scholarly journals Financial Crisis Of A Health Clinic: A Case Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morris D. Long

The Northern Indiana Health Clinic (NIHC) is a small community, non-profit health organization located in northern Indiana. Over the last 18 months, local factories have downsized or closed their doors, residents have left the community, and the number of uninsured individuals has continued to escalate. NIHC is not immune to the economic misfortune and closed out last year with its first operating loss in the last three years. The outlook for the coming year looks even more dismal and places NIHC in financial jeopardy.  The CEO has presented a number of recommendations to the board of directors for consideration. The board hired a consulting company to analyze the CEO’s proposal and provide long-term solutions that will turn around the current financial direction without sacrificing patient care.  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-360
Author(s):  
Adrienne Collins

Leaders of small non-profit organisations are in a ‘lonely position’, caught between the board of directors and the staff. One form of support that can assist them in their role is being mentored by an individual outside their organisation. This paper presents a case study of a mentoring programme run by Carmichael, an Irish non-profit support organisation, since 2012. It outlines the processes involved in the programme and the experiences of and learning from the mentees and mentors.


Author(s):  
Nils Brunsson

This chapter continues to analyze the relationship between decision and action using a case study on Swedish Rail (Statens Järnvägar, SJ). In February 1987, the board of directors of SJ met to consider a plan drawn up by an international consultancy company to implement a radical reform, the ‘New SJ’. The basic idea was to make the company more businesslike. SJ was to be run as a company and not as a government service, and its corporate aim was to be a profitable business. The chapter addresses the question of why reforms may be difficult to implement. It suggests that there are certain fundamental and common characteristics of administrative reforms which make them difficult to implement by nature.


Author(s):  
Sultana Lubna Alam ◽  
Ruonan Sun ◽  
John Campbell

While most crowdsourcing (CS) cases in the literature focus on commercial organisations, little is known about volunteers’ motivation of initial and continued participation in not-for-profit CS projects and importantly, about how the motivations may change over time. It is vital to understand motivation and motivational dynamics in a not-for-profit context because a fundamental challenge for not-for-profit CS initiations is to recruit and keep volunteers motivated without any formal contract or financial incentives. To tackle this challenge, we explore high performing volunteers’ initial motivation for joining and sustaining with a GLAM (galleries, libraries, archives and museums) CS project. We situated our interpretive exploration in a case study of the Australian Newspapers CS project initiated by the National Library of Australia. Based on the case study, we found that high-performing volunteers were motivated by a combination of personal, collective, and external factors classified into intrinsic, extrinsic, and internalised extrinsic motivations. Further, we found that these motivations changed over time. Specifically, many volunteers presented substantial personal (i.e., personal interest and fun) and community-centric motivations (i.e. altruism and non-profit cause) when they initially joined the project, whereas external motivations (i.e., recognition and rewards) had a greater impact on long-term participation. Our findings offer implications for CS system design (e.g., user profiles, tagging and commenting), incentive structure (e.g., reputation-based ranking, leader boards), and relational mechanisms (e.g., open communication channels) to stimulate sustainable contributions for not-for-profit CS initiatives.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Patricia Francis

This case study describes the problems faced and transformation efforts taken by the Board of Directors of Menga Berhad in order to stay relevant in the evolving requirements of technology in the ICT industry. The case was identified as a result of stiff competition faced by Menga over the years which resulted in declining of revenues and profit margins, delayed projects and declining customer satisfaction during the recent years and how the strategic vision was turned into operational reality. The data related to the case study has been compiled from Company’s Periodic Financial Statements, BURSA announcements given by the new management, websites, articles and through interviews and discussions with the relevant stakeholders of Menga Berhad. The analysis is based on management theories and proven concepts. The strategic intervention identified is per that which has been undertaken by the management in order to mitigate the issues that were being experienced by Menga Berhad. The outcomes of those strategic interventions along with the outcomes, justification of managerial decision making and its critical analysis have been recorded in order to provide further insights to the readers for future application.


1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Ajit Kanitkar ◽  
N V Belavadi

Theoretically, the Board of Directors (BOD) of organizations belonging to corporate as well as cooperative sectors is expected to have a long-term, strategic focus. However, a critical difference between the BOD of a corporate organization and a cooperative organization is that the latter is constituted by user-members and are, therefore, expected to truly reflect user-owners' commitment to the organization. Against this backdrop, this paper by Ajit Kanitkar and N V Belavadi examines the dominant concerns of the BOD of cooperative sector organizations by analysing the agenda-items of Board meetings of federated dairy cooperatives. According to the authors, the BOD in this sector is more concerned with day-to-day operations than strategic issues.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinga Pétervári

This article is a case study, providing a possible interpretation of the current Hungarian financial-legal culture.How to apply those terms and conditions in long-term loan agreements in financial crisis, which are favourable or seemingly irrelevant in good times but turn out to be disadvantageous, sometimes even disastrous in bad times. How to calculate and allocate risks, what is acceptable and what is foreseeable to laymen? The focus here is on the laymen attitudes towards long-term contractual obligations and performances in the global financial crisis: whether debtors’ contractual obligations must be fulfilled, what should be construed as an excuse for non-performance, whether there should be measures designed to protect the debtors more, if yes, at whose expense – the creditors (rather preventive measures) or the taxpayers (rather restitutive measures) –, if no, how to allocate ideally the risks and liabilities, is profit-making an evil per se, that needs to be managed?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document