scholarly journals Judges’ Considerations in the Cancellation Decision of the Marriage Establishment (ITHBAT) of Polygamy (The Analysis of Supreme Court Decision No.351/K/Ag/2016)

Author(s):  
Rini Erlina ◽  
Yaswirman Yaswirman ◽  
Mardenis Mardenis

In Indonesia, polygamy is permissible as long as it is justified by religion and the rules of the marriage law. However, a husband who wants to have more than one wife can only be done if he fulfills various requirements decided by the Court. Based on the principle of “audi alteram partem”, the Supreme Court views that the consideration of the Jakarta Religious High Court towards the defendant's answers, evidence and witnesses submitted by the defendant is a right decision even though they are late and no trial is submitted. The Supreme Court argues that polygamy permission is a necessity. It aims to maintain the welfare of the parties bound to the marriage that have been and are still ongoing. The word "can" in Islamic Law Compilation (KHI) article 71A shows that the cancellation of marriage for a reason of polygamy without court permission is tentative (facultative). Whether or not the marriage is canceled must be submitted to the court and is very dependent on the assessment of the benefits of the wife/wives and children. The legal consequences of the stipulation of the marriage establishment (ithbat) based on the decision of the Religious Court and the refusal to cancel the marriage establishment (ithbat), the child of the second wife has inheritance rights from his father, including assets from his property with his first wife.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Liana Noviyanti ◽  
Mulati Mulati

Islamic law has stated that every person of different religion cannot inherit each other, both Muslims inherit for non-Muslims and from non-Muslims inherit for Muslims, but in practice, Judges at the Supreme Court level implement mandatory wills, this is required which has been decided in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This study aims to examine how to implement the mandatory non-Muslim wills in the Supreme Court ruling Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA based on the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and what the Supreme Court Judges consider in implementing mandatory testaments against non-Muslims in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This research is a normative legal research with the nature of qualitative research with the type of library research. Based on the studies that have been carried out, the Decision of the Supreme Court Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA does not include legal considerations in force in Indonesia concerning inheritance provisions and concerning the granting of an approved mandatory will set out in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The application of mandatory wills in the Supreme Court Decision is contrary to the provisions of Islamic Law and the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Article 209 paragraphs (1) and (2) concerning mandatory wills.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 139
Author(s):  
Deno Ukida Narasoma ◽  
Iwan Permadi ◽  
Diah Aju Wisnu Wardhani

This study aimed to analyze the reasons the Supreme Court issued a Supreme Court Decision Number 50 P/HUM/2018 which decided the cancellation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 25 of 2017 and analyze the legal consequences of the decision on new notary candidates. This study used normative juridical with a statutory approach and historical approach. The reasons the Supreme Court issued Supreme Court Decision Number 50 P/HUM/2018 were influenced by two factors, i.e., juridical and non-juridical factors. The legal consequences of the Supreme Court Decision Number 50 P/HUM/2018 for new notary candidates was the disappearance of the notary candidate’s obligation to take the notary appointment exam and the emergence of problems related to the clarity of the qualifications that should be completed to register as a notary because the ruling resulted in a legal vacuum related to the terms of the conditions in the appointment of a public notary.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Diah Ragil Kusuma ◽  
Munsharif Abdul Chalim

ABSTRAKKewajiban dalam melaksanakan wasiat wajibah itu bersifat Qadhai, disini dapat diartikan bahwa tidak hanya sebagai tanggung jawab seseorang dalam melaksanakan perintah agama, namun wasiat wajibah tersebut dapat dipaksakan apabila ia lalai dalam melaksanakannya karena sudah menyangkut kepentingan umum.Peran notaris dalam membuat akta pembagian harta waris terhadap ahli waris non muslim yakni dengan membuatkan Akta Keterangan Waris yang di dalamnya menjelaskan pemberiannya melalui wasiat wajibah. Demikian pula yang menjadi landasan yuridis atas pemberian wasiat wajibah kepada ahli waris non muslim oleh Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 368 K/AG/1995, tanggal 16 Juli 1998 yang telah menetapkan bahwa seorang anak perempuan yang beragama Nasrani berhak pula mendapat harta warisan pewaris, tidak melalui warisan melainkan melalui wasiat wajibah. Dan besar perolehannya adalah sama dengan bagian seorang anak perempuan, bukan 1/3 dari harta warisan dan bukan pula ¾ bagian dari perolehan anak perempuan pewaris. Selanjutnya Putusan Mahakamah Agung RI Nomor: 51 K/AG/1999, tanggal 29 September 1999 yang telah memberikan pertimbangan: “Menimbang, bahwa namun dengan demikian Mahkamah Agung berpendapat bahwa putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Yogyakarta harus diperbaiki, karena seharusnya Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Yogyakarta memperbaiki amar putusan Pengadilan Agama Yogyakarta mengenai ahli waris non muslim, mereka berhak mendapat warisan melalui wasiat wajibah yang kadar bagiannya sama dengan bagian ahli waris muslim.”Kata Kunci : Notaris, Wasiat Wajibah, Non Muslim.ABSTRACTObligation in carrying out the mandate is Qadhai, here it can be interpreted that not only as a person's responsibility in carrying out religious orders, but the will is compulsory if he neglects in carrying it out because it is related to the public interest.Notary's role in making the deed of dividing the heirs against non-Muslim heirs by making the Deed of Inheritance Statement which in it explains its grant through the mandatory testament. Likewise, the juridical basis for the provision of a mandatory will to non-Muslim heirs by the Supreme Court Decision Number 368 K / AG / 1995, dated July 16, 1998 which has stipulated that a Christian girl is entitled to also get the inheritance, not through inheritance but through a mandatory will. And the gains are equal to the share of a daughter, not 1/3 of the estate and not the part of the acquisition of the daughter of the testator. Furthermore, the Supreme Court Decision Number 51 / K / 1999 dated 29 September 1999 has given consideration: "Considering that, however, the Supreme Court is of the opinion that the decision of the Yogyakarta High Religious Court must be improved, since the Religious High Court of Yogyakarta should have improved the amar the decision of the Religious Court of Yogyakarta concerning the non-Muslim heirs, they are entitled to inheritance through a mandatory testament whose content is equal to that of the Muslim heirs".Keyword : Notary, Mandatory Testament, Non-Muslim.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-154
Author(s):  
Siti Ruhama Mardhatillah

Abstract Since the publishment of environment permit through Governor of Central Java Decision Number 660.1/30 of Year 2016 has caused any juridical problem because this environment permit replaces of the previous permit, that is Governor of Central Java Decision Number 660.1/17 of Year 2012 which has been canceled by the earlier Supreme Court Decision Number 99/PK/TUN/2016. The problem formulation of this research is how the legal consequences through the publishment of the last environment permit after cancellation the previous environment permit by the Supreme Court. This research is juridical-normative research with using conceptual and statute approach. The result of the research is the legal consequnces through the publishment of last environment permit is that permit can be cancelled (vernietigbaar), so that all the consequences during the enactment of that permit are legitimate until the revocation by Governor of Central Java Decision Number 660.1/4 of Year 2017.   Key words: Legal consequences, Environment Permit Number 660.1/17 of Year 2012, Environment Permit Number 660.1/30 of Year 2016.    


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Alip Pamungkas Raharjo ◽  
Elok Fauzia Dwi Putri

In Article 171 letter (c) Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law affirms that the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs do not obtain inheritance from the inheritor's inheritance. However, in its development because it felt unfair, the Supreme Court through The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K / AG / 1995 provided a way for joint cooperation of different inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. But in its development, this provision was changed again by a landmark decision from the Supreme Court, namely through the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018 because there was a change in the value of justice in the community. The research method used normative research with constitutional approach, conceptual approach and case approach. This study aims to explain the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs before and after the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018. The results showed that prior to the Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018, heirs of non muslim religions were given a share of inheritance in the form of a wasiat wajibah for ¾ of the inheritance inheritance. Post the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018, the amount of wasiat wajibah will change to ¼ from the inheritor's inheritance. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Nurhadi Nurhadi

Since the birth of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, the legal experts have discussed the positions of marriage children through articles, papers, books and seminars, pros and cons when interpreting the non-marital child, judges also gave birth to many interpretations. The Supreme Court (MA) has two views in adjudicating the marriage case, Supreme Court Decision Number 329 K/AG/2014 states that the ratification of an unmarried child is not a jurisdiction of the Religious Courts, whereas in Decision of Supreme Court Number 597 K/AG/2015 states that the non-marital children are legitimate even though the marriage of their parents only carries out marriage under Islamic law. The formulation of the problem is how the criteria of marital legitimacy in Indonesia? How is the outsider interpretation of the two Supreme Court decisions? The research method used is literature study, with the type of normative legal research, which is descriptive analytical. The conclusion is that in Supreme Court Decision Number 329 K/AG/2014 considered the marriage to be legitimately religious, but because it is not recorded so that the marriage does not get the certainty and protection of the law, consequently the child born from the marriage is not a legal child, whereas in Decision Number 597 K/AG/2015 The Supreme Court considers that although the marriage is not recorded, the child born from the marriage must still have legal certainty and protection so that the child is considered a legal child.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-68
Author(s):  
Hartanto Hartanto ◽  
Gilang Yudha Wirawan

Business competition is an economic activity that runs in line with technological and industrial advances. With the existence of business competition, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission in Indonesia was formed which aims to supervise and protect business competition. This research will discuss the impact and legal consequences of the KPPU decision to the Supreme Court decision which still considers and uses circumstantial evidence and testimony based on hearing from other people.  Based on the description above, the writer chooses the research title "Judicial Review of the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in the Motorcycle Industry (Review of Supreme Court Decision No. 217 K / Pdt.Sus-KPPU / 2019) with the formulation of the problem of legal impact from the Assembly's decision. The Cassation Judge proven not to consider and examine the objections / demands of the Cassation Appellant as well as whether the legal consequences of the verdict of the Cassation Panel of Judges use testimony from other people (testimonium de auditu) and indirect evidence (circumstantial evidence / indirect evidence) as a means trial evidence. So the authors want to examine this and use normative research methods that use interviews as supporting data. Keywords: Monopoly, Business Competition, Indirect Evidence


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Livia Clarista ◽  
Endang Pandamdari

Buying and selling is a process of transferring rights of land carried out by making a sale and purchase deed by a land deed official. Therefore, the procedure must be in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations to produce a valid deed and can be used to transfer the land rights. In this case, there was a mismatch in the procedure for making land sale and purchase deeds carried out by land deed official. This caused a legal defect in the deed which was then supported by a statement from the District Court Verdict Number 381/Pdt.G/2014/PN/Bdg. and the Bandung High Court with Decision Verdict 451/PDT/2015/ PT BDG., where both of them grant the plaintiff's claim, namely land deed official itself. However, the Supreme Court Judges considered that land deed official did not have a legal standing in filing a claim because it was deemed not to have legal interests in the sale and purchase deed. The Supreme Court Judges in Verdict Number 888 / PDT / 2016 canceled the previous court decision. This resulted in the deed returning to its original state. However, the deed can then only be canceled by the parties in it, but the cancellation also can only be done if both parties agree. While the legal consequences of the land deed official issuing the sale and purchase deed are the acceptance of sanctions in the form of temporary and permanent dismissals.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darmi Wati

Shared assets are abattoir items obtained during marriage. If the divorce of the joint property is divided in two, except for the marriage agreement. This is regulated in Article 97 Compilation of Islamic Law as a basis for legal certainty. But the fact is that the sharing of the collective shares is not in accordance with Article 97 Compilation of Islamic Law, namely the division is not divided in two as occurred in the Supreme Court decision Number 266K / AG / 2010, namely the Plaintiff / Cassation Respondent ex-husband gets ¼ (one quarter). This is the object of the author's research by reviewing the principles of legal certainty. Keywords : Sharing of Joint Assets, Principle of Legal Certainty


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Alip Pamungkas Raharjo ◽  
Elok Fauzia Dwi Putri

In Article 171 letter (c) Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law affirms that the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs do not obtain inheritance from the inheritor's inheritance. However, in its development because it felt unfair, the Supreme Court through The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K / AG / 1995 provided a way for joint cooperation of different inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. But in its development, this provision was changed again by a landmark decision from the Supreme Court, namely through the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018 because there was a change in the value of justice in the community. The research method used normative research with constitutional approach, conceptual approach and case approach. This study aims to explain the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs before and after the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018. The results showed that prior to the Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018, heirs of non muslim religions were given a share of inheritance in the form of a wasiat wajibah for ¾ of the inheritance inheritance. Post the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018, the amount of wasiat wajibah will change to ¼ from the inheritor's inheritance.Keywords: Non Moslem Heir, Legacy, Moslem Heir, The Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document