scholarly journals Issues of the Interaction between Municipal Structures and Government Authorities of the Russian Federation in View of the 2020 Constitutional Reform

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
Marina P. Bespalova ◽  

The article amendments introduced into the text of the chapter eighth of the Russian Federation Constitution by the federal constitutional law of March 14, 2020 "On improving the regulation of certain issues of the organization and functioning of public authorities" and approved during the All-Russian vote on July 1, 2020 are described and interpreted. It is noted that the fundamental twist in the theory of municipal law was the innovation in the text of Article 132 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation on a unified system of public authorities, which includes both local authorities and bodies of federal entities and federal authorities. Promising directions for the development of legislation in the field of interaction between municipalities and public authorities in the context of the changes to the text of chapter eight of the Russian Federation Constitution are proposed.

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 12-22
Author(s):  
Dzhamilya S. Velieva ◽  
◽  
Mikhail V. Presnyakov ◽  

The article presents an analysis of amendments introduced to the Federal Constitutional Law On the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation within the framework of the 2020 constitutional reform. The authors review two areas of reformation of operations of the Constitutional Court: the organizational and management aspect and the transformation of powers to carry out constitutional compliance assessment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
N. А. Gazimagomedova ◽  

The article discusses the problems of further improving the theory and legislation of constitutional law, as well as the practice of ensuring and protecting human and civil rights and freedoms in the Russian Federation based on the novels of the constitutional reform of 2020. All-Russian requirements in the regions of the North Caucasian Federal District.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 719-728
Author(s):  
Levan T. Chikhladze ◽  
Evgeny Y. Komlev

On April 19-23, 2021, an All-Russian conference with international participation Problems and Prospects for the Development of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation and Foreign Countries was held at the Law Institute of the Peoples Friendship University of Russia on the basis of the Department of Municipal Law. More than 150 scientists from the Russian Federation and foreign countries took part in the Conference. The Conference has acquired a traditional character and is being held for the fifth time. The 2021 conference was marked by a significant increase in the number of participants, both Russian and foreign. The additional relevance of the Conference was caused by the Russian 2020 constitutional reform, which has a significant impact on the development of local self-government institution in the Russian Federation. This review presents a general description of the conference, the contents of the plenary meeting and sessions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 153-157
Author(s):  
Alexander N. Kostyukov ◽  
Irina A. Tretyak

The article assesses the monograph by Sergey Baburin. The monograph is devoted to formation in the process of international integration supranational law, taking into account peculiarities of the synthesis of international and constitutional law. This problem is one of the most actual in the context of the constitutional reform in the Russian Federation. Taking into account certain discussion points, it is necessary to come to a conclusion about the high relevance of Sergey Baburin’s scientific research. The monograph is based on serious analysis of the legal, sociological, historical and teleological features of integration processes and their root causes. Such research fully meets the requirements of modern legal scientific thought.


Author(s):  
Gyul'naz Eldarovna Adygezalova ◽  
Marina Mikhailovna Kuryachaya ◽  
Ruslan Mukharbekovich Dzidzoev ◽  
Irina Valerevna Shapiro

This article provides an overview of the speeches given by the participants of the All-Russian Scientific Practical Conference including international members “2020 Russian Constitutional Reform: political and legal importance” held remotely on December 4, 2020 by the Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law of Kuban State University jointly with the Interregional Association of Constitutionalists of Russia in Krasnodar Krai. The author describes the key provisions of the reports of the Russian and foreign participants, as well as messages received by the organizational committee of the conference. The general conclusions on the conference results are formulated. In the course of discussions were outlined the primary theoretical problems and practical aspects of constitutional legal development, as well as the trends of further improvement of the legislation. Within the framework of the discussion of 2020 constitutional reform, the participants placed emphasis on the peculiarities of modern Russian constitutionalism, its historical and theoretical aspects; questions of social and civil activism, expansion of the constitutional principles of civil society; renewal and transformation of the entire system of legal regulation; enhancement of the social component in the Constitution; consolidation of the unity of public authority; changes in the judicial system, broadening of competence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation; networking of public legal relations; protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, guarantees of rights and support of particular categories of Russians (minors, compatriots residing outside of Russia, etc.); correlation between the norms of international and national law. A number of participants gave attention to voting on the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-169
Author(s):  
M A Riekkinen

This article attempts to define the meaning and contents of the concept «protest» as it exists in constitutional law. The author abstains from acknowledging «the right to protest» in Russia’s constitutional law system. Instead it is studied how the opportunities to express the protest against decisions, actions (or lack thereof) by public authorities can be implemented as the modes of substantive public participation. The author considers the differences between formal and substantive public participation while emphasizing that the Constitution of the Russian Federation avoids direct usage of such terms as «protest», «criticism», or «objections» with respect to both types of such participation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document