scholarly journals Differential prognostic impact of interleukin-34 mRNA expression and infiltrating immune cell composition in intrinsic breast cancer subtypes

Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (33) ◽  
pp. 23126-23148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Zins ◽  
Gerwin Heller ◽  
Mathias Mayerhofer ◽  
Martin Schreiber ◽  
Dietmar Abraham
PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e7252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongjun Dai ◽  
Yiming Zhong ◽  
Zhuo Wang ◽  
Neelum Aziz Yousafzai ◽  
Hongchuan Jin ◽  
...  

Background The aim of current study was to use competing risk model to calculate the potential differences that age played in the prognosis of different breast cancer subtypes. Methods The cohort was selected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The cumulative incidences of death (CID) was assessed for breast cancer caused deaths and other causes of mortality. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model and the multivariate subdistribution hazard (SH) model were used to evaluate the prognostic value of age in different breast cancer subtypes. Results We involved 33,968 breast cancer patients into our cohort. We found older patients had worse overall survival (OS) than young patients in hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer (HR+/HER2+) (≥40 vs. <40, HR = 2.07, 95% CI [1.28–3.35], p < 0.05). However, when we used competing risk model, we found young age was an independent risk factor only for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (≥40 vs. <40, HR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.56–0.89], p < 0.05). No association was found in other groups. Conclusion Our research was currently the largest sample size study and the first competing risk model-based study on the prognostic association between age and different breast cancer subtypes. We found <40 years patients had worse breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) than older patients in the TNBC subtype.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12577-e12577
Author(s):  
Naoki Hayashi ◽  
Madoka Iwase ◽  
Atsushi Yoshida ◽  
Yuko Takahashi ◽  
Junko Takei ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Bergen ◽  
C. Tichy ◽  
A. S. Berghoff ◽  
M. Rudas ◽  
P. Dubsky ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xinhui Li ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Mingming Xiao ◽  
Lingyu Zhao ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
...  

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous malignant disease with different prognoses and has been divided into four molecular subtypes. It is believed that molecular events occurring in breast stem/progenitor cells contribute to the carcinogenesis and development of different breast cancer subtypes. However, these subtype-specific molecular characteristics are largely unknown. In this study, we employed 1217 breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database for a multiomics analysis of the molecular characteristics of different breast cancer subtypes based on PAM50 algorithms. We detected the expression changes of subtype-specific genes and revealed that the expression of particular subtype-specific genes significantly affected prognosis. We also investigated the mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) of breast cancer driver genes and the representative genes of ten signaling pathways in different subtypes and revealed several subtype-specifically altered genes. Moreover, we detected the infiltration of various immune cells in different subtypes of breast cancer and showed that the infiltration levels of major immune cell types are different among these subtypes. Additionally, we investigated the factors affecting the immune infiltration level and the immune cytolytic activity in different breast cancer subtypes, namely, the mutation burden, genome instability and cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) infiltration. This study may shed light on the molecular events contributing to carcinogenesis and development and provide potential markers and targets for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of different breast cancer subtypes.


Author(s):  
ES Bergen ◽  
C Tichy ◽  
AS Berghoff ◽  
M Rudas ◽  
P Dubsky ◽  
...  

Planta Medica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Robles ◽  
L Du ◽  
S Cai ◽  
RH Cichewicz ◽  
SL Mooberry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document