scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM PIDANA DALAM KEJAHATAN PERKOSAAN

2015 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabar Slamet ,

<h4>Abstract</h4> <p><strong><em> </em></strong></p> <p><em>Rape crime is a form of crime against women. In its development, this crime can no longer be seen as merely moral offence, however it had touched the problem of anger and violence considered as violation and denial against human rights. Considering this development, the Drafting Team of KUHP Barn should change the formulation of rape crime law, the definition of which no longer exists in the article 285 of KUHP (penal code) but it should be extended in order to be consistent with development and future condition. Through policy or penal code politics, the more adequate law formulation about rape crime would be achieved, consistent with the time condition.</em><em> </em></p> <p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Criminal Law Politics, Crime, Rape</p> <h3>Abstrak</h3> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p>Tindak pidana perkosaan merapakan salah satu bcntuk kejahatan kekerasan terhadap wanita. Dalam perkembangannya tindak pidana ini tidak lagi dilihat sebagai persoalan moral semata-mata <em>(moral offence), </em>namun di dalamnya sudah menyentuh pada masalah <em>anger and violence </em>yang dianggap merupakan pelanggaran dan pengingkaran HAM. Mendasarkan perkembangan ini Tim Perancang KUHP Baru memandang perlu untuk mengubah rumusan tindak pidana perkosaan, yaitu tidak lagi pengertiannya seperti yang ada dalam rumusan Pasal 285 KUHP tetapi diperluas sesuai dengan perkembangan dan keadaan di masa mendatang,. Melalui kebijakan atau politik hukum pidana dapat dicapai rumusan tindak pidana perkosaan yang lebih memadai dengan keadaan zaman.</p> <strong>Kata kunci: </strong>Politik hukum pidana, Kejahatan, Perkosaan.

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabar Slamet

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Rape crime is a form of crime against women. In its development, this crime can no longer be seen as merely moral offence, however it had touched the problem of anger and violence considered as violation and denial against human rights. Considering this development, the Drafting Team of KUHP Barn should change the formulation of rape crime law, the definition of which no longer exists in the article 285 of KUHP (penal code) but it should be extended in order to be consistent with development and future condition. Through policy or penal code politics, the more adequate law formulation about rape crime would be achieved, consistent with the time condition.</em></p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Criminal Law Politics,Crime, Rape</p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Tindak pidana perkosaan merapakan salah satu bcntuk kejahatan kekerasan terhadap wanita. Dalam perkembangannya tindak pidana ini tidak lagi dilihat sebagai persoalan moral semata-mata <em>(moral offence), </em>namun di dalamnya sudah menyentuh pada masalah <em>anger and violence </em>yang dianggap merupakan pelanggaran dan pengingkaran HAM. Mendasarkan perkembangan ini Tim Perancang KUHP Baru memandang perlu untuk mengubah rumusan tindak pidana perkosaan, yaitu tidak lagi pengertiannya seperti yang ada dalam rumusan Pasal 285 KUHP tetapi diperluas sesuai dengan perkembangan dan keadaan di masa mendatang,. Melalui kebijakan atau politik hukum pidana dapat dicapai rumusan tindak pidana perkosaan yang lebih memadai dengan keadaan zaman.</p><strong>Kata kunci: </strong>Politik hukum pidana, Kejahatan, Perkosaan


2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Farrell

The prohibition on torture in international human rights law seems a fairly straightforward candidate for productive use in international criminal law. The Convention against Torture contains an elaborate definition of torture and human rights institutions have developed substantial jurisprudence on the prohibition and definition of torture. Indeed, the ad hoc Tribunals and the drafters of the Rome Statute have employed the human rights law approach to torture to varying degrees. But the conception of torture reached by human rights bodies is problematic and unsuitable for usage where individual criminal responsibility is sought. It is unsuitable because the human rights law understanding of torture is subjective and victim-derived. Human rights bodies do not scrutinize intent, purpose and perpetration, central aspects of international criminal legal reasoning. The communication on torture between these bodies of law to date shows that cross-fertilisation, without detailed reasoning, is inappropriate - because rights are different to crimes.


Author(s):  
Çetin Arslan ◽  
Didar Özdemir

The Turkish Penal Code (TPC) no.5237 embodies “the reveal of bank and customer secrets” as a crime. However, neither article 6 of the TPC titled “definitions” nor the legal justification of the article contains the definition of the bank or customer secret. On the other hand, the bank or customer secrets are under guarantee of four different codes. These dispositions can be counted as the article 239 of the TPC, the articles 35 and 68/II/a of the Turkish Republic Central Bank Code dated 14.01.1970 and numbered 1211, the articles 73 and 159 of the Banking Code dated 19.10.2005 and numbered 5411 and also the articles 8, 23 and 31 of the Bank Cards and Credit Cards Code dated 23.02.2006 and numbered 5464. Though, these two special codes do not make a connection to the article 239 of the TPC which constitutes the general norm nor the TPC makes a reference to those dispositions. In this study, we will try to explain first the notions of bank and customer secrets, then the penal norms protecting the bank and customer secrets and last, the elements of the crime disposed in the article 239 of the TPC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rustam Rustam

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat tinjaun yuridis terhadap tindakan aborsi yang ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No.36 Tahun 2009, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), hubungan antara Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan UU No. 36 Tahun 2009serta perbandingan pandangan (Perspektif) terhadap aborsi antara UU No.36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan, KUHP dan HAM. Berdasarkan aturan  KUHP dan HAM aborsi dilarang sedangkan menurut Undang-Undang No.36 Tahun 2009, aborsi diperbolehkan dengan syarat tertentu. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan analisis yuridis. Perbedaan aturan tentang aborsi yakni antara Undang-Undang No.36 Tahun 2009, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Hak Azazi Manusia ditengahi oleh asas lex posteriori derogat legi priori yang membuat gagasan baru tentang aborsi yakni pada kedaruratan medis yakni provokatus medicalis. Sedangkan abortus provocatus, berdasarkan pandanga ketiga aturan tersebut adalah merupakan tindakan pidana yang dilarang, serta di anggap sebagai pelanggaran terhadap hak azazi manusia. Kata Kunci; Aborsi, Hukum Pidana, KUHP, HAMThe purpose of this study is to  determine at the legal review of abortion actions reviewed from Law No.36 of 2009, Penal Code, the relationship between the , Penal Code and Law No, 36 of 2009 and comparison of perspective on Abortion action among Law no. 36 in 2009 on Health, Penal Code and Human Rights. Based on Penal Code and Human Rights, abortion is prohibited in Indonesia but based on the Law No.36 of 2009 stated that abortioncould be done with certain conditions. The approach used was the juridical analysis approach. Differences  abortion regulation lawsbased on the Law No.36 of 2009, Penal Code and Human Rights were mediated by the principle of “lex posteriori derogat legion priori” which made an issue on abortion regulation lawsonly in medical emergency namely” provokatus medicalis”. Meanwhile “forabortus provocatus”, based on the threelaws’ views,is a prohibited action and considered as a violation of human rights.Keywords; Abortion, Criminal Law, Penal Code, Human Rights


2020 ◽  
pp. 276-285
Author(s):  
Victor Manuel Solís Buitrón

Last August of this year, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, through the Law School, by initiative of the College of Professors of Criminal Law, in response to the suspension of academic activities, as a result of the pandemic that afflicts the world arising from the SARS-Cov2 virus, taking advantage of digital platforms available to people at this time as a tool to use to communicate at a distance, organized the First International Virtual Congress of Criminal Law. In this event, more than 130 academics from different Latin American Universities participated as speakers, who presented on topics of the criminal legal reality, both substantive and adjective, in the panels that were organized by themes that addressed different concepts in these specialties. The Congress was embellished by Magisterial Conferences issued by Masters Emeritus and Deans of the Faculty of Law of the UNAM and other law schools of invited countries.The importance of the Congress surprised the Academic Forum, almost twenty thousand people registered and approximately two million of them accessed the event that was transmitted and broadcast on social networks through the Facebook platform “Live streaming”. From the approaches that were most emphasized in the presentations, the concern of the present article is born. Specifically, it highlights concerns about exercise, it highlights the concern about the arbitrary exercise of criminal law due to its punitive nature and the importance of limiting the excess in its application, respecting in general the human rights of individuals and, in particular, those recognized for the parties in the procedural rules, this in equity with the Fundamental Principles of the Prosecution Systems in the accusatory model, already adopted in practically all democratic countries in Latin America. This highlights the need for a new definition of preventive prison, conceived now as a precautionary measure and its intimate relation with the principle of the “Presumption of Innocence”, in whose application there must be absolute communion, a necessary condition in order to have a profound and definitive vision in the protection of Human rights.


Author(s):  
Iryna V. Kalinina ◽  
Volodymyr M. Kupriienko ◽  
Iryna I. Shulhan ◽  
Dmytro O. Pylypenko ◽  
Olena A. Kozeratska

The objective of the study was to determine the legality of the application of coercive medical measures and to develop recommendations to improve the legislative regulation of their use. The study included data on the number of offenders with mental disorders; the empirical background was the decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the application of coercive medical measures; provisions of the legislation of 31 countries. Methods of system approach, comparison, descriptive analysis, pragmatic approach, prognosis were used. The national criminal law of most states regulates the application of coercive medical measures to persons who have committed a crime in a state of limited sanity or insanity or have acquired it before sentencing or during the execution of the sentence, but its practical application causes several complications. It is concluded that the legislative definition of coercive medical measures corresponds to human rights legislation. But there are problems with its practical application. Proposals were made to amend national and international legislation: to broaden the range of grounds for the application of coercive medical measures; regulate the possibility of early termination of a coercive medical measure; oblige the courts to determine the appropriate terms.


FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-132
Author(s):  
Kuswardani Kuswardani ◽  
Sunaryo Sunaryo

Naked parade and vigilantism are social sanctions or informal sanctions imposed by the community for acts deemed contrary to the local community's norms. These sanctions include vigilante action, which breaks the law. This paper aims to explain social sanctions (naked parade) from a legal perspective, particularly studied from human rights and criminal law. The study uses a normative approach so that the data sources include legal documents, references, and journals relevant to the problem being studied. The data analysis using consists of human rights principles and criminal law. The study results show that naked parade and vigilante as social sanction contradict human rights principles (liberty, non-discrimination, dignity, humanity, and equity). This act is also a criminal act, considering that the criminal law functions to protect the legal rights of individuals, the community, and the state. There is no explicit formulation of naked parade in the Penal Code (KUHP) or regulations outside the Penal Code. It is necessary to formulate it explicitly as an act that can be punished.


Author(s):  
Thomas MacManus

While state crime is a relatively recent event in the discipline of criminology, tracing the roots of its modern form to the 1990s, it has attracted some of the best minds to research and theorize on the immense and fatal excesses of the modern nation state. State crime is defined most convincingly by Penny Green and Tony Ward as state organizational deviance involving the violation of human rights. The crimes are organizational in nature and are carried out by vast state systems and corporate structures. This approach can be contrasted with the individual criminal liability, “scapegoat” ideology of international criminal law and other criminal law regimes. The definition relies on the criminological concept of deviance, a label applied by a social audience, to make up for the lack of criminal legal definition of the behaviors, legitimacy, and human rights norms in order to differentiate it from crimes that are carried out without harm to human or planet (such as minor international economic treaty violations). A sub-field of state crime, state-corporate crime has developed to track those crimes which occur at the intersection of the state and the market.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Mahmood Rooholamini

Undoubtedly, in many cases, the definition of a legal term or an entity provided by lawyers has significant difference with the definition provided by the institution of the legislature. Therefore, it can be distinguished between the concept of abbeting from a legal perspective, i.e., from the perspective of lawyers and the legal perspective as well as that of the legislature. There is no single definition of abetment from a legal standpoint, but there are various definitions of the term. However, the definitions have much in common. Iranian legislator has not defined “abetment” in the Islamic Penal Code (2003) but addressed some cases of behaviors that may constitute complicity in the crime. In addition, the Iranian legislator has extended the scope of the crimes that shall also apply abetment in IPC (2013). This is contrary to the principle of minimumality of criminal law based on the scope of the criminal law must be limited. In addition, the new law has serious flaws that have the current paper tried to remind objections and provide recommendations for amendments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document