scholarly journals Abordagens, estratégias e ferramentas para o acesso aberto via periódicos e repositórios institucionais em instituições acadêmicas brasileiras | Approaches, strategies and tools for open access through journals and institutional repositories in Brazilian

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sely Costa
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Communication Process ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Disciplinary Differences ◽  
Institutional Repositories ◽  
Open Access Journals

Resumo Este ensaio tem por objetivo discutir, de modo sucinto, o movimento do acesso aberto nos dias atuais, procurando-se identificar a diferença entre acesso aberto à literatura científica e acesso aberto ao conhecimento científico. A abordagem do acesso aberto à literatura relaciona-se com o processo de comunicação, enquanto o acesso aberto ao conhecimento científico, com a gestão do conhecimento. Recorre-se à literatura e à experiência pessoal no intuito de identificar e relatar estratégias e ferramentas que têm sido utilizadas em diferentes países e no próprio Brasil. A discussão fundamenta-se em três tópicos considerados basilares para o estudo e a prática com periódicos eletrônicos e repositórios de acesso aberto, que são: as diferenças disciplinares, o sistema de comunicação científica e os modelos de gestão do conhecimento. Parte-se do pressuposto de que as diferenças disciplinares devem nortear as ações e decisões a respeito da criação e manutenção de revistas e repositórios. As primeiras, como veículos efetivos de comunicação científica. Os últimos, como, ferramentas eficientes de gestão do conhecimento. Palavras-chave acesso aberto à literatura científica; acesso aberto ao conhecimento científico; periódicos científicos eletrônicos de acesso aberto; repositórios institucionais; diferenças disciplinares; modelo de comunicação científica; modelo de gestão do conhecimento científico.Abstract This essay aims at briefly discussing the open access movement today, trying to identify the difference between open access to scientific literature and open access to scientific knowledge. Open access to scientific literature is related to the scholarly communication process approach, while open access to scientific knowledge concerns the knowledge management approach. Both the literature and personal experience are used as the basis for discussion, attempting to identify and report strategies and tools that have been used in different countries and in Brazil itself. The discussion is based on three fundamental issues for the study and practices with open access journals and repositories, which are disciplinary differences, the scholarly communication system and knowledge management models. The assumptions behind the discussion are that disciplinary differences should guide both decisions and actions related to creating and maintaining journals and repositories. Journals are to be approached as effective communication channels while repositories are to be considered as efficient knowledge management tools.Keywords Open access to scientific literature. Open access to scientific knowledge. Scientific and scholarly electronic journals. Institutional repositories. Disciplinary differences. Scholarly communication models. Scientific knowledge management.

The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 163-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Mary Marsh
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Communication Process ◽  
Research Information ◽  
Scholarly Research ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Institutional Repositories

Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process.

scholarly journals Open Journal System in the Era of Paperless Papers

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tayyaba Gul Malik
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Developing World ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Resource Constrained ◽  
Open Access Journals

With the start of 2020, we have entered a new decade with the never-ending challenges of the developing world. One of the challenges is the barrier against access to the latest scientific knowledge. To cope with this barrier it is indispensable that the current scientific literature should be made freely available to the resource-constrained countries like Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology has taken a step forward and joined the club of open access journals through “Open Journal System” (OJS).

scholarly journals Supporting and Enhancing Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Open Access Institutional Repository

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Chan
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Research Impact ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
Communication Process ◽  
Institutional Repositories ◽  
Scholarly Output ◽  
Digital Format ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Relationship Of

Abstract: Scholarly communication and publishing are increasingly taking place in the electronic environment. With a growing proportion of the scholarly record now existing only in digital format, serious and pressing issues regarding access and preservation are being raised that are central to future scholarship. At the same time, the desire of scholars to maximize readership of their research and to take control of the scholarly communication process back from the restrictive domain of commercial publishing has prompted the proliferation of access options and experimental models of publishing. This paper examines the emerging trend of university-based institutional repositories (IRs) designed to capture the scholarly output of an institution and to maximize the research impact of this output. The relationship of this trend to the open access movement is discussed and challenges and opportunities for using IRs to promote new modes of scholarship are provided. Résumé : La communication et l’édition savantes ont de plus en plus lieu dans un milieu électronique. En effet, une proportion croissante de la recherche existe seulement sous forme numérique. Cette situation soulève des questions sérieuses et pressantes sur l’accès et la préservation qui sont vitales pour l’érudition future. En même temps, les désirs de chercheurs de maximiser leur lectorat et de retirer la communication savante de l’emprise des éditeurs commerciaux ont mené à une prolifération d’options pour l’accès et de modèles d’édition expérimentaux. Cet article examine la tendance émergeante vers des entrepôts institutionnels basés dans des universités conçus de manière à préserver la production savante d’une institution et à maximiser son impact sur la recherche. Cet article discute du rapport de cette tendance au mouvement favorisant un accès libre et il propose des défis et des occasions dans l’utilisation d’entrepôts institutionnels pour promouvoir de nouvelles approches érudites.

Faculty Attitudes Towards Open Access Publishing, E-Print Servers and Institutional Repositories

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Wust
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Faculty Attitudes ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Teaching And Research ◽  
Institutional Repositories ◽  
Etude Qualitative

This qualitative study investigates how faculty gather information for teaching and research and their opinions on open access approaches to scholarly communication. Despite generally favorable reactions, a perceived lack of peer review and impact factors were among the most common reasons for not publishing through open-access forums.Cette étude qualitative examine comment les membres du corps professoral recueillent l’information pour l’enseignement et la recherche, et leurs opinions envers les approches de la communication scientifique à libre accès. Malgré des réactions généralement favorables, le manque perçu de révision par les pairs et les facteurs d’impact comptent parmi les motifs habituellement évoqués pour ne pas publier sur ces tribunes à libre accès. 

scholarly journals Researchers' perspectives on open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
F.W. Dulle ◽  
M.K. Minishi-Majanja
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Public Universities ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
Institutional Repositories ◽  
Recognition Quality ◽  
Dissemination Of Research ◽  
Research Findings

This research explored the awareness, usage and perspectives of Tanzanian researchers on open access as a mode of scholarly communication. A survey questionnaire targeted 544 respondents selected through stratified random sampling from a population of 1088 university researchers of the six public universities in Tanzania. With a response rate of 73%, the data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The study reveals that the majority of the researchers were aware of and were positive towards open access. Findings further indicate that the majority of researchers in Tanzanian public universities used open access outlets more to access scholarly content than to disseminate their own research findings. It seems that most of these researchers would support open access publishing more if issues of recognition, quality and ownership were resolved. Thus many of them supported the idea of establishing institutional repositories at their respective universities as a way of improving the dissemination of local content. The study recommends that public universities and other research institutions in the country should consider establishing institutional repositories, with appropriate quality assurance measures, to improve the dissemination of research output emanating from these institutions.

Scholarly communication in the digital environment

2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 481-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Rowlands ◽  
David Nicholas
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
Substantial Contribution ◽  
Disciplinary Culture ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Journal Publishing ◽  
Institutional Repositories ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Regional Location

PurposeThis paper aims to make a substantial contribution to the ongoing debate about the potential of open access publishing and institutional repositories to reform the scholarly communication system. It presents the views of senior authors on these issues and contextualises them within the broader framework of their journal publishing behaviour and preferences.Design/methodology/approachA highly representative online opinion survey of more than five and half thousand journals authors, building on an earlier (January 2004) benchmarking study carried out by CIBER.FindingsSenior researchers are rapidly becoming more informed about open access publishing and institutional repositories but are still a long way off reaching a consensus on the likelihood that these new models will challenge the existing order, nor are they in agreement whether this would be a positive or a negative development. Disciplinary culture and, to a less extent, regional location are key determinants of author attitudes and any policy response should avoid “one‐size‐fits‐all” solutions.Research limitations/implicationsThis survey reflects the opinions of senior corresponding authors who have recently published in a “top” (i.e. ISI‐indexed journal) with 95 per cent confidence. The findings should not be generalised to represent the views of all authors in all journals, open access or otherwise.Originality/valueThe journal publishing sector is facing enormous challenges and opportunities as content increasingly migrates to the web. The value of this research is that it provides an objective, non‐partisan, assessment of the attitudes and opinions of more than 5,000 senior researchers, a key stakeholder group, and thus contributes both to the development of public policy as well as more realistic commercial strategies.

Scientific Authorship and E-commons

2010 ◽  
pp. 193-205
Author(s):  
Luc Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Source Model ◽  
Public Domain ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Scientific Authorship ◽  
The Web

This contribution tries to assess how the Web is changing the ways in which scientific knowledge is produced, distributed and evaluated, in particular how it is transforming the conventional conception of scientific authorship. After having properly introduced the notions of copyright, public domain and (e-)commons, I will critically assess James Boyle's (2003, 2008) thesis that copyright and scientific (e-) commons are antagonistic, but I will mostly agree with the related claim by Stevan Harnad (2001a,b, 2008) that copyright has become an obstacle to the accessibility of scientific works. I will even go further and argue that Open Access schemes not only solve the problem of the availability of scientific literature, but may also help to tackle the uncontrolled multiplication of scientific publications, since these publishing schemes are based on free public licenses allowing for (acknowledged) re-use of texts. However, the scientific community does not seem to be prepared yet to move towards an Open Source model of authorship, probably due to concerns related to attributing credit and responsability for the expressed hypotheses and results. Some strategies and tools that may encourage a change of academic mentality in favour of a conception of scientific authorship modelled on the Open Source paradigm are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document