scholarly journals European Deposit Insurance Scheme(s) – Consequences for the EU’s Financial Stability

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-136
Author(s):  
Klaudia Zielińska-Lont
Keyword(s):  
Financial Stability ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Target Level ◽  
Insurance Scheme ◽  
National Implementation ◽  
Deposit Guarantee Schemes ◽  
Limited Scope ◽  
The Eu

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the potential consequences that the shortcomings in harmonising the national deposit guarantee schemes may have on the financial stability of the European Union. The relevance of this subject is underlined both by the European Commission’s intention to revive the European Deposit Insurance Scheme project in 2021 and the recent signals from Germany that they are willing to support the initiative. The paper presents a review of the discussions on establishing a European Deposit Insurance Scheme, the reasons for the project’s failure and the consensus solution that took the form of the Deposit Guarantee Scheme Directive (DGSD). The limited scope of deposit guarantee scheme harmonisation under this directive is discussed in the context of the related EBA opinions pointing to different areas of potential improvements. Differences in national implementation are also reviewed in terms of their potential impact on financial stability. Apart from a careful literature review, statistical analysis of the available financial information characterizing the largest national deposit schemes of the euro is performed to quantify their progress towards the target level of the available financial means. The results prove that most national schemes are still far from reaching the 0.8% target level of readily available funds and that potentially desirable amendments to the DGSD may drag them even further away from reaching that target by 2024. The author concludes that from the perspective of financial stability, the EU should focus on establishing a single scheme at an international level that would complete the project of establishing a banking union. The results contribute to the ongoing discussion on the need to further integrate the national deposit guarantee schemes inside the EU.

scholarly journals Deposit insurance systems in the European union: legal regulation and development prospects

2019 ◽  
pp. 156-162
Author(s):  
N. M. Alsov
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Insurance Policy ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Eu

The paper provides a historical, substantive and functional analysis of the legal regulation of deposit insurance systems (hereinafter referred to as DIS) in the European Union based on Directive 2014/49 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 16, 2014. “On Deposit Insurance Systems” (revised). The author considers the contribution of DIS to improving the financial stability of the EU banking sector. The paper shows a conducted assessment of the measures implemented and planned for implementation initiated by the European Commission and the European Central Bank for the implementation of a single European DIS as the third pillar of the Banking Union. The author concludes that the third Directive “On DIS” allows for a qualitative step forward towards the creation of the third pillar of the Banking Union. Despite some unresolved and controversial issues, it creates uniform rules of the game for national DIS in a deposit insurance policy. Further development and movement towards European DIS will make it possible to increase the effectiveness of the EU deposit insurance policy by reducing costs, overcoming administrative barriers in national DISs, increase the level of protection of depositors’ rights, and strengthen confidence in the banking sector and its stability.

15 The Operation of the Single Resolution Mechanism in the Context of the EU State Aid Regime

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kokkoris Ioannis ◽  
Olivares-Caminal Rodrigo
Keyword(s):  
Crisis Management ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
State Aid ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Single Resolution Mechanism ◽  
The Eu

This chapter addresses the initiatives of the European Commission to maintain the financial stability of the banking sector. It analyses the regulatory reforms on bank recovery and resolution introduced by the EU aimed at creating a Banking Union, and provides an overview of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) by taking into account the crisis management tool innovations. It also offers a critical appraisal of the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM). The initiatives examined here are envisaged in a two-pronged approach: through the uniform rules of the Banking Union and in a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) and a Single Resolution Fund (SRF) on one hand, and its interrelation with the state aid rules of the Treaty for the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the other.

scholarly journals The missing European Deposit Insurance Scheme

2020 ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Pery Bazoti
Keyword(s):  
Euro Area ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Risk Minimization ◽  
Insurance Scheme ◽  
European Banking Union ◽  
European Banking

The European Banking Union embarked as a highly ambitious project of the European Union as a response to the signifi cant fl aws and weaknesses in the original architecture of the European Monetary Union that became apparent during the economic crisis. However, the establishment of a single European banking system has stumbled upon the creation of a common deposit insurance scheme that could safeguard depositors and create a more stable fi nancial framework in the euro area. The European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS) was fi rstly introduced by the European Commission in 2015. As a bold proposal that comprises wide risk mutualization among the euro area member states, it has spurred a vivid discussion in the European public speech and many proposals have been made since then altering its original planning in an effort to tackle the moral hazard concerns that have risen. The present article, after discussing the reasons that keep obstructing EDIS, presents these suggestions that move around, primarily, the role of the national deposit guarantee schemes. However, as highlighted in the article, before moving to any alterations on the structure and role of a proposed common deposit insurance scheme, signifi cant risk minimization on behalf of the national banking systems, must precede by limiting the sovereign exposures of banks and the size of the Non-Performing Loans. Such steps of risk minimization are critical for addressing concerns and the political unwillingness demonstrated by several European countries in moving forward towards deeper integration.

scholarly journals Recent developments in deposit insurance from EU perspective

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 867-870
Author(s):  
Łukasz Szewczyk
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Crucial Issue ◽  
Funding Model ◽  
Strong Emphasis ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
European Banking ◽  
Deposit Guarantee Schemes ◽  
The Eu

The aim of this article is to present recent developments on deposit guarantee scheme within the EU. These schemes has changed significantly during the financial crisis, which led to adoption of a directive on deposit guarantee schemes in 2014. A strong emphasis will be put on deposit guarantee schemes financing issues. This is a crucial issue, especially at the time when European Banking Authority is working on methods for calculating contributions to deposit guarantee schemes and its funding model. This model may be an important step in mitigating risks generated by banks and may contribute to financial stability in EU.

The European deposit insurance game plan

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-20
Author(s):  
Theo Kiriazidis
Keyword(s):  
Financial Stability ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Discretionary Power ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Framework ◽  
Seeking Behavior ◽  
Game Plan ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
The Eu

Purpose This paper aims to analyze the development of European Deposit Insurance (DI) and assess the recent development at the EU level to establish a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS) in the context of a more integrated financial framework: the Banking Union (BU). Design/methodology/approach The author uses literature review and empirical evidence to analyze the dynamic interaction among European governments in an effort to attract aggressive deposits with severe repercussion for financial stability. Findings The paper argues that a liquidity providing EDIS would render regulatory subsidy and rent-seeking behavior persisting by allowing national policies to be pursued with considerable discretionary power and in the context of increasing competition for deposits. This would run contrary to the BU objectives and constitute a major failure of the program. Practical implications The findings of the study can be helpful in understanding the DI policies pursued by European governments and their implications. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that examines the interactions among European governments in pursuing DI policies and assesses the implications of EDIS.

scholarly journals Assessment of the European banking regulatory framework in light of its significance for the Republic of Serbia

Bankarstvo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-101
Author(s):  
Kristijan Ristić ◽  
Aleksandar Živković
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Financial Markets ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Debt Crisis ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
The Eu

The debt crisis in the European Union is known to be caused by the interdependence of banking and state financial stability, and, together with the non-existence of the fiscal union, it has taken on the existential dimensions of the EU project itself. Under the guise of financial fragmentation within the financial markets of the Eurozone, and from the aspect of the outbreak of the crisis, EU member states resorted to national interventions, thus closing national banking and financial markets, which ultimately resulted in deepened and stronger structural foundation of the crisis and its economic and financial consequences. In that context, the Banking Union is the regulatory and institutional response of the EU after the global financial crisis, about which the first proposals have found a place in institutional controversies since 2012. In addition to the key moment and motive for establishing such an institutional regulatory arrangement, the reason for its creation is more to create a union that is connected with the creation of a single market for financial services and free money circulation, and certainly with the tendency of fuller monetary integration. However, certain questions which arose remained relevant to date: whether these established and instrumentalized frameworks, mechanisms and procedures are in fact sufficient; whether the EU banking union, conceptually designed, really represents banking integration; and whether the "centralized-common" and "sovereign-national" relationships continued in the EU financial architecture, the use of the principle "one measure for all" in the implementation of the Basel III, non-inclusion of all types of banks, and the conflict of emission and supervisory roles of the Central Bank, be a structural conflict in achieving the desired financial stability, which is the ultimate goal. In the broader context of the functioning of the EU, financial stability can also be interpreted as a factor in the survival of the common currency and the European Union itself, regardless of the intertwined contradictions and construction conflict. In this paper, we analyze the functional scope of the regulatory framework for banking supervision in the EU during the five-year existence to date, and finally the effects and impact that this framework has had on the regulatory adjustment of the Serbian banking sector.

11 The Role of Deposit Insurance Post Implementation of the EU Recovery, Resolution, and Deposit Guarantee Directives

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
LaBrosse John Raymond ◽  
Walker David K
Keyword(s):  
Financial Stability ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
International Association ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
System Safety ◽  
European Directive ◽  
Eu Directive ◽  
Deposit Guarantee Schemes ◽  
The Eu

This chapter explores some key provisions of the European Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) and how it relates to deposit protection provided by the European Directive on Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS). It explains the structure and roles of the agencies that comprise a financial system safety net and the pertinent features of the arrangements that have been widely adopted. In particular, the chapter considers the provisions of the Directive respecting which agency within the safety net should have responsibility for bank resolutions, the ‘bail-in’ provisions embodied within the Directive, and significant issues that have yet to be addressed fully. In doing so it examines how the EU Directive lines up with work undertaken by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI).

scholarly journals Pandemics, Climate and Public Finance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Battiston ◽  
Monica Billio ◽  
Irene Monasterolo
Keyword(s):  
Financial Stability ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Economic Resilience ◽  
Taxation Policy ◽  
Containment Measures ◽  
Socio Economic Impact ◽  
Business As Usual ◽  
The Eu

The outbreak of COVID-19 and the containment measures are having an unprecedented socio-economic impact in the European Union (EU) and elsewhere. The policies introduced so far in the EU countries promote a ‘business as usual’ economic recovery. This short-term strategy may jeopardise the mid-to-long-term sustainability and financial stability objectives. In contrast, strengthening the socio-economic resilience against future pandemics, as well as other shocks, calls for recovery measures that are fully aligned to the objectives of the EU Green Deal and of the EU corporate taxation policy. Tackling these long-term objectives is not more costly than funding the current short-term measures. Remarkably, it may be the only way to build resilience to future crises.

Part I Regulatory Structure, 3 European Financial Services

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walker George ◽  
Purves Robert ◽  
Blair Michael
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Primary Sources ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Regulatory Structure ◽  
European Court ◽  
Treaty Of Rome ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Council Of Ministers ◽  
The Eu

This chapter examines the evolution of the European Union' financial services law and its impact on the development of financial services law in the UK, as it stands at the end of 2016, six months after the EU referendum. It first describes the evolving role and functions of the EU institutions, namely: the Council of Ministers, the European Commission, the European Court of Justice, and the European Parliament. It then considers the primary sources of EU law, including treaties, and the effects of the various changes in the Treaty of Rome. It also discusses the establishment of the single market in financial services and the moves to establish a banking union. Finally, it analyses the substantive financial services measures that have been adopted in the EU since the 1970s.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document