Functional Conservation and Genetic Divergence of Chordate Glycinergic Neurotransmission: Insights from Amphioxus Glycine Transporters

Glycine is an important neurotransmitter in vertebrates, performing both excitatory and inhibitory actions. Synaptic levels of glycine are tightly controlled by the action of two glycine transporters, GlyT1 and GlyT2, located on the surface of glial cells and glycinergic or glutamatergic neurons, respectively. Glycinergic neurotransmission in invertebrates has so far only been investigated in a very limited number of species, and, although it was suggested that its functions are to some extent conserved with vertebrates, the evolution of glycinergic neurotransmission remains very poorly understood. Here, by combining phylogenetic and gene expression analyses, we characterized the glycine transporter complement of amphioxus, an important invertebrate model for studying the evolution of chordates. We show that amphioxus possesses three glycine transporter genes, two of which (GlyT2.1 and GlyT2.2) are closely related to GlyT2 of vertebrates, while the other (GlyT) is a member of an ancestral clade of deuterostome glycine transporters. While expression of GlyT2.2 is predominantly non-neural, GlyT and GlyT2.1 are widely expressed in the amphioxus nervous system and are characterized by differential expression in neurons and glia, respectively. However, in vertebrates, glycinergic neurons express GlyT2 and glia GlyT1, suggesting that the evolution of the chordate glycinergic system was accompanied by complex genetic remodeling leading to the paralog-specific inversion of gene expression. Albeit this genetic divergence between amphioxus and vertebrates, we found strong evidence for a general conservation of the role of glycinergic neurotransmission during larval swimming, allowing us to hypothesize that the neural networks controlling the rhythmic movement of chordate bodies are homologous.

Download Full-text

Functional Conservation and Genetic Divergence of Chordate Glycinergic Neurotransmission: Insights from Amphioxus Glycine Transporters

Cells ◽

10.3390/cells10123392 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (12) ◽

pp. 3392

Author(s):

Matteo Bozzo ◽

Simone Costa ◽

Valentina Obino ◽

Tiziana Bachetti ◽

Emanuela Marcenaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Genetic Divergence ◽

Limited Information ◽

Functional Conservation ◽

Glycine Transporter ◽

Glycine Transporters ◽

Gene Expression Analyses ◽

The Neural Networks ◽

Invertebrate Model ◽

Glycinergic Neurotransmission

Glycine is an important neurotransmitter in vertebrates, performing both excitatory and inhibitory actions. Synaptic levels of glycine are tightly controlled by the action of two glycine transporters, GlyT1 and GlyT2, located on the surface of glial cells and neurons, respectively. Only limited information is available on glycinergic neurotransmission in invertebrates, and the evolution of glycinergic neurotransmission is poorly understood. Here, by combining phylogenetic and gene expression analyses, we characterized the glycine transporter complement of amphioxus, an important invertebrate model for studying the evolution of chordates. We show that amphioxus possess three glycine transporter genes. Two of these (GlyT2.1 and GlyT2.2) are closely related to GlyT2 of vertebrates, whereas the third (GlyT) is a member of an ancestral clade of deuterostome glycine transporters. GlyT2.2 expression is predominantly non-neural, whereas GlyT and GlyT2.1 are widely expressed in the amphioxus nervous system and are differentially expressed, respectively, in neurons and glia. Vertebrate glycinergic neurons express GlyT2 and glia GlyT1, suggesting that the evolution of the chordate glycinergic system was accompanied by a paralog-specific inversion of gene expression. Despite this genetic divergence between amphioxus and vertebrates, we found strong evidence for conservation in the role glycinergic neurotransmission plays during larval swimming, the implication being that the neural networks controlling the rhythmic movement of chordate bodies may be homologous.

Download Full-text

Experimental evolution confirms signatures of sexual selection in genomic divergence

10.1101/2020.09.07.285650 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

R. Axel W. Wiberg ◽

Paris Veltsos ◽

Rhonda S. Snook ◽

Michael G. Ritchie

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Sexual Selection ◽

X Chromosome ◽

Experimental Evolution ◽

Genetic Divergence ◽

Evolutionary Divergence ◽

Genomic Divergence ◽

Differential Gene ◽

Signatures Of Selection

AbstractComparative genomics has contributed to the growing evidence that sexual selection is an important component of evolutionary divergence and speciation. Divergence by sexual selection is implicated in faster rates of divergence of the X chromosome and of genes thought to underlie sexually selected traits, including genes that are sex-biased in expression. However, accurately inferring the relative importance of complex and interacting forms of natural selection, demography and neutral processes which occurred in the evolutionary past is challenging. Experimental evolution provides an opportunity to apply controlled treatments for multiple generations and examine the consequences for genomic divergence. Here we altered sexual selection intensity, elevating sexual selection in polyandrous lines and eliminating it in monogamous lines, and examined patterns of divergence in the genome of Drosophila pseudoobscura after more than 160 generations of experimental evolution. Divergence is not uniform across the genome but concentrated in “islands”, many of which contain candidate genes implicated in mating behaviours and other sexually selected phenotypes. These are more often seen on the X chromosome, which overall shows divergence above neutral expectations. There are also characteristic signatures of selection seen in these regions, with lower diversity and greater Fst on the X chromosome than the autosomes, and differences in diversity on the autosomes between selection regimes. Reduced Tajima’s D implies that selective sweeps have occurred within the divergent regions, despite considerable recombination. These changes are associated with both differential gene expression between the lines and sex-biased gene expression within the lines. Our results are very similar to those thought to implicate sexual selection in divergence in natural populations, and hence provide experimental confirmation of the likely role of sexual selection in driving such types of genetic divergence, but also illustrate how variable outcomes can be for different genomic regions.Impact SummaryHow does sexual selection contribute to the divergence of genomes? It is often thought that sexual selection is a potent force in evolutionary divergence, but finding ‘signatures’ of sexual selection in the genome is not straight-forward, and has been quite controversial recently. Here we used experimental evolution to allow replicate populations of fruit fly to evolve under relaxed or strengthened sexual selection for over 150 generations, then sequenced their genomes to see how they had diverged. The feature we find are very similar to those reported in populations of natural species thought to be under strong sexual selection. We found that genomic divergence was concentrated in small patches of the genome rather than widespread. These are more often seen on the X chromosome, which overall shows greatly elevated divergence. There are also characteristic signatures of selection seen in these regions, with lower genetic diversity and greater differences on the X chromosome than the autosomes. Selection was probably strong in these regions. The changes are associated with both differential gene expression between the lines and sex-biased gene expression within the lines. Many of the patches of divergence also contain candidate genes implicated in mating behaviours and other sexually selected phenotypes. Our results provide experimental confirmation of the likely role of sexual selection in driving such types of genetic divergence.

Download Full-text

Role of small nuclear RNAs in eukaryotic gene expression

Essays in Biochemistry ◽

10.1042/bse0540079 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 54 ◽

pp. 79-90 ◽

Cited By ~ 34

Author(s):

Saba Valadkhan ◽

Lalith S. Gunawardane

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Protein Interactions ◽

Rna Stability ◽

Splice Sites ◽

Branch Site ◽

Small Nuclear Rnas ◽

Eukaryotic Gene Expression ◽

Eukaryotic Gene ◽

Rna Biogenesis

Eukaryotic cells contain small, highly abundant, nuclear-localized non-coding RNAs [snRNAs (small nuclear RNAs)] which play important roles in splicing of introns from primary genomic transcripts. Through a combination of RNA–RNA and RNA–protein interactions, two of the snRNPs, U1 and U2, recognize the splice sites and the branch site of introns. A complex remodelling of RNA–RNA and protein-based interactions follows, resulting in the assembly of catalytically competent spliceosomes, in which the snRNAs and their bound proteins play central roles. This process involves formation of extensive base-pairing interactions between U2 and U6, U6 and the 5′ splice site, and U5 and the exonic sequences immediately adjacent to the 5′ and 3′ splice sites. Thus RNA–RNA interactions involving U2, U5 and U6 help position the reacting groups of the first and second steps of splicing. In addition, U6 is also thought to participate in formation of the spliceosomal active site. Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests additional roles for snRNAs in regulation of various aspects of RNA biogenesis, from transcription to polyadenylation and RNA stability. These snRNP-mediated regulatory roles probably serve to ensure the co-ordination of the different processes involved in biogenesis of RNAs and point to the central importance of snRNAs in eukaryotic gene expression.

Download Full-text