scholarly journals Evaluation of Winter Annuals for Suitability as Cut and Loose Flowers under Hill Zone of Karnataka

Author(s):  
K. Sindhu ◽  
B. Hemla Naik ◽  
Y. Kantharaj ◽  
S. Y. Chandrashekar ◽  
M. Ganapathi
Keyword(s):  
Weed Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin C. Hill ◽  
Karen A. Renner ◽  
Christy L. Sprague

Winter annual weeds protect the soil from erosion and retain nutrients during the winter; however, they can also act as a host for crop pests and pathogens and impede planting. Increased knowledge of the reproductive biology and the seed fate of winter annuals would be useful to improve management and crop productivity. The objectives of this research were to determine the recruitment biology of shepherd's-purse, henbit, common chickweed, and field pennycress, including seed production, dispersal, dormancy, and seedling emergence, based on growing degree days (GDD). Henbit was the least prolific of the four weeds studied, producing 800 to 40,000 seeds m−2at naturally occurring densities; shepherd's-purse was the most prolific, producing 11,000 to 400,000 seeds m−2with 40 to 230 plants m−2. Fifty percent seed rain occurred for henbit, common chickweed, shepherd's-purse, and field pennycress at 620, 790, 880, and 1300 GDDBase,0C, respectively. Overall, seeds were dormant for all species at the time of dispersal. In 2 of 3 yr, dormancy of later-dispersed common chickweed decreased after 6 mo of storage at natural, fluctuating temperatures in the absence of water. The emergence patterns of the four species followed the Gompertz equation and were indicative of facultative winter annuals. The emergence patterns by rate were similar between henbit and common chickweed and between shepherd's-purse and field pennycress. Seed production, dispersal, dormancy, and seedling emergence were influenced by moisture; therefore, including a precipitation or soil moisture component into a GDD model (such as the use of hydrothermal time) would improve the accuracy of predicting winter annual reproduction, seed fate, and emergence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-288
Author(s):  
Bikash Bhattarai ◽  
◽  
Soumen Maitra ◽  
Rocky Thokchom ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 103-115
Author(s):  
Sellam Perinban ◽  
Babita Singh ◽  
Jayoti Majumder ◽  
Puja Rai

Ecology ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Raynal ◽  
F. A. Bazzaz

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
Wayne K Coblentz ◽  
Matthew Akins

Abstract Cereal-grains have a long history of providing quality forage for livestock operations. Our objective is to review the existing literature and describe the principle factors controlling the yield and quality of cereal-grain forages. Generally, cereal-grain forage production can occur via management scenarios that include: 1) winter-annuals planted during fall and then grazed or harvested the following spring; 2) cereals not requiring vernalization planted during early spring and harvested during late-spring or summer; and 3) cereals not requiring vernalization planted during late-summer and harvested before winter. Winter-annuals planted during fall also are used extensively for fall grazing, particularly for backgrounding stocker cattle. The requirement for vernalization before plants elongate and produce viable seed plays a large role in synchronizing management strategies with producer goals. For example, maximization of fall growth can be attained by choosing a species or cultivar that does not require vernalization and will elongate, but this choice will likely eliminate winter survival and subsequent spring forage production. Ambient temperature during plant maturation affects lignin formation positively; therefore, forages grown during cooler fall temperatures will typically exhibit greater NDF digestibility than those maturing during summer. Most nutritional characteristics are influenced heavily by two competing processes that include the normal negative maturation effects that reduce the quality of most forages. However, this process is juxtaposed against the physiological process of grain fill, which can dilute concentrations of forage fiber components, increase energy density, and improve DM digestibility at advanced plant-growth stages. Digestibility of NDF declines with plant maturity, and generally is not affected by grain fill. A boot-stage harvest for silage often exhibits the most favorable nutritional characteristics for lactating dairy cows; however, producers making this management choice will need to accept a substantial yield penalty compared with a commonly recommended harvest at soft-dough stage, which would likely maximize yield.


2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
William K Kelley ◽  
Max Runge ◽  
Katie Mason ◽  
Kimberly Mullenix ◽  
Joshua Elmore ◽  
...  

Abstract Cattle producers typically feed hay and supplement for a 90 to 120 day window to maintain cows during the winter in Alabama. A 75-day trial evaluated the use of three systems (n = 3 replications per system): 1) rotationally grazed-winter annuals (GWA) on a 14-day rotation, 2) free-choice whole cottonseed (WCS) and bermudagrass hay, or 3) 50% soybean hulls and 50% corn gluten feed (SH:CGF) fed on alternate days at up to 1% BW daily and free-choice bermudagrass hay. GWA had the greatest Total Cost Per Pair Per Day (TCPD) for the 75 day grazing system at $6.58, followed by WCS at $4.73 and SH:CGF at $4.86. Initial and final cow BCS was not different among treatments (P = 0.1558). Cow ADG was greater (P = 0.0370) on GWA than SH:CGF and WCS (0.9, 0.2, and 0.2 kg, respectively), and calf ADG followed a similar pattern (1.5, 1.2, and 1.1 kg/day for GWA, WCS, and SH:CGF, respectively). WCS and SH:CGF were static across trial when only days of trial are considered, but TCPPD decreased linearly (R=.9723) as days on grazing increase. GWA becomes the low cost feed option (with WCS and SH:CGF inputs remaining constant) if trial days were extended to 119 days. This project demonstrates that GWA produces greater animal performance than other project diets, but requires additional grazing days (>119) to be the least cost feeding option.


1967 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack A. Freeman

Early spring and fall applications of a mixture of paraquat 2.2 kg and simazine 2.2 to 3.4 kg/ha repeated over a 3-year period provided excellent weed control without adversely affecting raspberry yield. Paraquat 2.2 kg/ha applied in April gave good broadleaf weed control for 2 months and fairly good grass control for 3 months. Fall applications suppressed grasses and controlled winter annuals through to spring. Combining paraquat with simazine eliminated the need for pre-treatment hoeing or cultivation and prolonged weed control. Atrazine 3.4 and 5.6 kg/ha applied in the spring resulted in excellent control of grass and broadleaf weeds. But, fall applications were not as effective for weed control as the paraquat and hoe-plus-simazine treatments. Atrazine 5.6 kg/ha caused chlorosis and necrosis of the raspberry leaves and reduced yields. Simazine, on the other hand, caused little or no leaf injury, but it also reduced yields at the 5.6-kg rate. Fruit quality was not affected significantly by any treatment, although atrazine and simazine tended to increase ascorbic acid content.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document