundamentals, tertiary structure prediction, and functional imminent. The basic ideas and advances of these directions are discussed in detail.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S13-S13
Author(s):  
Valery Novoseletsky ◽  
Mikhail Lozhnikov ◽  
Grigoriy Armeev ◽  
Aleksandr Kudriavtsev ◽  
Alexey Shaytan ◽  
...  

Background: Protein structure determination using X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) includes analysis and merging a large number of snapshot diffraction patterns. Convolutional neural networks are widely used to solve numerous computer vision problems, e.g. image classification, and can be used for diffraction pattern analysis. But the task of protein structure determination with the use of CNNs only is not yet solved. Methods: We simulated the diffraction patterns using the Condor software library and obtained more than 1000 diffraction patterns for each structure with simulation parameters resembling real ones. To classify diffraction patterns, we tried two approaches, which are widely known in the area of image classification: a classic VGG network and residual networks. Results: 1. Recognition of a protein class (GPCRs vs globins). Globins and GPCR-like proteins are typical α-helical proteins. Each of these protein families has a large number of representatives (including those with known structure) but we used only 8 structures from every family. 12,000 of diffraction patterns were used for training and 4,000 patterns for testing. Results indicate that all considered networks are able to recognize the protein family type with high accuracy. 2. Recognition of the number of protein molecules in the liposome. We considered the usage of lyposomes as carriers of membrane or globular proteins for sample delivery in XFEL experiments in order to improve the X-ray beam hit rate. Three sets of diffractograms for liposomes of various radius were calculated, including diffractograms for empty liposomes, liposomes loaded with 5 bacteriorhodopsin molecules, and liposomes loaded with 10 bacteriorhodopsin molecules. The training set consisted of 23625 diffraction patterns, and test set of 7875 patterns. We found that all networks used in our study were able to identify the number of protein molecules in liposomes independent of the liposome radius. Our findings make this approach rather promising for the usage of liposomes as protein carriers in XFEL experiments. Conclusion: Thus, the performed numerical experiments show that the use of neural network algorithms for the recognition of diffraction images from single macromolecular particles makes it possible to determine changes in the structure at the angstrom scale.


1997 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 125-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Leherte ◽  
J. Glasgow ◽  
K. Baxter ◽  
E. Steeg ◽  
S. Fortier

A fundamental goal of research in molecular biology is to understand protein structure. Protein crystallography is currently the most successful method for determining the three-dimensional (3D) conformation of a protein, yet it remains labor intensive and relies on an expert's ability to derive and evaluate a protein scene model. In this paper, the problem of protein structure determination is formulated as an exercise in scene analysis. A computational methodology is presented in which a 3D image of a protein is segmented into a graph of critical points. Bayesian and certainty factor approaches are described and used to analyze critical point graphs and identify meaningful substructures, such as alpha-helices and beta-sheets. Results of applying the methodologies to protein images at low and medium resolution are reported. The research is related to approaches to representation, segmentation and classification in vision, as well as to top-down approaches to protein structure prediction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document