Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Do we always need antibiotics?

Pharmateca ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14_2020 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
A.Yu. Ovchinnikov Ovchinnikov ◽  
M.A. Edzhe Edzhe ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (18) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
ABHISHEK AGARWAL ◽  
ROBERT H. HOPKINS ◽  
WILLIAM E. GOLDEN

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 614-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Steurer ◽  
Ulrike Held ◽  
Lucas M. Bachmann ◽  
David Holzmann ◽  
Peter Ott ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 172-177
Author(s):  
S. V. Starostina ◽  
D. A. Sivokhin

Acute rhinosinusitis is one of the most common diseases in the world. According to statistics, about 10 million cases are registered in Russia every year.Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) in most cases develops as a result of an acute respiratory viral disease, proceeds easily and it does not require antibiotic therapy. However, it significantly reduces the patient's quality of life in cases of moderate and severe disease, and in the absence of timely treatment, can lead to intracranial complications (meningitis, encephalitis, intracranial abscesses, etc.) and orbital (reactive edema of the eyelid, phlegmon of the orbit, periorbital abscesses, etc.). To avoid complications, with exacerbation of rhinosinusitis, it is necessary to choose the right antibiotic therapy, taking into account the resistance of the microorganisms that caused the disease.The article describes the differential diagnosticprinciples of bacterial rhinosinusitis according to the latest recommendations and research in this area, the most common antibiotic-resistant pathogens in the practice of an ENT doctor are presented, the issue of choosing the correct systemic antibiotic therapy for the treatment of patients with moderate and severe acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is considered according to modern data on the sensitivity of bacterial pathogens to antibacterial drugs prescribed in the otorhinolaryngologist's practice. The article presents data on a new universal cephalosporin of the 3rd generation (the active ingredient is cefditoren), as a second- and third-line drug, due to its high activity against most causative agents of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, and clinical observation using the above antibacterial agent within the framework of the considered topics.


Author(s):  
A.P. Smirnov ◽  
◽  
P.A. Shamkina ◽  
A.A. Krivopalov ◽  
Yu.K. Yanov ◽  
...  

The purpose was to assess the possibilities of applying a personalized approach to the appointment of macrolides in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, depending on the carrier of single-nucleotide polymorphism genes. Materials and methods. An analysis of Russian and English-language publications was conducted with a search depth of 30 years. Results. The main enzymes involved in macrolide pharmacokinetics are P-gp, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, CYP3A4, MRP2. P-gp activity is higher in carriers of the homozygous genotype in the major allele C (3435CC, 48.33%) and the heterozygous genotype (3435CT, 45.90%) of the SNPs rs1045642, whereas the lowest activity was detected in the carriers of the homozygote genotype in the minor allele T (3435 TT, 31.62%), P = 0.02. SNPS 521 T> C (rs4149056) in the SLCO1B1 gene, encoding because of the need for OATP1B1*5, associated with changes in the activity of the protein that carries and erythromycin metabolizing, respectively, in homozygous carriers of the major T allele (P = 0.0072). The activity of the 3A4 isoenzyme in the liver in homozygous carriers of negative T (CC) alleles was 1.7 and 2.5 times higher than in heterozygous (ST) and homozygous (TT) carriers of the minor T allele (rs35599367). The homozygous carriage of the G major allele (rs717620) is associated with a reduced protein function, the homozygous carriage of the minor A allele is associated with an increase in the activity of the MRP2 protein. Conclusion. Genetically determined differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of macrolides were detected depending on the gene carrier of the SNP ABCB1, SLCO1B1, CYP3A4, АВСС2. Knowledge of the genetically determined metabolism of macrolides in humans can provide new insights into the systemic effects that are available and clinically interesting from their appointment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-286
Author(s):  
Dussawan Suwannawong ◽  
Kachorn Seresirikachorn ◽  
Songklot Aeumjaturapat ◽  
Supinda Chusakul ◽  
Jesada Kanjanaumporn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document