scholarly journals Market Concentration, Capital and Risk Taking in Banking Industry

Author(s):  
Erika Sefila Putri ◽  
Rahmat Setiawan

Banking market concentration is an interesting banking topic to study because the banking market structure plays an important role in a country's banking system. This study aims to determine the relationship between banking market concentration and bank risk taking, and bank capital as a moderating variable on the relationship between bank capital and bank risk taking. The test was conducted using multiple linear regression on 104 conventional commercial banks in Indonesia from 2007 to 2016. The results of this study indicate that banking market concentration has a positive effect on bank risk-taking, and bank capital weakens the positive effect of bank market concentration on bank risk-taking.

Author(s):  
Eman Abdel-Wanis

This paper explores the association between bank competition, regulatory capital, and bank risk taking in an Egyptian setting and to examine the interaction between bank competition and regulatory capital and their impact on bank risk taking in developing countries like Egypt and also investigate the effect of bank characteristics on the relationship between bank competition and bank risk taking through a sample of 27 Egyptian listed banks during the period 2012-2018 using OLS regression . Results indicated that there is a negative impact of bank competition on the bank risk taking and a positive effect of regulatory capital on bank risk taking in the Egyptian listed banks. Results show that increase regulatory play a vertical role in enhance association between competition and bank risk taking and also, there is a positive impact of bank characteristics like: bank size and divarication on bank risk taking in the Egyptian banks. Results refer to there is no effect of bank type, leverage and profitability to support the relationship between bank competition and risk taking


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-131
Author(s):  
Faisal Abbas ◽  
Zahid Irshad Younas

Abstract This research aims to investigate the influence of bank capital, risk-based capital and bank capital buffers on the behaviour of bank risk-taking by applying GMM on the data of US commercial banks ranges from 2002 to 2018. The findings show that bank capital has a positive influence on total risk. However, risk-based capital and capital buffer have a negative impact on total risk. In addition, the results showed that the relationship between bank asset risk and bank capital, risk-based capital and a capital buffer is negative in pre, amid and post-crisis periods. The findings also reveal that the result of bank capital, risk-based capital and a capital buffer is not similar in case of well, adequately, under, significantly under, and critically undercapitalized banks. Our conclusions have numerous implications for policymakers and regulators in the banking sector.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-292
Author(s):  
Elliv Hidayatul Lailiyah ◽  
◽  
Ika Purwanti ◽  
Umar Yeni Suyanto ◽  
◽  
...  

The financial institution roles as the bank credit distribution. According to the banking surveys in Indonesia, it indicates that new credit growth has been strengthened. The increasing of credit led to increase the level of risk taking by banks that its concentration of banking in a country plays in influencing banking risk taking. This study examined the effect of banking market concentration on bank risk taking. It also explored the moderating variable of bank size on the effect of market concentration on risk taking in the banking sector. The results of the study showed that the banking market concentration has the positive effect on banking risk taking. The size of the bank weakens the positive effect of market concentration on bank risk taking. The larger the size of the bank in a concentrated banking market, the lower the risk taking of the bank. The concentrated banking market requires to distribute the market share in banks to be carried out by banking regulators so that the banking market is not concentrated and reduces banking risk taking.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 2050020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faisal Abbas ◽  
Shahid Iqbal ◽  
Bilal Aziz

This study provides new insights about how bank liquidity and bank risk have influenced the capital ratio of commercial banks operating in Asia’s emerging economies after the financial crisis 2007–2008. The data were collected for 377 banks from the Bankscope database covering the period of eight years between 2010 and 2017. The linear regression panel-corrected standard errors approach is used to find consistent estimators. The results of the overall sample and medium-sized banks regression revealed a positive relationship between bank liquidity and bank capital ratio, whereas the liquidity and bank capital ratio of large commercial banks have a negative association. The impact of liquidity on bank capital ratio is positive but insignificant in the case of smaller banks. The impact of bank risk on bank capital ratio is negative in the case of smaller and medium-sized banks, whereas the association is found positive in the case of larger and overall banks data results in short run, other things remain unchanged. The findings have valued information for researchers, analysts, managers, and policymakers.


Author(s):  
Ai-Xin Lee ◽  
Chee-Wooi Hooy

This study investigates state ownership on risk-taking behaviour in Malaysia’s banking industry. Using the panel of Malaysian commercial banks, this paper examines whether banks’ risk-taking is affected by Malaysian government ownership through the five largest investment arms of Malaysia (GLICs). The findings show that state-owned banks exhibit higher risk-taking behaviour compared to the private-owned banks in terms of loans. There is evidence that a higher degree of state ownership has a more significant impact on banks’ risk-taking behaviour. We also investigate the relationship with corporate governance mechanisms. The findings suggest that the composition of board of directors somehow plays a significant role in the governance of banks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-365
Author(s):  
Jorge Andrés Muñoz Mendoza ◽  
Sandra María Sepúlveda Yelpo ◽  
Carmen Lissette Veloso Ramos ◽  
Carlos Leandro Delgado Fuentealba

This paper analyzes the effects of market concentration and income diversification on the financial stabilityof the world banking system. It uses the GMM estimator proposed by Arellano and Bover (1995) to study 206 countries between 1994 and 2015. The results show that market concentration and income diversification have a positive and nonlinear effect on financial stability; and a negative and nonlinear effect on bank risk. The nonlinearity shape suggests that the effects are reversed when the banking industry has a higher market concentration and income diversification. In these cases, lower levels of stability and higher risks would characterize the banking industry. Nonlinearity establishes threshold values that are relevantfor the empirical discussion oriented to an optimal design of financial policies and banking strategies.


Author(s):  
Sylwester Kozak ◽  
Agata Wierzbowska

The relationship between the structure of the banking market and efficiency of banks has been a subject of many studies for several decades. There is no uniform opinion on the correlation between these variables. The goal of the research is to investigate this relationship for 96 banks operating in eleven CEE countries in the years of 2005-2017. Bank efficiency scores are assessed with the SFA method and regressed with bank and macroeconomic characteristics. The results show that the efficiency of banks is positively affected by the concentration of the market on which they operate, as well as by the size of individual banks. This relationship is valid for all examined countries. Additionally, bank efficiency is positively impacted by improving the banking system. On the other hand, the GDP per capita, inflation rate and bank capital ratio are not conducive to bank efficiency.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Ali Awartany ◽  
Khaled Alzubi

This study examines the determinants of bank risk taking for a sample of 15 Jordanian banks, according to Basel I and Basel II standards for capital regulation and by testing the relationship between bank risk taking and banks financial information using multiple linear regression analysis. The study found that most Jordanian banks committed to capital adequacy ratio regulations which decrease the bank risk taking, Bank Risk Taking (RSK) was found to be adversely affected by Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), The Franchise value (FRN) has a negative effect on bank risk taking (RSK), The Stable Shareholder (HLD) variable has a significant positive effect on Bank Risk Taking (RSK). The squared value of Stable Shareholders (HLD_SQR) has a significant negative effect on Bank Risk Taking (RSK).


Author(s):  
Ai-Xin Lee ◽  
Chee-Wooi Hooy

This study investigates state ownership on risk-taking behaviour in Malaysia’s banking industry. Using the panel of Malaysian commercial banks, this paper examines whether banks’ risk-taking is affected by Malaysian government ownership through the five largest investment arms of Malaysia (GLICs). The findings show that state-owned banks exhibit higher risk-taking behaviour compared to the private-owned banks in terms of loans. There is evidence that a higher degree of state ownership has a more significant impact on banks’ risk-taking behaviour. We also investigate the relationship with corporate governance mechanisms. The findings suggest that the composition of board of directors somehow plays a significant role in the governance of banks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document