Reducing Aggressive Male Behavior In Elementary School: Promising Practices

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-258
Author(s):  
Barbara Holmes ◽  
Jamel Gibson ◽  
Dietrich Morrison-Danner

Student aggression and violent behavior, especially among males, is pervasive and problematic in the classroom. When incorporated in the lesson design, promising practices (music, movement, and visual stimulation) are evidence-based strategies that may reduce male aggression in the classroom.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine A. Sinsky ◽  
Lee Daugherty Biddison ◽  
Aditi Mallick ◽  
Anna Legreid Dopp ◽  
Jessica Perlo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
June Gothberg ◽  
LaSonja Roberts ◽  
Mary Ebejer

Much of education research in recent years has focused on how the bullying and victimization of LGBTQ+ students and youth with disabilities (YWD) can lead to increased challenges and limited opportunities later in life. However, few studies have focused on how bullying and victimization affects students who both have disabilities and identify as LGBTQ+ or on how specific practices could improve both their experiences in school and their success later in life. YWD face the same challenges when it comes to puberty, social identity, and planning for adult roles as their non-disabled peers, but they are more likely to struggle with developing their identity and thinking about their future, particularly if they identify as LGBTQ+, which is why educators and parents must work together to advocate for changes that promote an inclusive, safe, and just environment for all students. In this article, we offer guidance using evidence-based promising practices (EBPPs) to improve educational settings for LGBTQ+ YWD that is informed by our work at the state, local, and classroom levels. Gran parte de las investigaciones en educación en los últimos años se han enfocado en como el acoso y la victimización de los estudiantes LGBTQ+ y estudiantes con discapacidades pueden llevarlos a un aumento de desafíos y menos oportunidades más tarde en sus vidas. Sin embargo, pocas investigaciones se han enfocado en como el acoso y la victimización afecta a los estudiantes con discapacidades o identificados como LGBTQ+ o en como prácticas específicas pueden mejorar sus experiencias escolares y a la vez su éxito en el futuro. Los estudiantes con discapacidades enfrentan los mismo retos que sus compañeros sin discapacidades cuando se trata de la pubertad, identidad social, y en planear para su rol como adultos, pero tienen más dificultad en luchar con el desarrollo de su identidad y en pensar en su futuro, especialmente si se identifican como LGBTQ+, por lo tanto es importante que los docentes y padres de familia trabajen juntos para abogar para cambios que promuevan un ambiente inclusivo, seguro, y justo para todos los estudiantes. En este artículo, ofrecemos consejos utilizando prácticas prometedoras basadas en evidencias para mejorar el ambiente educativo para estudiantes LGBTQ+ con discapacidades que están informadas en nuestro trabajo al nivel estatal, local y de aula.


1969 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41
Author(s):  
Mary E. Rekstad ◽  
James Miller ◽  
H. Edwin Lanehart

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Graham ◽  
Tracey E. Hall

In today’s world, writing is an essential skill. At school, writing is often used to gauge students’ understanding of content material as well as to promote the learning of it. Students with learning disabilities (LD) and those at risk for writing difficulties experience considerable difficulty with almost every aspect of writing. The field of LD is developing a reasonable foundation of knowledge about what and how students with LD and those at risk for LD write. The articles in this series contribute to our growing knowledge of how students with LD struggle with the writing process and can benefit from evidence-based practices, beginning in elementary school and continuing into college. The purpose of this article is to introduce the special series on writing and writing difficulties. Three of the articles are included in this issue, and the two remaining articles will appear in the next issue. This introduction provides readers with the rationale for the series, the purpose of each article, and a brief overview of each contribution.


Author(s):  
Brian Butterworth ◽  
Sashank Varma ◽  
Diana Laurillard

Recent research in cognitive and developmental neuroscience is providing a new approach to the understanding of dyscalculia that emphasizes a core deficit in understanding sets and their numerosities, which is fundamental to all aspects of elementary school mathematics. The neural bases of numerosity processing have been investigated in structural and functional neuroimaging studies of adults and children, and neural markers of its impairment in dyscalculia have been identified. New interventions to strengthen numerosity processing, including adaptive software, promise effective evidence-based education for dyscalculic learners.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 303-320
Author(s):  
Alexander Alperin ◽  
Linda A. Reddy ◽  
Todd A. Glover ◽  
Nicole Breeden ◽  
Christopher Dudek ◽  
...  

Despite receiving little to no training in behavior management, paraprofessionals often support young students with or at risk of disruptive behavior disorders in elementary schools. The Behavior Support Coaching for Paraprofessionals (BSC-P) is a new evidence-based data-driven approach for enhancing paraprofessionals’ skills in identifying behavior needs, setting goals, and selecting and implementing evidence-based interventions for improving student disruptive behaviors. The current case study presents the application of the BSC-P (eight sessions over 3 months) with a paraprofessional and teacher who support two first-grade students exhibiting disruptive behaviors in an urban high-poverty elementary school. Implemented evidence-based interventions include say, show, check, a token economy, and antecedent modification. Findings revealed increased paraprofessional intervention fidelity, improved student classroom engagement (effect sizes of 3.77 and 2.10), and decreased student inappropriate verbal and physical behavior (effect sizes of 1.34 and 1.88, respectively).


Author(s):  
Kirstin Painter ◽  
Maria Scannapieco

This chapter focuses on evidence-based and promising treatments and interventions for conduct disorder (CD) and oppositional defiant disorders (ODD). Unlike some mental health problems, psychosocial and behavioral interventions are the first line of treatment for CD and ODD. Psychotropic medication is not a first-line treatment for either disorder; however, they are sometime prescribed to manage distressing symptoms or to treat co-occurring disorders. Chapter 12 presents evidence-based and promising practices aimed at the youth only, the caregiver only, or a combination. Multisystemic therapy, multidimensional treatment foster care, functional family therapy, and parent–child interaction therapy are all evidence-based treatments described. The end of the chapter returns to the case studies presented in Chapter 11 and describes the real-life outcomes followed by questions for class discussion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document