scholarly journals Social Sanction: Naked Parade and Vigilantism as Legal Violation Criminal Law Perspective and Human Rights

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-132
Author(s):  
Kuswardani Kuswardani ◽  
Sunaryo Sunaryo

Naked parade and vigilantism are social sanctions or informal sanctions imposed by the community for acts deemed contrary to the local community's norms. These sanctions include vigilante action, which breaks the law. This paper aims to explain social sanctions (naked parade) from a legal perspective, particularly studied from human rights and criminal law. The study uses a normative approach so that the data sources include legal documents, references, and journals relevant to the problem being studied. The data analysis using consists of human rights principles and criminal law. The study results show that naked parade and vigilante as social sanction contradict human rights principles (liberty, non-discrimination, dignity, humanity, and equity). This act is also a criminal act, considering that the criminal law functions to protect the legal rights of individuals, the community, and the state. There is no explicit formulation of naked parade in the Penal Code (KUHP) or regulations outside the Penal Code. It is necessary to formulate it explicitly as an act that can be punished.

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rustam Rustam

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat tinjaun yuridis terhadap tindakan aborsi yang ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No.36 Tahun 2009, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), hubungan antara Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan UU No. 36 Tahun 2009serta perbandingan pandangan (Perspektif) terhadap aborsi antara UU No.36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan, KUHP dan HAM. Berdasarkan aturan  KUHP dan HAM aborsi dilarang sedangkan menurut Undang-Undang No.36 Tahun 2009, aborsi diperbolehkan dengan syarat tertentu. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan analisis yuridis. Perbedaan aturan tentang aborsi yakni antara Undang-Undang No.36 Tahun 2009, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Hak Azazi Manusia ditengahi oleh asas lex posteriori derogat legi priori yang membuat gagasan baru tentang aborsi yakni pada kedaruratan medis yakni provokatus medicalis. Sedangkan abortus provocatus, berdasarkan pandanga ketiga aturan tersebut adalah merupakan tindakan pidana yang dilarang, serta di anggap sebagai pelanggaran terhadap hak azazi manusia. Kata Kunci; Aborsi, Hukum Pidana, KUHP, HAMThe purpose of this study is to  determine at the legal review of abortion actions reviewed from Law No.36 of 2009, Penal Code, the relationship between the , Penal Code and Law No, 36 of 2009 and comparison of perspective on Abortion action among Law no. 36 in 2009 on Health, Penal Code and Human Rights. Based on Penal Code and Human Rights, abortion is prohibited in Indonesia but based on the Law No.36 of 2009 stated that abortioncould be done with certain conditions. The approach used was the juridical analysis approach. Differences  abortion regulation lawsbased on the Law No.36 of 2009, Penal Code and Human Rights were mediated by the principle of “lex posteriori derogat legion priori” which made an issue on abortion regulation lawsonly in medical emergency namely” provokatus medicalis”. Meanwhile “forabortus provocatus”, based on the threelaws’ views,is a prohibited action and considered as a violation of human rights.Keywords; Abortion, Criminal Law, Penal Code, Human Rights


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Mahmood Rooholamini

Undoubtedly, in many cases, the definition of a legal term or an entity provided by lawyers has significant difference with the definition provided by the institution of the legislature. Therefore, it can be distinguished between the concept of abbeting from a legal perspective, i.e., from the perspective of lawyers and the legal perspective as well as that of the legislature. There is no single definition of abetment from a legal standpoint, but there are various definitions of the term. However, the definitions have much in common. Iranian legislator has not defined “abetment” in the Islamic Penal Code (2003) but addressed some cases of behaviors that may constitute complicity in the crime. In addition, the Iranian legislator has extended the scope of the crimes that shall also apply abetment in IPC (2013). This is contrary to the principle of minimumality of criminal law based on the scope of the criminal law must be limited. In addition, the new law has serious flaws that have the current paper tried to remind objections and provide recommendations for amendments.


2015 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabar Slamet ,

<h4>Abstract</h4> <p><strong><em> </em></strong></p> <p><em>Rape crime is a form of crime against women. In its development, this crime can no longer be seen as merely moral offence, however it had touched the problem of anger and violence considered as violation and denial against human rights. Considering this development, the Drafting Team of KUHP Barn should change the formulation of rape crime law, the definition of which no longer exists in the article 285 of KUHP (penal code) but it should be extended in order to be consistent with development and future condition. Through policy or penal code politics, the more adequate law formulation about rape crime would be achieved, consistent with the time condition.</em><em> </em></p> <p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Criminal Law Politics, Crime, Rape</p> <h3>Abstrak</h3> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p>Tindak pidana perkosaan merapakan salah satu bcntuk kejahatan kekerasan terhadap wanita. Dalam perkembangannya tindak pidana ini tidak lagi dilihat sebagai persoalan moral semata-mata <em>(moral offence), </em>namun di dalamnya sudah menyentuh pada masalah <em>anger and violence </em>yang dianggap merupakan pelanggaran dan pengingkaran HAM. Mendasarkan perkembangan ini Tim Perancang KUHP Baru memandang perlu untuk mengubah rumusan tindak pidana perkosaan, yaitu tidak lagi pengertiannya seperti yang ada dalam rumusan Pasal 285 KUHP tetapi diperluas sesuai dengan perkembangan dan keadaan di masa mendatang,. Melalui kebijakan atau politik hukum pidana dapat dicapai rumusan tindak pidana perkosaan yang lebih memadai dengan keadaan zaman.</p> <strong>Kata kunci: </strong>Politik hukum pidana, Kejahatan, Perkosaan.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabar Slamet

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Rape crime is a form of crime against women. In its development, this crime can no longer be seen as merely moral offence, however it had touched the problem of anger and violence considered as violation and denial against human rights. Considering this development, the Drafting Team of KUHP Barn should change the formulation of rape crime law, the definition of which no longer exists in the article 285 of KUHP (penal code) but it should be extended in order to be consistent with development and future condition. Through policy or penal code politics, the more adequate law formulation about rape crime would be achieved, consistent with the time condition.</em></p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Criminal Law Politics,Crime, Rape</p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Tindak pidana perkosaan merapakan salah satu bcntuk kejahatan kekerasan terhadap wanita. Dalam perkembangannya tindak pidana ini tidak lagi dilihat sebagai persoalan moral semata-mata <em>(moral offence), </em>namun di dalamnya sudah menyentuh pada masalah <em>anger and violence </em>yang dianggap merupakan pelanggaran dan pengingkaran HAM. Mendasarkan perkembangan ini Tim Perancang KUHP Baru memandang perlu untuk mengubah rumusan tindak pidana perkosaan, yaitu tidak lagi pengertiannya seperti yang ada dalam rumusan Pasal 285 KUHP tetapi diperluas sesuai dengan perkembangan dan keadaan di masa mendatang,. Melalui kebijakan atau politik hukum pidana dapat dicapai rumusan tindak pidana perkosaan yang lebih memadai dengan keadaan zaman.</p><strong>Kata kunci: </strong>Politik hukum pidana, Kejahatan, Perkosaan


Author(s):  
Rowan Cruft

Chapter 9 examines what differing conceptions of ‘the human good’ underpinning pre-legal rights imply for such rights’ relation to positive law. Three models are compared: a varied, specific model on which each party’s good might be different from anyone else’s, a shared specific model on which certain things (e.g. education, sustenance, freedom) are good for each and every human, and a generic model on which the good of ‘the generic human’ grounds human rights. Problems for each approach are outlined, as are their differing implications for the relation between pre-legal ‘natural’ human rights and human rights law, criminal law, and other branches of law. A central argument defends the view that the socio-economic rights recognized by human rights law institutionalize pre-legal ‘natural’ rights borne by individuals against other individuals, their state and—most crucially for the author’s argument—humanity at large. The contrary views of Buchanan and O’Neill are criticized.


Humaniora ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Ahmad Sofian

The doctrine of novus actus interveniens used in causation to establish the liability of the principle offender for a prohibited result. The doctrine can be used in various legal fields in both civil and criminal law. The aim of this study was finding the kind of intervention that conducted by another actor, a victim or a medical worker, a non-human agent such as an animal or nature, could influenced the judge’s decisions in determining the defendant in accordance with novus actus interveniens doctrine. The method used was the normative method. The normative method in the study of jurisprudence was a method used to study secondary data sources on some legal documents. These secondary data sources were composed of some legal materials, namely primary legal materials consisting of the KUHP (the Indonesia Penal Code) and court decisions that have permanent legal force. This study finds that the doctrine of novus actus interveniens unfortunately is not commonly used by judges, prosecutors, lawyers and legal experts in Indonesia even though it can be used to solve problems in finding material truth. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-170
Author(s):  
Hasuri Hasuri ◽  
Mia Mukaromah

Corruption is considered a great crime and requires special handling. In handling corruption, special handling is needed by using the proof reversed or reversal of the burden of proof but in a balanced manner. The purpose of this study is to explain the reverse evidence of corruption from a human rights perspective. This research uses the empirical normative legal research method, namely the combination of normative legal provisions (laws) with practical elements (legal events in society/social elements). The study results state that the theory of reverse proof of corruption cases based on a human rights perspective does not violate the principles and respect for the rights of the defendants in the general principles of criminal law.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Ida Monika Putu Ayu Dewi

Laws are the norms that govern all human actions that can be done and should not be carried out both written and unwritten and have sanctions, so that the entry into force of these rules can be forced or coercive and binding for all the people of Indonesia. The most obvious form of manifestation of legal sanctions appear in criminal law. In criminal law there are various forms of crimes and violations, one of the crimes listed in the criminal law, namely the crime of Human Trafficking is often perpetrated against women and children. Human Trafficking is any act of trafficking offenders that contains one or more acts, the recruitment, transportation between regions and countries, alienation, departure, reception. With the threat of the use of verbal and physical abuse, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of a position of vulnerability, example when a person has no other choice, isolated, drug dependence, forest traps, and others, giving or receiving of payments or benefits women and children used for the purpose of prostitution and sexual exploitation. These crimes often involving women and children into slavery. Trafficking in persons is a modern form of human slavery and is one of the worst forms of violation of human dignity (Public Company Act No. 21 of 2007, on the Eradication of Trafficking in Persons). Crime human trafficking crime has been agreed by the international community as a form of human rights violation.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document