Aim: To assess comparison of PEFR between Android and Gynoid Pattern Obesity in Females. Objectives: To assess Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Android Pattern, Gynoid Pattern of Obesity in Females and compare Peak Expiratory Flow Rate between Android and Gynoid Pattern Obesity in Females.
Methodology: 100 Female Obese Subjects with BMI> 30 in the Age Group between 20-40 yrs living a sedentary lifestyle were recruited with incidental sampling over the period of 1 year duration and allocated to Android (n = 50) and Gynoid (n = 50) groups on the basis of Adiposity Markers like BMI, Height, Weight, Waist Circumference (WC), Hip Circumference (HC), WHR - Waist Hip Ratio (WHR) and Waist to Height Ratio (WtHR). PEFR was recorded by taking 3 readings and the highest among them chosen.
Results: Pearson correlation test and Linear Regression was done between PEFR & BMI, PEFR & WHR and PEFR & WHtR. Using an Unrelated t Test, results were found to be Significant (p < 0.05) between PEFR in Both the Groups.
Conclusion: The study establishes that there is a difference in PEFR between Android and Gynoid Pattern of Obesity in Females and PEFR in Gynoid Pattern is 5% better than PEFR in the Android Pattern Obesity in Females.
Key words: Obesity, Android, Gynoid, PEFR, BMI, WHR, WtHR, WC, HC.