scholarly journals The Importance of the Flow Cytometry for the Diagnostics of the Chronic Lymphoproliferative Diseases

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-125
Author(s):  
Nataša Lazić
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 62-67
Author(s):  
K.Yu. Gashynova  ◽  
G.V. Usenko

The prevalence of the chronic lymphoproliferative diseases is increasing worldwide with increase of the population age. It is known that the presence of comorbidities in such patients plays an important role in predicting treatment outcomes. The aim of the work was to study the prevalence and determine the structure of respiratory symptoms and comorbid pulmonary pathology in patients with chronic lymphoproliferative diseases (CLPD) in the Dnipro region of Ukraine. After analyzing 986 cards of inpatients of the hematology department, whose average age was 65 (56; 69) years, it was determined that 9.0% of patients had at least one chronic respiratory disease, the most common among which were chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as community-acquired pneumonia. Dyspnea and tachypnea are also common among patients with CLPD without established respiratory comorbidity, cardiovascular disease, or anemia. Based on the data obtained, we can recommend a study of the respiratory function and pulse oximetry, as well as a thorough collection of anamnesis of smoking and analysis of the results of chest computed tomography in all patients with CLPD in order to identify the possible cause of shortness of breath and establish the presence of respiratory comorbidity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer P. Bynum ◽  
Amy Duffield ◽  
Syed Z. Ali

Background: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of lymphoproliferative diseases. Cytomorphology alone is often insufficient for the diagnosis and subclassification of lymphoma; therefore, flow cytometry (FC) plays an important role in the characterization of lymphoproliferative disorders. This study reviews our experience with FC on liver FNA at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Methods: 2,424 liver FNAs performed over a 21-year period were reviewed for clinical FC data (n = 74) or a subsequent diagnosis of lymphoma in the liver without FC data (n = 40). Results: In our study, 114 cases (4.7%) were included out of the 2,424 liver FNAs performed during the study period. Lymphoma was diagnosed 79 times. Cytomorphology alone was diagnostic of lymphoma in 45 cases, and in 33 cases both the cytomorphology and the FC were consistent with a diagnosis of lymphoma. Neither FC nor cytomorphology were diagnostic of lymphoma on 1 specimen. In 39 cases, FC had negative results on a lesion suspicious for lymphoma based on cytomorphology. In several nonlymphoma cases, FC provided information that allowed further subclassification of the neoplasm. Conclusion: FC is a useful adjuvant diagnostic test for liver FNAs performed on patients with lymphoproliferative disorders.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3924-3924
Author(s):  
Lorena L. de Figueiredo-Pontes ◽  
Fabio M. do Nascimento ◽  
Rodrigo S. de Abreu e Lima ◽  
Rodrigo Proto-Siqueira ◽  
Aglair B. Garcia ◽  
...  

Abstract PRAME (Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma) gene was originally isolated in melanoma. A significant increase in the number of PRAME transcripts has been demonstrated in hematologic malignancies such as acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemias, multiple myeloma and chronic lymphoproliferative diseases. Furthermore, our group generated an anti-PRAME monoclonal antibody (MoAb) and by quantitative flow cytometry has demonstrated that PRAME protein was aberrantly expressed in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Mantle Cell Lymphoma. However, the expression of this antigen in normal lymphoid tissues and during B cells ontogeneis has not been characterized. To address this question, PRAME protein expression was studied by flow cytometry in peripheral blood (PB, n=15) and bone marrow (BM, n=6) from healthy donors, lymphonodes (n=4) and spleen (n=4) from patients submitted to lymphonode excision or splenectomy for non malignant diseases. First, we determined in which hematopoietic lineage PRAME was expressed by concomitantly staining PB, BM, lymphonode and spleen mononuclear cells (MCs) with anti-PRAME and a panel of MoAbs specific to B(CD19)/ T(CD3)/ NK(CD16/56), monocytic(CD14) and granulocytic(CD33) markers. PRAME was detected exclusively in CD19+ cells. The median percenatge of PRAME positive cells was 5,31% (2,55–12,34%), 13,01% (8,47–38,15%), 12,79% (3,15–23,06%) and 17,5% (12,67–27,43%) in PB, BM, lymphonode and spleen MCs, respectively. Amongst CD19+ cells, we have observed that PRAME was expressed by 42,39% (16,16–75,72%), 16% (13–69,5%), 15,16% (5,49–41,20%) and 48,82%(12,67–58,89%) in PB, BM, lymphonode and spleen, respectively. To establish in which stage of B ontogenesis PRAME was expressed on, cell suspensions stained with anti-CD19 were submitted to positive magnetic separation and labeled with anti-PRAME, CD5, CD27, CD38, CD34, CD10 and IgD MoAbs. PRAME+/CD19+ cells were CD5−, CD27+, CD38+, CD34−, CD10− and IgD+, thus suggesting that PRAME is expressed by the memory B cell compartment of the normal lymphoid tissues. This study defines PRAME as a B cell antigen that may accompany the neoplastic clone proliferation of mature B cell neoplasms. Although PRAME is mainly an embryonic antigen, expressed by carcinomas of immature phenotype, it is expressed by mature B cells in normal and pathological lymphoid tissues. Our findings suggest that maturational events occurring at the germinal center of lymphoid follicles affects PRAME expression.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4975-4975
Author(s):  
Zuhair Y. Ghanem ◽  
Mahmoud Q. Moammar ◽  
Sherif A. Nasr ◽  
Maher Albitar

Abstract Introduction: The standard criterion for diagnosing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is clonal lymphocytosis of >5×10 9/L. Cases of CLL with normal lymphocyte count have been diagnosed by flow cytometry based on the presence of clonal CD19+/CD5+/CD23+ cells. Therefore, it is not unexpected that a proportion of patients with borderline lymphocytosis (>3.5 and <5.0x10 9/L) will have CLL. The aim of our study is to establish the prevalence of CLL in patients with borderline “4.0 to 5.0x109/L” lymphocytosis in the adult population (age >40 years) seen in community practice. Methods: Using flow cytometry we analyzed a total of 157 sequential peripheral blood samples collected from patients older than 40 years presented with borderline lymphocytosis (4 to 5 x109/L). Majority of these patients (#106) were detected incidentally during routine CBC and 51 samples were submitted to rule out lymphoproliferative diseases. Results: Forty of the 157 (26%) patients had clonal B-cell disease meeting the criteria for chronic lymphoproliferative disease. The disease was classified as CLL in 35 patients (87.5%), hairy cell leukemia in 1 patient (2.5%), Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia in 1 patient (2.5%) and marginal zone B-cell lymphoma in 3 patients (7.5%). This data suggests that patients older than 40 year with lymphocyosis >4x10 9/L have high probability of having chronic lymphoproliferative disease. This disease could be other than CLL and should be thoroughly investigated. DISCUSSION: In our study the prevalence of low grade lymphoproliferative disorders in patients with borderline lymphocytosis (4–5 x109/L) above the age of 40 is 26%. This number may be positively skewed considering our selection criteria (including a subset of patients retrospectively included). Currently, there is no data to support that early intervention is beneficial for CLL, even for patients with unfavorable prognosis (e.g., those with ATM and P53 deletions). Early diagnosis of CLL will create more opportunity to study the disease in its early stages.[Shanafelt TD, Geyer SM, Kay NE: Prognosis at diagnosis: integrating molecular biologic insights into clinical practice for patients with CLL. Blood. 2004 Feb 15;103(4):1202–10. Epub 2003 Oct 23. Review.], [ Hamblin TJ: Achieving optimal outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Drugs. 2001;61(5):593–611. Review.]. Since lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) is a prognostic factor (the prognostic utility of LDT is most important for patients with early stage disease who typically are treated by watchful waiting [ Shanafelt TD, Call TG. Current approach to diagnosis and management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Mar;79(3):388–98. Review. ] ). early diagnosis may help to better segregate low from high-risk patients. Finally, in today’s cost containment pressures, it is beneficial to have an expectation for the cost/benefit ratio of performing a test. Knowing the prevalence of disease at decision limits may help us to better justify establishing testing guidelines.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
Geraldo Barroso Cavalcanti Júnior ◽  
Valeria Soraya de Farias Sales ◽  
Dany Geraldo Kramer Cavalcanti e Silva ◽  
Maria Cleide de Araújo Lopes ◽  
Aldair de Souza Paiva ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: CD5 is a T cell marker, aberrantly express in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Other chronic B cell malignancies including hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and B cell prolymphocytic leukemia (B-PLL) are CD5 negative or express this antigen in a weak way. In this study, CD5 expression was investigated in leukemic cells from 42 patients with chronic B cell lymphoproliferative disease. METHODS: We studied the CD5 expression in leukemic cells from 42 patients with chronic B-cell malignancies by flow cytometry. Demographic features such as age, sex and clinical date were also analyzed. RESULTS: There were 22 males and 20 females. The immunophenotyping showed that 35 cases were B-CLL, 3 B-PLL and HCL and one patient was MCL. CD5 expression was present in all B-CLL and MCL. Low expression of CD5 was observed in one patient with B-PLL and negative in all cases of HCL. CONCLUSION: Our date demonstrated that CD5 expression can help distinguish among B-CLL from HCL and B-PLL, but is similar expressed in MCL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Fedyanina ◽  
Yu. Yu. Chuksina ◽  
A. N. Khmelevskaya ◽  
A. N. Khvastunova ◽  
Yu. N. Matveev ◽  
...  

Background: At present, the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders is based on the combination of blood or bone marrow smear morphology and immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. Immunophenotypic testing by flow cytometry technique is available only in big medical centers, which is not always convenient for a  patient. Therefore, development of an available method for preliminary diagnosis of lymphoproliferative diseases not requiring special equipment seems relevant.Materials and methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 17  patients admitted to the hospital with suspicion of a  lymphoproliferative disorder, and 17  healthy donors were studied on a cell biochip for determination of proportions of cells positive for various surface CD antigens. The diagnosis was verified by flow cytometry.Results: Compared to healthy controls and patients with T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (TCLPD), the patients with B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (BCLPD) had significantly lower proportion of CD7+ cells (medians, 7% and 73% respectively, p=2×10-6 for comparison with healthy controls; median  7% and 93% for comparison with TCLPD, p=0.032). In addition, the patients with BCLPD had higher proportion of peripheral СD19+ mononuclear cells, compared to that in the patients with TCLPD and healthy donors (medians 84% and 13% for comparison between BCLPD and healthy control, p=2×10-5; 84% and 3% for comparison of BCLPD and TCLPD, p=0.033). The patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia had significantly higher CD5+ cells in the cell biochip compared to the patients with other BCLPD (medians 72% and 9%, p=0.024). The patients with TCLPD had significantly lower proportion of CD19+ cells than the healthy controls (medians, 3% and 13%, respectively, р=0.042).Conclusion: The study has demonstrated the potential to use the previously developed cell biochip for diagnosis of lymphoproliferative diseases. The biochip makes it possible to sort out white blood cells according to their surface differentiation antigen for their further morphological analysis. The cell biochip allows for the differential diagnosis between BCLPD and TCLPD and determination the lymphocyte clones based on the expression of immunoglobulin light chains.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document