scholarly journals No Need for Dark-Matter, Dark-Energy or Inflation, Once Ordinary Matter Is Properly Represented?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yehonatan Knoll
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Classical Electrodynamics ◽  
Spontaneous Breaking ◽  
Metric Tensor ◽  
Ordinary Matter ◽  
Scale Covariance ◽  
Self Force ◽  
Force Problem

In a recent Foundations of Physics paper [5] by the current author it was shown that, when the self-force problem of classical electrodynamics is properly solved, it becomes a plausible ontology underlying the statistical description of quantum mechanics. In the current paper we extend this result, showing that ordinary matter, thus represented, possibly suffices in explaining the outstanding observations currently requiring for this task the contrived notions of dark-matter, dark-energy and inflation. The single mandatory 'fix' to classical electrodynamics, demystifying both very small and very large scale physics, should be contrasted with other adhoc solutions to either problems. Instrumental to our cosmological model is scale covariance (and 'spontaneous breaking' thereof), a formal symmetry of classical electrodynamics treated on equal footing with its Poincare covariance, which is incompatible with the (absolute) metrical attributes of the GR metric tensor.

scholarly journals No Need for Dark-Matter, Dark-Energy or Inflation, Once Ordinary Matter is Properly Represented?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yehonatan Knoll
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Classical Electrodynamics ◽  
Spontaneous Breaking ◽  
Metric Tensor ◽  
Ordinary Matter ◽  
Scale Covariance ◽  
Self Force

In a recent Foundations of Physics paper [5] by the current author it was shown that, when the self force problem of classical electrodynamics is properly solved, it becomes a plausible ontology underlying the statistical description of quantum mechanics. In the current paper we extend this result, showing that ordinary matter, thus represented, possibly suffices in explaining the outstanding observations currently requiring for this task the contrived notions of dark-matter, dark-energy and inflation. The single mandatory `fix' to classical electrodynamics, demystifying both very small and very large scale physics, should be contrasted with other ad hoc solutions to either problems. Instrumental to our cosmological model is scale covariance (and `spontaneous breaking' thereof), a formal symmetry of classical electrodynamics treated on equal footing with its Poincare covariance, which is incompatible with the (absolute) metrical attributes of the GR metric tensor.

scholarly journals No Need for Dark-Matter, Dark-Energy or Inflation, Once Ordinary Matter is Properly Represented?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yehonatan Knoll
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Classical Electrodynamics ◽  
Spontaneous Breaking ◽  
Ordinary Matter ◽  
Scale Covariance ◽  
Self Force ◽  
Force Problem

In a recent Foundations of Physics paper [5] by the current author it was shown that, when the self-force problem of classical electrodynamics is properly solved, the representation of matter which results becomes a plausible ontology underlying QM's statistical description. In the current paper we extend this result, showing that ordinary matter, thus represented, possibly suffices in explaining the outstanding observations currently requiring for this task the contrived notions of dark-matter, dark-energy and inflation. The single `fix' to classical electrodynamics, demystifying both very small and very large scale physics, should be contrasted with other ad hoc solutions to either problems. Instrumental to our cosmological model is scale covariance (and `spontaneous breaking' thereof), a formal symmetry of CE which we consider to be just as important as its Poincare covariance.

scholarly journals FORMATION OF DARK MATTER HALOES IN A HOMOGENEOUS DARK ENERGY UNIVERSE

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (08n10) ◽  
pp. 1397-1403
Author(s):  
L. MARASSI
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
State Parameter ◽  
Mass Function ◽  
Accelerated Expansion ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Energy Models ◽  
Dark Energy Component ◽  
Standard Press

Several independent cosmological tests have shown evidences that the energy density of the universe is dominated by a dark energy component, which causes the present accelerated expansion. The large scale structure formation can be used to probe dark energy models, and the mass function of dark matter haloes is one of the best statistical tools to perform this study. We present here a statistical analysis of mass functions of galaxies under a homogeneous dark energy model, proposed in the work of Percival (2005), using an observational flux-limited X-ray cluster survey, and CMB data from WMAP. We compare, in our analysis, the standard Press–Schechter (PS) approach (where a Gaussian distribution is used to describe the primordial density fluctuation field of the mass function), and the PL (power–law) mass function (where we apply a non-extensive q-statistical distribution to the primordial density field). We conclude that the PS mass function cannot explain at the same time the X-ray and the CMB data (even at 99% confidence level), and the PS best fit dark energy equation of state parameter is ω = -0.58, which is distant from the cosmological constant case. The PL mass function provides better fits to the HIFLUGCS X-ray galaxy data and the CMB data; we also note that the ω parameter is very sensible to modifications in the PL free parameter, q, suggesting that the PL mass function could be a powerful tool to constrain dark energy models.

scholarly journals Observational constraints of a new unified dark fluid and the H0 tension

2019 ◽  
Vol 490 (2) ◽  
pp. 2071-2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiqiang Yang ◽  
Supriya Pan ◽  
Andronikos Paliathanasis ◽  
Subir Ghosh ◽  
Yabo Wu
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cold Dark Matter ◽  
Early Time ◽  
Observational Constraints ◽  
Minimal Extension ◽  
Energy Evolution ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Different Sources

ABSTRACT Unified cosmological models have received a lot of attention in astrophysics community for explaining both the dark matter and dark energy evolution. The Chaplygin cosmologies, a well-known name in this group have been investigated matched with observations from different sources. Obviously, Chaplygin cosmologies have to obey restrictions in order to be consistent with the observational data. As a consequence, alternative unified models, differing from Chaplygin model, are of special interest. In the present work, we consider a specific example of such a unified cosmological model, that is quantified by only a single parameter μ, that can be considered as a minimal extension of the Λ-cold dark matter cosmology. We investigate its observational boundaries together with an analysis of the universe at large scale. Our study shows that at early time the model behaves like a dust, and as time evolves, it mimics a dark energy fluid depicting a clear transition from the early decelerating phase to the late cosmic accelerating phase. Finally, the model approaches the cosmological constant boundary in an asymptotic manner. We remark that for the present unified model, the estimations of H0 are slightly higher than its local estimation and thus alleviating the H0 tension.

Observational and astrophysical cosmology: 1980–2018

2019 ◽  
pp. 375-423
Author(s):  
Malcolm S. Longair
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Cosmological Constant ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cosmological Parameters ◽  
Semiconductor Detectors ◽  
Empirical Knowledge ◽  
Global Geometry ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Large Scale Structure Formation

Since 1980, our empirical knowledge of the universe has advanced tremendously and precision cosmology has become a reality. These developments have been largely technology-driven, the result of increased computer power, new generations of telescopes for all wavebands, new types of semiconductor detectors, such as CCDs, and major investments by many nations in superb observing facilities. The discipline also benefitted from the influx of experimental and theoretical physicists into the cosmological arena. The accuracy and reliability of the values of the cosmological parameters has improved dramatically, many of them now being known to about 1%. The ΛCDM model provides a remarkable fit to all the observational data, demonstrating that the cosmological constant is non-zero and that the global geometry of the universe is flat. The underlying physics of galaxy and large-scale structure formation has advanced dramatically and demonstrated the key roles played by dark matter and dark energy.

Cosmology Today

Daedalus ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 143 (4) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
David N. Spergel
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Gravitational Lensing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Empty Space ◽  
Microwave Background ◽  
Astronomical Observations ◽  
Basic Parameters ◽  
Age Of The Universe ◽  
The Universe

We seem to live in a simple but strange universe. Our basic cosmological model fits a host of astronomical observations with only five basic parameters: the age of the universe, the density of atoms, the density of matter, the initial “lumpiness” of the universe, and a parameter that describes whether this lumpiness is more pronounced on smaller physical scales. Our observations of the cosmic microwave background fluctuations determine these parameters with uncertainties of only 1 to 2 percent. The same model also provides an excellent fit to the large-scale clustering of galaxies and gas, the properties of galaxy clusters, observations of gravitational lensing, and supernova-based measurements of the Hubble relation. This model implies that we live in a strange universe: atoms make up only 4 percent of the visible universe, dark matter makes up 24 percent, and dark energy – energy associated with empty space – makes up 72 percent.

scholarly journals A quantum theory of spacetime in spinor formalism and the physical reality of cross-ratio representation: the equation of density parameters of dark energy, matter, and ordinary matter is derived: ΩM2 = 4 Ωb ΩΛ

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Liu
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Friedmann Equation ◽  
Physical Reality ◽  
Cross Ratio ◽  
Mathematical Relationship ◽  
Ordinary Matter ◽  
Evolution Of The Universe ◽  
Spinor Formalism ◽  
The Universe

ABSTRACT By theorizing the physical reality through the deformation of an arbitrary cross-ratio, we leverage Galois differential theory to describe the dynamics of isomonodromic integratable system. We found a new description of curvature of spacetime by the equivalency of isomonodromic integratable system and Penrose’s spinor formalism of general relativity. Using such description, we hypothetically quantize the curvature of spacetime (gravity) and apply to the problem of the evolution of the universe. The Friedmann equation is recovered and compared so that the mathematical relationship among dark energy, matter (dark matter + ordinary matter), and ordinary matter, ΩM2≃4ΩbΩΛ, is derived; the actual observed results are compared to this equation (calculated ΩM = 0.33 vs. observed ΩM = 0.31); the model might explain the origin of dark energy and dark matter of the evolution of the universe.

scholarly journals A United Description for Dark Matter and Dark Energy

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4S) ◽  
pp. 83-91
Author(s):  
Vo Van On
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Lower Limit ◽  
Ordinary Matter ◽  
Average Mass

In this paper, we show a unifying description to the dark matter and dark energy. This description does not demand dark energy with the anti-gravitational property. It also points out a lower limit of the average mass of the particles of cosmological energy (ordinary matter, dark matter and dark energy particles) \(\bar{m}\gg 54\) eV. The coincident problem between the density of dark energy and one of matter is a clear fact.

scholarly journals Dynamics of dark energy in collapsing halo of dark matter

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tsizh ◽  
B. Novosyadlyj
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Einstein Equations ◽  
Linear Stage ◽  
Expanding Universe ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Linear Evolution ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Linear Differential

We investigate the non-linear evolution of spherical density and velocity perturbations of dark matter and dark energy in the expanding Universe. For this we have used the conservation and Einstein equations to describe the evolution of gravitationally coupled inhomogeneities of dark matter, dark energy and radiation from the linear stage in the early Universe to the non-linear stage at the current epoch. A simple method of numerical integration of the system of non-linear differential equations for evolution of the central part of halo is proposed. The results are presented for the halo of cluster (k=2 Mpc-1) and supercluster scales (k=0.2 Mpc-1) and show that a quintessential scalar field dark energy with a low value of effective speed of sound cs<0.1 can have a notable impact on the formation of large-scale structures in the expanding Universe.

scholarly journals Can a negative-mass cosmology explain dark matter and dark energy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 626 ◽  
pp. A5 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Socas-Navarro
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Cosmological Model ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Dark Matter Halos ◽  
Challenging Problem ◽  
Speed Of Light ◽  
Negative Mass ◽  
Galactic Dark Matter

A recent study by Farnes (2018, A&A, 620, A92) proposed an alternative cosmological model in which both dark matter and dark energy are replaced with a single fluid of negative mass. This paper presents a critical review of that model. A number of problems and discrepancies with observations are identified. For instance, the predicted shape and density of galactic dark matter halos are incorrect. Also, halos would need to be less massive than the baryonic component, otherwise they would become gravitationally unstable. Perhaps the most challenging problem in this theory is the presence of a large-scale version of the “runaway effect”, which would result in all galaxies moving in random directions at nearly the speed of light. Other more general issues regarding negative mass in general relativity are discussed, such as the possibility of time-travel paradoxes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document