scholarly journals INTERACTION EFFECT OF INTOLERANCE OF AMBIGUITY, PERSPECTIVE AND TYPE OF BALANCED SCORECARD MEASURES ON PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-42
Author(s):  
S.E. Handoyo ◽  
A. Thoyib ◽  
K. Ratnawati ◽  
Andarwati
2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-227
Author(s):  
Ming-Hon Hwang ◽  
Hsin Rau

In the industrial economy, evaluating company performance based on financial results was good enough. However, in the current globalized and highly competitive environment, maintaining long term competitiveness requires companies to engage in overall strategic planning and performance evaluation. The balanced scorecard is a tool or method for balancing an organization's performance and can react to situations where a company's direction becomes disoriented. This approach assists in strategy planning, process management, and performance evaluation from four perspectives, including financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. Good strategy planning provides companies with a correct management direction, correct process management ensures the efficient execution of plans, and correct performance evaluation illustrates the execution results. This study mainly focuses on how a large rubber company in Taiwan utilizes the balanced scorecard in its organization. As the technical perspective is important in the rubber keypad industry, besides the four above perspectives, this company has added the technical perspective. By introducing this company and its progress in implementing the balanced scorecard, this study hopes to provide other companies, especially rubber companies, with a planning direction and reference for the future implementation of the balanced scorecard.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
RoghayehMohammadi Bakhsh ◽  
Hamid Gangi ◽  
AhmadReza Raeisi ◽  
MohammadHossein Yarmohammadian

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric N. Johnson ◽  
Philip M. J. Reckers ◽  
Geoffrey D. Bartlett

ABSTRACT This study examines evaluator ratings of subordinate performance in implementing a new corporate strategy in a Balanced Scorecard environment. We focus on two factors predicted to influence strategic performance judgments: (1) the presence or absence of an explicit timeline for strategy implementation, and (2) the evaluator's perceptions of the effectiveness of the new strategy. One hundred eleven M.B.A. students averaging over eight years of work experience participated in the study. Consistent with predictions, we find that (1) absence of an implementation timeline was associated with fixation on lagging financial performance measures outside of the subordinate's time span of control, and (2) evaluator perceptions of the strategy's effectiveness were positively associated with evaluations of strategy-congruent performance. These results extend prior research by highlighting the importance of the time dimension and perceptions of strategy effectiveness in performance judgments. Implications for future research in strategic performance evaluation are discussed. Data Availability: Contact the authors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document