scholarly journals Scholarship Suppression: Theoretical Perspectives and Emerging Trends

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Stevens ◽  
Lee Jussim ◽  
Nathan Honeycutt
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
Free Speech ◽  
Real World ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
The Past ◽  
Academic Scholarship ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Emerging Trends ◽  
Free Speech Rights

This paper explores the suppression of ideas within academic scholarship by academics, either by self-suppression or because of the efforts of other academics. Legal, moral, and social issues distinguishing freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, and academic freedom are reviewed. How these freedoms and protections can come into tension is then explored by an analysis of denunciation mobs who exercise their legal free speech rights to call for punishing scholars who express ideas they disapprove of and condemn. When successful, these efforts, which constitute legally protected speech, will suppress certain ideas. Real-world examples over the past five years of academics who have been sanctioned or terminated for scholarship targeted by a denunciation mob are then explored.

scholarly journals Scholarship Suppression: Theoretical Perspectives and Emerging Trends

Societies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Sean T. Stevens ◽  
Lee Jussim ◽  
Nathan Honeycutt
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
Free Speech ◽  
Real World ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
The Past ◽  
Academic Scholarship ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Emerging Trends ◽  
Free Speech Rights

This paper explores the suppression of ideas within an academic scholarship by academics, either by self-suppression or because of the efforts of other academics. Legal, moral, and social issues distinguishing freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, and academic freedom are reviewed. How these freedoms and protections can come into tension is then explored by an analysis of denunciation mobs that exercise their legal free speech rights to call for punishing scholars who express ideas they disapprove of and condemn. When successful, these efforts, which constitute legally protected speech, will suppress certain ideas. Real-world examples over the past five years of academics that have been sanctioned or terminated for scholarship targeted by a denunciation mob are then explored.

scholarly journals Scholarship Suppression: Theoretical Perspectives and Emerging Trends

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Stevens ◽  
Lee Jussim ◽  
Nathan Honeycutt
Keyword(s):  
Free Speech ◽  
Real World ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
Sociological Analysis ◽  
The Past ◽  
Academic Scholarship ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Emerging Trends ◽  
Free Speech Rights

This paper explores the suppression of ideas within academic scholarship by academics, either by self-suppression or because of the efforts of other academics. Legal, moral, and social issues distinguishing freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, and academic freedom are reviewed. How these freedoms and protections can come into tension is then explored by a sociological analysis of denunciation mobs who exercise their legal free speech rights to call for punishing scholars who express ideas they disapprove of and condemn. When successful, these efforts, which constitute legally protected speech, will suppress certain ideas. Real-world examples over the past five years of academics who have been sanctioned or terminated for scholarship targeted by a denunciation mob are then explored.

Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 643-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Galvagno ◽  
Daniele Dalli
Keyword(s):  
Management Decision ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Past ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Emerging Trends ◽  
Building Management ◽  
Innovation And Technology ◽  
Management Decision Making ◽  
Theory Of Value ◽  
Science Innovation

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to summarize and classify extant research and to better understand the past, present, and future state of the theory of value co-creation. Its main objectives are: to identify the different theoretical perspectives and research streams that characterize and define the co-creation literature, and to highlight the connections between them; to look for emerging trends and gaps in the literature by comparing the most recent papers with those representing the field's core. Design/methodology/approach – The paper relies on bibliometric data: co-citation techniques were employed to select, analyze, and interpret citation patterns within the co-creation literature. Findings – The paper identified two main clusters, as well as specific research streams and common themes, representing scholarly journals’ publications on co-creation over the past years. These research streams and themes apply three different theoretical perspectives: service science, innovation and technology management, and marketing and consumer research. Data from the most recent publications has been used to verify if and how the original streams and themes are reflected in the contemporary debate. Research limitations/implications – Inevitably, the findings of the analysis have limitations related to the research design, the databases, and the applied bibliometric methods. Practical implications – From a practical perspective, the research impacts on theory building, management decision making, and teaching. Originality/value – This study depicts the remarkable development of the literature on co-creation and shows the latent structure underlying its different research streams. To the best knowledge, this study is the first to determine co-citation frequencies from both the SSCI and Scopus databases.

Canadians Discuss Freedom of Speech: Individual Rights Versus Group Protection

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Free Speech ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
Vulnerable Groups ◽  
Individual Rights ◽  
Individual Freedom ◽  
Civic Leaders ◽  
Versus Group ◽  
Collective Rights ◽  
Core Value ◽  
Free Speech Rights

AbstractFreedom of speech as an individual right is often thought to interfere with the collective rights of vulnerable groups to protection against threats of violence and demeaning group insults. This study analyzes interviews with 78 Canadian civic leaders that probed their views on this possible rights conflict. For most respondents, freedom of speech is not a core value, but one that must be reconciled with equality, nondiscrimination, and multiculturalism. Most of these Canadians will tolerate some restrictions on freedom of speech, believing such restrictions will promote community harmony and respect for all groups in society. These Canadians hold to a communitarian view of rights, and trust their government to curb free speech rights to protect vulnerable groups. However, ’new’ free speech issues, involving conflicts among members of different vulnerable groups, may point to the need to reinforce individual freedom of speech.

Learning the Value of Rights: Abortion Politics and the Liberalization of Evangelical Free Speech Advocacy

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Free Speech ◽  
General Public ◽  
Campaign Finance ◽  
Past Century ◽  
The Past ◽  
Abortion Politics ◽  
Free Speech Rights

AbstractFor the past century, the expansion of free speech rights has been the domain of liberals. Recently, however, conservatives have become advocates for expanded free speech rights. For Evangelicals Protestants, this advocacy would have been highly controversial only a generation ago, offending the base's ordered liberty sentiments. I suggest that abortion politics is a primary contributor to the evangelical free speech advocacy shift. Using a variety of data, I detail the evangelical shift toward expanded free speech by exploring the topics of radical protest, campaign finance, and obscenity. While rank-and-file evangelicals are less supportive of free speech than the general-public, elites have routinely used abortion politics to frame the shift toward individual free speech rights. Elites have diverged from their constituents to support a higher-priority issue (abortion), and the constituents have been supportive. Abortion politics has come to dominate evangelical advocacy decisions and has cultivated an evangelical rights culture.

Part VII Rights—Substance and Content, Ch.45 Free Speech and Expression

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Lawrence
Keyword(s):  
Deliberative Democracy ◽  
Free Speech ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Indian Constitution ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Right ◽  
Successes And Failures

This chapter examines the place of the right to freedom of speech and expression within Indian constitutionalism. After reviewing the classical normative arguments for free speech, it considers how the domain of speech is related to colonial continuity, sedition, and public order. It discusses the scope of Article19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution with respect to free speech, as well as the Indian Supreme Court’s successes and failures in its efforts to expand the domain of speech. It explores the democracy argument as the primary justification used by the courts in free speech cases, and its consequences. Finally, it looks at the standards for determining reasonableness, hate speech, and obscenity, and argues that the idea of a deliberative democracy must be supplemented with the concept of agonistic politics to enrich and strengthen the free speech tradition that has evolved in the past six decades.

Arms

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Zick
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
Free Speech ◽  
The Other ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Free Speech Rights ◽  
University Classrooms ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Speech Clause

Chapter 7 addresses the relationship between the Free Speech Clause and the Second Amendment’s right to “keep and bear Arms.” Relative to the other non-speech rights examined in the book, recognition of an individual right to keep and bear arms occurred relatively recently (the Supreme Court recognized the right in 2008). As a result, the relationship between free speech and Second Amendment rights is still developing. The chapter focuses primarily on two aspects of their intersection. The first is the extent to which the nature and scope of Second Amendment rights ought to be modeled on Free Speech Clause doctrines and principles. The chapter considers the pros and (mostly) cons of “borrowing” the Free Speech Clause for this purpose. The second aspect of the relationship between the Free Speech Clause and the Second Amendment relates to potential conflicts between them. The chapter addresses two tension points—the effect on free speech of openly carrying firearms at public protests and demonstrations, and the effect on academic freedom and inquiry from the presence of firearms in university classrooms. The chapter argues that the future of the Second Amendment will not be determined by explicit borrowing of Free Speech Clause doctrines. However, in terms of constructing the modern right to keep and bear arms, there is much we can learn from the nation’s long experience with free speech rights.

Religious Activities in Public Schools

1999 ◽  
Vol 83 (610) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph D. Mawdsley
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
Free Speech ◽  
Religious Activities ◽  
The Past ◽  
Religious Issues ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Free Speech Rights

Religious activities in public schools have generated considerable litigation in the past few years. Not only are courts wrestling with the definition of religious free speech rights of teachers and students, but also with whether rights between these two categories can be different. Any differences between teachers and students notwithstanding, one can predict that any effort by public schools to treat teachers or students differently where religious issues are at stake could result in litigation.

scholarly journals “Dignitizing” Free Speech in Israel: The Impact of the Constitutional Revolution on Free Speech Protection

2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-856
Author(s):  
Guy E. Carmi
Keyword(s):  
Free Speech ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Constitutional Protection ◽  
The Past ◽  
Model Following ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
Israeli Supreme Court ◽  
Free Speech Rights ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Prior Restraint

This article examines the changes in the approach to the analysis of free speech rights in Israel. It demonstrates the growing shift from the American liberty-based influence in the 1980s to a more dignity-based, and principally Canadian- and German-inspired, model following the adoption of the partial bill of rights in the 1990s. This is demonstrated both by a statistical analysis of the Israeli Supreme Court free speech rulings in the past thirty years and by a substantive analysis of recent rulings in the areas of prior restraint, pornography, and libel. The statistical findings demonstrate that while human dignity rarely played a role in free speech rulings in the past, it plays a significant role today. Another indication of the “dignitization process” lies in the reference to foreign rulings. Moreover, a substantive examination of the Israeli Supreme Court’s free speech rulings from the last decade reveals the dignitization process both in rhetoric and outcomes. This article offers a means of strengthening the protection that free speech receives in Israel by divorcing the constitutional protection of free speech from the concept of human dignity, and by focusing on the value of liberty. This can be achieved by the incorporation of the unenumerated right to free speech via the liberty clause within Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty.

Does Pornography Silence Women?

Pornography ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 51-87
Author(s):  
Mari Mikkola
Keyword(s):  
Free Speech ◽  
Speech Act ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Speech Act Theory ◽  
The Past ◽  
Gut Feelings ◽  
Free Speech Rights

One of MacKinnon’s central claims is that pornography is not only words. Rather, pornographic speech subordinates and silences women. Using Austin’s speech act theory, Langton and Hornsby argue that pornographic speech has the power to silence women, thus depriving women of free speech rights. This silencing claim has attracted much philosophical interest over the past couple of decades. The chapter considers how we should understand the silencing claim by carefully dissecting the relevant literature. It further assesses the philosophical and practical tenability of the claim. The main philosophical lessons to arise from this chapter are as follows. First, even though some aspects of the silencing claim have pretheoretical plausibility, it remains to be established that pornographic speech is responsible for women’s silencing. Second, the silencing claim is often discussed by appealing to intuitive gut-feelings about specific cases. But (the chapter argues) this is not methodologically conducive to settling the matter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document