Effect of Magnesium Sulfate on the Total Anesthetic and Analgesic Requirements in Neurosurgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 27-28
Author(s):  
Essam Manaa
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Hemodynamic Parameters ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: The intraoperative anesthetic and postoperative analgesic requirements are of great importance especially in neurosurgical anesthesia. This requires balancing a deep and effective anesthesia and postoperative analgesia versus the risks of delayed recovery and postoperative respiratory depression from excessive analgesics. Magnesium sulfate is an antagonist of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptors in a voltage-dependent fashion. Propofol also inhibits the NMDA subtype of the glutamate receptor. Therefore, magnesium sulfate when coadministered with propofol potentiates anesthetic effect and NMDA antagonism of propofol. Majority of the studies that evaluated the anesthetic and analgesic requirement in patients receiving magnesium sulfate depended on the clinical parameters, for example, hemodynamic parameters and measurement of pain scores. In this study, we added bispectral index (BIS) and neuromuscular monitoring using train-of-four (TOF) to adjust intraoperative anesthetic requirements in addition to the clinical parameters. Methodology: This randomized controlled double-blind study included 50 adult ASA I and II male and female patients undergoing neurosurgical maneuvers. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Routine intraoperative monitoring including invasive BP and in addition TOF and BIS were applied. In a blind fashion, patient in group I (Magnesium group) received magnesium sulfate 20 mg/kg as bolus dose over 5 min followed by 0.1 ml/kg/hr of 10% solution as infusion, while patient in group II (Control group) received saline with the same bolus and infusion rates after the induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced in both groups by fentanyl 2 µg/kg, propofol 1.5–2 mg/kg, and rocuronium in a dose of 0.6 mg/kg to facilitate ETT insertion. This is followed by continuous infusion of propofol 6–10 mg/kg/hr and fentanyl 1–2 mic/kg/hr. The parameters which were assessed included hemodynamic parameters (HR and BP), TOF, and BIS. Total consumptions of propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, and postoperative analgesic requirements (PCA morphine) were recorded. In addition, recovery time and postoperative pain score by visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded. Result: There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the two groups. As regard the hemodynamic changes and BIS, no significant difference was seen between the two groups except the HR change which was significantly reduced (p = 0.005) with surgical stimulation in group I compared to the other group. Results also showed that the mean fentanyl, propofol, and rocuronium consumption, recovery time, degree of postoperative pain, and postoperative analgesic requirements were significantly less in patients that received magnesium sulfate infusion compared to those in the control group. Conclusion: Magnesium sulfate is most likely a safe and cost-effective supplement to the general anesthesia in neurosurgery as it reduces the total anesthetic and analgesic requirements and postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Effect of IV Infusion of Magnesium Sulfate on Postoperative Pain after Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubhi Singhal ◽  
Devang Bharti ◽  
Sangeeta Yadav ◽  
Nitin Hayaran
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vas Scores

Background: The current study attempts to evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) infusion of magnesium sulfate during spinal anesthesia on postoperative pain and postoperative analgesic requirements in lower limb surgeries. Methods: In this double blind, randomized controlled study, 60 patients undergoing elective lower limb surgeries, were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Group I received isotonic saline and group II was administered magnesium sulfate 50 mg Kg-1 IV for 15 min and then 15 mg Kg-1 h-1 by continuous IV infusion till the end of surgery or 2 hours, whichever was earlier. Ramsay sedation scores, VAS scores for pain, time of first administration of rescue analgesic and total analgesic requirement were noted in both the groups. Results: Statistically significant difference was observed in the VAS score between the two groups at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th hour intervals; with VAS scores being lower in the magnesium group (p<0.05). The mean time of first rescue analgesic requirement in control group was 144.00 mins, while in magnesium group was 246.00 mins (p<0.05). The total rescue analgesic requirement was found to be 251.67 mg and 181.67 mg at the end of 24 hours, in control and magnesium groups, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates statistically significant lowering of postoperative VAS scores, delayed need of postoperative analgesia and reduced total postoperative analgesic requirement in patients receiving intraoperative IV magnesium sulfate compared to the control group. Magnesium sulfate did not cause sedation or any other significant adverse effect in the doses used in the study.

scholarly journals A comparative evaluation of the effects on postoperative pain of systemic and topical forms of benzydamine hydrochloride after periodontal flap surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-399
Author(s):  
Gülhan Kocaman
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Topical Application ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Flap Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Spray Form ◽  
Periodontal Flap Surgery

Objective:  The aim of this study was to evaluate comparatively the topical and systemic forms in the postoperative pain control periodontal flap surgery in spite of the daily dose of benzydamine hydrochloride spray form about one in twenty of the oral dose,. Materials and Methods: In this randomized trial, the 48 systemic healthy individuals in need double-blind study with periodontal flap surgery were evaluated. Consent, demographic information and periodontal clinical parameters were obtained before surgery and periodontal flap surgery was performed with local anesthesia. The patients who underwent surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. One of the groups was prescribed tablet form of postopertive benzydamine hydrochloride and for the other was spray form as topical application. Postoperative pain was assessed by visual analog scale at 2, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours. Results: There was no difference between systemic and topical drug groups in terms of demographic characteristics and periodontal clinical parameters. A statistically significant difference was found between 2 and 6 hours in favor of topical application. (p <0.05), but there was no significant difference in pain intensity at the 8th, 12th, 24th and 48th hours. Conclusion: Although the topical form of benzydamine hydrochloride was 1/20 lower in postoperative pain control after periodontal flap surgery, it was found to be more effective in the early period compared to the systemic form, but equally effective in the late period. We premierly recommend that topical application should be preferred primarily in the prevention of overdose and toxicity in postoperative pain control after periodontal flap operation.

scholarly journals The Effects of Magnesium Sulfate with Lidocaine for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Extremity Surgeries

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. e33-e39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siavash Beiranvand ◽  
Arash Karimi ◽  
Majid Haghighat Shoar ◽  
Maryam Baghizadeh Baghdashti
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Case Group ◽  
Hemodynamic Parameters ◽  
Infraclavicular Block

Abstract Background An addition of analgesic to anesthetic agents is likely to increase the effects of anesthesia and reduce associated adverse outcomes. Several adjuvants are studied in this regard. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of adding a magnesium adjunct to lidocaine for the induction of infraclavicular block. Methods Patients referred to Shohada Ashayer Hospital, Khorramabad, for wrist and hand surgery were enrolled in this study. The intervention/case group included patients who received 18 mL lidocaine (2%) + 2 mL magnesium sulfate (50%), 10 mL normal saline; control group: 18 mL lidocaine (2%) + 12 mL of normal saline. After the induction of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block, parameters such as duration of reach with respect to complete sensory and motor block, hemodynamic parameters (hypotension and bradycardia), and postoperative pain, using visual analogue scale criteria, were measured. The obtained data were analyzed using a Bayesian path analysis model. Results A total of 30 patients were included in each group. In the case group, sensory and motor block was achieved for 12.136 ± 4.96 and 13 ± 3.589 minutes more than those in the control group. The duration of sedation and immobilization was 2.57 ± 0.764 minute and 4.66 ± 0.909 minutes lengthier in the case group. Regarding the hemodynamic parameters, blood pressure was 0.217 ± 5.031 and 1.59 ± 5.14 units lower in the case group, immediately following the block and the surgery. Similarly, heart rate was 0.776 ± 4.548 and 0.39 ± 3.987 units higher in the case group, after 30 minutes and 2 hours of the procedure. A decrease in the pain was seen at 8, 10, and 12 hours after the surgery, as compared with the control group. An addition of magnesium to lidocaine for infraclavicular block resulted in a significantly longer sedation and immobilization period and decreased postoperative pain at 12 hours. Conclusion Heart rate and blood pressure did not decrease significantly in the case group. It can be concluded that addition of magnesium sulfate to lidocaine can produce better anesthetic and analgesic outcomes with low-to-no adverse effects.

scholarly journals Is magnesium sulfate as a "preemptive analgesia" effective to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption?

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
Abasali Delavari ◽  
Marzieh Lak ◽  
Hassan Arragizade ◽  
Babak Salatini
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Preemptive Analgesia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Operation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Control

Background<br />Reducing postoperative pain can improve patient satisfaction and hospital cost. Intravenous magnesium sulfate is one of the proposed drugs for preemptive analgesia. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of magnesium sulfate on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.<br /><br />Methods<br />A double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on candidates for vertebral fusion surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-II. One hundred and two patients were randomized into the magnesium sulfate group and control group. The magnesium sulfate group received magnesium sulfate at a dose of 50mg/kg in 20 mL volume and infused during 15-30 minutes pre-operation, while the control group received 20 mL normal saline. The severity of the pain was assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after patients entering the post-anesthetic care unit. After the operation, the patients’ relaxation rate was assessed based on Ramsay sedation score (RSS).<br /><br />Results<br />There was no significant difference at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours post-operation between the two groups in the mean severity of pain (p&gt;0.05). There was no significant difference at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours post-operation between the two groups in the mean of pethidine consumption. There was no significant difference in the relaxation of the patients according to the RSS criteria in the magnesium sulfate and control groups (p=0.162). <br /><br />Conclusion<br />Pre-operative administration of magnesium sulfate does not affect reduction in postoperative pain and opioid consumption of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.

scholarly journals Preemptive effect of amantadine as adjuvant in postoperative analgesia of ovaryhisterectomy in dogs

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e68091110128
Author(s):  
Raquel Vieira Niella ◽  
Aline Silva Sena ◽  
Janaína Maria Xavier Corrêa ◽  
Priscila Carvalho Lima Rocha Soares ◽  
Taísa Miranda Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Nociceptive Threshold ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Preoperative Administration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mechanical Nociceptive Threshold ◽  
Preemptive Effect

This study aimed to evaluate the preemptive analgesic effect of amantadine on postoperative pain control in female dogs that underwent ovariohysterectomy. Twenty female dog were randomly assigned to two groups of ten. The control group (CONTROL) received oral placebo capsules, while the amantadine (AMANT) group received 5 mg/kg of oral amantadine one hour before sedation. All the animals were premedicated with 3 mg/kg (IM) meperidine, induced with propofol and maintained with isofluorane. The transanesthetic physiological parameters were recorded, and postoperative pain was evaluated every hour after extubation for six hours with the Dynamic Interactive Visual Analog Scale (DIVAS) and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) and when the necessary analgesic rescue was administered (morphine, 0.2 mg/kg (IM)). During the surgical procedure, there was no significant difference in the variables measured between the two groups. Regarding postoperative pain assessment, there was a significant difference in the DIVAS score (p = 0.004) between the groups, in which AMANT required fewer rescues than did CONTROL (p = 0.03). The MNT was significantly higher ​​in AMANT than in CONTROL (p = 0.03). The results suggested that the preoperative administration of amantadine decreased analgesic requirement in female dogs that underwent elective ovariohysterectomy.

scholarly journals Pretreatment with Magnesium Sulfate to Alleviate Pain on Propofol Injection: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Study

Mediscope ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sazzad Hossain ◽  
Md Mamunur Rashid ◽  
Mohammad Mamunur Rashid ◽  
Md Anisur Rahman Babu ◽  
Afsana Sultana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Sulfate Group ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Elective Surgical Procedure ◽  
Group Ii

Background and aim of study: Propofol is one of the most frequently used medications for inducing and maintaining anesthesia. However, propofol injection causes pain and discomfort in more than 70% of patients. This study was performed to determine the effect of magnesium sulfate on reducing pain at the onset of anesthesia induced by propofol injection. Materials and methods: A total of 80 healthy adult patients were selected in this study with either sex, scheduled for routine elective surgical procedure under general anesthesia. The patients enrolled were divided randomly into two groups of 40 patients each. Group I received 30 mg/kg of intravenous magnesium sulfate in 5 ml. Group II (placebo group) received 5ml of 0.9% intravenous normal saline 1 minute before propofol injection. The patients were asked to report their pain during injection of propofol. For all statistical tests, p<0.05 was taken to indicate a significant difference. Results: The incidence of pain experienced in magnesium sulfate group was 30% patients and in saline group was 60% patients, which is statistically significant p<0.05. The severity of POPI was also lower in magnesium sulfate group than the saline group (p<0.05). The incidence of mild and moderate pain in groups I versus group II was 22.5% versus 37.5% and 7.5% versus 22.5% respectively p<0.05. There was no severe pain recorded in any groups. Conclusion: Magnesium sulfate can be used before induction of anesthesia to reduce pain on propofol injection. Mediscope Vol. 6, No. 2: Jul 2019, Page 73-77

scholarly journals Antinociceptive effects of magnesium sulfate for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-fei Gao ◽  
Jing-yan Lin ◽  
Shun Wang ◽  
Yun-feng Zhang ◽  
Guo-qiang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Isotonic Saline ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Anesthesia Care ◽  
Monitored Anesthesia Care ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Opioids are the most effective antinociceptive agents, they have undesirable side effects such as respiratory depressant and postoperative nausea and vomiting. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the antinociceptive efficacy of adjuvant magnesium sulphate to reduce intraoperative and postoperative opioids requirements and their related side effects during hysteroscopy.Methods: 70 patients scheduled for hysteroscopy were randomly divided into 2 groups. Patients in the magnesium group (Group M) received intravenous magnesium sulfate 50 mg/kg in 100 ml of isotonic saline over 15 min before anesthesia induction and then 15 mg/kg per hour by continuous intravenous infusion. Patients in the control group (Group C) received an equal volume of isotonic saline as placebo. All patients were anesthetized under a BIS guided monitored anesthesia care with propofol and fentanyl. Intraoperative hemodynamic variables were recorded and postoperative pain scores were assessed with verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) 1 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 hour, and 4 hours after recovery of consciousness. The primary outcome of our study was total amount of intraoperative and postoperative analgesics administered.Results: Postoperative serum magnesium concentrations in Group C were significantly decreased than preoperative levels (0.86 ± 0.06 to 0.80 ± 0.08 mmol/L, P=0.001) while there was no statistical change in Group M (0.86 ± 0.07 to 0.89 ± 0.07 mmol/L, P=0.129). Bradycardia did not occur in either group and the incidence of hypotension was comparable between the two groups. Total dose of fentanyl given to patients in Group M was less than the one administered to Group C [100 (75-150) vs 145 (75-175) μg, median (range); P < 0.001]. There was no statistically significant difference for patients who needed rescue analgesic between the two groups [14 vs 6 subjects in Group C and Group M, RR=0.44 (0.19 to 1.01), P=0.052, NNT 4.349]. In addition, patients receiving magnesium displayed lower VNRS scores at 15 min, 30 min, 1 hour, and 4 hours postoperatively. Conclusions: In hysteroscopy, adjuvant magnesium administration is beneficial to reduce intraoperative fentanyl requirement and postoperative pain without cardiovascular side effects. Our study indicates that if surgical patients have risk factors for hypomagnesemia, assessing and correcting magnesium level will be necessary.Trial registration: www.chictr.org.cn ChiCTR1900024596 date of registration: July 18th 2019.

Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Levobupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine and Levobupivacaine for Scalp Block before Supratentorial Craniotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
pp. 1028-1035
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Supratentorial Craniotomy ◽  
Numerical Rating ◽  
Fentanyl Consumption ◽  
Scalp Block

Background: Craniotomy causes acute and chronic pain. Uncontrolled postoperative pain may lead to adverse events. Perioperative scalp nerves block is not only effective in reducing intraoperative hemodynamic response, but it also reduces postoperative pain and postoperative analgesia requirement. Objective: To compare the benefits of adding dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine in scalp nerves block before craniotomy for the duration of analgesia in supratentorial craniotomy. Materials and Methods: After approval by the Committee for Research, 50 supratentorial craniotomy patients were randomized into two groups. The control group received 30 mL scalp nerves block with 0.25% levobupivacaine with adrenaline 1:200,000, whereas the study group received 30 mL scalp nerves block with 0.25% levobupivacaine with adrenaline 1:200,000 plus dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg. The primary outcome was the time to first analgesic requirement postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included intraoperative fentanyl consumption, verbal numerical rating scale, tramadol consumption, and complications during the first 24 hours postoperatively. Results: Patients in the study group had significantly increase time to the first analgesic requirement in postoperative period and reduced intraoperative fentanyl consumption. The median time to first analgesic requirement was 555 (360 to 1,035) minutes in the study group versus 405 (300 to 520) minutes in the control group (p=0.023). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption 125 (75 to 175) mcg in the study group was significantly lower than 200 (150 to 250) mcg in the control group (p=0.02). The verbal numerical rating scale at 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively, tramadol consumption, and complications during the first 24 hours postoperatively were not statistically significant different. Conclusion: Preoperative scalp nerves block with 0.25% levobupivacaine with adrenaline (1:200,000) with dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg significantly increased the time to first analgesic requirement and reduced intraoperative fentanyl consumption compared to 0.25% levobupivacaine with adrenaline (1:200,000) without perioperative complications. Keywords: Scalp block, Dexmedetomidine, Post-craniotomy analgesia, Supratentorial tumor, Levobupivacaine

scholarly journals Regenerative Therapy Modality for Treatment of True Combined Endodontic-Periodontal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 6220
Author(s):  
Reham AlJasser ◽  
Sundus Bukhary ◽  
Mohammed AlSarhan ◽  
Dalal Alotaibi ◽  
Saleh AlOraini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Endodontic Treatment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Bony Defect ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grafting Procedure

The aim of this in-vivo study was to evaluate/compare the clinical periodontal parameters in patients with true combined endo-perio lesions (EPL), treated with gutta-percha (GP) and mineral trioxide (MTA) as an obturation material alone and with addition of bone grafting in such lesions. 120 Saudi patients (mean age = 41yrs) diagnosed with true combined EPL participated in this study. Group I (control group, n = 30) was treated with conventional endodontic treatment using GP for obturation. Group II (n = 30) was treated with conventional endodontic treatment using MTA for obturation. Group III (n = 30) was treated with conventional endodontic treatment using GP for obturation + grafting procedure to fill the bony defect. Group IV (n = 30) was treated with conventional endodontic treatment using MTA for obturation + grafting procedure to fill the bony defect. Clinical parameters (Pocket depth (PD); Clinical attachment loss (CAL); keratinized tissue width (KTW); gingival phenotype (G.Ph.) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Periapical Index (CBCTPAI)) were recorded and compared at baseline, 3, 6, 12 months’ interval. For the groups III and IV, CBCTPAI showed significant difference (p < 0.0001) with the other groups at 6 months and 1-year interval. The group with MTA + bone graft showed 76% and 90% patients with 0 score at 6 months and 1-year follow-up, respectively. Comparison of mean values of PD among study groups at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year showed significant difference at 3 months, whereas the mean PD values of subjects in GP + bone graft showed significantly higher PD values than other 3 groups (p = 0.025). Use of GP and MTA for root canal obturation along with periodontal therapy and bone augmentation helps in resolving complex endo-perio lesions. Bone grafting in addition to obturation with MTA was found to be the best treatment strategy in management of EPL cases and is recommended for clinicians who are treating EPL patients.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Resin Fiber Post and Stainless Steel Post: An In Vitro Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 080-084
Author(s):  
Vijay Singh ◽  
Poonam Bogra ◽  
Saurabh Gupta ◽  
Navneet Kukreja ◽  
Neha Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Compressive Force ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractFracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with post. Aims: This study aims to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with resin fiber and stainless steel post. Commercially available prefabricated resin fiber post(Dentsply Maillefer Easy Post), prefabricated stainless steel post(Coltene/Whaledent Parapost) were used. Methods and Material: Forty five maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 3 groups: Control Group (Group I) without any post (n = 15), Resin Fiber Post Group (Group II) (n = 15) and Stainless Steel Post Group (Group III) (n = 15). In all Groups except control group, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. All the specimens were subjected to compressive force under a universal testing machine until fracture. Statistical analysis used: The results were analyzed using the variable analysis test (ANOVA). Results: One-way analysis of variance revealed significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (925.2183 N), followed by the resin fiber post group (486.7265 N) and stainless steel post group (423.539N). Conclusions: Teeth restored with resin fiber post showed higher fracture resistance values than prefabricated stainless steel post.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document