scholarly journals Strategies to Improve Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Efficacy, other than Abscopal Effect: A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Vito Longo ◽  
oronzo Brunetti ◽  
Amalia Azzariti ◽  
Domenico Galetta ◽  
Patrizia Nardulli ◽  
...  

Despite the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on malignancies treatment is unprecedented, a lack of response to these molecules is observed in several cases. Differently from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, where the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors results in a high efficacy, the response rate in other tumors, such as gastrointestinal cancers, breast cancer, sarcomas, and part of genitor-urinary cancers remains low. The first strategy evaluated to improve the response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors is the use of predictive factors for the response as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and clinical features. In addition to the identification of the patients with a high sensibility to immune checkpoint inhibitors, another approach currently under intensive investigation is the use of therapeutics in a combinatory manner with immune checkpoint inhibitors to obtain an enhancement of efficacy through the modification of the tumor immune microenvironment. In addition to the abscopal effect induced by radiotherapy, a lot of studies are evaluating several drugs able to improve response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors, including microbiota modifiers, drugs targeting co-inhibitors receptors, anti-angiogenic therapeutics, small molecules, and oncolytic viruses. In view of the rapid and extensive development of this research field, we conducted a systematic review of the literature identifying which of these drugs are closer to achieving validation in the clinical practice.

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Longo ◽  
Oronzo Brunetti ◽  
Amalia Azzariti ◽  
Domenico Galetta ◽  
Patrizia Nardulli ◽  
...  

Despite that the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on malignancies treatment is unprecedented, a lack of response to these molecules is observed in several cases. Differently from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, where the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors results in a high efficacy, the response rate in other tumors, such as gastrointestinal cancers, breast cancer, sarcomas, and part of genitourinary cancers remains low. The first strategy evaluated to improve the response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors is the use of predictive factors for the response such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and clinical features. In addition to the identification of the patients with a higher expression of immune checkpoint molecules, another approach currently under intensive investigation is the use of therapeutics in a combinatory manner with immune checkpoint inhibitors in order to obtain an enhancement of efficacy through the modification of the tumor immune microenvironment. In addition to the abscopal effect induced by radiotherapy, a lot of studies are evaluating several drugs able to improve the response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors, including microbiota modifiers, drugs targeting co-inhibitory receptors, anti-angiogenic therapeutics, small molecules, and oncolytic viruses. In view of the rapid and extensive development of this research field, we conducted a systematic review of the literature identifying which of these drugs are closer to achieving validation in the clinical practice.


Author(s):  
Dalibey H ◽  
◽  
Hansen TF ◽  
Zedan AH ◽  
◽  
...  

Background: The development of immunotherapy has shown promising results in several malignant diseases, including prostate cancer, calling for a systematic review of the current literature. This review aims to evaluate the present data and prospects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC). Methods: Articles were identified via a systematic search of the electronic database Pubmed, in accordance with the PICO process and following the PRISMA guidelines. Articles in English studying immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mCRPC published between March 2010 and March 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Endpoints of interest were Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), clinical Overall Response Rate (ORR), and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) response rate. Results: Ten articles were identified as eligible for inclusion. The studies primarily explored the use of Ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 inhibitor, and Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor. These drugs were both used either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment modalities. The largest trial included in the review demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival between the intervention and placebo. However, two studies presented promising data combing immunotherapy and immune vaccines. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events ranging from 10.1% to 82.3%, whit diarrhea, rash, and fatigue were the most frequently reported. Forty relevant ongoing trials were identified exploring immunotherapy with or without a parallel treatment modality. Conclusion: Overall, the current data shows that the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy may have limited impact on mCRPC, and the results from ongoing combinational trials are eagerly awaited.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsty Wai Chung Lee ◽  
Sarah J. Lord ◽  
Lawrence Kasherman ◽  
Ian Marschner ◽  
Martin Stockler ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Omar Fahmy ◽  
Nabil A. Alhakamy ◽  
Mohd G. Khairul-Asri ◽  
Osama A. A. Ahmed ◽  
Usama A. Fahmy ◽  
...  

Recently, checkpoint inhibitors have been investigated in metastatic prostate cancer, however their overall effect is unclear and needs to be further investigated. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the oncological response of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: Based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, a systematic review of the literature was conducted through online electronic databases and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting Library. Eligible publications were selected after a staged screening and selection process. RevMan 5.4 software was employed to run the quantitative analysis and forest plots. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for the randomized and non-randomized trials, respectively. Results: From the 831 results retrieved, 8 studies including 2768 patients were included. There was no significant effect on overall survival (OS) (overall response (OR) = 0.98; Z = 0.42; p = 0.67). Meanwhile, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better with immune checkpoint inhibitors administration (OR = 0.85; Z = 3.9; p < 0.0001). The subgroup analysis for oncological outcomes based on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity status displayed no significant effect, except on prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA RR) (OR = 3.25; Z = 2.29; p = 0.02). Based on DNA damage repair (DDR), positive patients had a significantly better PFS and a trend towards better OS and overall response rate (ORR); the ORR was 40% in positive patients compared to 20% in the negative patients (OR = 2.46; Z = 1.3; p = 0.19), while PSA RR was 23.5% compared to 14.3% (OR = 1.88; Z = 0.88; p = 0.38). Better PFS was clearly associated with DDR positivity (OR = 0.70; Z = 2.48; p = 0.01) with a trend towards better OS in DDR positive patients (OR = 0.71; Z = 1.38; p = 0.17). Based on tumor mutation burden (TMB), ORR was 46.7% with high TMB versus 8.8% in patients with low TMB (OR = 11.88; Z = 3.0; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Checkpoint inhibitors provide modest oncological advantages in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. There are currently no good predictive indicators that indicate a greater response in some patients.


Immunotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
pp. 1183-1193
Author(s):  
Robin Park ◽  
Laercio Lopes ◽  
Anwaar Saeed

Background: Given the inconclusive evidence behind the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors re-challenge, herein, we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize available data. Results/methodology: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database, and ASCO and ESMO were searched for studies published from conception to March 2020. Pooled incidence of recurrent immune-related adverse events (irAEs), objective response rates, and odds ratios for irAEs at initial versus re-treatment were calculated. Overall, 437 patients (ten studies) were included. Incidence of any grade, grade 3/4, and steroid-requiring recurrent irAEs were 47%, 13.2%, and 26% respectively. Objective response rate in previous non-responders was 12.5% (5.8–24.8%). Odds ratio for severe irAEs was 0.28 (0.11–0.72) and steroid-requiring irAEs 0.19 (0.06–0.56). Discussion/conclusion: This analysis suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors re-challenge is safe and potentially efficacious.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14512-e14512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Yarchoan ◽  
Adam Diehl ◽  
Burles Avner Johnson ◽  
Blake Scott ◽  
Alexander Hopkins ◽  
...  

e14512 Background: Lymphopenia is frequent in advanced cancers, but the impact of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on clinical responses with PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors is unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult solid tumor patients treated with a PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) at Johns Hopkins from 2015-2016. Patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors concurrently with investigational immunotherapies, on unreported clinical trials or for cancers in which the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear, or for whom response information is not available, were excluded. Data were collected on patient treatment history, objective response to PD-1 therapy by RECIST 1.1, and ALC at treatment initiation and one and three months after treatment initiation. Results: 172 patients met the inclusion criteria (lung n = 54; melanoma n = 61; kidney n = 25; other tumors n = 32). Lymphopenia (ALC < 1000) was present in 30.2%, 26.7%, and 34.3%, at 0, 1, and 3 months after treatment initiation. In a multiple regression analysis that adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, tumor type, number of prior therapies, and concurrent ipilimumab usage, lymphopenia at baseline was not predictive of response to an immune checkpoint inhibitor. However, in this same model, lymphopenia at 1 and 3 months after treatment initiation was inversely related to response rate (p < 0.01). Of patients with lymphopenia at baseline, 37 patients (71.2%) had persistent lymphopenia (ALC < 1000 at baseline persisting to month 3) whereas 15 patients (28.8%) had normalized lymphocyte counts by month 3. In a univariate analysis, patients with persistent lymphopenia had decreased response rates as compared to patients who were not lymphopenic at baseline (21.6% vs. 47.5%, p < 0.01). However, patients with lymphopenia at baseline who had normalized lymphocyte counts at month 3 responded similarly as patients who were not lymphopenic at baseline (46.7% vs. 47.5%). Conclusions: Patients on anti–PD-1 therapy with persistent lymphopenia may have a reduced likelihood of responding to these agents. This association requires further validation in additional patient cohorts.


Author(s):  
Aline Petracco Petzold ◽  
Fernanda Nascimento Lubianca ◽  
Laura Gazal Passos ◽  
Carolina Knorst Keppler ◽  
Nicole Bernd Becker ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document