scholarly journals Assessment of Visual Outcome Following Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery at Tertiary Care Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr Abhinav Ashok Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision

scholarly journals A comparative study of post-operative astigmatism in superior versus superotemporal scleral incisions in manual small incision cataract surgery in a tertiary care hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 009-015
Author(s):  
Hazra Soumyadeep ◽  
Saha Tapes Kanti
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Postoperative Astigmatism ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background: In developing countries, manual small incision cataract surgery is a better alternative and less expensive in comparison to phacoemulsification and thus the incision is an important factor causing high rates of postoperative astigmatism resulting into poor visual outcome. Thus, modifications to the site of the incision is needed to reduce the pre-existing astigmatism and also to prevent postoperative astigmatism. Modification to superotemporal incision relieves pre-existing astigmatism majorly due to its characteristic of neutralizing against-the-rule astigmatism, which is more prevalent among elderly population and thus improves the visual outcome. Aims: To study the incidence, amount and type of surgically induced astigmatism in superior and superotemporal scleral incision in manual SICS. Methodology: It is a randomized, comparative clinical study done on 100 patients attending the OPD of Ophthalmology at a tertiary care hospital, with senile cataract within a period of one year and underwent manual SICS. 50 of them chosen randomly for superior incision and rest 50 with superotemporal incision. MSICS with PCIOL implantation were performed through unsutured 6.5 mm scleral incision in all. Patients were examined post-operatively on 1st day, 7th day, 2nd week and 4th week and astigmatism was evaluated and compared in both groups. Results: It is seen that on postoperative follow up on 4th week, 77.78% of the patients with ATR astigmatism who underwent superior incision had increased astigmatism whereas, only 13.63% of the patients with ATR astigmatism who underwent supero-temporal incision, had increased astigmatism but 81.82% had decreased ATR astigmatism. However, 77.78% of the patients with preoperative WTR astigmatism who underwent supero-temporal incision, had increased astigmatism, whereas 44.45% of the patients with WTR astigmatism preoperatively, had increased astigmatism in contrast to 50% had decreased amount of astigmatism. It is also seen that the supero-temporal incision group had more number of patients (78%) with visual acuity better than 6/9 at 4th postoperative week than superior incision group (42%). Conclusion: This study concludes that superior incision cause more ATR astigmatism postoperatively whereas superotemporal incision causes lower magnitude of WTR astigmatism, which is advantageous for the elderly. Besides superotemporal incision provides better and early visual acuity postoperatively.

scholarly journals Visual outcome of difficult cataract surgeries in a tertiary care center in India

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
SmitaMohod Harne ◽  
Ranjana Pande ◽  
Namrata Bhuta
Keyword(s):  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care Center

scholarly journals Comparative study between conventional extra capsular cataract extraction versus manual small incision cataract surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gannaram Laxmiprasad ◽  
Chhaya Shori ◽  
Rakesh Shori ◽  
Ashalatha Alli
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Posterior Chamber ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Rehabilitation ◽  
Surgically Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Surgically Induced

Background: Recent reports indicate that both manual small incision cataract surgery and extra capsular cataract excision surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation are safe and effective for treatment of cataract surgery, however, manual small incision cataract surgery gives better uncorrected vision. Objectives of the study were to compare intraoperative and postoperative complications, to compare induced astigmatism and to compare the visual rehabilitation.Methods: This is a prospective study of 100 consecutive patients assigned to undergo conventional extra capsular cataract excision surgery (50 cases) and manual small incision cataract surgery (50 cases). Study was done for a period of two years at a tertiary care referral hospital. Institutional Ethics Committee permission was taken. Also the informed consent was obtained from each patient.Results: In conventional ECCE, the most common surgically induced astigmatism was WTR in 73.4% of cases with mean of 2.79 D±1.3 on first day. 70% of cases with mean 2.1 D±1.28 and 64% of cases with mean of 1.86 D±1.14 at six weeks. ATR was common in MSICS group, 83.67% of cases with mean of 1.5 D±0.72 on first day, 86% of cases with mean of 1.03 D±0.6 at one week and 88% of cases with mean of 1.27 D±0.81 at six weeks. The induced astigmatism was less in MSICS group compared to ECCE group at first day but after six weeks there was no much significant difference found. Early visual recovery was better in MSICS groupConclusions: MSICS has definitive advantages over conventional ECCE in terms of early visual rehabilitation, minimal surgically induced astigmatism; no suture related complications and reduced surgical time.

Visual Outcome in Posterior Polar Cataract after Small Incision Cataract Surgery at Navodaya Medical College, Raichur

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Shruti Hunakunti ◽  
◽  
Anupama Taklikar ◽  
Pradeep Reddy ◽  
Shreya Hunakunti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Posterior Polar Cataract

scholarly journals Visual outcome and complications of manual small incision cataract Surgery (MSICS) in a peripheral CMH

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Md Abdullah Al Masum ◽  
Md Kamrul Hasan Khan ◽  
M Anwar Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
World Health ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Cataract Patients

Introduction: Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) is a cost-effective alternative to phacoemulsification cataract surgery for developing countries. This prospective study was carried out in Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Chittagong from October 2009 to March 2011 on 75 cataract patients who were operated by MSICS technique. Objectives: Aim of this study was to assess the visual outcome and complications of MSICS in a peripheral CMH. Methods: Seventy five cataract patients were operated by MSICS technique. All surgical procedures were performed by the principal author. Major per-operative and postoperative complications were documented. Visual outcome was assessed by Snellen’s visual acuity test 06 weeks after operation. Results: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 6/6 – 6/18 in 57 (76.0%) patients, < 6/18 – 6/60 in 15 (20%) and < 6/60 in 03 (4.0%) patients. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6-6/18 in 65 (86.7%) patients, < 6/18-6/60 in 07 (9.3%) and < 6/60 in 03(4.0%) patients. Visual outcome was good in 86.7% of patients according to World Health Orgnization (WHO) criteria and was not far away from the WHO expected outcome. Posterior capsule rupture was the most significant per-operative complication which was found in 7(9.3%) cases and surgically induced astigmatism was main postoperative complication that affected visual outcome. Mean postoperative astigmatism (against-the rule) was - 1.25DC. 14 JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 10, No 1 (June) 2014 Conclusion: MSICS is a safe and cost-effective technique of extra-capsular cataract extraction where surgical skill and experience of the surgeon plays a significant role in the result. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jafmc.v10i1.22895 Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.10(1) 2014

scholarly journals Hospital-based community cataract surgery: comparison of visual outcomes between conventional extra-capsular cataract extraction and small incision cataract surgery

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Karki ◽  
JK Shrestha ◽  
JB Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Cataract Extraction ◽  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Statistical Program

Introduction: The small-incision cataract surgery is gaining popularity among the ophthalmic surgeons. Objective: To compare the visual outcome of conventional extra-capsular cataract extraction (ECCE) and small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) in a hospital based community cataract program. Materials and methods: A prospective interventional study without randomization was carried out including the patients undergoing cataract surgery by either conventional ECCE or manual SICS. They were followed up for 6 weeks postoperatively. The visual outcomes were compared between the two groups. Statistics: The statistical program Epi-Info version 2000 was used to analyze the data. Mean values with standard deviations, 95% CI and p value were calculated. The p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of 85 patients, 44 (M: F=10:34) underwent ECCE and 41 (M: F=15:26) SICS (RR= 0.71, 95% CI=0.42-1.2, p value=0.16). Unaided visual acuity on the 1st postoperative day in the ECCE group was e"6/ 18 in 22.7%,<6/18-6/60 in 63.6 %,< 6/60 in 13.7%, whereas in the SICS group, the same was e"6/18 in 70.7%,<6/18-6/60 in 22 %,< 6/60 in 7.3% (95% CI = 0.23 - 0.48, p=0.001). Best corrected visual acuity on the 6th week follow-up in the ECCE group was e"6/18 in 79.5%,<6/18-6/60 in 18.2 %,< 6/60 in 2.3% and in the SICS group the same was 6/18 in 90.5% and <6/18-6/60 in 4.9% (95% CI=0.44 - 0.73; p=0.0012). Conclusion: Both ECCE and SICS are good procedures for hospital based community cataract surgery but within the 6 weeks postoperative period SICS gives better visual outcome. Remarkably higher number of female patients can be provided service in a hospital based community cataract programme as compared to males. Keywords: cataract; small incision; extra-capsular DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i2.3686 Nep J Oph 2009;1(2):118-122

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document